logo
‘Jurassic World: Rebirth' Review: For the Love of God, Can Something Please Kill All the Dinosaurs Again

‘Jurassic World: Rebirth' Review: For the Love of God, Can Something Please Kill All the Dinosaurs Again

Yahooa day ago
The 'Jurassic' franchise has long become a lot like the bioengineered mutant dinosaur — amusingly dubbed 'Distortus Rex' — that escapes from an InGen research facility in the series' loud nap of a new installment: Pointless to keep alive but impossible to kill.
The mere existence of Gareth Edwards' 'Jurassic World: Rebirth' would have been enough to clarify that condition, and yet this back-to-basics standalone — arriving just a few summers after the franchise's bone-dumb second trilogy ended with a billion-dollar blah — takes pains to remind us that the 'Jurassic' period won't stop printing money just because Universal doesn't know how to spend it. To misquote a certain mathematician: 'Your executives were so unpreoccupied with whether or not they should, they didn't stop to think if they could.'
More from IndieWire
'The Naked Gun' Is the Most Important Movie of the Summer
Celine Song Says Audiences Are 'Scared' of Taking Rom-Coms Seriously Due to 'Misogyny'
In that sense, and in that sense only, I have no choice but to admit that Edwards' installment lives up to its much-advertised promise as a tribute to the 1993 masterpiece that started it all. 'Rebirth' certainly isn't any better than the previous five sequels that have already hatched from the original (though I'm relieved to report that it's less bloated and self-impressed than the last three), but the sheer nothingness of its spectacle — combined with a complete non-story that feels like it was 65 million studio notes in the making — allows it to become a singularly perfect legacy for Steven Spielberg's classic about how people lack the power to control their own creations.
Life finds a way, and no 'Jurassic' movie since the first one has more convincingly illustrated how, in the absence of evolution, survival is forced to become its own reward.
That idea is baked into the premise of David Koepp's script, which takes place 32 years after 'dinosaurs came back,' and roughly a decade after people grew bored of them (Koepp very much included). Parks aren't profitable, museums are empty, and the fine citizens of DUMBO just honk their horns at each other when a massive herbivore escapes from the zoo for a nap under the Brooklyn Bridge. And as if things weren't bad enough for our cold-blooded friends, it turns out that global warming isn't the best vibe for prehistoric lizards, and most of the remaining dinosaurs have retreated to a handful of equatorial islands whose climate more closely resembles the ancient world. We don't bother them, they don't bother us, and nature is left to run its course — or it would have been if not for all of those meddling corporations.
This time it's a pharmaceutical giant called ParkerGenix, whose scientists have discovered that a trillion-dollar cure for heart disease could be cultivated from the blood of the three biggest dinosaurs left on Earth. Naturally, they want to brand it before anyone else gets the chance (nothing revs up the imagination like a race for medical patents!), which is why they've given sleazebag goon Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend, serving yassified Dennis Nedry) the blank check necessary to hire a team capable of going to Skull Island — or whatever the abandoned InGen testing site is called — and getting the samples ParkerGenix needs.
Leading the pack is former special-forces operative Zora Bennett (a pathologically chipper Scarlett Johansson, often rocking some casual Linda Hamilton cosplay), who's allegedly still reeling from the death of a beloved colleague on her most recent mission. I say 'allegedly' because she never shows a hint of human emotion, even after witnessing the death of a beloved colleague on her current mission, but everyone makes a point of paying their condolences for her loss. After walking away with $200 million of ParkerGenix's money, Zora will be able to pay for them herself.
Her Suriname-based war buddy Duncan Kincaid (Mahershala Ali, whose role is all presence and no acting) is hoping for a similar reward. Getting rich wouldn't ease the grief he feels for his dead son, which is a mighty cheap device for a movie so uninterested in its characters (Koepp's script doesn't exactly follow through on the notion of people internalizing 'life finds a way' on their own terms), but getting chewed alive by dinosaurs wouldn't hurt the guy anymore than he already is. Ed Skrein is definitely also there, along with Bechir Sylvain and Philippine Velge, who might as well be wearing t-shirts that say 'eat me first.' Styled to look like Steve from 'Sex and the City,' 'Wicked' star Jonathan Bailey rounds out the team as the bookish paleontologist Henry Loomis, who studied under franchise icon Dr. Alan Grant, but is still dumb enough to go to an InGen island full of untamed dinosaurs.
Adventurous dad Reuben Delgado (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) might be even dumber for thinking he can sail around it, as the known existence of prehistoric species doesn't stop him from steering his two daughters — and the older one's wastoid boyfriend — straight through Mosasaurus territory as they make their way across the Atlantic. (These characters are introduced with a Vampire Weekend song, which is an amusingly multiplex-brained way of teeing up the fact that Reuben's eldest is going to NYU in the fall.) Zora's crew bails them out from the inevitable attack that follows, but the dinos return with a vengeance, and it isn't long before all of the film's characters find themselves stranded on the same island where the Distortus Rex escaped from its enclosure during the film's prologue (a sequence that bears an uncanny resemblance to the prologue from Edwards' own 'Godzilla,' and is worth noting in a movie that betrays almost no other trace of its director's fingerprints).
