State leads in elephant conservation, innovative conflict solutions: Minister
Elephant Task Force
office building in Bikkodu, Belur taluk, the minister said that due to the strict implementation of the Wildlife Protection Act, there was an increase in the numbers of wildlife.
Karnataka ranks number one in elephant population with 6,395 elephants. Therefore, there is a need to find a permanent solution to human-wildlife conflict, he said.In Hassan district, over the past 20 years, the problem of elephants increased.
Even after being relocated, they return. There are 50-60 elephants in the plantations of Hassan, Chikkamagaluru, and Kodagu also facing the same issue, he added. Since the forests and plantations in this region are similar, elephants roam freely, and thus various measures like railway barricades, elephant trenches, and solar fences have been implemented to prevent elephants from entering human settlements, he said.Instructions were given to capture elephants troubling people in Hassan district, and the forest department is successfully capturing elephants, he stated. In Bikkodu, where the elephant problem is severe, an elephant task force camp should be established. An officer of DCF rank should monitor elephant movements and provide timely information to the public. A temporary camp is already in place, and now a building is being constructed, he said.New concept of
Elephant Sanctuary
The concept of an Elephant Sanctuary or Soft Release Center is a new experiment being implemented for the first time in Karnataka. While 80% of officials believe it will effectively solve the elephant problem, 20% do not consider it a suitable measure. State govt has taken steps to implement this new experiment, he said. Tenders will be called within 15-20 days for establishing the Elephant Sanctuary, and the foundation stone will be laid within two months to start the work, Khandre assured.Awareness, coexistence essential In the current scenario, it is necessary to raise awareness among people living on the forest fringes about coexisting with wildlife.
At the same time, it is essential to prevent damage to farmers' crops and loss of valuable lives. The forest department will carry out this task sincerely, he informed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Wildlife Sanctuary vs National Park vs Zoo: What is the difference
Wildlife conservation in the world uses various protected places in a bid to conserve biodiversity. Some of the most common ones include wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, and zoos. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They all have one thing in common, which is to protect animals and nature, but differ in their purposes, functions, and levels of human interference. Differentiating between these is necessary to understand the way conservation works, and how institutions enter into it in varying forms. Definition and purpose A wildlife sanctuary is a protected area where wildlife may live freely in its natural state, subject to minimum human interference. The focus is on the preservation of specific species or populations of wild animals. A national park is more restrictive, meant to safeguard whole natural habitats, fauna, flora, and landscapes whereas, a zoo is a man-made institution where animals are kept in enclosures, usually for public display, education, research, and captive breeding. It doesn't replicate the wild, but is extremely significant in awareness and conservation of endangered species. Legal protection and governance Wildlife sanctuaries and national parks are protected under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 in India and similar acts everywhere else. National parks have more legal protection; no grazing, hunting, or human settlement is allowed. Sanctuaries are subject to fewer restrictions, some activity is allowed under regulation. Zoos are controlled under distinct frameworks, say the Recognition of Zoo Rules, 2009 in India, and are generally under municipal or urban jurisdictions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Their focus is more on animal welfare and management than on conserving wild ecosystems. The level of protection has a direct impact on the success of conservation in these diverse environments. Location and size Wildlife sanctuaries are usually situated far from human habitations, in forests, grasslands, or wetlands, and can be small or very large based on the variety of animals they are sheltering. National arks usually span larger geographical territories, like mountains, rivers, and forests, with a complete natural environment for plants and animals. Zoos, however, are typically built in city or metropolitan regions, with little, closed-off areas for general public visitation. Size and place decide how much wild behavior animals may have and how faithfully conservation mimics real-world unsegmented habitat typically offers superior conditions for species in the wild. Animal freedom and natural habitat In wildlife sanctuaries, animals move about freely in their natural environment. Humans are minimised, and animals can maintain their natural behavior. National parks ensure even greater protection and freedom, with no interference from humans whatsoever. They are untouched regions where entire ecosystems are preserved. Zoos, by contrast, isolate animals into artificial enclosures, typically with walls, cages, or glass dividers. Even though modern zoos attempt to replicate natural environments, they can never truly do justice to the natural state of life. The level of freedom impacts not only animal behavior but also health and well-being, especially in large or social species. Human use and access Wildlife sanctuaries may allow limited human use in the form of controlled tourism, research, or residence of tribes, depending on the place. While, human use is greatly restricted in national parks. Recreational uses like tourism are strictly regulated, and grazing, logging, or living are totally banned. Zoos are meant for public contact. Tourists can move around freely, take guided tours, or participate in education courses. A delicate balance must be had between access and conservation. Sanctuaries and parks promote in-situ conservation, while zoos engage the public directly in an attempt to raise awareness and support for conservation. Focus and approach of conservation Wildlife Sanctuaries are usually interested in the protection of specific species or small groups of animals, for instance, birds, deer, or elephants. They operate in a narrow but successful way. National parks strive to conserve whole ecosystems, including plants, animals, rivers, and landscapes. What