Gen Z support for Trump collapses amid Epstein fallout
The US president's approval rating among 18 to 29-year-olds fell from roughly even around the time of his inauguration in January to minus 40 by July, according to analysis of YouGov data by the pollster G Elliott Morris.
Gen Z voters swung towards Mr Trump in last year's election, even though support for Republican candidates tends to lag among younger voters, but this has collapsed in the months since.
Mr Trump is facing the biggest crisis of his second term over his handling of the Epstein files, with his administration refusing to make public all of its documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile financier, who died in 2019.
By the US president's own account, he was friends with Epstein for about 15 years before they fell out in the early 2000s.
The drop in support could be a hopeful sign for the Democrats, many of whom were panicked by Mr Trump's support among younger voters when he won last year's presidential election, almost equalling his opponent Kamala Harris for support among 18 to 29-year-olds.
However, data appear to show that a drop in approval for Mr Trump is not necessarily translating to support for the Left-wing party, Axios reported.
A separate poll for CBS News and YouGov published on Sunday showed 8 per cent of Democrats, 17 per cent of independents and 50 per cent of Republicans approved of Mr Trump's handling of the Epstein case.
It also revealed widespread scepticism of his handling of the economy, with 36 per cent approving of his handling of inflation compared with almost two thirds against.
Almost half believed Mr Trump's ' one big, beautiful bill ', which passed Congress last month, would hurt their family, compared with 25 per cent who believed it would help.
The legislation extends tax cuts from the president's first term in 2017, but also cuts funding for Medicaid, which covers medical costs for low-income Americans, by trillions of dollars, despite Mr Trump's election pledge not to do so.
However, the Democrats are hugely unpopular, failing to regroup following a series of shattering defeats in November's elections.
Just 28 per cent had a favourable opinion of the party, according to a CNN poll conducted between July 10 and July 13, compared with 54 per cent who were unfavourable.
This marks a small dip from shortly before Mr Trump's inauguration in January this year, when 33 per cent had a favourable opinion compared with 48 per cent who were unfavourable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Alan Dershowitz says he's suing Martha's Vineyard vendor for refusing to sell him pierogi
If there's one thing that can be counted on every summer, it is that Alan Dershowitz will make a loud public stink about the social angst he suffers at Martha's Vineyard. This time around, the former Jeffrey Epstein lawyer is crying foul that he was refused pierogi at a farmer's market, claiming he was discriminated against due to his political beliefs and that he will be suing the vendor for violating his rights. Meanwhile, a local resident who captured Dershowitz being confronted by local police over the incident tells The Independen t that he stepped in to stop the famed defense attorney from continuing to harass the vendor, who reached out to thank him later and even offered him some free pierogi for his troubles. 'I'm somewhat fearless when it comes to facing these types of bullies,' the vendor said. Dershowitz, who has been in the news recently amid the uproar over the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files, took to his social media accounts Wednesday night to loudly complain about the latest shunning he'd experienced at the summer playground for the ultra-wealthy. 'Bigoted vendor @ Martha's Vineyard Farmer's Market refused to sell to me for political reasons. I'm suing,' he tweeted while promoting an upcoming broadcast of his online show on Rumble, a right-wing-friendly alternative to YouTube. During his Rumble show that evening, Dershowitz reiterated that he would be filing a lawsuit against the business Good Pierogi, making sure to toss in a bit of criticism about their product for good measure. 'There was the pierogi place,' Dershowitz said. 'They're Ukrainian, Russian delicacies. And I had gone there a few times before, and I bought the pierogi. They were OK. They were not my grandmother's pierogi, but they were OK.' He went on to claim that after he asked for six pierogi, the vendor told him they wouldn't sell to him because they 'don't approve' of his politics, who he has represented legally in the past and who he supports politically. 'The clear implication was that he opposed me because I defended Donald Trump on the floor of the Senate,' he added. 