From there, the rest of the film adheres to video game logic: If Zora's team can successfully extract blood from a swimming dino (the aforementioned Mosasaurus), a land dino (Titanosaurus), and a sky dinosaur (Quetzalcoatlus), they'll unlock the secret fourth boss you've spent the whole movie waiting to show up. Spoiler alert: It does! Distortus is a big ugly chungus, and it basically does so little that its enormous paw tracks are the only impression its capable of leaving behind.
That would be disappointing in and of itself, but it's even more so with an effects wizard like Edwards at the helm, whose 'Godzilla' remains among the most sweeping and majestic monster movies of the 21st century (in addition to being an unfathomably perfect audition reel for directing a 'Jurassic' sequel). It's no secret that Edwards joined 'Rebirth' just a short while before it raced into production, and that Universal targeted 'The Creator' creator because he was one of the only proven filmmakers capable of delivering a CGI-fest like this in time for its predetermined summer 2025 release date. And as we all remember from 'Jurassic Park,' there are never any negative consequences for operating on a timeline that prioritizes shareholder value above structural integrity.
It would be disingenuous to suggest that 'Rebirth' is totally deprived of tolerable setpieces and/or well-engineered thrills; the T-Rex cameo has some fun with an inflatable raft, while the Quetzalcoatlus sequence introduces a high-flying pinch of 'Indiana Jones' into a movie so desperate to coast off Spielbergian magic that it doesn't seem to care where it comes from. Edwards might have done better to set his sights on Joe Johnson-level fun, as 'Rebirth' — which channels the straightforwardness of 'Jurassic Park III' — would kill for a single moment that matches the aura of the Pteranodon emerging from the fog. Alas, to a less explicit but similarly enervating degree as the previous 'Jurassic World' titles, this movie is undone by its need to make dinosaurs feel modern enough to compete against the rest of today's multiplex fare.
Much as I appreciate Edwards' decision to shoot on 35mm film, his facility with CGI ends up being less of a feature than a bug in the context of a franchise that requires your brain to believe in the context of its franchise. The dinosaur attacks in the original movie are so terrifying because of how palpably they collapse 65 million years of animal instinct — and how credibly they straddle the line between nightmare fuel and waking life.
When the T-Rex runs its claws along the unelectrified fence of its paddock, our intellectual discomfort at the idea of playing God suddenly crystallizes into the stuff of clear and present danger. When the kids are hiding from the Velociraptors in the kitchen, the suspense is rooted in the bone-deep belief that the dinosaurs are as real as the humans they're trying to eat and vice-versa, and that belief was sustained by the simplicity of the action at hand. 'Jaws' works because the shark didn't, and 'Jurassic Park' endures as a movie for the same reason it failed as a destination: People could only exert so much control over the attractions. 'Rebirth' has a scene where a pair of Titanosauruses make out.
It's great that Edwards can make a Mosasaur look tangible enough to touch as it glides under the surface of the ocean, but his film's pencil-thin characters betray the reality of the CGI dinos chasing them, who seem that much faker as a result of the ability to make them do whatever the director wants. It's no wonder that none of the kids in 'Rebirth' are ever sufficiently petrified about their situation, or that 'Jurassic Park' continues to be the only one of these movies that doesn't feel like watching people enjoy a theme park ride second-hand.
Needless to say, 'Rebirth' doesn't do itself any favors by so frequently harkening back to the original. Bad as some of the previous sequels have been, none of them have been so eager to measure themselves against Spielberg's masterpiece. Nothing in this movie is quite as maddening as the second trilogy's attempt to make audiences invest in a specific Velociraptor (though Edwards half-heartedly tries to sweeten us on an adorable baby Aquilops named Dolores), but the extent to which this franchise is just fending off its own extinction has never been more obvious than it is in during the 'Rebirth' sequence that pays homage to the kitchen encounter from the first movie. The 'Jurassic' sequels were bad enough when they made an effort to evolve — they're even less worth seeing now that they already come pre-fossilized.
Universal Pictures will release 'Jurassic World: Rebirth' in theaters on Wednesday, July 2.
Want to stay up to date on IndieWire's film and critical thoughts? to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best new reviews and streaming picks along with some exclusive musings — all only available to subscribers.
Best of IndieWire
The 25 Best Alfred Hitchcock Movies, Ranked
Every IndieWire TV Review from 2020, Ranked by Grade from Best to Worst
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Men face double dementia risk if they have a hidden genetic mutation
Men face double dementia risk if they have a hidden genetic mutation

