Alleged Trump assassin to represent himself in Florida trial
The decision came after Routh's court-appointed lawyers requested to withdraw, citing a breakdown in communication.
District Judge Aileen Cannon approved Routh's request to act as his own attorney but mandated standby counsel to assist.
The move followed a filing by federal public defenders stating, 'It is clear that Mr Routh wishes to represent himself, and he is within his Constitutional rights to make such a demand.'
Routh, a Hawaii resident, faces charges including attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer, and firearms offenses. His trial is scheduled for September in Florida.
Authorities arrested Routh on September 15 after a Secret Service agent spotted a rifle barrel protruding from bushes near Trump's West Palm Beach golf course.
The agent fired, and Routh fled before being apprehended shortly after.
Court documents revealed that months before the incident, Routh left a box at an undisclosed residence containing letters.
One, addressed to 'The World,' allegedly read, 'This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you.'
The letter also offered $150,000 to anyone who could 'finish the job.'
This was the second assassination attempt on Trump last year. The first occurred in July at a Pennsylvania rally, where a gunman wounded Trump in the ear and killed one attendee before being neutralized. - AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
FEMA to require states use terrorism prevention funds for migrant arrests
A resident enters a FEMA's improvised station to attend claims by local residents affected by floods following the passing of Hurricane Helene, in Marion, North Carolina, U.S., October 5, 2024. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Emergency Management Agency will require states to spend part of their federal terrorism prevention funds on helping the Trump administration arrest migrants, as part of the U.S. president's transformation of the agency. This is latest example of the Trump administration tying its goal to arrest migrants to federal funding for states. States must spend at least 10% of their funds from the Homeland Security Grant Program on enforcing immigration laws 'against all inadmissible and removable aliens,' according to an agency announcement. They can use it for tasks that support President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration, including to construct detention facilities or set up partnerships between police officers and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to the post. States have until Aug. 11 to apply for their portion of $373.3 million, according to the post. Congress established the Homeland Security Grant Program before Trump took office to help states prepare for and respond to terrorist attacks. All 50 states receive the funds annually. In the past, they have used the money to buy security cameras, firefighting foam equipment and computers, among other needs, according to statements from state officials. Reuters asked the White House press office whether Congress intended the funds be spent on migrant arrests. The office referred Reuters to FEMA. (Reporting by Courtney Rozen; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama )
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: 'AI is too important not to regulate'
TECH titans have finally got what they were clambering for: a free pass to artificial intelligence (AI) development, thanks to United States President Donald Trump's AI Action Plan unveiled on Wednesday in Washington, at a tech summit attended by the elites of the industry. Calling it "Winning the AI Race", he said his action plan is designed to put the US ahead of other nations. "America must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with green light, not strangled with red tape", the media quoted him as saying. There is only one way to read Trump's "green light" message: whatever regulations that stand in the way of AI "innovation" will be removed. First to go will be whatever that remains of the former administration's regulations. Is this the right path to take on AI? While tech titans will say yes, there are others who say no because AI comes with so many unknowns. Not even the AI entrepreneurs know where the technology is taking us. Certainly, AI has promises of benefits, but they come clothed with known and unknown risks. Alphabet and Google chief executive officer Sundar Pichai writing an opinion piece in the Financial Times on May 23, 2023 said that "AI is too important not to regulate and too important to regulate well", meaning regulating in a way that balances innovation and potential harms. But a race to be first will certainly not strike the right balance. Google's promise is to develop AI responsibly, but when the profit chase becomes hot would the pledge still hold? Pichai must know AI is fast becoming a crowded space, with every company racing to shape the technology according to its business needs. In other words, profit before people and planet. Our bad old free market economic model — the myth that markets perform best when they are free of regulations — has followed us into the digital world. Myth-busting economist Ha-Joon Chang has made it crystal clear that the free market doesn't exist anywhere in the world. With this "free-to-choose" mindset, nothing can be developed responsibly, let alone AI. We have long been witnesses of irresponsible capitalism, at times victims even. Hence the call for "compassionate capitalism", a sign that the free-to-choose market model has hit the lowest of low. Innovative AI development is only possible in a regulation-free space is a similar myth by another name. This is why the European Union has opted for the AI Act, one of whose aims is to make the technology "work for people and is a force for good in society". It came into effect on Aug 1 last year, claiming the honour of being the first-ever legislation to address the risks of AI. Whether or not such a goal is enforced is a question of political will, not the fault of the law. The EU model isn't the only way to tame AI. A better approach is a global AI treaty. But this will only work in a rules-based world order. Ours isn't. The Paris Treaty on climate change is in a bit of a shambles. So are the Rome Statute and the Law of the Sea. Regional or national approach may be inevitable.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Netherlands bans Israeli ministers over Gaza violence incitement
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands has barred two Israeli ministers from entering the country, accusing them of inciting violence and advocating ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir were declared persona non grata following their inflammatory remarks. Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp stated, 'They repeatedly incited settler violence against Palestinians, promoted illegal settlement expansion, and called for ethnic cleansing in Gaza.' The decision follows the Netherlands' earlier support for EU sanctions against the ministers, which failed to pass in June. Smotrich responded on social media, accusing European leaders of yielding to 'the lies of radical Islam' and rising antisemitism. Ben-Gvir dismissed the ban, vowing to continue advocating for Israel despite being unwelcome in Europe. The Dutch government emphasized its commitment to alleviating suffering in Gaza. Veldkamp noted that while airdrops of food aid are costly and risky, the Netherlands is exploring land-based aid delivery options. Humanitarian pauses announced by Israel have allowed limited aid to resume in Gaza, where famine conditions persist. A UN-backed report confirmed that famine thresholds have been breached, with over 20,000 children treated for acute malnutrition since April. Veldkamp warned that the Netherlands may push to suspend the EU-Israel trade agreement if Israel fails to meet humanitarian obligations. Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated the urgency of unfettered aid access for Gaza civilians. The conflict, triggered by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel, has resulted in nearly 60,000 Palestinian deaths, according to Gaza's health ministry. - AFP
