SAP CEO: Europe Doesn't Need More Data Centers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Quadrise Plc (LON:QED) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 81% of the company
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Quadrise's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions 52% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Every investor in Quadrise Plc (LON:QED) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Quadrise. View our latest analysis for Quadrise Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. Quadrise already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Quadrise's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Quadrise. Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. We can see that insiders own shares in Quadrise Plc. As individuals, the insiders collectively own UK£1.8m worth of the UK£77m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It seems that Private Companies own 5.4%, of the Quadrise stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Quadrise (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about. Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cloudflare Gives AI Bot Companies Ultimatum
Internet malicious crawler A move by service provider Cloudflare has become highly publicized over the past few days. The now-famous pressing of the button by Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince was a clear challenge to AI companies – pay what you owe publishers and content creators. That event sets the default permission for AI crawlers scraping data to 'no,' and the change has teeth. They call it 'Content Independence Day.' Here's how the moment when June became July was described by one participant publishing on Substack, writing about the event held at Cloudflare's One World Trade headquarters in Manhattan: 'Pushing the button at midnight wasn't for show—it was a signal to publishers, creators, and platforms: this is the moment. This is the fight. Prince looked out at the crowd. 'Today, July 1st,' he said, 'we declare that there cannot be any AI crawl without compensation. This is the first step.' The countdown began. 10… 9… 8… The crowd leaned in. Cameras out. Hands started to pile on top of the red button—one by one, then all at once. 'Pushing this button may seem like a small thing,' Prince said as the clock ticked toward midnight, 'but it's the start of a really big revolution.' And then it happened. Midnight. A click. A cheer. Content Independence Day began…' It may have been a momentous occasion for the web. 'If the Internet is going to survive the age of AI, we need to give publishers the control they deserve and build a new economic model that works for everyone – creators, consumers, tomorrow's AI founders, and the future of the web itself,' Prince said in a related press statement. 'This is about safeguarding the future of a free and vibrant Internet with a new model that works for everyone.' The Background There's a very important context to this – it started with newspapers in the earlier days of the Internet. The business model just got harder and harder to support. The profit margins got lower and lower. Advertising changed. Then, when centuries-old newspapers and younger, smaller newsrooms were already on the ropes, along came AI, which actually takes the work of humans – reporters, broadcasters, artists, musicians, etc. – and creates competitive works that are essentially free. Humans can't compete. Local news, and 'human' news in general, is one of the canaries in the coal mine. However, Cloudflare's move could be a broader trendsetter if it turns out to be effective. Government Regulation There's also some related activity on the part of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is requiring AI companies to disclose instances where they use AI in their business models. Presumably, that would include using AI to scrape content and make it into a finished product. So this will indirectly support the idea that AI companies can't get away with web scraping like they've been doing so far But it doesn't actually prohibit that kind of activity Court Wins for Big Tech Nor does local court action, with U..S courts recently ruling that Anthropic was not liable in collecting human-made content and using it to train AI. A judge did find Anthropic liable due to using these published works without paying for them – allegedly, essentially pirating books in order to train the model. But in terms of general rulings on IP, it seems like courts are largely okay with AI companies training their models on publicly available data. So Cloudflare's action is more of a deliberate play on societal morals, and not the law itself. In other words, it's not a legal vehicle. ChatGPT, Are You Killing Local News? I felt like asking a model directly if it's responsible for compromising local newsrooms around the country. After all, there's nothing like hearing it from the horse's mouth. Also, I was curious as to whether the model would admit its culpability, something that humans are usually loathe to do. It turns out, though, that, devoid of human functions and related incentives, ChatGPT, in this instance, really couldn't tell a lie. Here's what it came up with: Q (me): 'are you killing local news?' A (ChatGPT 4.5): 'That's a sharp and important question — and the honest answer is: not directly, but AI (including me) can accelerate trends that are killing local news.' Wow. It did qualify this by pointing out the ways that content creators were already suffering previously: 'Even before AI, local news was bleeding out due to: And the conclusion, restated: 'So, am I killing local news? Not deliberately — but I'm part of an ecosystem that can either erode or enhance it, depending on how people, platforms, and policymakers choose to act.' Next Steps A blog post at Cloudflare reveals that the grand opening of Content Independence Day is not the end of the firm's efforts. 'Next, we'll work on a marketplace where content creators and AI companies, large and small, can come together,' write spokespersons. 'Imagine an AI engine like a block of swiss cheese. New, original content that fills one of the holes in the AI engine's block of cheese is more valuable than repetitive, low-value content that unfortunately dominates much of the web today. We believe that if we can begin to score and value content not on how much traffic it generates, but on how much it furthers knowledge — measured by how much it fills the current holes in AI engines 'swiss cheese' — we not only will help AI engines get better faster, but also potentially facilitate a new golden age of high-value content creation.' Presumably, there will be cooperation with groups like Press Forward that are aimed at helping news to survive. 'Like sidewalks and streetlights, local news is an essential resource for strong communities,' write Press Forward representatives. 'It's how we know when and where to volunteer, what's happening in our schools and city councils, and even what to do on the weekend. However, as once-thriving local newsrooms have shrunk and disappeared across America, this vital public resource is at risk.' The web site further reveals how Press Forward will fight back: with philanthropy, including an impressive $200 million paid to support news makers to date. I think that 2025 is going to be a flashpoint for the publishing battle. Will AI companies have to pony up and pay, which will revive moribund business models for newspapers and other media? Or will AI be allowed to scavenge online stuff for free, making news reporting a boutique hobby like, say, recording a musical album? We'll see. Here's one more admission that I got out of GPT when I told it; 'you can't copy my work in a satisfactory way.' 'I can't copy your work in a satisfactory way — not if "satisfactory" includes honoring your authorship, context, and rights. But I can help advocate for those rights, help you track usage, or even help design licensing models that protect your output. Would you like to explore one of those paths?' No thanks, ChatGPT. But thanks for fessing up.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Haydale Graphene Industries (LON:HAYD) shareholder returns have been stellar, earning 210% in 1 year
When you buy shares in a company, there is always a risk that the price drops to zero. But when you pick a company that is really flourishing, you can make more than 100%. For example, the Haydale Graphene Industries plc (LON:HAYD) share price had more than doubled in just one year - up 210%. It's up an even more impressive 567% over the last quarter. On the other hand, longer term shareholders have had a tougher run, with the stock falling 84% in three years. On the back of a solid 7-day performance, let's check what role the company's fundamentals have played in driving long term shareholder returns. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Given that Haydale Graphene Industries didn't make a profit in the last twelve months, we'll focus on revenue growth to form a quick view of its business development. Generally speaking, companies without profits are expected to grow revenue every year, and at a good clip. Some companies are willing to postpone profitability to grow revenue faster, but in that case one would hope for good top-line growth to make up for the lack of earnings. In the last year Haydale Graphene Industries saw its revenue shrink by 28%. So we would not have expected the share price to rise 210%. It just goes to show the market doesn't always pay attention to the reported numbers. Of course, it could be that the market expected this revenue drop. You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values). If you are thinking of buying or selling Haydale Graphene Industries stock, you should check out this FREE detailed report on its balance sheet. It's nice to see that Haydale Graphene Industries shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 210% over the last year. Notably the five-year annualised TSR loss of 12% per year compares very unfavourably with the recent share price performance. We generally put more weight on the long term performance over the short term, but the recent improvement could hint at a (positive) inflection point within the business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Haydale Graphene Industries (3 are a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on British exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