'I think that's illegal.' In a video posted to Instagram on Wednesday by resident Chris Hulbert, Dershowitz could be seen speaking to a West Tisbury police officer about the incident. Throughout the exchange, Dershowitz could be heard griping that the vendor 'won't sell to me' while the officer pulled the emeritus Harvard Law professor to the side to talk about the issue. With Dershowitz also taping the conversation on his phone, the officer disagreed with Dershowitz that Good Pierogi was violating Massachusetts law because he understood that private establishments had the right of refusal. While the officer added that the former Trump impeachment attorney could pursue a complaint against the vendor through 'civil means,' he also asked for Dershowitz to stay away from the vendor and the respect that it was private property. Dershowitz, on the other hand, continued to debate that the vendor did not have the right to discriminate against him based on his personal politics – all while pointing out that he would be posting the footage online. In his Instagram post, Hulbert claimed that he stopped the celebrity lawyer 'from harassing a vendor who wouldn't serve him pierogi at the farmer's market on Martha's Vineyard,' noting that he also 'made a statement to the police.' Hulbert further asserted that the police officer had threatened to cite Dershowitz for trespassing if he bothered other vendors, insisting that three others at the market also refused to serve the attorney. 'The police took a [statement] from me. No one else wanted to do it because he sues everyone here. Was talking about suing the vendor. Total scum!' Hulbert wrote, prompting Good Pierogi to reply 'thank you so much' on his Instagram post. In an interview with The Independent, Hulbert spoke about his interaction with Dershowitz, noting that he wasn't initially aware that it was the celebrated lawyer when he first happened upon him. 'He was already rejected by the vendor, and then started b*tching and complaining and videotaping his statements to try to dissuade people from patronizing the vendor, and I walked up and I had no idea who he was,' Hulbert said. 'So his statement was that because of his political views, they weren't serving him.' After Hulbert asked what political views caused him to be refused service and whether it was because he's a 'Trumper,' he claimed that Dershowitz insisted it's 'the opposite' and that he 'opposes Trump.' Instead, according to Hulbert, Dershowitz said 'they object to my clients' before revealing that he's represented Trump and Epstein. At this point, Hulbert noted, he realized who Dershowitz was. After Hulbert claimed he told Dershowitz that he'd be 'really pleased to know' that he was the vice president of Take Back New York and lobbied for the passage of New York's sex offender registry act, he said Dershowitz became distracted and briefly stopped bothering and videotaping the vendor. Hulbert also told The Independent that it was the police officer who informed him that three other vendors at the market had complained about Dershowitz and also may have refused him service as well. While Hulbert says he hasn't heard back from the police department or Dershowitz amid the legal complaints, he did note that Good Pierogi had thanked him for coming to their aid and offered to give him some free pierogi. He also said that he wasn't worried about any potential blowback from Dershowitz himself. 'If I had to, I could defend myself or retain counsel if I needed to fight fire with fire,' he concluded. 'I'm somewhat fearless when it comes to facing these types of bullies.' When reached for comment about the incident, West Tisbury Police Dept. Chief Matthew L. Mincone told The Independent that he's 'reviewing the information and will forward any/all reports per' our request. Dershowitz and Good Pierogi did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In recent years, it has become commonplace for Dershowitz to grouse about his social suffering at the exclusive enclave, which he has largely chalked up to his defense of Trump since the president's first administration. After Dershowitz first began griping in 2018 that he'd become ostracized by the Martha's Vineyard social elite, the New York Times ran no less than four separate stories about his complaints – including an interview with the longtime Harvard Law professor. In fact, the Times' executive editor admitted that the Gray Lady had done too many Dershowitz stories. 'We are trying to increase our coverage of cranky white guys,' Dean Baquet joked to The Daily Beast at the time. 'Seriously, it's a big place and different desks made their own plans. We should have coordinated better and done fewer.' Since then, Dershowitz has continued to publicly fume about being 'blackballed' on the island, which has included book fairs canceling his appearances, invitations to cocktail parties drying up and comedian Larry David 'screaming' at him at a Chilmark store. On top of that, Dershowitz made his 'cancellation' at Martha's Vineyard one of the central themes in his 2022 book The Price of Principle: Why Integrity Is Worth the Consequences.
