Credit Suisse Services AG admits to U.S. tax conspiracy involving Singapore accounts
The announcement was made on 6 May 2025 via a press release issued by the Office of Public Affairs of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
Alongside the guilty plea, Credit Suisse Services AG entered into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) concerning undeclared U.S. accounts held at Credit Suisse AG Singapore.
The NPA requires the company to cooperate with ongoing DOJ investigations and pay over US$510 million in penalties, restitution, asset forfeiture, and fines.
According to court documents cited in the DOJ's release, the conspiracy spanned from 1 January 2010 until approximately July 2021.
During this time, Credit Suisse AG worked with employees, U.S. clients, and others to obscure ownership and control of assets to evade IRS scrutiny.
The scheme involved maintaining undeclared offshore accounts and facilitating various private banking services designed to help U.S. taxpayers avoid disclosing assets and income.
Bankers involved in the scheme falsified documents, processed fraudulent donation records, and failed to ensure compliance with U.S. tax laws. At least US$1 billion in accounts were serviced without verifying tax compliance.
This conduct violated the terms of a 2014 plea agreement in which Credit Suisse AG had already admitted to similar wrongdoing.
The DOJ determined that the bank engaged in 'new criminal conduct,' thereby breaching the earlier deal.
Between 2014 and June 2023, Credit Suisse AG Singapore held undeclared accounts for U.S. persons with over US$2 billion in assets. It failed to identify beneficial owners and neglected to investigate signs that account holders were U.S. taxpayers.
Following the merger of UBS AG Singapore and Credit Suisse AG Singapore in 2023, UBS discovered the undeclared accounts and voluntarily reported them to the DOJ. UBS froze some of the accounts and initiated an internal review.
The DOJ noted that, under the resolution, Credit Suisse Services AG—and by extension, UBS AG—is required to provide ongoing cooperation and disclose any further relevant information.
The agreements provide no immunity to individual employees or clients involved. Legal proceedings against such individuals may still be pursued.
Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the DOJ's Tax Division, U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia, and IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Chief Guy Ficco jointly announced the resolution.
According to the press release, IRS-CI agents from its International Tax & Financial Crimes group conducted the investigation with support from the DOJ's Office of International Affairs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Buffett's Berkshire sells one-third of VeriSign stake for US$1.23 billion
BERKSHIRE Hathaway sold about one-third of its stake in VeriSign, an internet infrastructure and domain name registry company that Warren Buffett's conglomerate has invested in since 2012, VeriSign said on Monday. The sale of 4.3 million VeriSign shares at US$285 each generated gross proceeds of about US$1.23 billion, reducing Berkshire's ownership stake to 9.6 per cent from 14.2 per cent. Buffett's company may sell an additional 515,032 shares to meet demand, and VeriSign will receive no proceeds from the sale, VeriSign said. VeriSign, based in Reston, Virginia, said the sale was intended to reduce Berkshire's stake to below 10 per cent, a threshold that triggers regulatory obligations. The price was a 6.9 per cent discount to VeriSign's closing price of US$305.98. In after-hours trading, VeriSign shares fell 5.9 per cent to US$288.00. Berkshire did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside business hours. Buffett's company owned about 13.29 million VeriSign shares as of March 31, a regulatory filing shows. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up That stake was worth about US$4.07 billion before the sale, based on the US$305.98 closing price. VeriSign traded at less than one-sixth that level when Berkshire began buying. Berkshire ended March with US$347.7 billion of cash, and through that month was a net seller of stocks for 10 straight quarters. It had nevertheless been adding to its VeriSign stake as recently as January. Berkshire's smaller investments in technology-related companies have often been spearheaded by Buffett's portfolio managers, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. Buffett, 94, has run Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire since 1965. He is expected to step down as chief executive at the end of the year and be replaced by Vice-Chairman Greg Abel, 63. Buffett would remain chairman. JPMorgan Securities underwrote the VeriSign share sale. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Jane Street to argue that retail demand drove its India trades
