Lebanese Army reinforces its deployment on outskirts of Rmeish after Israeli incursion
The army described the incident as 'a blatant violation of U.N. Resolution 1701 and the cease-fire agreement.'
Resolution 1701, adopted in 2006, called for the cessation of hostilities, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon, the deployment of the Lebanese Army south of the Litani River, and the disarmament of all non-state militias.
'As a result, the Lebanese Army reinforced its deployment in the area to confront the enemy,' the statement said. 'A patrol from the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) arrived to document the violations, which forced the enemy forces to retreat back into occupied territory.'
The statement added that the Army Command 'continues to monitor developments along the southern border in coordination with UNIFIL.'
Under the cease-fire agreement, which came into effect on Nov. 27, Hezbollah was expected to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River, about 30 kilometers from the Israeli border, leaving only the Lebanese Army and U.N. peacekeeping forces in the area.
Despite the terms of the agreement, Israel has maintained its presence in five positions in southern Lebanon. Violations have persisted, with near-daily attacks and incursions into southern Lebanon, repeated strikes on the Bekaa, and four airstrikes on the southern suburbs of Beirut with the most recent being on June 5. These attacks have killed more than 270 people in Lebanon, including dozens of civilians, according to figures compiled by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and L'Orient Today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
6 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Israel bets on MAGA influencers to win over US youth
Israel's Foreign Ministry plans to fund a visit for figures aligned with the Make America Great Again (MAGA) and America First movements, according to the Israeli daily Haaretz. These conservative groups represent a key part of President Donald Trump's base. In order to counter what authorities consider a decline in support for Israel among young Americans, the tour will bring together 16 U.S.-based social media personalities under the age of 30, each with several hundred thousand to several million followers. The ultimate goal is to encourage the spread of pro-Israel messages in line with government. The contract has been awarded to the NGO Israel365, which will receive 290,000 shekels (about $86,000). The organization was selected because of its "unique position to advocate a pro-Israel vision close to the MAGA and America First movements." Founded in 2012, Israel365 promotes support for its state on "spiritual, biblical, and political" grounds. Its website states that it "unequivocally defends the divine right of the Jewish people to all of the land of Israel." The two-state solution is described there as a "delusion." The NGO says its mission is to "protect Western civilization against the dual threat of left-wing extremism and global jihad." According to Haaretz, ties between Israel365 and the MAGA movement have only grown stronger since the Hamas attacks in October 2023. This project is expected to mark a major turning point in the way the Israeli state communicates with the American public, according to the daily. The objective is now to reverse the trend and leverage the huge audiences of young influencers to bolster Israel's image in the United States. "While older Republicans remain supportive of Israel, positive views of Israel are declining across all younger age groups," sources from the Foreign Affairs Ministry told Haaretz. These officials acknowledge the effectiveness and impact of influencers on young people, stating that "their networks are immensely successful and their messages are more effective than if they came directly from the ministry." A strategy that has already proven successful during the recent 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran in June. Pro-Israel messages were viewed 1.8 billion times online, thanks in particular to social media influencers who have millions of followers. The Foreign Affairs Ministry has set a goal of bringing 550 delegations of influencers to Israel by the end of 2025 to continue this work.
L'Orient-Le Jour
6 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Death toll from violence in Sweida rises to more than 1,260
The violence in Syria's Sweida province (south) has left more than 1,260 dead before a cease-fire took effect Sunday, according to an updated toll published Monday by the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). The NGO said it has documented new deaths that occurred before the truce began. Among the dead are 505 Druze fighters and 298 Druze civilians, including 194 who were "summarily executed by members of the Defense and Interior Ministries." The toll also includes 408 members of government security forces and 35 Sunni Bedouins, including three civilians "summarily executed by Druze fighters." Fifteen government soldiers were also killed in Israeli strikes, according to SOHR.
