Trump's ‘Nihilistic' Crusade Against Harvard Is About Much More Than Harvard
In the case of Trump v. Harvard, Conti believes that the university, 'is close to being an appendage of the Democratic Party.' Harvard and units within it, Conti wrote in Compact, have
issued numerous public statements during the Great Awokening that aligned the organization with left-wing causes (a practice which Harvard has since ended). Self-censorship is generally prevalent on campuses across the nation, but is much higher among conservatives, who rightly sense that the university is largely hostile to their views.
Despite Conti's indisputably conservative credentials, he has come to believe that the Trump administration's approach to higher education — and toward Harvard in particular — not only violates due process but threatens to destroy the reputation of the United States as an international center of learning.
'It now looks like the administration has decided,' Conti wrote in a more recent essay in Compact, 'A Dangerous Turn in Trump's War on Universities,' 'that it will simply bludgeon Harvard, inflicting a lot of senseless damage until the latter makes a 'deal' of some sort.'
As a consequence, Conti continued, 'it is now within the realm of possibility that a fate I never thought I would see may come about: an end to American pre-eminence in science and scholarship. Such a result would be a tragedy not only for scholars, but for all patriotic Americans.'
In an email, Conti described the revocation of Harvard's certification to participate in the Student and Visitor Exchange Visitor program as a 'capricious and illiberal action, which one might fairly say borders on the nihilistic.'
I asked Conti whether the administration wants to bankrupt Harvard and other Ivy League schools as a demonstration of conservative muscle.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
5 minutes ago
- Fast Company
No distractions, just action: Leading with clarity in uncertain times
When I was 14 years old, I was the squad leader on a 9th-grade camping trip. It rained the whole time, which meant we weren't just wet and cold; we were also pretty stressed. We cooked our meals over a fire, so I coped with the stress the best way I knew how: chopping wood. Correction: chopping a lot of wood. My dad had taught me and I enjoyed the tangible physicality of the act. I spent hours chopping log after log so the group could eat a warm meal. I felt proud to serve my squad in a meaningful way. But soon I developed blisters, which eventually got so bad that I couldn't hold the axe any longer. I went to the teachers' cabin for first aid, and when I returned, I wasn't sure what to do with myself. I'd fixated on chopping wood as my contribution; my way of showing strength and responsibility to my squad. Without that, who was I as squad leader? Unable to fall back on chopping wood, I had to find another way to lead. So I helped set up a tarp, cooked meals, and supported the team in quieter ways. And I taught them how to chop wood. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Decades later, I still think about this trip frequently—this year more than most. During a year of great economic, political, and cultural upheaval, I find myself looking down at my palms often, the memory of those hard-earned blisters echoing in the tough calluses that formed there. They remind me of the invaluable lesson I learned that damp, chilly day after returning to camp: There is strength in doing hard things, and there is strength in being vulnerable and leaning on others. If you're a leader, you've likely earned your share of 'blisters and calluses' navigating recent years. It's clear we won't lead by having all the answers. Instead, we'll guide our teams by staying focused and relying on one another. Here's what's helping me navigate 2025: STAY FOCUSED ON THE WORK When political tensions rise or the headlines create whiplash, we return to what remains clear: our purpose. My company, 1% for the Planet, exists to ensure our planet and future generations thrive. That hasn't changed, and it's our responsibility to keep it front and center every day. Because we've taken the time to lock in our purpose, vision, and values—and because we built a strong strategic plan for 2025—we don't need to reassess. We need to stay the course. Our model and strategy are built to thrive in times like this. But what if yours aren't? What if you set up camp intending to cook over wood, but find the logs have been drenched by unexpected rain? Then it's time to reorient. Figuring out a way to fuel your team becomes the priority. Get creative, find some camp stoves, and keep everyone fed. One of the great gifts of purpose clarity is that it makes hard decisions easier. You don't have to second-guess. You just have to keep going. SPEAK OFTEN AND OPENLY WITH YOUR TEAM advertisement It is easier to keep a team focused and energized when they feel confident in the plan and how they contribute to it. However, a recent report by Axios HQ found that while 27% of leaders believe their employees are well-aligned with org-wide goals, only 9% of employees agree. Both numbers are low, but the staggering gulf between them speaks volumes about the common communication gaps between leaders and their teams. I suspect this gulf persists because closing it is challenging in a particular way: you have