[HONG KONG] Jane Street Group is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, sources familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defence against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favour of its options bets on multiple days. Jane Street said on Monday (Jul 28) that it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, Sebi lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees (S$718 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from Sebi detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinised. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the sources familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the sources said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2 per cent at the open and fell further during the day. Sebi alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the sources familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about US$4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street, which was acting as a market maker, facilitated about US$1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities, the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. Partial hedging Sebi's order said that Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16 per cent and 25 per cent of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the sources familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10 per cent of it could have been hedged, partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the sources said it will argue. Sebi did not respond to a request for comment. Huge turnover Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of US dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets, has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative', though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at Sebi's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who is not involved in the case, said that too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices', he said. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
The hidden hurdles behind building South-east Asia's $129b supergrid
Singapore is aiming to import 6 gigawatts of low-carbon power from neighbors by 2035, up from nearly zero today. VIENTIANE – The hardest part of building a wind farm along the misty ridges of southern Laos wasn't hauling 25-ton blades up mountain roads or laying 71km of cables in thick vegetation. It wasn't even removing unexploded bombs left over from the Vietnam War. Instead, it was bureaucracy that kept engineering veteran Nat Hutanuwatr up at night – the delicate diplomacy and seemingly endless paperwork required for neighbouring South-east Asian nations to share clean electricity. It was, he says, like 'climbing a series of Everests'. After more than a decade of government talks, biodiversity surveys and financial negotiations, Mr Hutanuwatr's Monsoon Wind started exporting power to Vietnam in July. Its 133 turbines bring a heterogeneous region of 700 million people one step closer to a long-awaited supergrid – a vast, interconnected power network that will eventually carry clean energy from the expansive north to densely populated islands to the south. Part of the ambition behind the grid is fuelled by environmental concerns. South-east Asia is a major driver of coal growth and breaking that dependence on fossil fuels – vital for the world to avoid the worst climate-change scenarios – requires a single network that allows inexpensive, clean power to flow. Reliable green electricity is also critical for a region that aims to succeed China as the factory of the world, attracting billions from major manufacturers with weighty climate commitments, from Apple to Samsung. An interconnected grid could boost the GDP of every South-east Asian country by between 0.8 and 4.6 percentage points, according to a US-funded study. Yet executing that vision has proved complex. Asean – the grouping of ten nations that is the region's main political organization and a key proponent of the supergrid – has long struggled with diverging priorities and tends to avoid bold decisions. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thirty dead, over 80,000 evacuated, following heavy rain in Beijing World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres Business BYD tops Singapore car sales in first half of 2025 with almost one-fifth of the market Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far Sport Dare to dream, urges Singapore's first International Swimming Hall of Famer Joseph Schooling Singapore 44 suspects under probe for involvement in SIM card fraud It has no framework for cross-border energy deals, leaving developers alone to navigate a matrix of varying technical specifications and local political hurdles. And that's before considering the outlay, an investment that would require at least US$100 billion (S$129 billion) by 2045, according to the Asian Development Bank, roughly a quarter of Malaysia's gross domestic product. All of this makes Monsoon Wind an encouraging milestone, and evidence that a push is finally in motion to connect countries from Myanmar to the scattered islands of the Philippines and Indonesia. 'We want this to be a role model for cross-border renewable energy exchange,' said Mr Hutanuwatr, the chief operating officer of Bangkok-based renewables developer Impact Electrons Siam. 'If we start with bilateral deals like our project, we can showcase how to make it work.' There is heartening movement elsewhere too, with a 30km cable due to connect Malaysia's hydropower-rich Sarawak state to neighboring Sabah by October. That will eventually link up with the rest of the island of Borneo, including Indonesia's provinces and Brunei, and then with peninsular Malaysia across the South China Sea. These are small wins, but the industry is celebrating. Mr Hutanuwatr still spends his days poring over paperwork in a makeshift office or driving over rough terrain to inspect wind turbines, but he hosted a team party in June to mark the completion of the Monsoon Wind farm. With a bottle of beer in hand, dressed in jeans and a hoodie emblazoned with the project name, he addressed a cheerful crowd of workers, recalling the first visit to pitch the idea of importing power to Vietnam's state utility. 