
Putin 'is pushing migrants to Britain' in an attempt to overwhelm borders, insiders claim
Russia is aggravating Britain's migrant crisis to overwhelm border defences and sow division in the nation, security sources have reportedly claimed.
Vladimir Putin 's government is believed to be providing fake documents, transport and even military escorts to smuggling gangs ferrying migrants across the Channel.
The threat overwhelming migration poses to national security is so fierce that this week NATO recognised it by allowing its members to count border protection to spending targets for the first time.
A security source told the Sun: 'Hostile states and malign actors are using illegal migration to test borders, cause disruption and destabilise countries like Britain.
'That's exactly why NATO is now treating border protection as a core part of collective defence — because the lines between traditional military threats and national security are more blurred than ever.'
So far this year, over 18,000 people have arrived in small boats. This is far higher than 2018, when just 299 people crossed the Channel.
The highest year for arrivals was 2022, which saw nearly 46,000 people arrive.
On top of the threat to British national security, Russia's alleged actions are also harming those crossing the Channel, who are often desperate and vulnerable.
Earlier this month, a man on crutches was seen hobbling over to a small boat on French soil and making his way over to England, less than 24 hours after failing in his mission.
The man was seem holding his crutch aloft like Excalibur as his fellow migrants helped him aboard.
Within minutes, the rubber boat was full to bursting, around 20 migrants sitting on each side and more in the middle.
It then set off across the Channel towards England, passing over the horizon within a quarter of an hour. Whether it arrived is unclear.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who scrapped the Conservative plan to send small boat arrivals to Rwanda, continues to declare he will be able to 'smash the gangs' and stop the boats with the aid of French police, who we are sending millions to.
Yet the migrants continue to exploit the loophole which means once they are in the sea, even up to the ankles, police will touch neither them nor their dinghies, through fear of harming them, meaning they are free to sail to England.
And police have told the Mail there are simply too many migrants, and too much shoreline near England, for them ever to be stopped - particularly as they are confident they will be welcomed here.
A bearded middle-aged man, who could only hobble towards the waves aided by a friend
Latest figures show £3.1 billion was spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7 billion.
More than 30,000 asylum seekers are housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, many of whom arrived illegally in dinghies, and ministers are looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs.
But despite Ms Reeves' pledge to end the use of hotels, the Tories pointed out that the small print of her Spending Review documents revealed that £2.5 billion will still be spent each year on asylum support by the end of the decade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hong Kong's last active pro-democracy group says it will disband amid security crackdown
HONG KONG, June 29 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's League of Social Democrats said on Sunday that it would disband amid "immense political pressure" from a five year-long national security crackdown, leaving the China-ruled city with no formal pro-democracy opposition presence. The LSD becomes the third major opposition party to shutter in Hong Kong in the past two years. Co-founded in 2006 by former lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung as a radical wing of the pro-democracy camp, the LSD is the last group in Hong Kong to stage small protests this year. Mass public gatherings and marches spearheaded by political and civil society groups had been common in Hong Kong until 2020, but the threat of prosecution has largely shut down organized protests since. China imposed a national security law on the former British colony in 2020, punishing offences like subversion with possible life imprisonment following mass pro-democracy protests in 2019. A second set of laws, known as Article 23, was passed in 2024 by the city's pro-Beijing legislature covering crimes such as sedition and treason. Current chair Chan Po-ying said the group had been "left with no choice" and after considering the safety of party members had decided to shutdown. Chan declined to specify what pressures they had faced. "We have endured hardships of internal disputes and the near total imprisonment of our leadership while witnessing the erosion of civil society, the fading of grassroots voices, the omnipresence of red lines and the draconian suppression of dissent," Chan told reporters, while flanked by six other core members including Tsang Kin-shing, Dickson Chau, Raphael Wong, Figo Chan and Jimmy Sham. In February, the Democratic Party, the city's largest and most popular opposition party, announced it would disband. Several senior members told Reuters they had been warned by Beijing that a failure to do so would mean serious consequences including possible arrests. Earlier this month, China's top official on Hong Kong affairs, Xia Baolong, stressed national security work must continue as hostile forces were still interfering in the city. "We must clearly see that the anti-China and Hong Kong chaos elements are still ruthless and are renewing various forms of soft resistance," Xia said in a speech in Hong Kong. The League of Social Democrats is one of Hong Kong's smaller pro-democracy groups known for its more aggressive tactics and street protests in its advocacy of universal suffrage and grassroots causes including a universal pension scheme. In a 2016 incident, Leung threw a round object at former Hong Kong leader Leung Chun-ying inside the legislature. Three LSD members were fined on June 12 by a magistrate for setting up a street booth where a blank black cloth was displayed and money was collected in public without official permission. Chan told reporters that the party had no assets to divest and no funds left after several of its bank accounts were shut down in 2023. While never as popular as the more moderate Democratic Party and Civic Party, it gained three seats in a 2008 legislative election - its best showing. The LSD's founder Leung, 69, was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021 in the landmark '47 Democrats' case. He is currently serving a sentence of six years and nine months in prison. Another member, Jimmy Sham, was also jailed in the same case and released in May. The security laws have been criticised as a tool of repression by the U.S. and Britain, but China says they have restored stability with 332 people so far arrested under these laws. "I hope that the people of Hong Kong will continue to pay attention to the vulnerable, and they will continue to speak out for injustice," Figo Chan said.


