logo
Zambia's cyber laws: concerning or necessary? – DW – 07/07/2025

Zambia's cyber laws: concerning or necessary? – DW – 07/07/2025

DW13 hours ago
Zambian leaders say new cybersecurity laws are protecting citizens from online scams and identity theft. But critics see an attack on freedom of expression.
It has been almost three months since Zambia's president, Hakainde Hichilema, signed the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Acts of 2025 into law.
His supporters hailed the laws, calling them progressive, and said they would help fight digital crimes and improve national security.
But rights groups maintain the laws, especially the Cyber Crimes Act, are undemocratic, and stifle freedom of expression and speech.
The laws allow for the interception and surveillance of all electronic communications, including calls, emails, messages and streamed content. The Zambia Cyber Security Agency has been moved from an independent agency of state, and brought under the Office of the President.
Violating the laws also carries significant consequences: the legislation allows for the extradition of Zambians abroad, and stiff penalties, from fines to prison sentences – potentially two to 25 years – depending on the specific offense committed.
Mulambo Haimbe, Zambia's Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, said the legislation is meant to protect citizens online and not stifle fundamental freedoms.
"This conception that the cyber laws are perhaps meant to intrude, to go into your personal details in a willy-nilly fashion is not correct," he told journalists at a press briefing in Lusaka.
"It needs to be put in its proper context, contrary to the assertions that the government's intention is to intercept any of your communication and break into your gadget," he added.
Oliver Shalala Sepiso, media consultant for the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND), also defended Zambia's new cyber laws – saying they are not about surveillance of citizens but merely for digital or data protection.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
But for laws meant to protect Zambians from digital crimes and identity theft while improving national security, the laws' enactment on April 8 received surprisingly little fanfare. There was so little media coverage that most Zambians only learned about the new rules through an alert issued by the United States embassy in Lusaka, warning Zambians abroad about the intrusive nature of the legislation.
"Cyber legislation is needed to combat cybercrimes that are very rampant, like identity theft, and online fraud," Richard Mulonga, CEO of Bloggers of Zambia, told DW.
"There are some provisions that have the potential to restrict free expression, for example assembly and association, and just broader digital rights."
President of the Law Association of Zambia, Lungisani Zulu, said his association will challenge the new law in court.
"Numerous provisions of the Act, which is now law, infringe upon the rights and freedoms of citizens, hinder a free press, and have the potential to undermine the cherished democracy in our country," Zulu said.
The new laws replace the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act of 2021, which were passed by former president Edgar Lungu. Under these laws, Zambia police arrested Mbewe Sibajene in April 2024 for circulating satirical memes and videos mocking government officials and institutions. Police said the memes were abusive, defamatory, and aimed at inciting public disorder towards state institutions.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
Among the contentious provisions are laws that criminalize so-called "false information," vague definitions of indecent content, and a lack of protection for journalists reporting on sensitive national issues.
The Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), a regional media watchdog in eight African countries, says the new law has already impacted journalists negatively.
"Journalists a living in fear because whenever they are doing their stories, they need to now do self-censorship because they don't know what is going to come out from what they are doing," Kennedy Mbulo, vice chairperson of MISA Zambia, told DW, "it has also impacted investigative journalism. You cannot record an individual because one day that could be used as evidence."
Tech savvy young Zambians are divided over the new cyber laws.
Kellys Mushota, a frequent social media user and youth member Zambia's Congress of Trade Unions, has noticed some changes online.
"The enactment of this law has seen some reduction in the number of harassment or even the way of harassment social media users engage in. However, there has also been a reduction of the will by people to speak freely on matters such as governance and politics," he told DW.
Kitwe-based 22-year-old researcher Joshua Seke says young people online are worried about their private conversations being intercepted by authorities.
"If you look at what young people are saying online, does it mean that now I can't laugh with my girl online? Is the government actually going to read everything that we do?" he asked.
Others, like 31-year-old Lusaka resident Mary Ndau, told DW that the laws would discourage online abuse.
"People will be doing the right thing online, they will not express bad behaviors or bully others online because they will be subjected to the law," she said.
As opposition leader, President Hichilema repeatedly criticized cyber laws, describing them as tools of government surveillance. Yet he has enacted arguably even stricter cybersecurity laws.
Kampala-based Edrine Wanyama of CIPESA (Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa), says cyber security legislation is not unique to Zambia, with neighbors South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Malawi also enacting cybersecurity laws.
"Countries tend to pick practices from one country, apply in theirs," the lawyer told DW. "The whole virus keeps biting the rest of the continent, and these laws have been found to be effective for governments in checking on freedoms of expression, access to information, assembly and association in the online spaces."
The West Africa Media Foundation has also reported a rise in restrictive cyber laws infringing on freedom of expression and privacy in countries like Nigeria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Benin and Niger.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did South Korea's ex-leader try to goad North into conflict? – DW – 07/07/2025
Did South Korea's ex-leader try to goad North into conflict? – DW – 07/07/2025

