logo
Brutal video reveals makeshift ICE detention facility in Manhattan where immigrants sleep on floors next to toilets

Brutal video reveals makeshift ICE detention facility in Manhattan where immigrants sleep on floors next to toilets

Independent6 days ago
Videos from inside a small immigrant detention facility at a federal building in New York City show roughly two dozen people crammed in, lying on a cement floor with nothing but emergency blankets, steps away from a toilet separated only by a waist-high partition.
'Look how they have us like dogs in here,' the person filming the videos can be heard saying in Spanish.
Immigrants' rights groups, lawyers and lawmakers have warned for weeks about deteriorating conditions inside the building, which also houses immigration courts. Federal law enforcement officers have been stationed in the building's hallways since at least May 20 to make arrests moments after immigrants appear in court.
People have been detained on the 10th floor for 'days and weeks at a time without showers, medication or a change of clothes,' with only minimal food and outside contact, according to the New York Immigration Coalition.
'The American Dream,' the man recording the videos says in Spanish. 'Immigration, 26 Federal Plaza.'
Footage, obtained by The Independent, provides outsiders with a first glimpse of the room, which Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have prevented members of Congress from seeing.
In a statement to The Independent, Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the building does not house a 'detention center' but a 'processing center where illegal aliens are briefly processed to be transferred to an ICE detention facility.'
'Any claim that there is overcrowding or subprime conditions is categorically false,' she said.
The brief clips, which were first reported by The City, show the inside of one of several brightly lit holding rooms. The men inside are seated on benches that line the walls or are lying on aluminum emergency blankets on the bare floor. Two toilets in the room, one of which appears to be covered by tinfoil, are blocked off by a small partition. There are no doors separating the toilets from the rest of the room.
'ICE is kidnapping so many people from New York's immigration courts that they had to create a new detention facility,' New York Immigration Coalition president Murad Awawdeh said in a statement.
'But instead of sharing the truth with the public, ICE has skirted accountability by consistently lying about what's happening on the 10th floor, and breaking the law by not allowing Congressmembers to view the conditions,' Awawdeh added.
The group is demanding the facility be immediately inspected and shut down.
'As we arrest and remove criminal illegal aliens and public safety threats from the U.S., ICE has worked diligently to obtain greater necessary detention space while avoiding overcrowding,' McLaughin said in a statement.
'Despite a historic number of injunctions, DHS is working rapidly overtime to remove these aliens from detentions centers to their final destination — home.'
Democratic members of Congress and other New York officials have repeatedly been denied entry to the facility, despite congressional authority granted to lawmakers to 'conduct unannounced inspections of detention facilities holding individuals in federal immigration custody.'
'Since May, ICE has been snatching New Yorkers off the streets and out of immigration court and taking them to this floor,' said Rep. Nydia Velazquez, who is among House lawmakers who were denied entry to the facility.
'They've claimed it's not a detention facility, just a 'processing center,' to block members of Congress from exercising our legal right to conduct oversight,' she said. 'This video confirms what we've feared all along: ICE has been lying and locking us out to hide what's happening inside. There is no more excuse. ICE must grant members of Congress immediate access to the 10th floor and shut this facility down.'
Rep. Adriano Espaillat said the facility is emblematic of the Trump administration's anti-immigration agenda, which he says views immigrants as 'disposable.'
'This video demonstrates a moral and legal failure that demands immediate action,' he said.
While ICE has repeatedly denied that the room on the building's 10th floor is being used as a detention facility, detention data analyzed by The City shows that the floor is being used for much more than just processing immigrants' cases.
In May and June, when arrests at immigration check-ins and courthouses began to skyrocket, immigrants were being held inside the room for 29 hours on average, according to The City 's review. Within those two months, 81 people were detained there for four days or more at a time.
Detentions peaked on June 5, when 186 people were held there overnight.
On June 17, masked federal officers arrested New York City comptroller Brad Lander after observing immigration court hearings in the building.
The city's elected watchdog, among the city's top officials second only to the mayor, was accused of assaulting and impeding an officer. He was released from federal custody hours later, and said that the charges against him were dropped.
Thousands of people have faced arrest after showing up for court-ordered ICE check-ins, and immigration court hearings, as part of the Trump administration's mass deportation agenda.
The administration has effectively 'de-legalized' tens of thousands of immigrants, including people who show up to immigration courts each week only to have their cases dismissed, with federal agents waiting to arrest them on the other side of the courtroom doors.
Those actions have radically expanded a pool of 'undocumented' people to add to the president's demands for mass deportations.
Unlike federal district court judges, immigration judges operate under the direction of the attorney general's office.
The Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review has issued guidance to judges to grant motions from government lawyers to immediately dismiss immigrants' cases, making them easy targets for arrest and removal.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain has no business laughing at Trump's EU trade deal
Britain has no business laughing at Trump's EU trade deal