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The BBC's broadcast of Glastonbury hate chanting is nothing short of criminal
Another week, another utter disgrace for the BBC when it comes to antisemitism and the safety of Britain's Jewish community. This time the setting was Glastonbury. The BBC has been broadcasting live from the festival for many years. It employs hundreds of people to cover the event at significant expense to licence-fee payers. It is meant to have systems in place to ensure that racist, offensive content is not broadcast. So how was it possible on Saturday afternoon that the rap duo Bob Vylan were allowed to broadcast live on the BBC chanting 'death to the IDF' and talking about 'f-ing Zionists'? Why was the live feed not immediately cut? Why did BBC executives allow the racist rant to continue unchecked? The BBC's own editorial guidelines state the following: 'Material that contains hate speech should not be included in output unless it is justified by the context. Broadcasting hate speech can constitute a criminal offence if it is intended or likely to stir up hatred relating to race, or intended to stir up hatred relating to religious belief'. So has the BBC committed a criminal offence in broadcasting this hateful, racist material? The police should investigate, as should the BBC's Board, led by Chairman Samir Shah. How much longer can they tolerate the failings of BBC leadership on antisemitism and bias? Director General Tim Davie and his executives have had more than eighteen months to get a grip and yet this weekend's debacle shows the BBC's problems are getting ever worse not better. It is also time for the government and Ofcom to act. The BBC has repeatedly shown itself unable to get its own house in order on antisemitism, whether that be the racism broadcast live this weekend from Glastonbury, the consistent Jew-hate and bias from reporters on BBC Arabic or the debacle of the Gaza documentary that the corporation was forced to pull because, amongst other things, a payment had been made to the family of a Hamas official. The BBC's editorial failings on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias are now so numerous, so widespread and so consistent that perhaps I should not be surprised. But to see our national broadcaster allow this racist rant to be aired was stomach-churning. Many Jews I have spoken to feel the same: a mixture of shock, disgust, sadness and fear. There is disbelief that the BBC gave a platform to those inciting violence against Jews and gleefully telling racist stories. The BBC has hit a new low. It is, frankly, unforgivable.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pride organisers warn Trump's DEI purge directly hitting UK events as corporate sponsorships drop
UK Pride faces a 'critical' funding crisis amid warnings that Donald Trump 's assault on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the US is having a direct impact on firms in Britain. The UK Pride Organisers Network said 75 per cent of Pride events across the UK seen a decline in corporate sponsorships this year, with a quarter experiencing funding drops of more than 50 per cent. Meanwhile, GoFundMe has reported a 'remarkable' 82 per cent increase in organisers resorting to crowdfunding events to bridge the gap in funding. Pride organisers have told The Independent that big corporations who have long sponsored them are 'pulling back their funding in all aspects', especially those with head offices in the US, after Trump issued a series of executive orders targeting diversity programmes in the public and private sectors, with many corporations such as Amazon and Google scaling back their DEI efforts since February. While Pride has grown as a movement across the UK for a decade, Dee Llewellyn, chair of UK Pride Organisers Network and director of partnerships and growth for London Pride, said corporate funding has 'fallen off a cliff', causing a number of events across the country close their doors, including big events such as Liverpool. The situation has led one expert to warn that 'the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over' for LGBTQ organisers. Mrs Llewellyn fears the LGBTQ community could experience 'five years of difficulty and struggles' as Trump fully implements the DEI cuts, adding 'it is the start of that process now.' 'I think we will see more global brands declining, not because they don't want to participate, but because they don't have the EDI budget to do so,' she added. 