SpaceX Starship rocket explodes in dramatic fireball after ‘major anomaly'
The company said the Starship"experienced a major anomaly" while on the test stand preparing for the tenth flight test at Starbase, SpaceX's launch site at the southern tip of Texas.
Starship is the most powerful rocket ever made, and SpaceX hopes that it will eventually carry humans to the Moon and Mars. But first it must conduct a series of uncrewed tests – the latest of which was expected to happen as soon as this month.
In advance of that test, SpaceX has conducted a series of tests of the Starship spacecraft as well as the booster engines that are due to carry it to space. The latest was a static fire test, in which the engines are turned on but the spacecraft stays attached to the ground, but it exploded as preparations were being made.
"A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for," SpaceX said in a statement on the social platform X.
'Our Starbase team is actively working to safe the test site and the immediate surrounding area in conjunction with local officials. There are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue.'
It is unclear how much damage the explosion has done to the testing facilities and SpaceX's facilities near Starbase, its Texas town.
More follows
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
MIT's Light-Only AI Chip Could Supercharge Electric Vehicles
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Chevy's Toyota Tacoma contender is getting pricier, but 2025 models offer the same powertrain and more value. View post: 2026 Chevrolet Colorado Updates Are Coming—But Should You Buy the 2025 Instead? View post: Amazon Is Selling a 'Secure' $14 Car Phone Holder for 43% Off, and Shoppers Say It's 'By Far One of the Best' The only correct way to modify something as heinous as the XM is to lean into its absurdity. Imagine an EV that doesn't need a bulky cooling system for its brain. Imagine your car processing LiDAR data, high-res camera feeds, and driver monitoring in real time—without sipping a ton of juice from the battery. MIT's new light-only AI chip, which swaps electrons for photons, might just pull this off. This isn't a minor tweak in chip design. It's a potential industry earthquake. The chip runs on photons, meaning it processes data with light instead of electricity. Sounds like sci-fi, right? But the benefits are huge: 90 percent less power consumption, almost no heat generation, and computations that happen at, well, the speed of light. For EVs, which fight tooth and nail for every mile of range, this could be the difference between 300 miles and 350 miles on a single charge. Why This Matters for EVs Every modern EV has a digital nervous system that sucks energy. The AI stack — everything from lane-keeping assist to voice commands — relies on energy-hungry chips like NVIDIA's Drive platform. Even when the car's parked, these processors run diagnostics and software updates, quietly draining the battery. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. Swap those power-hogging silicon chips with something that barely sips energy? You free up power for the motor, heating, and air conditioning. Suddenly, EVs can be smarter and go further without strapping on a bigger, heavier battery pack. And it's not just about range. The photonic chip's speed could slash latency in autonomous driving. Maybe this is exactly what Tesla's Autopilot needs to work without killing people. Imagine your car spotting a cyclist darting across the road and responding faster than your reflexes. That's not marketing hype — that's rather some life-saving tech. The Autonomous Game-Changer Self-driving cars rely on billions of calculations per second. Traditional GPUs do the job, but they're power-hungry beasts that require liquid cooling and complex thermal management. A photonic AI chip can handle these calculations with barely any heat output, which means lighter systems, lower costs, and fewer points of failure. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Tesla, Waymo, and every other company chasing autonomy would kill for this kind of efficiency. Even if photonic chips start as co-processors — handling vision or sensor fusion — they'll free up traditional CPUs and GPUs to handle the rest with more breathing room. The Catch There's always a catch. These chips are still in the lab, and automotive-grade hardware certification isn't exactly speedy. Cars need chips that can survive scorching heat, freezing temperatures, and years of vibration. Expect a timeline closer to 2027 before you see a production EV using this tech. Still, the writing's on the wall. The next wave of EV innovation won't just be about battery chemistry or charging speed. It'll be about making the brains of the car just as efficient as its brawn. This MIT breakthrough is a reminder that the EV arms race is far from over. Today, it's all about range anxiety. Tomorrow, it will be about how fast your car's AI can think without stealing electrons from the wheels. About the Author Brian Iselin View Profile
