logo
Sydney sisters return to Iran homeland after 38 years – only for history to repeat itself

Sydney sisters return to Iran homeland after 38 years – only for history to repeat itself

The Guardian21-06-2025
The Iran that Melika and Betissa rediscovered after 38 years was a 'wondrous' land until, once more, the bombs began to fall.
The Sydney sisters had fled their birthplace Iran as children in 1987, amid the violence and the tumult of the Iran-Iraq war.
With memories coloured by the uncertainty of their sudden departure nearly four decades earlier, they found a homeland wildly different from their expectations.
'We've traveled extensively … we've been to lots and lots of third world countries. And so that was our impression of Iran,' Betissa told the Guardian. 'But what we experienced was the complete opposite: we experienced a very well developed, very modern country.
'On top of that, you had this incredibly rich cultural overlay where it almost felt like you were drunk from the richness of the sights and the sounds and the smells – the beauty of the culture and the history, but also the people.
'I've never experienced anything like this level of hospitality, where everyone you meet is invested in you having a good time.'
But conflict has come again to stalk Iran. The day before the sisters and their parents, who had also travelled from Australia, were due to fly to Istanbul to reunite with extended family members from all over the world, they were woken before dawn by frantic calls from friends and family back home desperate to know they were OK.
'In 1987 we fled to Australia from Tehran because of a war. It was so strange for history to be repeating itself 38 years later,' Melika said.
The Middle East descended into further turmoil on 13 June, when Israel launched a series of airstrikes on what it said were nuclear facilities and military targets inside Iran.
Israel has maintained its ongoing bombardments were 'pre-emptive and precise strikes' that are lawful and necessary to prevent Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and using them in the future.
Iran has responded with barrages of missiles fired into Israeli territory, and said Israel's offensive was illegal under international law. It said it sought an end to hostilities, but would not negotiate while the conflict continued.
According to local reporting, at least 639 people have been killed in Iran, while at least 25 have died in Israel.
On the morning of Friday 13 June, Betissa and Melika woke to discover a city in chaos, with airstrikes hitting a hotel less than a kilometre from where they were staying.
Their flight, due to leave the next morning, could not fly out of Tehran, so the sisters hastily called the van driver booked to take them to the airport, asking if he could instead drive them to the Turkish border, nearly 900km away, immediately.
He agreed and soon arrived to drive them 12 hours to Bazargan border crossing, a gateway into the relative peace of eastern Turkey.
They stopped only three times: twice for fuel, bypassing the hours-long lines at most petrol stations for quieter stops. The family's third stop was a military checkpoint, where they were flagged stopped.
'First they took Dad and all our passports for half an hour,' Betissa said. 'They just took him inside a building and told us to stay out.
'After half an hour, they came and took Mum … the driver was like, 'Oh, this has never happened to me before'. But after an hour, luckily, they both came back with all our passports and we were on our way again.'
There were further anxieties. As the family drove, they were being given conflicting information about whether the Turkish border was still open, or whether the Iranian regime had sealed the country shut. The sisters were told by phone they should turn around and drive through the night back to the capital.
'But from my perspective, I was like, 'I'd rather sleep in a barn on the border',' Betissa said.
As Turkish territory approached, the military and police checkpoints became more frequent, those manning them more interrogative.
But as night fell the border remained open, and the family members each paid an exit fee to escape the country.
They were then stuck for two hours in 'no man's land' – the patch of barren territory between two countries, but belonging to neither – where people were lined up sitting on suitcases in the dust. Once again, the sisters' father was taken away to be interrogated and again he was returned.
Finally, more than 15 hours after they'd fled Tehran, the sisters and their parents crossed into Turkish territory. In the calmer days that followed, they drove and flew across the country to reach Istanbul.
'We had a reunion with our husbands, our children, and the rest of the family in Istanbul airport, which was very emotional,' Betissa said.
The escalating conflict remains intensely personal for Betissa and Melika.
They had been in touch by phone with their driver in the days after their escape, but since a nationwide internet blackout have not heard whether he is safe, whether he is alive.
Their homeland now holds a reawakened affection.
'The country we had just rediscovered and fallen in love with was getting destroyed, nearly all the beautiful cities we had visited attacked,' Melika said.
'It was surreal as just the night before the attacks we were reliving some of our experiences from the Iraq war.
'I was remembering how we all had to hide underground during the raids and how terrified I was as a child. These conflicts have lasting impacts on the civilian population.'
Betissa said friends in Tehran were describing on WhatsApp messages the chaos the continues to roil the country.
'How there's no fuel … bakeries have massive lines, supermarket shelves are starting to be empty,' she said.
'People are trying to leave Tehran, but all the roads are completely choked up because there is no fuel - people are basically … abandoning their cars in the middle of the road.'
Betissa said while airstrikes might be targeting particular sites in Iran, 'that doesn't mean that the areas around those sites are not getting hit'.
'They may be targeting a general who lives in an apartment building, but everyone else in that building is dying.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pete Hegseth embarrassed as truth about his 'secret' leaked Signal messages on Yemen bombing exposed
Pete Hegseth embarrassed as truth about his 'secret' leaked Signal messages on Yemen bombing exposed