'It's not the people on the ground in the UK either, I've had brands that have withdrawn this year that were absolutely devastated to have to do it. 'But they've had their budgets cut from America and there was absolutely nothing they could do to argue or fight that in the UK.' Pride events across the country receive a bulk of funding from big businesses, varying on a scale of a minimum of 50 per cent funding to events like London, where approximately 95 per cent of the funding comes from corporate partnerships. Gary Richardson, an organiser from Worthing Pride whose regional celebrations were almost cancelled this year, said: 'It very much seems if they've got offices overseas, specifically in America, the DEI conversations that are happening there seem to be drip feeding into the economy over here'. John Hyland, former co-chair of Liverpool Pride and the Community Partnerships and Individual Giving Lead for LGBTQ charity Sahir, close supporters of Pride celebrations in the city, echoed Mr Richardson's point: 'When America sneezes, we all catch a cold.' 'Businesses seem to be a bit more reluctant to support LGBT organisations, which is having a massive impact on the likes of Pride,' he added. Pride in Liverpool had to cancel its plans this year due to 'significant financial and organisational challenges, which have impacted timescales and resulted in it reverting to an almost entirely volunteer-led operation.' Organisers severed ties with key sponsor Barclays in May after the bank's boss said it would prohibit Trans women from using female toilets in its buildings following the Supreme Court Ruling which ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. 'I think definitely in light of what's happened with the Supreme Court ruling, we've had a number of number of transgender community-led protests happen in Liverpool,' said Mr Hyland. 'If there's a year where we need Pride to happen, it's this year and our community has been very vocal about that.' As well as a decrease in corporate sponsorships, organisers have cited that local communities have struggled to fill the financial hole in Pride events planning due to the cost of living. Mr Hyland said that calls for support from local businesses in Liverpool fell through because 'they haven't got that kind of money.' On an average year where it costs around £140,000 to produce Worthing Pride over a weekend, 60 per cent of budgeting comes from sponsorship, while the rest comes from ticket sales. This year, the organisers are aiming for 70 per cent from ticket sales and 30 per cent from sponsors. Instead of receiving support from five to six big sponsors, they've managed to accrue 20 small sponsorships instead, with a number of companies offering pro bono support. Dr Francesca Ammaturo, senior lecturer in in Sociology and International Relations at London Metropolitan University, author of forthcoming book The Politics of Pride Events: Global and Local Challenges, said that while big businesses have taken on Pride as an issue of corporate responsibility, organisers have relied on corporate sponsorship because public funding has not always been accessible to the LGBTQ+ community. 'Pride events have become really dependent on them,' she said. 'Now when you insert the rollback that Trump is enacting on DEI policies, that is sending shockwaves not just across the US, but also across the globe because of globalisation. She added: 'The repercussions for these companies to sponsor pride events even beyond the US could be creating some backlashes at home. 'It's quite difficult for LGBT organisers today to accept that the golden era of corporate sponsorship might be over, at least for now until we realise what is the next political that we will encounter.' Dr Ammaturo added that big business involvement in Pride had always been 'a very superficial commitment' more akin to 'a marriage of convenience which was conducive to a certain veneer of rainbow washing'. Mrs Llewellyn said that despite the radical funding cuts, Pride will persist in the UK, adding: 'It's essential now more than ever, really more than it has been over the past 10 years for us to be able to stand together as a community to have that safe space for us to join together. 'Pride is a protest. That is what it was born and rooted in,' she added. 'We've been through lots of hardships as a community, but when we stand together and we unite our voices, that is when we're strongest.'