Fox News

time44 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Men face double dementia risk if they have a hidden genetic mutation

A hidden genetic mutation could predict a man's likelihood of developing dementia. That's according to an Australian study led by Monash and Curtin Universities, which analyzed the medical data of thousands of Australians and Americans. Men who had a certain variant in the haemochromatosis (HFE) gene — which regulates iron levels in the body — were found to be at a higher risk of dementia, the researchers found. Previously healthy men over age 70 who have two copies of the variant, which is known as H63D, are at least twice — or up to four times — as likely to develop dementia. Having just one copy did not appear to elevate the risk. One in 36 men carry two copies of the mutation; one in three have just a single copy. "It is only men who have two copies of the variant that are at risk," study co-author Professor John Olynyk from the Curtin Medical School told Fox News Digital. "Women are not affected by the abnormality – we do not know why that is at the current point in time." The study, which was published in the journal Neurology, used data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial, which gathered health and aging data for 19,114 healthy older adults. Those who have the genetic variant can't change it, but it's possible that the "brain pathways" it affects could be treated, Olynyk noted. "The HFE gene is routinely tested for in most Western countries … when assessing people for haemochromatosis, a disorder that causes the body to absorb too much iron," the doctor said. "Our findings suggest that perhaps this testing could be offered to men more broadly." Despite the fact that the HFE gene is responsible for controlling iron levels, the team found no direct link between iron and dementia risk. "Our findings suggest that perhaps this testing could be offered to men more broadly." "This points to other mechanisms at play, possibly involving the increased risk of brain injury from inflammation and cell damage in the body," Olynyk added. More research is needed to determine why the heightened risk wasn't seen in women. "Understanding why men with the double H63D variant are at higher risk could pave the way for more personalized approaches to prevention and treatment," added co-author Professor Paul Lacaze from Monash University in a press release. The main limitation of the study, according to Olynyk, was that the study population was largely composed of Australians. "Whether other populations exhibit the same effects is unclear," he told Fox News Digital. "Our work should be repeated in different countries to assess this." "Further research will be undertaken to try and determine the likely mechanism by which this anomaly causes dementia and what more we can do to reduce the impact of it." Beyond this specific mutation, many other genetic and environmental factors can contribute to dementia risk, Olynyk noted. "While genetic risk factors cannot be changed, the mechanisms by which these genetic abnormalities and environmental factors cause disease may well be modifiable to some extent, through adopting a healthy lifestyle and being proactive about maintaining an overall good state of health," he said. To reduce risk, the researchers recommend adopting a healthy lifestyle that includes exercising regularly, eating a nutritious diet, minimizing alcohol intake, remaining mentally active, and seeing a doctor to address any medical problem known to increase the likelihood of dementia. For more Health articles, visit The University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Fiona Stanley Hospital also contributed to the study.