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Pete Hegseth embarrassed as truth about his 'secret' leaked Signal messages on Yemen bombing exposed

An internal investigator at the Department of Defense has received evidence that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth sent secret documents over Signal, according to sources. In March, the Pentagon was shrouded in controversy after a group message on Signal regarding imminent U.S. strikes in Yemen inadvertently included a journalist from The Atlantic. The thread included major heads of state, like Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and discussed plans to bomb Houthi militants. The debacle, dubbed 'Signalgate,' resulted in several high-profile officials firings. It also led to Mike Waltz stepping down as national security advisor. At the time Hegseth and others fought back against the scandal, arguing that classified information was not shared through improper channels. But sources have revealed to the Washington Post that the information put in the group chat by Hegseth came from an email marked 'SECRET/NOFORN,' indicating the email's material was highly sensitive in nature. 'NOFORN' means that the information was not to be shared with foreigners, not even with close U.S. allies. Now as Pentagon's internal investigator, the inspector general, reviews the matter, sources say there's evidence that the attack plans originated from classified sources. This revelation cuts directly against the Pentagon's claims that classified information was not shared frivolously - a claim defense officials stand by. 'This Signal narrative is so old and worn out, it's starting to resemble Joe Biden's mental state,' chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell told the Daily Mail. 'The Department stands behind its previous statements: no classified information was shared via Signal.' 'As we've said repeatedly, nobody was texting war plans and the success of the Department's recent operations - from Operation Rough Rider to Operation Midnight Hammer - are proof that our operational security and discipline are top notch,' Hegseth's spokesman added. The information allegedly shared by the secretary originated in an email thread with CENTCOM commander Gen. Erik Kurilla, who sent the plans over classified channels, sources said. Kurilla's message detailed strike plans for that day with precise details, including what aircraft and weapons were to be deployed. It also indicated when the bombing was expected to start. The existence of the chat was exposed by Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, who was accidentally added to the sensitive thread. Hegseth has repeatedly insisted that 'no classified information was shared' in the group chat, contrary to the Post's reporting. Since the debacle many Democrats have called for Hegseth to step down. Republican Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., also called for the secretary of defense to resign. But Hegseth has persevered, in part due to Trump's reluctance to hand the media narrative that his Cabinet is in chaos. Republicans in the Senate have remained skeptical of Hegseth; one even told the Daily Mail that some right-wing senators are 'sharpening their knives' and eagerly awaiting the secretary's next misstep. Now, a new rebellion brewing in the Pentagon over the secretary of defense. An effort is under way among some Pentagon officials to denounce Hegseth as unfit to serve as Defense Secretary, the Daily Mail can reveal. Since May, drafts of a letter have been circulating among high and mid-level military brass and civilian workers to 'Let the American public know this guy has no clue what he's doing,' one of them told the Daily Mail. Three Pentagon sources shared that the letter is full of complaints, ranging from politicized decision-making to department-wide dysfunction, low morale, and a climate of paranoia driven by what they describe as Hegseth's obsession with rooting out dissent. The Pentagon again caught a round of negative press earlier this month when Trump and Hegseth appeared at odds over aide for Ukraine. Reports indicated that Hegseth unilaterally decided to halt some weapons shipments to the country. When asked about the pause, Trump said he didn't know about it, putting him in an awkward position. 'I think it would be really unusual for a Secretary of Defense to put a pause on assets to somebody like Ukraine, who we want to help, without consulting the president,' Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, a noted Hegseth skeptic and Trump critic, told the Daily Mail at the time. She called Hegseth's reported pause 'interesting' and praised Trump for changing that directive.