Daily Mirror
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump broke royal protocol over 'tricky' rule Royal Family rule says ex-butler
Donald Trump was seen breaking royal protocol during his visit to Scotland earlier this week as an ex-royal butler has now weighed in on the US president's faux pas A former royal butler has suggested that Donald Trump committed a major blunder that broke royal protocol during his visit to Scotland earlier this week. Following his arrival on Scottish territory last Friday (July 25), the controversial American president spent four hectic days opening a new golf course and fielding questions from journalists alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. During one of his media exchanges, the president at one point addressed King Charles and Queen Camilla using only their first names. This represents a blunder that is commonly understood to violate established royal protocol regarding how the monarch and his queen consort should be addressed. Outlining the rule, ex-royal butler Grant Harrold explained: "You should never call the Royal Family by their first names, even family use their correct titles, like 'Your Majesty'. " The former palace employee offered the president some leniency, suggesting there could be a minor exception given the American leader's citizenship. He continued: "Trump really should be referring to them as King Charles and Queen Camilla. It's a tricky one because, being American, he doesn't need to refer to them by their titles, but out of politeness and in the name of good etiquette, he should." Grant went on in his discussion with Slingo: "To call the royals by their first names, I would consider that a breach in protocol. The King won't be so bothered by it, but I can imagine the courtiers will not be best pleased." Meanwhile, Trump claimed the historic trade deal between the US and EU was the "biggest deal ever made" during a meeting with Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. He was also spotted launching another course at his Trump International Golf Links venue that opened in Aberdeenshire in 2012. Speaking to reporters at the ribbon-cutting ceremony, he declared: "It's going to be a special day, it's going to be a special year, a special decade." Addressing those gathered at the event he added: "I hope everyone in Scotland, and well beyond Scotland enjoys it (the golf course) for many, many years to come." The 79-year-old has deep ties with Scotland after his mum, Mary Anne Trump, was born and brought up on the Isle of Lewis, which sits in the north west of the country. In 2006, his bond with the nation strengthened further when he bought land in Aberdeenshire to construct his Trump International Golf Links.
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Voters will agree with Donald Trump, not Ed Miliband about wind farms
Who's right about wind farms? Donald Trump or Labour and the SNP? The question arises because the wheels of Air Force One had barely touched down back in the USA before his opponents started singing the praises of wind farms. After Trump's pretty savage attack in which he described them, variously, as 'ugly' and as bird killers, ministers from both the British and Scottish Governments queued up to disagree with him. Labour and the SNP heaped praise on the decision to allow the development of what may turn out to be one of the world's biggest wind farms – with 307 turbines – at what's known as Berwick Bank, off the coast of East Lothian. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray welcomed the decision taken by the SNP – an extremely rare event – and said it tied in with his determination to prioritise more clean energy jobs in Scotland. And he said that the Berwick Bank project had the potential to make a 'huge contribution' to the UK Government's energy policy. Mind you, I don't for a second think that Mr Murray's priorities played any part in the Nats' decision. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband also praised the SNP decision saying that it meant the British Government was now 'within touching distance' of its offshore wind targets to deliver clean power by 2030. He added that the Berwick Bank decision was helping secure Britain's energy security. However, it's pretty certain that the relevant SNP minister, Kate Forbes, while acknowledging the gratitude of her political enemies, would prefer to hail her decision as a major contribution to Scotland's – and not necessarily Britain's – energy future. With opponents of this huge venture insisting that a wind farm on this scale would result in the death of thousands of sea birds – including everyone's favourite, puffins – Scotland's Deputy First Minister insisted that her final approval was subject to a 'detailed seabird compensation plan', to show how the birds could be saved. How's that for a bit of typical SNP 'havering' and trying to keep everyone sweet – from hungry developers to bird lovers? But Kate Forbes is at least one of the more practical nationalists and said that this project was a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy. During his recent Scottish visit Trump returned to his frequently expressed view that wind turbines were 'ugly, costly and harmful to wildlife', while large scale wind farms were 'a con job'. Both Labour and the SNP are super-keen on renewables, but while voters might still be persuaded about a rosy future for wind power, ministers in both parties would be mad to sneer at Trump's words about North Sea oil and gas being a 'treasure chest' for the UK. I'm certain that a great many voters agree with him, and will vote accordingly in next year's Scottish Parliament election.