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Britain has no business laughing at Trump's EU trade deal

In a world where Donald Trump's tariffs and trade wars make everyone a loser, are there any winners from his latest deal, sealed by a handshake with the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in a ballroom at one of the president's Scottish golf courses, of all places? One very clear loser is von der Leyen herself. If body language is anything to go by, she looked like she'd been badly bullied by the Big Orange Man – and, truthfully, so she had. In her own clipped remarks, she admits that a reduction in tariffs to 15 per cent, while 'not to be underestimated', was 'the best we could get'. President Macron has declared the US-EU trade deal a 'dark day' for Europe – and you can understand why. A general tariff level of 15 per cent – better than the 20 per cent proposed by Trump on his infamous 'Liberation Day' in April, and even better than the 30 per cent he was threatening a couple of weeks ago – is still prohibitive. It is certainly way above the 2 to 3 per cent levels that most EU exporters used to face. A trade war has been avoided, but this looks like the kind of deal the Americans have forced on the likes of Vietnam or Indonesia. So it is something of a humiliation for the mighty European Union, a global trade superpower. The feeling in some parts of Europe must be that if von der Leyen had played hard ball like the Chinese, a more evenly balanced and more advantageous relationship could have been reached in the long run. We will never know the truth about that. For European pride and for many of its great industrial concerns, the deal is disappointing, and will be expensive – the Volkswagen group is just one to speak out. But for European consumers, it is surely good news. They will be able to enjoy cheaper imports from the United States; it is American customers who will have to pay more for their French wines and Italian sports cars. Could it be that the EU's trade deal – which Trump has, well, trumpeted as the 'biggest ever', and whose biggest 'win' is the removal of a threat to raise tariffs to 30 per cent later this week – is marginally worse than the one Starmer did with Trump in May? Britain's trade deal lowered tariffs of UK goods imported into the US to 10 per cent, and imposed a lesser, 25 per cent tariff on the UK steel industry, with room for further concessions, while the 50 per cent 'worldwide rate' will remain for the EU. For those now cheering this as a rare Brexit benefit, it is a hollow victory. For the concessions to Britain are so minor, they cannot hope to make up for the ground lost since Brexit – essentially, a GDP loss in excess of 5 per cent. And we're not out of the rough, by any stretch. As Keir Starmer meets the US president for further trade discussions at the Trump Turnberry golf course, he will be acutely conscious of his counterpart's unpredictability. Starmer has milked the modest concessions he managed to wangle, particularly on cars and food standards, but much remains vague and far from nailed-down. The greatest danger is the fuzzy UK commitment to improve the trading environment for the US pharma groups will eventually mean an enormous increase in the drugs bill for the National Health Service, which it can ill-afford. Trump also omitted virtually the whole of the service sector from his UK deal, where the British actually enjoy a surplus, which is great until he decides otherwise. There are no legally binding rules here. The world economy remains highly inter-dependent, and globalisation, while receding, cannot sensibly be ended, as even Elon Musk tries to argue. All barriers to trade harm the country that erects them both directly and, in their depressing effects on world growth, indirectly. Consumers are charged more, on a highly regressive basis, companies are forced to pay more for inputs, and be less cost-effective, and competition and dynamic structural change are deliberately impeded. Whatever the details of the individual deals counties are trying to strike with one another, tariffs make us all poorer in the long run.