L'Orient-Le Jour
6 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
No breakthrough in Barrack's latest trip to Beirut, all eyes on Berri
BEIRUT — The ball is in the Lebanese court. That is the main message from U.S. envoy Tom Barrack during his third visit to Beirut on Monday, to discuss the issue of Hezbollah's disarmament. The diplomat reaffirmed that this matter is up to the Lebanese authorities, who must define the approach themselves. After his meeting with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the U.S. envoy said that Hezbollah's disarmament is "an internal Lebanese issue," as Hezbollah circles accuse the Americans of wanting to impose this disarmament to "reassure Israel." 'The United States is not here to force Israel to do anything. We are here to use our influence to bring calm minds together around a solution,' he continued, believing that the cease-fire agreement reached in November to end the war between Hezbollah and the Hebrew state 'did not work.' Arriving in Beirut on Sunday evening, the U.S. envoy was first received by President Joseph Aoun before his meeting at the Grand Serail. According to the presidency, Aoun handed him a 'draft memorandum of understanding' outlining Lebanon's commitments since the cease-fire. These include points from the truce agreement, the president's inauguration speech, and the ministerial statement of Salam's Cabinet. Among these commitments, the presidency cited 'the urgent need to save Lebanon by extending the state's authority over its entire territory with nothing but its own forces, monopolizing arms exclusively in the hands of the Lebanese Army and asserting the authority of the Lebanese constitutional institutions over decisions of war and peace.' These factors must be ensured 'simultaneously and in parallel with maintaining Lebanese sovereignty over all its international borders, reconstruction, and the initiation of economic recovery.' Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' In his remarks, Barrack stated that 'President Donald Trump attaches importance to the situation in Lebanon and the restoration of stability in the region.' 'My return to Lebanon comes as Syria and the region have once again become unstable, and today we must focus on Lebanon to restore stability,' he stressed, affirming that he would 'continue his meetings with Lebanese officials working towards solutions,' whether on security issues or economic reforms. He also claims not to have taken note of Hezbollah's 'remarks' on his roadmap, adding that for the American administration, Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' with which it does not engage in dialogue. In short, no tangible progress was recorded during this tour. The U.S. envoy still insists on the need to move to operational steps for the state's weapons monopoly, through a clear and public decision by official Lebanon and with the approval of all parties. Certainly, according to L'Orient Today's information, the Lebanese response he received reaffirms Lebanon's attachment to the weapons monopoly as well as its commitment to the ministerial statement and the presidential inaugural address. But what Washington now expects is a concrete mechanism for implementation and the start of its execution. This mechanism is still to be defined in its details. These details concern the launch date of its implementation, considering it is meant to be conducted in several stages. The first would consist of a clear government decision in favor of the state's monopoly on arms. The second would see Hezbollah begin to hand over its weapons north of the Litani River, notably missiles and drones, with the United States pressuring Israel to avoid escalation, cease its aggressions, violations, and targeted assassinations. The third step should concern Beirut and its suburbs, especially the southern suburb, concurrently with American pressure on Israel to initiate a withdrawal from occupied points. The fourth stage would be dedicated to the withdrawal of weapons from the Bekaa region. Nabih Berri's proposal In this context, Lebanon has clearly expressed its requirements, particularly the effective cease-fire implementation by Israel, the need to activate the monitoring committee's work on the agreement, and the importance of maintaining the role of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). Barrack emphasized that the Lebanese state must prove its effectiveness and remain attentive to regional developments. Lebanon has also insisted on obtaining guarantees regarding control of the situation in Syria, in light of concerns expressed by several Lebanese factions regarding the repercussions of recent events in Syria, especially after the clashes in Sweida. Some believe that Hezbollah is using Syrian instability as a pretext to keep its weapons, citing the defense of the Shiite communities' presence in the area and the protection of border region. But Barrack's logic is clear: to end Israeli violations and strikes, Lebanon must begin to regain the weapons monopoly, as the State alone is responsible for the security of its citizens. The Lebanese response has not received Hezbollah's approval, as it does not consider itself concerned by this document. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the American proposal, believing that Washington is trying to reach a new agreement and is pressuring the Lebanese Army to remove his party's weapons at the risk of provoking civil war. In this context, the main issue remains Tuesday's scheduled meeting between Barrack and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. According to some reports, Berri is expected to put forward a proposal consisting of a 15-day suspension of Israeli military operations during which a serious dialogue would take place with Hezbollah on the mechanism for returning weapons to the state. The Americans have not yet responded to this proposal, but according to well-informed sources, Barrack should travel to Israel to discuss it with officials. Other meetings The envoy was also received by Elias Audi, the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan of Beirut, with whom he discussed the situation in Lebanon and the region, and by Druze leader Walid Jumblatt. L'Orient Today learned that Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rai will meet with Barrack on Wednesday, who is also expected to meet with the commander of the army, General Rodolphe Haykal. A dinner bringing together several MPs is also planned at the U.S. Embassy.