to be open with your team, even when the chips are down and especially when you have stumbled. How do I know this? Because I've learned this lesson the hard way in my decade-plus at the helm of 1% for the Planet. Last year, I made some missteps in leadership, which my team quickly identified in our quarterly survey. Thanks to past experience and great coaching, I knew I needed to address their feedback head-on. I directly addressed their concerns, taking responsibility for my mistakes, and then shared our learnings and changes in all-staff meetings. This transparent approach established a foundation of trust, resulting in greater strategic and operational clarity for our team. LEAN ON ONE ANOTHER As leaders, we continually walk a fine line between taking decisive action and delegating effectively. Our teams need both and my experience is that it's an ongoing, daily process of discerning what is called for. Something that's clear time and again is that we lead better—particularly in uncertain, dynamic environments—when we acknowledge that our singular perspective is inherently limiting, and proactively tap into the vantage points of others. MAKE BUSINESS DECISIONS WITH THE FUTURE IN MIND Uncertainty is the rule, not the exception. That's why it's so important to make decisions that can withstand cultural and political volatility, rather than just reacting to the moment. For companies deeply rooted in their values, making purpose-aligned decisions over trend-driven ones becomes intuitive. I'm inspired by 1% for the Planet members who integrate environmental responsibility into their core business, not as a trend, but as a strategic move to future-proof their operations. This demonstrates the courage leaders need today: to think long-term, stay focused, and adapt without losing their center. I'm a long way from having it all figured out (and I'm fairly certain none of us ever will). However, one of the unexpected gifts of leading through uncertainty is that it teaches us how to learn, grow, and become stronger. The challenges shape us. And if we're lucky, they leave us with the kind of calluses that remind us what we're capable of.
Fox News
6 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former Biden adviser admits failure to address border crisis reality led to Trump's re-election
Former Biden border adviser Blas Nuñez-Neto wrote in the New York Times on Tuesday that the administration's failure to address and act on the border crisis contributed to President Donald Trump's re-election. "The first step in responding to a crisis is to acknowledge it exists," Nuñez-Neto wrote. "The surge in illegal crossings at our southern border during the first three years of Joe Biden's presidency was, by any reasonable definition, a crisis. The failure to acknowledge this reality and take timely action to try to resolve it cost Democrats a great deal of trust with American voters and contributed to President Trump's return to the White House." Nuñez-Neto was the assistant secretary for border and immigration policy at the Department of Homeland Security under former President Joe Biden. He described experiencing "a tidal wave" of illegal entries at the border in 2021. The Biden aide said economic devastation from the Coronavirus pandemic was a factor but also acknowledged "a lack of resources" at the border and "the inability to deport people to countries like Venezuela" as issues that contributed to the numbers. "Deliberations that delayed important policy choices didn't help, either," he wrote. Nuñez-Neto added, "By the time Mr. Biden and congressional Democrats began working in earnest with Republicans in late 2023 and 2024 on revamping our immigration laws, the politics were hopelessly interwoven with the presidential election, which is why a tough, bipartisan bill ultimately foundered." Though he conceded that the border was more secure now than under Biden, Nuñez-Neto warned that this was done at the cost of "eroding our constitutional order." Instead, he argued, Congress needed to step in and provide a system that can be both generous to legal applicants and strict with people living in the United States illegally. "In other words, we need a system that recognizes that we are not only a nation of immigrants but also a nation of laws and that we need to respect both. Until that happens, the next border crisis will always be just around the corner," he concluded. Despite Nuñez-Neto's criticism of the Biden administration's border policies, his op-ed drew intense backlash online. Nuñez-Neto's former department, Homeland Security, took to X to mock him. "'I was Humpty Dumpty. Here's how to sit on a wall,'" the Homeland Security page wrote. Illegal border crossings reached record highs under Biden, with 249,785 Border Patrol apprehensions being recorded in December 2023. Under Trump, border encounters dropped by over 90% within his first few months in office.
CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
Rep. Crockett calls for Attorney General Pam Bondi to testify on Epstein files: ‘Why are you lying?'
Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas tells CNN's Laura Coates that Attorney General Pam Bondi should testify before Congress about the Jeffrey Epstein files. Crockett also addressed redistricting in Texas and responded to President Donald Trump's comments about taking an IQ test.