Auto Blog
3 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Honda Prologue Break EV Sales Records in July
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The only correct way to modify something as heinous as the XM is to lean into its absurdity. The Bentley Continental GT Speed is a sight behold. The 2024 model was the last one with a W12 and this example is for sale on Exotic Car Trader with just 6,500 miles! July was a huge month for electric vehicles in the U.S., and two standout models helped lead the way: the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Honda Prologue. Both compact electric SUVs posted their best-ever July sales, pushing their brands to new overall sales records and setting the tone for what could be a very electrified end to summer. Hyundai Ioniq 5 Sets New July Benchmark Hyundai sold 5,818 units of the Ioniq 5 in July, a massive 71% increase over the same month last year. That helped push Hyundai to its best July ever in the U.S., with total sales reaching 79,543 units. About a third of those were electrified vehicles, and the Ioniq 5 continues to play a key role in that success, especially the new XRT trim level. Built in Georgia, the Ioniq 5 remains one of the top-selling EVs in the country. Hyundai claims it delivers up to 318 miles of range and can charge from 10% to 80% in roughly 20 minutes when using a fast charger. The bold, retro-futuristic design is just the cherry on top. Prices start at $42,600, making it one of the better value picks in the segment. Honda Prologue Pulls Ahead of the Pack Honda Prologue — Source: Honda Honda's Prologue had an even stronger month. With 6,318 units sold in July, it not only beat the Ioniq 5 but also outsold the 5,308 Ford Mustang Mach-Es, despite Ford's new lease offers. Honda's total electrified sales reached 38,050 for the month, setting a new July record for the brand. The Prologue is built on GM's Ultium platform and offers an EPA-estimated range of 308 miles. It starts at $47,400, so it's priced a bit higher than the Hyundai and Ford, but Honda recently sweetened the deal by giving drivers access to Tesla's Supercharger network, which includes more than 23,500 stations across the U.S. The Tax Clock Is Ticking Source: Honda While these EVs are impressive on their own, the rush may also have something to do with timing. Both electric SUVs currently qualify for the full $7,500 federal EV incentive. But that's set to expire at the end of September for many models, prompting buyers to act fast. So far in 2025, the Mustang Mach-E is still slightly ahead with 27,093 total units sold. The Ioniq 5 sits at 24,910, followed closely by the Prologue at 22,635. With two months left before the tax break disappears, this sales race is far from over. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. About the Author Marnus Moolman View Profile
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Using Generative AI for therapy might feel like a lifeline – but there's danger in seeking certainty in a chatbot
Tran* sat across from me, phone in hand, scrolling. 'I just wanted to make sure I didn't say the wrong thing,' he explained, referring to a recent disagreement with his partner. 'So I asked ChatGPT what I should say.' He read the chatbot-generated message aloud. It was articulate, logical and composed – almost too composed. It didn't sound like Tran. And it definitely didn't sound like someone in the middle of a complex, emotional conversation about the future of a long-term relationship. It also did not mention anywhere some of Tran's contributing behaviours to the relationship strain that Tran and I had been discussing. Like many others I've seen in therapy recently, Tran had turned to AI in a moment of crisis. Under immense pressure at work and facing uncertainty in his relationship, he'd downloaded ChatGPT on his phone 'just to try it out'. What began as a curiosity soon became a daily habit, asking questions, drafting texts, and even seeking reassurance about his own feelings. The more Tran used it, the more he began to second-guess himself in social situations, turning to the model for guidance before responding to colleagues or loved ones. He felt strangely comforted, like 'no one knew me better'. His partner, on the other hand, began to feel like she was talking to someone else entirely. ChatGPT and other generative AI models present a tempting accessory, or even alternative, to traditional therapy. They're often free, available 24/7 and can offer customised, detailed responses in real time. When you're overwhelmed, sleepless and desperate to make sense of a messy situation, typing a few sentences into a chatbot and getting back what feels like sage advice can be very appealing. But as a psychologist, I'm growing increasingly