BIE staff cuts result in lawsuit from tribal nations, Native students
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Washington's Answer Stands As President Trump Speaks Out On 'Commanders' vs. 'Redskins'
Washington's Answer Stands As President Trump Speaks Out On 'Commanders' vs. 'Redskins' originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Washington Commanders are one of the most storied franchises in the NFL. They have won multiple Super Bowl titles and have over the years been among the most profitable sports organizations worldwide. Advertisement But that was all from a time when they were not the "Commanders.'' The moniker "Redskins'' was dumped in 2020 when the organization shifted away from the perceived racist connotations of the slur towards Native Americans. So just like that, in a sense, over 80 years of team history were altered. It remains a point of debate, even now, and the President of the United States this week offered up his opinion. Donald Trump has his own history with the NFL after showing interest in buying a team during the 1980s, eventually settling on ownership in the USFL. The financial mogul turned leader of the free world isn't above responding to some of the league's biggest questions. Advertisement For instance, whether the Commanders should change their name back to the Redskins. "Well, you want me to make a controversial statement? I would [change back]," Trump said to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey, on Sunday. "I wouldn't have changed the name. But that's their – it just doesn't have the same ring to me." Trump later acknowledged that the team's recent success (a run to the conference title game in 2024) makes the new logo and name more palatable. No matter which side you are on, Trump's thoughts have already been considered by new Commanders owner Josh Harris who has made it clear that he isn't interested in returning to the team's old identity. Advertisement So Washington marches on, as do "controversial statements'' about D.C.'s favorite football team. Related: Commanders' Young Defender Praised by Analyst Related: Commanders Owner Reveals $135 Million Toy This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 8, 2025, where it first appeared.


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Long Island school district slapped with federal probe over plan to drop Native American team name
The federal government is launching a probe into a Long Island school district's attempts to rebrand its sports team to comply with New York State's Native American logo ban. US Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said the feds will probe Connetquot school district after it was revealed officials have been quietly working out a deal with the state to remove its Thunderbirds name. 'New York's patronizing attitude toward Native Americans must end,' McMahon said. 'We will continue to support the Native American community and ensure their heritage is equally protected under the law.' Advertisement 3 Connetquot High School is set to receive a federal probe over a potential plan to drop their Native American team name. James Messerschmidt The Trump administration has blasted the ban as discriminatory, in part because it singles out Native American imagery on logos and in sports team names. McMahon told Connetquot its efforts to cut a deal to rebrand as 'T-Birds' could be a violation of Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act. Connetquot had sued to keep the use of Thunderbirds in defiance of the state Board of Regents' ban, which was set in 2023 but is still going into effect. Advertisement The school district has allocated a jaw-dropping $23 million to phase out Thunderbirds – name shared with a sports car, an Air Force squadron and a Canadian Hockey League team. Both the Suffolk County district and the state Education Department had been silently negotiating a deal to contract Thunderbirds to 'T-Birds' — a phrase already used at the schools — as opposed to finding a new team name in late June. 3 Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon announced the probe on Connetquot's school district. Jack Gruber-USA TODAY via Imagn Images That was a turnaround after the state had previously said 'T-Birds' was not an acceptable alternative, according to a longtime Connetquot school board member. Advertisement 'Last month, they wouldn't allow it…They would not allow T-Birds or any derivative, not even Thunder,' Jaclyn Napolitano-Furno, whose time on the board since 2019 ended in July, previously told The Post. McMahon was called on by President Trump and toured Massapequa High School in May. There, the team name of the Chiefs had come under siege by the ban — one that can result in state funding cuts and removal of local board members. She criticized that only Native American team names were under scrutiny, whereas others like the Dutchmen or Huguenots were perfectly acceptable in the eyes of the state. 'The Department of Education has been clear with the state of New York: it is neither legal nor right to prohibit Native American mascots and logos while celebrating European and other cultural imagery in schools,' McMahon added. Advertisement 'During my recent visit to New York, many individuals in the Native American community express their deep pride in their heritage and local mascots. Images like the Thunderbirds and Chiefs are seen as symbols of strength, honor, and identity – not of disrespect.' 3 Connetquot High School sued to keep their team name, the Thunderbirds, in defiance of the state Board of Regents' ban, set in 2023. James Messerschmidt The Native American Guardians Association, which had a handful of its nearly 85,000 nationwide members join McMahon on stage at Massapequa High School, also filed a preliminary injunction against the ban and the Board of Regents last week. 'My clients are tired of it. They're tired of people pretending to speak for the Native American population — and they're tired of people trying to erase their history. It's unconstitutional, and we're not gonna put up with it,' NAGA attorney Chap Petersen told The Post last week. 'It's not even a state law. It's an ordinance,' he said, adding 'What they're doing is they're trying to erase history…a key piece of American culture.' Petersen also agreed that the terms being scrutinized have no offensive intent. 'It could be as innocuous as Thunderbirds, and as a result, you could lose your school funding…I just think that people have had it with this.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ann Coulter Draws Outrage Over Vile Post About Killing Native Americans
Ann Coulter is facing backlash for a violent remark about Native Americans. On Sunday, the far-right pundit reposted a video of University of Minnesota professor and Navajo Nation member Melanie Yazzie discussing decolonization and climate change at a 2023 conference. 'We didn't kill enough Indians,' Coulter wrote in the since-deleted post. The comment sparked swift condemnation from Indigenous leaders and others. Chuck Hoskin Jr., principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, called the post 'beyond abhorrent' and 'dangerous hate speech' in a Facebook statement. 'Coulter's statement, on its face, is a despicable rhetorical shot trained on the First Peoples of this continent, designed to dehumanize and diminish us and our ancestors and puts us at risk of further injury,' he wrote. 'We've faced enough of that since this country's founding,' Hoskin continued. 'This kind of rhetoric has fueled the destruction of tribes, their life ways, languages and cultures, the violation of treaty rights, and the perpetuation of violence and oppression.' Hoskin added how Coulter's words did 'not take place in a vacuum' but come amid a rise in attacks on marginalized people, 'used to score political points, to advance policy agendas, and sometimes to scare people to advance all of that and more.' 'The country frequently seems on the verge of political violence,' he wrote. 'Coulter's post implicitly encourages it.' Though he acknowledged the temptation to ignore such rhetoric, Hoskin warned against letting hate speech go unchecked. 'We can get used to the frequent attacks and watch silently as this group and that group is dehumanized and diminished,' he said. 'Hatred in the public will become white noise, accepted as 'just the way it is.' Alternatively, we can speak out against it.' 'What Ann Coulter said is heartless, vicious and should be repudiated by people of good faith regardless of political philosophy or party,' Hoskin continued. 'Some things are simply wrong and we cannot validate it through our silence.' Asking others to join him in speaking up, he said he remained 'optimistic that people of good will across parties, faiths, philosophies, regions, races, political status can work to unify the country' and reject Coulter's comments. Vice President of the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Tasha Mousseau also called out Coulter for invoking a deeply dated colonial mindset. 'In Indian country, either in the Western sense with education or taking our traditions back and learning our languages, we say that we are our ancestors' wildest dreams,' she told Oklahoma's KOSU public radio. 'I would argue that she's her ancestors' wildest dreams. She is what colonizers would like to continue on in this country.' These Powerful Photographs Highlight An Important And Often Overlooked Environmental Issue Missing Native American Woman Was Murdered On Air Force Base, Authorities Say Trump Administration Hires Strategist Who Posted Racist Tweet