DW

time9 hours ago

  • DW

Did South Korea's ex-leader try to goad North into conflict? – DW – 07/07/2025

Prosecutors have reportedly found evidence that former president Yoon Suk Yeol deployed drones over Pyongyang. Experts say it may have been a bid to provoke a response that would have justified his martial law decree. South Korean prosecutors investigating impeached ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol have reportedly found evidence that the disgraced former leader ordered military drones to be sent over Pyongyang. According to reports in South Korea this week, investigators have obtained audio recordings of communication between the then-president and the military over the alleged drone deployments. Analysts say the incursions, which reportedly occurred in October 2024, were likely intended to provoke North Korea into a reaction. That scenario would have provided Yoon with the justification to declare a national emergency and impose martial law, which he eventually did in December. Yoon, who has since been impeached, is now facing criminal charges for insurrection over his short-lived declaration of martial law. Choo Jae-woo, a professor of foreign policy at Kyung Hee University in Seoul, explained that there are "only two reasons" that a president can declare martial law, one of which is "external aggression or an invasion." "It appears that after provoking the North, Yoon expected a retaliation that he could then use to justify declaring martial law," he told DW. "But that plan backfired when the North did not respond militarily," he said. Pyongyang protested at the incursions but stopped short of responding militarily. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Yoon declared martial law on December 3, saying he needed to protect the nation from "North Korean communist" and "anti-state" forces. He did not provide any evidence for his claims. His controversial attempt to use the military to seize control of the government lasted only a few hours. He was impeached and suspended 10 days later and then arrested in January. The former leader's charge of insurrection is punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty, although South Korea has not executed anyone in decades. Yoon, who was released on bail in March, has denied the charges, saying "martial law is not a coup d'etat" and that his declaration was designed as a "peaceful message" to the nation to highlight the opposition's intentions against the government. He was questioned again in Seoul on Saturday, and a day later special prosecutors filed a request for a new arrest warrant for alleged abuse of power, falsification of official documents, violation of the presidential security act and obstruction of official duties. A hearing to confirm that arrest warrant has been scheduled for Wednesday, with Yoon expected to appear in person to present his arguments before the court, according to South Korea media. Authorities say that allegations of treason, which include the dispatch of drones into North Korea, were not included in the charges as they are still being investigated, but they could still be added later. In October 2024, there were reports of drones over the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, which is 210 kilometers (130 miles) north of the Demilitarized Zone that divides the Korean Peninsula, on three occasions. North Korea published purported images of the drones and later claimed to have found the remains of one of the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that had been shot down after dropping propaganda leaflets. In South Korea, the Defense Ministry quickly rejected Pyongyang's claims. But the ministry backtracked a few hours later, saying it could not confirm or deny the reports. North Korea threatened to carry out retaliatory strikes against the South in response to the propaganda leaflets filled with "inflammatory rumors and rubbish." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While Pyongyang condemned Seoul and said the incident "could be considered a military attack," it did not launch a cross-border retaliation. The special investigation team set up to look into Yoon's actions in office obtained a recording in which a senior officer of the Drone Operations Command said that his commander had received the order for the operation from "V," the South Korean military's term for the sitting president, the Korea JoongAng Daily reported on July 3. Further investigations have revealed that two reconnaissance drones were reported missing near the border in October, with a Defense Ministry report saying the reasons for the loss of the vehicles were "unknown." "It is clear that the situation could have been very serious," professor Choo said. "The exchanges that could have followed may not have been just localized skirmishes close to the border but could have escalated. We were very fortunate that the North decided not to respond." Dan Pinkston, a professor of international relations at the Seoul campus of Troy University, pointed out that the South's alleged drone intrusion was part of a series of tit-for-tat cross-border exchanges during Yoon's administration, which helped heighten tensions with Pyongyang. North Korea had been sending surveillance drones into the South and "was jamming GPS signals" close to the border, affecting flights going in and out of Incheon airport, he said. "There were also groups in the South sending balloons over the border carrying propaganda leaflets, small amounts of food, money and medicine, with the North replying with balloons carrying trash," Pinkston added. But Yoon's order for military drones to penetrate North Korea's airspace was more serious, Pinkston said, as this was "a clear violation of the armistice that ended hostilities in the Korean War" (1950-1953). Officially, the two neighboring countries have been at war ever since. In addition, "it appears it was done without informing the US or the United Nations Command on the border," the professor said. Yoon ordering the incursions could very easily have backfired, Pinkston said. "It is hard to understand the thinking behind this decision, but it put the country at the risk of a devastating war," he said. "This was an extreme move that endangered the territory of South Korea, the people and the nation's assets, all so Yoon could take a tighter authoritarian rule on the reins of government," Pinkston said. "There is no logical explanation for doing what he did," he added.

Russia: Minister found dead hours after being fired by Putin – DW – 07/07/2025
Russia: Minister found dead hours after being fired by Putin – DW – 07/07/2025

DW

time10 hours ago

  • DW

Russia: Minister found dead hours after being fired by Putin – DW – 07/07/2025

Russia's former Transport Minister Roman Starovoy has been found dead hours after Russian President Valdimir Putin fired him. The former Kursk governor's death follows fraud allegations linked to his successor. Russia's former transport minister Roman Starovoyt was found dead just hours after President Vladimir Putin dismissed him, Russian news agencies reported on Monday. Starovoyt reportedly shot himself in a Moscow suburb after the announcement of his sacking. The Investigative Committee said his body was found in a car. The news emerged after it was revealed Russian President Vladimir Putin has sacked 53-year-old Starovoit, in an unexpected move. "Today, the body of former Transport Minister Roman Starovoyt was found in his private car with a gunshot wound in the Odintsovo district," the Investigative Committee said in a statement. "The main version [considered] is suicide," it added. A decree published in Moscow gave no reason for Starovoit leaving his post. The former governor of the western Russian region of Kursk had been appointed transport minister in May last year. Starovoit's deputy, Andrey Nikitin, has been appointed acting transport minister. His successor as governor of the Kursk region, Alexei Smirnov, has been detained for alleged fraud. Ukrainian troops captured dozens of villages in the region in August last year, delivering a temporary but embarrassing setback for the Russian army. Smirnov, who became governor in May 2024, quit in December after Ukrainian troops invaded. The case against him alleges that funds meant for building fortifications on the border with Ukraine were misused. These fortifications have been under construction since 2022, shortly after Putin ordered Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Starovoit previously stated these facilities were completed, but no investigations against Starovoit are known at this time. Russian commentators have also pointed to chaos at airports as a possible factor in his dismissal, with hundreds of flights canceled because of frequent Ukrainian drone attacks during the holiday season. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Poland starts spot checks at German border  – DW – 07/07/2025
Poland starts spot checks at German border  – DW – 07/07/2025

DW

time10 hours ago

  • DW

Poland starts spot checks at German border – DW – 07/07/2025

Random checks will be carried out along Poland's borders with Germany and Lithuania and come after the German government ordered a similar approach for entry into Germany. Authorities in Poland on Monday began carrying out random checks at 52 border crossings at the country's border with Germany in a move contrary to the spirit of the European Union's visa-free Schengen zone. The comes afterstricter German controls at the Germany-Poland border, which have been stepped up under Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government after they were reintroduced in November 2023. The Polish border checks, which also apply to Poland's border with Lithuania, are set to run initially until August 5. Polish Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak said Sunday the controls were meant only to combat "illegal immigration" and that Polish and other EU nationals would not face hindrances. The controls will reportedly focus on buses, minibuses, cars carrying large numbers of passengers and vehicles with tinted windows. Before Poland's announcement, the German government said it would begin turning back asylum-seekers at the Polish border, leading to claims by Polish nationalist and far-right politicians that Berlin is overwhelming Poland with migrants. Since May 8, German officials have refused entry to around 1,300 people on the border to Poland, according to the German Interior Ministry, with one in 10 cases involving an asylum request. EU rules on the Schengen area stipulated that countries are allowed to introduce temporary measures as a "last resort" and "in exceptional situations." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store