'They looked at us like we were crazy,' the 56-year-old said, smiling. The utility insisted he secure approvals from both Vietnam's prime minister and the Laos National Assembly – no small feat in countries where decisions are not always transparent or swift. He ultimately did as asked. 'We now have expertise in negotiating with a range of difficult stakeholders,' he declared, before joining a round of karaoke. Patchy progress Leaders in South-east Asia, a region of political, geographic and economic diversity, first floated the idea of a supergrid in the late 1990s, but progress stalled for years due to the absence of a single vision and a patchwork of protectionist energy policies. 'Asean doesn't have the institutional set-up to support this kind of ambitious infrastructure project,' said Mr Hans Vriens of Singapore-based political risk advisory firm Vriens & Partners. 'The supergrid is the perfect excuse to keep going to meetings and talking, while actually doing nothing.' Connections remained limited until a breakthrough 2018 pilot project linked Laos, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore. That proved regional power trading was viable. Since then, progress has been tentative at best. In 2021, Malaysia banned sending solar power to neighbours to protect its local industry. It reversed the halt two years later, hoping to take advantage of demand from Singapore. Exporting renewable energy also became a hot political issue in Indonesia, but its projects have recently signed clean power deals with Singapore. The efforts that have succeeded are far too limited to cope with the rapid growth of power demand. Electricity consumption is set to grow 4 per cent annually through 2035, but annual investment in grid infrastructure needs to more than double to around US$22 billion just to keep pace, according to the International Energy Agency. Without interconnected networks, a much-needed rapid scale-up of renewables will stall. Bureaucracies haven't helped. While Asean has identified 18 priority grid connection projects that it aims to complete by 2045 – formally known as the Asean Power Grid – more than half of these supergrid projects are still in early planning stages, with timelines ranging from two years to indefinite. The lack of an integrated regional power market, plus the absence of harmonised grid codes of the kind seen in the European Union, are a 'major barrier' to scaling up connectivity projects, according to Ms Nadhilah Shani of the Asean Centre for Energy, a hub that tries to connect utilities, governments and developers. The ASEAN Secretariat did not respond to emailed requests for comment. Singapore and the supergrid But there is growing official enthusiasm, not least in Singapore – the wealthy financial hub eager to bolster both energy security and green credentials. The island is aiming to import 6 gigawatts of low-carbon power from neighbors by 2035, up from nearly zero today. Since 2021, it has backed a series of headline-grabbing projects through public tenders: a subsea cable to carry solar power from Indonesia, another to import hydro from Malaysia, and a hybrid land-and-sea transmission line to wheel offshore wind from Vietnam. The country began importing a limited amount of power from Laos in 2022. The splashiest of all, the SunCable project to bring Australian solar power thousands of kilometers across the sea to Singapore, is estimated at over US$20 billion. Singapore has set up a dedicated state-linked firm to manage such complex cross-border city-state's objectives are clear: a country less than half the size of Rhode Island doesn't have space for renewables, so it has no other option than to use its vast wealth to fund projects elsewhere and import the power. Currently dependent on natural gas, it also needs greener energy to support its tech, financial and climate leadership ambitions. 'Singapore has contributed directly to regional integration efforts,' said a spokesperson for the country's Energy Market Authority. It's studying how to enable efficient long-distance transmission and 'establish a framework that will facilitate the development of subsea power cables needed to realise the Asean Power Grid.' The South-east Asian country has become a 'champion' of the supergrid, said Ms Dinita Setyawati, a senior energy analyst at think tank Ember – and its ambitions could help the region make meaningful advances. 'We're seeing more progress in the past two years alone than in the past 20 years,' she said. 'If we can have other Asean countries on board and take a more active role,' then the 2045 target should be realised. Back on the Laos border, Mr Hutanuwatr and his team have started sending power to the 'backbone' of Vietnam's grid. At its full capacity of 600 megawatts, the project will generate enough to power hundreds of thousands of homes and factories. 'These bilateral trades are actually stepping stones that are essential. Then you replicate,' said Mr Pablo Hevia-Koch, head of the International Energy Agency's renewables integration. 'It allows Asean to benefit incrementally from early-stage trading, while building the foundation for future.' Mr Hutanuwatr credits the project's completion to his team's pragmatism. But Monsoon Wind's success lays bare the difficulties still ahead for those eager to repeat the feat. Every approval, every connection, every agreement was hard-fought, and one of a kind. A playbook would make it far easier for others to follow, Mr Hutanuwatr argues. For now, 'there are no given solutions,' he said, shrugging. 'You just have to figure it out as you go.' Bloomberg