concerned about what I'm seeing in the clinic; a silent shift in how people are processing distress and a growing reliance on artificial intelligence in place of human connection and therapeutic support. AI might feel like a lifeline when services are overstretched – and make no mistake, services are overstretched. Globally, in 2019 one in eight people were living with a mental illness and we face a dire shortage of trained mental health professionals. In Australia, there has been a growing mental health workforce shortage that is impacting access to trained professionals. Clinician time is one of the scarcest resources in healthcare. It's understandable (even expected) that people are looking for alternatives. Turning to a chatbot for emotional support isn't without risk however, especially when the lines between advice, reassurance and emotional dependence become blurred. Many psychologists, myself included, now encourage clients to build boundaries around their use of ChatGPT and similar tools. Its seductive 'always-on' availability and friendly tone can unintentionally reinforce unhelpful behaviours, especially for people with anxiety, OCD or trauma-related issues. Reassurance-seeking, for example, is a key feature in OCD and ChatGPT, by design, provides reassurance in abundance. It never asks why you're asking again. It never challenges avoidance. It never says, 'let's sit with this feeling for a moment, and practice the skills we have been working on'. Tran often reworded prompts until the model gave him an answer that 'felt right'. But this constant tailoring meant he wasn't just seeking clarity; he was outsourcing emotional processing. Instead of learning to tolerate distress or explore nuance, he sought AI-generated certainty. Over time, that made it harder for him to trust his own instincts. Beyond psychological concerns, there are real ethical issues. Information shared with ChatGPT isn't protected by the same confidentiality standards as registered Ahpra professionals. Although OpenAI states that data from users is not used to train its models unless permission is given, the sheer volume of fine print in user agreements often goes unread. Users may not realise how their inputs can be stored, analysed and potentially reused. There's also the risk of harmful or false information. These large language models are autoregressive; they predict the next word based on previous patterns. This probabilistic process can lead to 'hallucinations', confident, polished answers that are completely untrue. AI also reflects the biases embedded in its training data. Research shows that generative models can perpetuate and even amplify gender, racial and disability-based stereotypes – not intentionally, but unavoidably. Human therapists also possess clinical skills; we notice when a client's voice trembles, or when their silence might say more than words. This isn't to say AI can't have a place. Like many technological advancements before it, generative AI is here to stay. It may offer useful summaries, psycho-educational content or even support in regions where access to mental health professionals is severely limited. But it must be used carefully, and never as a replacement for relational, regulated care. Tran wasn't wrong to seek help. His instincts to make sense of distress and to communicate more thoughtfully were logical. However, leaning so heavily on to AI meant that his skill development suffered. His partner began noticing a strange detachment in his messages. 'It just didn't sound like you', she later told him. It turned out: it wasn't. She also became frustrated about the lack of accountability in his correspondence to her and this caused more relational friction and communication issues between them. As Tran and I worked together in therapy, we explored what led him to seek certainty in a chatbot. We unpacked his fears of disappointing others, his discomfort with emotional conflict and his belief that perfect words might prevent pain. Over time, he began writing his own responses, sometimes messy, sometimes unsure, but authentically his. Good therapy is relational. It thrives on imperfection, nuance and slow discovery. It involves pattern recognition, accountability and the kind of discomfort that leads to lasting change. A therapist doesn't just answer; they ask and they challenge. They hold space, offer reflection and walk with you, while also offering up an uncomfortable mirror. For Tran, the shift wasn't just about limiting his use of ChatGPT; it was about reclaiming his own voice. In the end, he didn't need a perfect response. He needed to believe that he could navigate life's messiness with curiosity, courage and care – not perfect scripts. Name and identifying details changed to protect client confidentiality Carly Dober is a psychologist living and working in Naarm/Melbourne In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat