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Will Friedle Explains Why He Won't Return as Terry McGinnis - 'I Don't Know If I Could Do It Again' — GeekTyrant
BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Will Friedle Explains Why He Won't Return as Terry McGinnis - 'I Don't Know If I Could Do It Again' — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

timean hour ago

  • Geek Tyrant

BATMAN BEYOND Voice Actor Will Friedle Explains Why He Won't Return as Terry McGinnis - 'I Don't Know If I Could Do It Again' — GeekTyrant

Fans hoping to see Will Friedle return as the voice of Terry McGinnis in a Batman Beyond project might want to temper their expectations. At a recent panel at Animate! Columbus 2025, Friedle made it clear that revisiting the role without the late Kevin Conroy by his side just doesn't feel right. 'If you asked me that question three years ago, the answer would be, 'Oh my god, yes. Get me in front of the microphone right now.' 'Now that Kevin's gone, I don't know if I could do it again. I think they would need to recast both roles. Being Terry and not having him answer as Bruce, I don't think I could do it.' Friedle's comments echo a similar sentiment shared by Mark Hamill, who officially retired from voicing the Joker in 2023. When asked at Fan Expo San Francisco whether he'd ever return to the role, Hamill famously replied: 'Without Batman, crime has no punch line.' Both actors last stepped into their iconic roles for the Crisis on Infinite Earths animated trilogy. Since then, the absence of Conroy, who passed away in 2022 from intestinal cancer at the age of 66, has left a noticeable void in the animated Bat-verse. Conroy portrayed Bruce Wayne for over 30 years across animation, games, and even live-action in The CW's Crisis crossover. His final gift to fans, the autobiographical comic Finding Batman, can be read for free on DC's website. Friedle, best known in the '90s as Eric Matthews on Boy Meets World , carved out a second career as a prolific voice actor with roles in Kim Possible , Transformers: Robots in Disguise , Guardians of the Galaxy , and of course, Batman Beyond . The series, created by Bruce Timm, Paul Dini, and Alan Burnett, ran from 1999 to 2001 and introduced audiences to a new kind of Batman… Terry McGinnis, a rebellious teenager mentored by a much older Bruce Wayne in a cyberpunk Gotham of 2039.

James Gunn Says He 'Didn't Feel Guilt' Leaving Marvel for DC: 'I Was Fired' — GeekTyrant
James Gunn Says He 'Didn't Feel Guilt' Leaving Marvel for DC: 'I Was Fired' — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

timean hour ago

  • Geek Tyrant

James Gunn Says He 'Didn't Feel Guilt' Leaving Marvel for DC: 'I Was Fired' — GeekTyrant

James Gunn has officially planted his flag in the DC Universe with Superman , and he's not looking back. During a recent episode of Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard, Gunn was asked if he felt any guilt about leaving Marvel for DC. His response was blunt and honest: 'No, I just shook my head. I didn't feel that way because I was fired. I didn't feel guilt at all. I mean, I had to take a job! I took a job [with] people that I also really liked, and that was it.' Gunn, of course, directed all three Guardians of the Galaxy films, and even shot the Thor: The Dark World mid-credits scene. But back in 2018, things took a turn. Disney cut ties with him over resurfaced tweets, leaving Gunn thinking his career might be done. 'I thought my career was over.' That's when Warner Bros. entered the picture. They initially reached out to him about Superman , but Gunn pitched The Suicide Squad instead. And in a twist of timing straight out of a comic book storyline, the same day Warner called, Disney reached back out, seemingly ready to bring him back into the fold. So Gunn found himself sitting at Kevin Feige's house, being asked if he was going to direct Superman . Eventually, he did return to Marvel one last time to finish Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 , before fully committing to DC, this time as co-head of DC Studios alongside Peter Safran. Despite the rocky exit, Gunn made it clear that the folks at Marvel were never the problem: 'Listen, there are people that I'm not that happy with over there [at Disney], but that certainly wasn't the Marvel guys, you know? They were completely supportive. '[Marvel Studios Co-President] Louis D'Esposito called me all the time. Lou and Kevin were great. So it certainly wasn't them.' Now, Gunn is fully focused on reshaping DC's cinematic universe. Chapter One: Gods and Monsters kicked off with Creature Commandos and now Superman . On deck are Supergirl , Peacemaker Season 2, Lanterns , and more, as DC aims to roll out two movies and multiple shows—live-action and animated—each year. For Gunn, the past is behind him. He didn't burn bridges, he just found a new one to build.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store