they do is more holistic and long-term, conserving biodiversity at a variety of levels. Zoos practice ex-situ conservation, conserving animals outside their natural ecosystem. They are necessary for breeding programs of endangered species, veterinary research, and gene pool conservation. Educational and research role Wildlife sanctuaries and national arks offer good platforms for ecological studies and field work, although access is restricted in order to preserve the environment. They receive scientists, wildlife photographers, and researchers in animal behavior, plant variety, and climate effects. Public education is a significant role of zoos. They are accessible to students and families, with interactive displays, labels, and activities meant to expose the public to animals and the environment. Zoos also fund captive animal research, and it can help to develop more effective conservation methods. Zoos spread all three pieces of information but to a larger extent are open to the public. Tourism and income generation Wildlife sanctuaries allow controlled eco-tourism, which can be in the form of safari or trekking, guided or otherwise. These allow income generation for conservation without disturbing the habitat. National Parks are popular travel destinations, with safaris, walks, and wildlife photography. Tourism is closely regulated to be able to minimize ecological impacts. Zoos are built thinking about the visitor. They have large numbers of visitors on a daily basis, generate significant revenue from ticket sales, and typically have cafes, gift centers, and learning centers. While tourism is widespread across all three, the approach and size differ; parks and sanctuaries concentrate on nature, and zoos concentrate on accessibility and publicity.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
South India's first penguin park at Mysuru's Karanji Lake
1 2 Bengaluru: In a first for South India, Mysuru is all set to have a state-of-the-art penguin park at Karanji Lake. Providing a fresh lease of life to the famed aquarium project at the waterbody, which was stuck in limbo for over a decade, the govt Thursday approved a proposal to convert the half-built facility at the lake into a penguin park under public-private-partnership (PPP) model. At the Zoo Authority of Karnataka (ZAK) board meeting, forest minister Eshwar Khandre approved the proposal — a first in south India and the third such facility in the country after Mumbai and Ahmedabad. "Based on experts' opinion and recommendations, we decided to convert the ongoing aquarium project into a penguin park facility. I asked officials to prepare a detailed project report and submit a proposal at the earliest," Khandre said after the board meeting. Senior forest department officials told TOI the project to build a world-class aquarium was in progress since 2010-11. Half of the structure was built by Mysuru City Corporation at a cost of over Rs 4 crore and handed over to ZAK in 2018. Thereafter, ZAK's multiple efforts to revive the project met with no response from the govt owing to Covid-19 pandemic. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru In the meantime, the tourism department came up with Rs 18-crore project to develop Karanji Lake nature park, linking both the zoo and lake. However, the proposal did not go well with ZAK as it violated guidelines set by Central Zoo Authority (CZA). Artificial cooling effects As penguins — flightless aquatic birds — are found only in cold climatic conditions, the facility at Karanji Lake will have special micro-climatic conditions recreated to suit their original habitat. "We have to create artificial cooling effects inside the facility to maintain water and ambience temperature. Currently, only Mumbai and Ahmedabad have penguins under micro-climatic conditions. The facility at Mysuru will have facilities on similar lines but in an advanced stage," said Sunil Panwar, member-secretary, ZAK. Forest department sources said the cost of creating a penguin park may require an investment of Rs 30-40 crore, considering the temperature needs to be below zero degrees and that has to be created mechanically. "This requires round-the-clock power supply to power the freezers and air conditioners which ensure cold climatic conditions," said a retired forest official who previously served at ZAK. The govt is considering getting at least 4 to 5 pairs of penguins initially.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Biodiversity board warns against exploitation of wild mushrooms
Panaji: As the sale of wild mushrooms has begun in Goa with the arrival of the monsoon, the Goa State Biodiversity Board (GSBB) has warned against the overexploitation of these edible mushrooms, known locally as 'roen olmi'. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The GSBB has appealed to Goans not to encourage the sale and consumption of these wild mushrooms and has said that locals should instead patronise the 'much cheaper and nutritious button and oyster mushrooms' available in local markets. The roen olmi is considered a delicacy locally. However, the GSBB began initiating awareness on the conservation of roen olmi from 2018, noting that the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, provides protection to natural species of wild mushrooms in wildlife sanctuaries. Yet, these mushrooms are seen being plucked secretly by entering forests for sale and consumption. 'For thousands of years, forest dwellers conserved wild mushroom species. But in recent times, people started exploiting mushrooms, posing a threat to nature,' the GSBB has said. 'The unethical approach of pluckers is degrading sensitive wild habitats, thus causing erosion of biodiversity. Scientists are researching mushroom species for new drugs/pharmaceuticals, but if wild species are destroyed in Goa, then nothing will be left for scientific research. ' The GSBB has also appealed to those involved in plucking and in the roadside sale of roen olmi to leave behind at least 50% of the young stages on the termite mounds for the conservation of their biodiversity. It also asked owners of private forests to care for and conserve the roen olmi species. 'People must completely avoid plucking and bringing very small mushrooms for sale. Nobody should plunder rare smaller species found outside forest areas,' GSBB said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It has added, 'These include varieties known as khut or khutyaliolami, toshaliolami, sonyaliolami, and chonchyaliolami. People must not overexploit non-marketed smaller species of termitomyces, locally known as shiti, shitololami, found at the end of the monsoon.'
