Former head of Royal Navy sacked after conduct ‘fell far short'
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence said a full investigation has resulted in the termination of his service and commission.
Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin said: 'We expect the highest standards of behaviour from our service personnel and our civil servants.
'We investigate all allegations of inappropriate behaviour and will take robust action against anyone found to have fallen short of our standards, regardless of their seniority.'
Admiral Sir Ben said: 'I deeply regret my conduct in the spring of last year, which fell well below the standard I set for myself and that which I set for the Royal Navy.
'As such, I fully accept the decision of the Defence Council.
'I am very sorry to those I have hurt personally, and I apologise to everyone who serves with the Royal Navy.'
Sir Ben was the first sea lord from 2021 until May this year, when he was succeeded by General Sir Gwyn Jenkins of the Royal Marines.
Educated at Bromsgrove School, in Worcestershire, Admiral Sir Ben joined the navy in 1984 as a university cadet.
He qualified as both helicopter aircrew and as a principal warfare officer and as a junior officer saw service around the world in a variety of frigates and destroyers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
More police patrols in 12 Surrey towns in Safer Streets campaign
Twelve towns in Surrey have joined a government scheme to protect town centres from anti-social behaviour and Home Office Safer Streets summer campaign will see increased police patrols and enforcement, with offences such as shoplifting police and crime commissioner Lisa Townsend is also backing the says Surrey Police have identified "key hotspots that are now going to benefit from more police action". The towns taking part are:GuildfordDorkingCaterhamAddlestoneEpsomWalton-on-ThamesReigateBansteadFarnhamWokingCamberleyStaines "I don't feel safe," one woman from Addlestone told BBC Radio Surrey, adding: "We need more police on the streets.""Certain areas feel very unsafe, especially at night time, you can definitely see a lot of anti-social behaviour," another Addlestone resident said. Ms Townsend said: "You'll see an increased police presence, including specific patrols tackling retail crime and anti-social behaviour."Plain clothes officers will be in our busiest night time hot spots and there'll be joint operations to stop crime that's enabled by mopeds and motorbikes."The Safer Streets campaign will run until September, with the Home Office promising 13,000 more police officers, PCSOs and special constables across the UK.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jersey politicians clash ahead of tenancy law debate
Jersey politicians on opposing sides of an argument around the rights of tenants and landlords have clashed ahead of a debate on changing the island's tenancy changes to the existing legislation put forward by Housing Minister Deputy Sam Mezec would enable tenants to challenge rent increases and there would be a limit on the use of fixed-term Sir Philip Bailhache, who is also a landlord, called the changes "fundamentally unfair" and lodged amendments to "delete" Mezec's there is no limit to how often and by how much a landlord can increase the rent on their property and tenants have no right to appeal any changes. 'Unnecessary bureaucracy' Landlords can also issue a three-month notice period to evict a tenant without reason. The proposed tenancy law would see changes including rent increases capped at 5%, limited use of fixed-term tenancies, and shorter notice periods for bad Philip called the changes "unnecessary bureaucracy"."It's unfair on landlords to restrict their rent increases to 5% a year when inflation may be considerably higher and their own expenses of maintenance and renewals and so forth will not be capped at 5%," he said. "I don't think it will make life better for tenants because it is true that rents are high but that is a reflection of the value of property in the island."He added the changes could make landlords leave the market, reducing the number of rental properties and increasing Phillip said members of the government who own properties for rent would be able to "look at the issue objectively". 'Lack of compassion' Mezec said Sir Philip had not attempted to discuss his concerns about the law changes with him ahead of lodging his "ill-informed amendment". He said: "It [his proposals] strikes the right balance of protecting landlords when the tenant is causing a problem, but [also] protecting tenants when it's the landlord causing a problem."He added that increasing rents at times of high inflation was "enforcing hardship on tenants"."Surely this is a burden that ought to be shared," he said. "I think that it shows a lack of compassion and understanding for the experience of people who rent their homes in Jersey where it's already extortionately expensive compared to lots of other places in the world." Patrick Lynch, from the charity Caritas Jersey, said people had come to the charity for advice after having up to 30% increases put on their rent. "If those are limited then those ways of increasing rents that perhaps are not fair will be stopped," he said."That will be a benefit to the people who really just cannot afford those at the moment."As a result of viewing the legislation I think its very balanced for both sides." 'Difficult for landords' Guy Morris of Jersey's Landlords Association warned a survey showed 70% of island landlords would consider selling one unit of their portfolio if the changes came in to force. "It's going to make it really difficult for landlords to make ends meet in the future, he said."Landlords' costs have gone up by substantially more than the Retail Prices Index in recent years." He added that changes included limiting rent increases to once a year were already being done by "most responsible landlords".Later, politicians will have an in principle debate on whether the law should be actual details of the law will be discussed in September, including Sir Phillip's amendments.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Scrutiny concerns over new Jersey maritime legislation
A scrutiny panel in Jersey has raised concerns after it reviewed proposed regulations aimed at strengthening maritime legislation on the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel said new proposed legislation did not include "sufficient provisions to deter operators of ships navigating while under the influence of alcohol or drugs".It said under the proposed changes, law enforcement would only be permitted to test for alcohol or drugs if a vessel had operated in a careless way or where it had resulted in the serious injury or death of another person. The panel said the new proposed legislation was not being "taken seriously enough". The proposition will be debated later. 'Mixed message' "The panel believes this sends a very mixed message from the Government about what is acceptable when operating a vessel and is at odds with what is expected of road users," it its comments paper, the panel recommended the minister for Sustainable Economic Development should analyse the data of all maritime accidents and call outs of the coastguard on a quarterly basis to establish if there had been an increase in cases that involved drugs or there was, the panel suggested the minister should consider updating the regulations to include provisions for breathalysing ship operators on suspicion of alcohol or drug consumption. Deputy Montfort Tadier, the chair of the panel said while evidence suggested the number of incidents involving drugs or alcohol in the island's water was "relatively low", the figures were likely to only reflect occasions when they were tested said: "What concerns the panel is that incidents involving drugs or alcohol may be missed as they do not meet the thresholds of dangerous or careless operation of a vessel or have not resulted in the death or serious injury of another person. "The panel recognises that it is not necessarily appropriate to apply the rules of the road to the sea, but we do recognise that like cars, vans and trucks, boats can be very dangerous too, when operated incorrectly."The panel therefore cannot accept that the proposed regulations fully meet their intended purpose and will be considering its next steps."The proposition is due to be debated by the States Assembly on Tuesday.
