Man arrested for posing as ED officer, extortion
The ED conducted searches under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) on Wednesday and found that the accused were impersonating ED officials to defraud businessmen. An FIR was filed at Bidhannagar South Police Station, in Kolkata.
'The public is strongly advised to exercise caution and not fall prey to fraudsters impersonating ED or other government agencies. Any summons issued by the ED can be verified through the official website … ,' read statement by the agency.
Police said the accused individual would contact businessmen by phone and summon them to the Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate Office under the guise of official inquiries and use fake ED credentials.
During the raids, the officials seized two vehicles and frozen Rs. 45.89 lakh in bank accounts of the accused, his wife, and a company M/s Sparklink Management Service Private Limited. In addition, incriminating documents, items, and digital evidence were seized, which include forged letters purportedly issued by the ED and other government authorities, complete with fabricated seals and forged signatures.
The authorities recovered multiple lanyards printed with 'Government of India' and a letterhead of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, bearing the name 'Dr SK Jinnar Ali' and embossed with the Ashoka Emblem. In addition, Ali was involved in cheating victims by falsely promising assistance in ongoing investigation cases. He projected himself as the chairman of an organisation — 'The National Anti-Trafficking Committee.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘National Herald' case: Congress hits back at ED over allegations
New Delhi: Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Congress leader Sonia Gandhi, raised serious questions over the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) probe into the 'National Herald' case. Arguing before a Delhi court on Friday, Singhvi described the case as 'really strange' and 'unprecedented,' claiming that it involves allegations of money laundering without any tangible assets involved. 'This is an alleged case of money laundering without any property, without any use or projection of property. It is really strange—more than strange,' Singhvi told the court, criticizing the foundation of the ED's accusations. His remarks followed arguments made by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, who presented the charge-sheet on behalf of the ED. Raju had claimed that the Gandhi family were the "beneficial owners" of the company Young Indian and accused them of conspiracy and money laundering in connection with the alleged fraudulent acquisition of assets worth over ₹2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Limited (AJL). The ED has named Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, the late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, as well as Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and private companies Young Indian and Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd in the case. The charges are filed under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which deal with money laundering and its punishment. According to the ED, the Gandhi family held 76% shares in Young Indian and used a ₹90 crore loan to fraudulently take control of AJL's vast assets. However, Singhvi rebutted this, claiming the transaction was a legitimate move to make AJL debt-free. 'Every company has the right under the law to clear its debts through various methods,' Singhvi argued. 'You take a loan and transfer it to another entity, thereby making the original company debt-free.' He also emphasized that Young Indian is a not-for-profit company, which, by law, cannot distribute dividends, salaries, bonuses, or any other financial benefits to its shareholders. 'This is a key point that contradicts the ED's narrative of personal enrichment,' Singhvi noted. Furthermore, Singhvi accused the ED of acting on political motivations. He alleged that the agency had remained inactive for years and only revived the probe based on a private complaint driven by political interests. Earlier, on July 3, Raju argued that the Gandhi family had acquired full control of Young Indian after the passing of other shareholders, making them the ultimate beneficiaries. The ED's charge-sheet names multiple individuals and entities, including Sunil Bhandari and Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd, apart from the Gandhis and senior Congress figures. The case remains under judicial review, with the court yet to decide on the cognizance of the charge-sheet.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bank fraud case: Fresh ED summons to Tollywood producer Allu Aravind in Rs 101 crore; land deal with prime accused under probe
HYDERABAD: In a major development in the Rs 101.4 crore Ramakrishna Electronics bank fraud case, the Enforcement Directorate has summoned prominent Tollywood film producer Allu Aravind to appear next week. The move comes after Aravind reportedly failed to submit key financial documents during his earlier appearance before the agency. Aravind was first questioned by the ED on June 2 regarding suspicious financial links to Ravi Kumar Vemula, a director in Ramakrishna Electronics and Ramakrishna Teletronics Private Ltd (RTPL) and prime accused in the case. According to sources, investigators are still determining whether Aravind's involvement in land and financial transactions with the accused was deliberate or incidental. Allu Arvind told TOI that the transaction under scrutiny was minor and that he is fully cooperating with the ED by providing all necessary information. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad "Back in 2017, I purchased a property, and a small portion of it was acquired from Ravi Vemula. He was reportedly unable to repay his loans, which led to the ED launching a probe," he said. He further said, "The agency asked me for details regarding the land transaction. The payment was made through proper banking channels. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like A Apple Recomenda o Blinkist, O Melhor App Para Intelectuais Ao Redor do Mundo Blinkist Undo When I appeared before the ED on July 2, they asked for transaction-related documents. Since the books of accounts weren't readily accessible, I requested a week's time. I will submit all the required details on the next date." Financial irregularities The ED's probe was based on an FIR filed by the CBI, Special Bureau of Forensic Science, Bengaluru, following a complaint from the Union Bank of India. The CBI alleged that directors, V Raghavendra and Ravi Vemula, fraudulently diverted loan funds sanctioned to their companies under overdraft and cash credit (OCC) facilities. In June 2024, ED teams conducted coordinated search operations and also froze Rs 1.45 crore .
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
ED attaches Rs 34.12 crore assets of actress Ranya Rao in gold smuggling, money laundering case
BENGALURU: The Headquarter Investigative Unit-II of Directorate of Enforcement (ED) in New Delhi has provisionally attached immovable properties of Rs 34.12 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), in a case related to the transnational gold smuggling and laundering of its proceeds by the popular Kannada actress Harshavardini Ranya alias Ranya Rao and her associates. The ED has provisionally attached four properties of equivalent value belonging to Rao. These include a residential house in Victoria Layout, a residential plot in Arkavathi Layout, industrial land in Tumakuru, and agricultural land in Anekal Taluk, with a combined fair market value of Rs 34.12 crore. The attachment has been carried out to prevent concealment or alienation of the tainted assets and to secure the proceeds of crime. The investigation revealed that Rao, along with Tarun Konduru Raju and others, orchestrated an operation for smuggling gold into India. Gold was procured from suppliers based in Dubai, Uganda, and other countries, and payments were made through hawala channels in cash, thereby circumventing legal financial systems. False customs declarations were filed in Dubai, fraudulently declaring the destination of gold shipments as Switzerland or the USA, while the actual destination of the gold smugglers was India. Dual sets of travel documents were used, one for the declared export destination and the other for their actual arrival in India. It revealed that the smuggled gold was then sold within India in cash to jewellers and other local entities, and the proceeds were laundered through further hawala remittances abroad to finance repeat consignments for smuggling more gold into India. Further investigation is in progress to trace the remaining proceeds of crime. The probe began after a FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation, following a complaint by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence.
