Poet Hemant Divate to return state award as protest against imposition of Hindi in schools
Divate was awarded by the government of Maharashtra in the year 2021 with Kavi Keshavsut Puraskar (award) for his book Paranoia, a collection of his poems. He made the announcement of his decision to return the award via his social media where he posted, 'As a protest against the decision to impose Hindi as the third language, I am returning the Maharashtra State Government's award, including the cash prize, that I received for my poetry collection Paranoia.'
Divate said, 'It is completely unnecessary to teach Hindi formally in schools at this young age. At this stage, children are just beginning to learn Marathi, and learning Hindi simultaneously—given the similarities between the two languages—can create confusion. Instead, the government could consider introducing subjects focused on skills, value education, and personality development, which would be more beneficial for young learners.'
Months after retracting its decision to make Hindi mandatory in Classes 1 to 5, the Maharashtra school education department issued a revised order, removing the word 'mandatory' as promised. However, restrictive conditions on language options have sparked fresh controversy, with many calling it a renewed push for Hindi by the state government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tavleen Singh writes: Bihar electoral rolls revision — another idiotic exercise
In an upper caste village in Bihar during a recent election, I was taken to see the quarter in which the mouse-catcher community lived. On travels in rural India, I have often seen desperate poverty, but this 'Musahar' quarter was the worst I have seen in a very long time. This mouse-catcher community was confined to living at some distance from the main village, in a largeish crater on the edge of a railway track. Mud hovels lined lanes so narrow that two people would find it hard to pass each other. When I went into one of the hovels, I found it frighteningly bereft of the ordinary things we need to survive — food, clothes, bedding. The children I saw in this 'Musahar' quarter were barefoot and in rags, their hair and teeth showed signs of acute malnutrition. The men I spoke to said they made a living by doing odd jobs for the upper-caste families in the village. When I saw the excellent report in this newspaper last week on the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, I remembered that 'Musahar' quarter. It surprised me not at all that the reporters who wandered about Bihar to gauge the reaction of ordinary voters to the Election Commission's new demand for proof of identity found that they were puzzled and confused. They would have already found it hard enough to go through the process of getting the Aadhaar cards they all seemed to have. Speaking of Aadhaar cards, were we not told then that this card would supersede all our other cards and be final proof of identity? There are more questions that need to be asked of the officials who thought up this new exercise and proved yet again that Indian officialdom remains worryingly oblivious to Indian realities. Did those in the Election Commission, who designed this 'Special intensive Revision' remember that an estimated 94 lakh Bihari families live on less than Rs 6,000 a month? Did they remember that more than half the population of this state is believed to live in poverty when it is measured on a multi-dimensional index? The multi-dimensions involve measuring things like nutrition, access to clean water, schools, healthcare and other things. Did they remember that the per capita income of a Bihari is Rs 54,111, when the national average is Rs 1,85,000? The answer is that they probably did not and, in any case, they couldn't care less. They follow orders from their political masters who should know better since they are supposed to represent the people. But Lutyens' Delhi is a long, long way from Indian realities and the politicians who now inhabit its fine bungalows have lived there for more than a decade now. The next time you hear someone from the Bharatiya Janata Party, or one of their daft devotees, sneer at 'Lootyens', it is worth reminding them that the English-speaking elite they so despise does not live there anymore. They have taken their drawing rooms and refinements with them, and fled. This has totally changed the character of this tiny, privileged enclave, in which I spent my childhood and growing years. But that is a subject for another day. This week, I would like to stick to the idiocy of schemes that are devised in the highest echelons of India's government. An Opposition leader in Bihar has referred to this latest scheme as 'votebandi' and compared it to 'notebandi'. It is a valid comparison. That other exercise was supposed to cleanse India of 'black money' and forever end the ways in which 'black' money was used to fund terrorism, corrupt politicians and other such things. So millions of very poor Indians were forced to queue for hours in the sun to exchange their old notes for new. And women I met in villages shortly after wept as they told me that they had lost the stashes that they concealed from alcoholic or reckless husbands. They did not dare reveal these secret stashes, so the money became useless. Narendra Modi's demonetisation in 2016 failed so utterly to become the magic wand that he was told it would be when he was learning economics in his alma mater, the RSS, that he no longer mentions it when he boasts of his achievements. When elections come around, his income tax sleuths routinely find rooms full of illegal funds in the houses of politicians and the offices of political parties. The police routinely stop cars ferrying huge piles of cash to and from candidates. And, in a new chapter in this unending story of 'black money', a Supreme Court judge is likely to face impeachment because of singed piles of cash found in his backyard. We need to ask why our political leaders and high officials are so removed from the realities of India that they have not noticed that the people of Bihar are nearly all too poor to get more documents to prove their identity. The question we should also be asking is what this 'special' inspection of election rolls seeks to achieve. If it is to weed out Muslims from Myanmar and Bangladesh who might be trying to vote for 'secular' parties, then it is a wasted exercise. Bihar is such a poor state that its own citizens are forced to travel to Delhi and Mumbai in search of employment of the most menial kind.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