Hamas leader's wife ‘smuggled from Gaza tunnels to Turkey'
Hamas leader's wife ‘smuggled from Gaza tunnels to Turkey'

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Hamas leader's wife ‘smuggled from Gaza tunnels to Turkey'

The wife of the architect of the October 7 massacre was smuggled out of Gaza and remarried in Turkey, it has been reported. Samar Muhammad Abu Zamar, the wife of Yahya Sinwar, slipped out of the enclave using a fake passport and carrying significant amounts of cash, sources in Gaza told Ynet, an Israeli news website. She married again a few months after Sinwar, Hamas's military commander, was killed by Israeli troops in October 2024, the news outlet reported. Sources said her wedding and resettlement in Turkey were organised by Fathi Hammad, a Hamas political bureau member who has been linked to attempts to hide terror operatives and their families. In 2024, footage was released showing Abu Zamar walking through a Hamas tunnel, clutching what appeared to be a designer handbag, hours before the October 7 attacks. Although officially unconfirmed, the story has been widely reported in Israel. Hamas, which styles itself as the primary force of Palestinian resistance to Israel, has repeatedly been accused of drawing strength from the suffering of ordinary Gazans who cannot leave the territory. Ynet reported an Israeli security official as saying that both Abu Zamar and Najwa Sinwar, the wife of Mohammed Sinwar, who took command of Hamas after his brother was killed, left Gaza via Rafah. 'She's no longer here – she crossed through the Rafah border using a fake passport,' a source said of Abu Zamar, saying the escape required 'high-level coordination, logistical support, and large sums of money that regular Gazans don't have'. The women are believed to have escaped via a smuggling network that Hamas has long had in place to evacuate its leaders' families. The report comes amid increasing resentment from Palestinians towards Hamas after 19 months of war. Pictures and videos showing senior members of the group living comfortable lifestyles elsewhere in the Middle East have also fuelled criticism. One Gazan civilian said: 'They send their children to study in Turkey and Qatar—and send ours to the grave. 'What makes them different from any corrupt ruler in the Arab world? 'They only look after themselves.' Hamas is now believed to be under the command of Izz al-Din al-Haddad, the only senior commander from October 7 still alive. Hostage negotiations are believed to have been hampered by difficulty in communicating with what is left of Hamas's military structure in the Strip.

Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error
Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error

An Iraqi who entered the UK illegally has won an appeal after arguing he cannot be deported because he is divorced. In claims disputed by the Home Office, he said he divorced a 'prominent' politician's daughter and brought 'dishonour' upon their family. The Iraqi said it would breach his human rights to send him back to Iraq because he was at risk of an 'honour feud'. The Iraqi, who was granted anonymity, has won an appeal at an upper immigration tribunal for his case to be reheard after it was initially rejected by the Home Office and lower court. The Iraqi entered Britain 'clandestinely' in 2020 after travelling through Turkey and across Europe before arriving by boat in the UK. He submitted his application for asylum the following day. The court was told that his 'claim for asylum is based upon a claimed risk of being a victim of an honour-based crime'. 'He alleges that he fled Iraq due to threats from his former father-in-law, a prominent and influential politician affiliated with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. 'According to the [Iraqi], he was accused of bringing dishonour upon [his ex-father-in-law's] family by divorcing his daughter,' the court was told. It was accepted that he was married and went through a divorce, but the Home Office 'did not accept that he had experienced problems from his ex-father-in-law'. The Home Office issued a deportation order but the Iraqi, who had a child with his ex-wife, appealed the decision. His challenge was dismissed by a lower tribunal as the judge questioned 'the credibility of the marriage itself'. The First-tier Tribunal said there was a 'disparity in social status' between his ex-wife – the daughter of a powerful politician – and him, a 'minimally educated taxi driver from a marginalised tribe'. A claim by the Iraqi that he had also been the victim of a 'violent' attack linked to the honour feud and stabbed 17 times was dismissed as implausible by the judge, partly because it was 'unsubstantiated' by any medical evidence. The judge said the asylum claim appeared a 'complete fabrication'. The Iraqi appealed to the upper tribunal where the judge Sara Anzani said the lower court was wrong to question the marriage and divorce certificates and said the Iraqi was not given a chance to respond to their doubts. Judge Anzani said: 'These concerns about the reliability and authenticity of the marriage and divorce certificates were not previously raised by the [Home Office], nor were they put to the [Iraqi] during the hearing. 'I find that the Judge's failure to raise his concerns about the authenticity and reliability of the marriage and divorce certificates, concerns not previously identified by the [Home Office], deprived the [Iraqi] of a fair opportunity to address the Judge's doubts. 'The Judge's findings on the marriage and divorce certificates contribute to his overall assessment of the [Iraqi's] credibility, and the ultimate finding that [his] claim was fabricated. 'Consequently, this procedural error is material and permeates the entirety of the Judge's decision'. Judge Anzani concluded that the case must be heard afresh at the First-tier Tribunal again, but not by the previous judge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store