More Ted Bundy than Elliot Rodger - forensic psychologist and expert on serial killers unpacks the perverse fantasies of 'evil' Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger
More Ted Bundy than Elliot Rodger - forensic psychologist and expert on serial killers unpacks the perverse fantasies of 'evil' Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

More Ted Bundy than Elliot Rodger - forensic psychologist and expert on serial killers unpacks the perverse fantasies of 'evil' Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger

Bryan Kohberger was driven by an extreme desire for control and notoriety rather than a blind hatred of women, forensic psychologist Dr Gary Brucato has told a new Mail podcast. Speaking to journalist and host Laura Collins, the violent crime expert saw shades of infamous serial killer Ted Bundy in Kohberger's murder of four college students in their rental home in Moscow, Idaho. Dr Brucato contrasted Kohberger's 'evil' psychosexual fantasies with the extreme misogyny that drove infamous incel murderer Elliot Rodger. Kohberger, 30, was charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary for the November 2022 killings but controversially accepted a plea deal in July 2025 to avoid the death penalty. Asked whether the victims' families' heartfelt statements at the sentencing would have any effect on Kohberger, Dr Brucato said he feared that for killers like him, such public grief becomes part of their fantasy. What dark fantasies drove a criminology student to butcher four college students? Find out on the Mail's On The Case: The Idaho Murders Speaking to journalist and host Laura Collins, the violent crime expert saw shades of infamous serial killer Ted Bundy in Kohberger's murder of four college students 'The families' approach was to try and get under his skin,' Dr Brucato said. 'That's because they had a sense that for a budding serial killer like Kohberger, the motive is to compensate for feelings of inadequacy. 'Those killers want to level the playing field through domination, control and manipulation of other people, usually in a psychosexual way, or in the playing out of some sort of fantasy. 'The idea is to tear them apart: to show that nothing that was done did that. That in the end, no one cares about you. That they've achieved no degree of notoriety beyond kind of a flash. I think that's terrific. 'But we must think about the kind of person this is, and I am afraid to say, he was like an automaton during those statements. 'Like a calculating machine – I wondered while he was sitting there he wasn't reliving in his mind what he had done, fantasising.' Brucato went on to describe Kohberger as a 'textbook serial killer' whose motivations, like Ted Bundy's, centred on control interwoven with sexual desire. Both killers were educated and superficially charming, the forensic psychologist observed, using their intelligence to carefully plan attacks on young women driven by fantasies of domination rather than obvious rage. Kohberger's interest in Bundy was well-documented - court documents reveal he had undertaken several Google searches on the serial killer before the murders took place. 'Control is really what this story is all about', Dr Brucato argued. 'Everything, even including this plea deal, seems to be about control. That's precisely why we feel so dissatisfied. 'Here's somebody who was arbitrating who lives and who dies, and ultimately managed to live himself, that's depressing. 'Kohberger is quite easy to figure out. His motives, as demonstrated in what was on the ground, are fairly classic. 'There are clues that this was psychosexual. Kohberger was viewing deeply disturbing pornography – and he clearly idolised sexually motivated serial killers. 'The greatest clue was that he purchased the knife months before there was even a victim selected. 'That means you have a fantasy, then you go out like a casting agent to find a person you can cast in your fantasy. 'A representative of the group he felt rejected by. Attractive young women – he homed in on a specific victim who was representative of that whole group.' Brucato said that the lack of personal relationship between Kohberger and his victims is particularly reminiscent of Bundy. 'A serial killer doesn't want a direct connection with his victim', the forensic psychologist said. 'There's a story about Ted Bundy that he once picked up a potential victim and she started talking too much about her life, her identity – that he dumped her because it was too difficult to project onto her.' Some media outlets initially compared Kohberger to incel killer Elliot Rodger, the 22-year-old who murdered six people in California in 2014 out of hatred toward women who rejected him. But asked by host Collins whether he sees validity in the comparison, Dr Brucato said Kohberger was more 'imitating Bundy' and doesn't meet the 'definition of an incel'. 'Bundy is much more of what Kohberger aspired to be', he told the podcast. 'The in-control person who knows how to use empathy to manipulate people. 'What you see in Kohberger was more that, when women would get near him, he wouldn't know what to do. 'If he ever got in an intimate moment, he would shut the woman down or condescend them or say something weird. 'He told a woman he went on a date with that he would like to tickle her, that she had great birthing hips. 'That's very different to an incel. An incel doesn't even get the opportunity.'

What's in Trump's trade deal with Europe?
What's in Trump's trade deal with Europe?

Reuters

time9 minutes ago

  • Reuters

What's in Trump's trade deal with Europe?

BRUSSELS, July 28 (Reuters) - The United States and the European Union agreed on a framework trade deal, which leaders on both sides of the Atlantic said would end months of uncertainty for industries and consumers. Here are the main elements of the deal that will enter into force on August 1 through an executive order by President Donald Trump, according to EU officials: * BASELINE TARIFF RATE: Almost all EU goods entering the U.S. will be subject to a 15% baseline tariff. The 15% tariff is not added to any existing rates. * CARS: Cars and car parts will be subject to the 15% tariff, compared to the 27.5% they face now. * PHARMACEUTICALS AND SEMICONDUCTORS: Pharmaceuticals and microchips will face a 0% tariff until the U.S. concludes Section 232 trade investigations in a few weeks and imposes new global tariff rates on the two industries. The levy on pharmaceuticals and microchips imported from Europe will not exceed 15%, irrespective of the tariffs applied more widely. * TIMBER AND COPPER: Tariffs will be applied after the conclusion of 232 investigations into those sectors. The duties on European lumber and copper will not exceed 15%. * STEEL AND ALUMINIUM: Tariffs on European steel and aluminium will stay at 50%, for now, but the EU and the U.S. agreed that they will be replaced by a quota system that will be negotiated later. European steel exports within the agreed quota would face the most-favoured nation tariff rate agreed under WTO rules, which are low and in some cases zero depending on the steel grade. Steel exports outside of the quota would be at 50%. * ZERO-FOR-ZERO tariffs: The U.S. and EU will have zero-for-zero tariffs on: - all aircraft and their components, - certain chemicals, - certain generic drugs, - semiconductor-making equipment, - some agricultural products but with the exclusion of all sensitive products like beef, rice, ethanol, sugar or poultry. - Natural resources and critical raw materials. More products are to be added. * WINE AND SPIRITS: A tariff rate for wine and spirits - a point of friction on both sides of the Atlantic - is still to be established. * STRATEGIC PURCHASES: The EU pledged to make $750 billion in strategic purchases, covering oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear technology during U.S. President Donald Trump's term in office. This will come as a mix of spot purchases for oil, long-term contracts for LNG and government procurement for nuclear technology. The amount has been estimated on the basis of Europe's planned phase out of energy purchases from Russia. EU purchases of U.S. microchips would be on top of the $750 billion. The U.S. will be the preferred vendor. * European companies are to invest $600 billion in the U.S. over the course of Trump's second term. Japan's package will consist of equity, loans and guarantees from state-run agencies of up to $550 billion to be invested at Trump's discretion, Tokyo says. EU officials, in contrast, said Europe's $600 billion investment pledge is based on the combined investment intentions expressed by European companies. * DEFENCE PROCUREMENT: EU member states will purchase U.S. military equipment. The deal does not specify an amount.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store