BJP hits out at Uddhav; Raj spared after show of unity
Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on Saturday took a veiled swipe at Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray, who held a joint event with his estranged cousin and MNS chief Raj Thackeray, saying the rally was not a victory celebration but a 'rudali darshan' (watching professional mourner in action). Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray with his cousin and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray during a joint rally in Mumbai. (ANI Photo) The Thackeray cousins shared the public stage at a victory rally in Mumbai to celebrate the rollback of two government resolutions issued earlier by the Fadnavis-led government introducing Hindi as a third language from class 1 in state schools. The event was originally planned as a protest against the Mahayuti government's decision. 'The rally was not Vijay utsav but a 'rudali' darshan,' Fadnavis said, while thanking MNS chief Raj Thackeray for crediting him in reuniting the two Thackeray cousins. Addressing the event, Raj Thackeray credited Fadnavis, albeit in a lighter vein, for bringing together the two cousins which even Bal Thackeray could not do. 'Balasaheb Thackeray must be blessing me,' Fadnavis said. The senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader said no word was spoken about Marathi at the event and the speech (delivered by Uddhav Thackeray) focused on how his government was toppled and how they can regain power. His remarks come even as the BJP sought to downplay the possible reunion of the Thackeray cousins after nearly two decades, claiming the 'inherent differences' in the Opposition's coalition will not affect the stability of the party-led Mahayuti government, which it shares with the Shiv Sena and the NCP, or impact its future in Maharashtra. Senior BJP leaders, requesting anonymity, however, admitted that the coming together of the estranged Thackeray cousins was precipitated by the protest over the state's emphasis on teaching Hindi as the third language in the state where linguistic hegemony of Marathi plays a central role in politics. 'The state government erred in issuing the circular…although it was not issued by the chief minister, there was lag between the time it was issued on April 16 and its withdrawal on June 29, which gave the Opposition an opportunity to attack the Mahayuti and also a platform to widen the anti-BJP front,' a senior BJP functionary said. The leader, however, asserted that the union should not be read as a 'threat to the Mahayuti' because the Opposition lacks unity and has used the language issue as a platform to widen the anti-BJP front ahead of the municipal polls, which are likely to be announced after the monsoon. 'The opposition's unity will be tested when the elections to the BMC are announced and when each of these alliance partners will fight over seat allocation and other such issues,' the functionary said. A second BJP leader said that besides 'inherent differences' among the Congress, the NCP (SP) and the two outfits led by the Thackeray cousins — to be sure the MNS joining the Opposition front was yet to be announced — that will come to fore over electoral issues, all eyes will be on how the political ambitions that drove a wedge between the cousins will play out. 'When (Shiv Sena founder) Balasaheb Thackeray was alive, Raj was seen as the natural inheritor of his brand of politics… differences between the families were cemented by political ambition and tussle for power, which led to Raj moving out. Today they have come together and with them are political outfits such as the CPI and the CPI(M), which stood for causes antithetical to Balasaheb, so the Marathi Manoos who believed in his brand of politics and Hindutva will not support such an alliance,' the second leader claimed. (With agency inputs)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sena's Buldhana MLA sparks row with remarks on Maratha kings
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: On Saturday, Shiv Sena 's Buldhana MLA Sanjay Gaikwad caused a political controversy by making remarks perceived as disrespectful towards Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. During an interaction with reporters in Hadoletti village, Latur, Gaikwad SAID the two Maratha kings were multilingual and questioned Uddhav and Raj Thackeray's opposition to teaching Hindi as a third language in primary schools. Gaikwad visited Hadoletti to meet an elderly farmer who has been manually ploughing his field due to the inability to afford oxen or a tractor. TOI reported the farmer's plight and the govt assistance provided following the news. His comments followed Raj and Uddhav Thackeray sharing the stage in Mumbai for the first time in two decades. "If they had united 15 years ago, it might have made some difference. It is too late now. I don't think Maharashtra will see any real change because have come together." Reaffirming his position on multilingualism, Gaikwad asked, "Will you speak in Marathi when you go to another state?" He said survival in a globalised world requires knowledge of multiple languages. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo While advocating for multilingualism, he also declared that they would not tolerate "any insult of the Marathi language." Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: On Saturday, Shiv Sena's Buldhana MLA Sanjay Gaikwad caused a political controversy by making remarks perceived as disrespectful towards Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. During an interaction with reporters in Hadoletti village, Latur, Gaikwad SAID the two Maratha kings were multilingual and questioned Uddhav and Raj Thackeray's opposition to teaching Hindi as a third language in primary schools. Gaikwad visited Hadoletti to meet an elderly farmer who has been manually ploughing his field due to the inability to afford oxen or a tractor. TOI reported the farmer's plight and the govt assistance provided following the news. His comments followed Raj and Uddhav Thackeray sharing the stage in Mumbai for the first time in two decades. "If they had united 15 years ago, it might have made some difference. It is too late now. I don't think Maharashtra will see any real change because have come together." Reaffirming his position on multilingualism, Gaikwad asked, "Will you speak in Marathi when you go to another state?" He said survival in a globalised world requires knowledge of multiple languages. While advocating for multilingualism, he also declared that they would not tolerate "any insult of the Marathi language."
