Shubman Gill, Gautam Gambhir called out for ‘not trusting' Shardul Thakur in Headingley: ‘Why did you play him?'
Former India wicketkeeper-batter Dinesh Karthik questioned Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir over the under-utilisation of Shardul Thakur. The India all-rounder was introduced into the attack well after the 40-over mark in the first innings.
In the end, Shardul bowled just six overs, conceding 38 runs at an economy rate of 6.30. Dinesh Karthik stated that there is no sense in playing Shardul as the bowling all-rounder if the management doesn't have enough trust in his abilities with the ball.
'The Shardul Thakur decision that Team India's management needs to look at - If they are not going to trust his bowling, why are they playing him? That is definitely an issue. If you are not going to trust a bowler, why have you played him? I understand when you play four fast bowlers, you are not going to give equal opportunity for Shardul,' Karthik said on Cricbuzz.
Also Read: IND vs ENG Live Score: Rishabh Pant makes history, scores his second century of the match
'When he did bowl, he did not bowl very nicely, but to give six overs when you have bowled so much is not a great picture. I feel bad for Shardul, but I can understand what Shubman is thinking. He is able to create more pressure on England when the other bowlers are bowling,' he added. 'Haven't shown faith in Shardul Thakur'
Former India batter Aakash Chopra echoed Dinesh Karthik's comments, saying the management has been found guilty of not trusting Shardul Thakur enough with the ball.
"I am thinking about Shardul Thakur's utilisation. They have selected him, but haven't shown faith in him. Of course, he bowled a few overs and was very expensive, but then you didn't bowl him at all for long spells. All bowlers bowled 20-plus overs, but Shardul Thakur was in single digits," Chopra said on his YouTube channel.
"The second new ball came, the first new ball came and went, the ball became old as well, but either it is underutilization of resources or the second thing could be that you don't have faith in him, and that is a bigger concern. Why did you play him if you don't have faith in him?" he added.
In the first innings of the Headingley Test, Jasprit Bumrah was the pick of the Indian bowlers as he returned with five wickets. Speaking of the contest, India firmly have their noses in front following centuries by KL Rahul and Rishabh Pant in the second innings.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
S Jaishankar calls out West for not backing India's anti-terror operations
7:11 ENG vs IND, 2nd Test: Yashasvi Jaiswal praised captain Shubman Gill, who scored a dogged hundred off 199 balls. It was his back-to-back centuries for the Indian skipper, having scored one on his Test captaincy debut in Leeds.


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Amarnath Yatra begins as thousands embark on pilgrimage amid tight security
7:11 ENG vs IND, 2nd Test: Yashasvi Jaiswal praised captain Shubman Gill, who scored a dogged hundred off 199 balls. It was his back-to-back centuries for the Indian skipper, having scored one on his Test captaincy debut in Leeds.


India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Michael Vaughan Slams India's Safe Selection, Questions Kuldeep Yadav Snub Despite Dry Edgbaston Pitch
IND vs ENG: As the second Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy kicked off at Edgbaston on Wednesday, July 3, the Indian team made bold changes but not bold enough for some. Despite widespread calls to include Kuldeep Yadav after Ravindra Jadeja's lacklustre performance in the series opener, the wrist-spinner was once again left out of the playing XI. India Make Three Changes, Leave Out Kuldeep The team management opted to rest Jasprit Bumrah to manage his workload, and dropped Shardul Thakur and Sai Sudharsan from the playing XI. In came Akash Deep, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Washington Sundar, giving the side more depth in both pace and batting. Shubman Gill, leading the side, explained at the toss that the decision to include Sundar was to strengthen the lower middle order, adding more batting cushion at No. 8. Michael Vaughan Questions 'Safe' Selection Former England captain Michael Vaughan, speaking on Sony Sports Network, was critical of the decision to overlook Kuldeep Yadav. He believed the dry Edgbaston pitch would have suited a wrist-spinner and labelled the call as 'playing it safe.' 'Not playing Kuldeep is a safe decision. They've not picked what I believe is a bowler that could easily get 6 or 7 wickets in a Test match,' Vaughan said. 'You have to get 20 wickets. The pitch is pretty dry. Surely you have to play a leg-spinner. I think India have gone for a safe selection.' 'Batting Wasn't the Problem' - Vaughan Doubles Down Vaughan further added that India's issues in the first Test were not related to their batting. Instead of reinforcing a strong batting lineup, he felt the management should have addressed bowling variety and gone in with a risk-taking mindset. 'When a team goes behind and starts losing, you start selecting for safety. The only way to break that losing pattern is to take risks.' 'I think this is a very safe selection. It might work, they might bat great but it's not the batting that was the problem at Headingley.' India Post Strong Start Despite Selection Debate England captain Ben Stokes won the toss and chose to bowl first. India, however, responded well. Shubman Gill struck a magnificent century (114*), and Yashasvi Jaiswal chipped in with a fluent 87. Ravindra Jadeja, under scrutiny for his performance, remained unbeaten on 41 at stumps. India closed Day 1 at 310/5, looking to build on a solid platform despite questions looming about their bowling options heading into the latter half of the match. With England leading the five-match series 1–0, all eyes will be on how India's gamble with an extra batting option plays out. If the dry pitch turns later in the game, the absence of Kuldeep Yadav may prove costly just as Vaughan fears. The decision to prioritise batting depth over bowling variety could define India's fortunes not just in this Test, but for the remainder of the series.