12-day war: Israeli F-15 suffered fuel tank issue while approaching Tehran; nearly aborted mission, report says
An F-15 fighter jet of the Israel Air Force reportedly suffered a fuel tank malfunction which almost forced it to stage an emergency landing, while approaching Tehran during the 12-day war with Iran last month .
The F-15 pilot first noticed the issue already deep inside Iran's borders, the Channel 12 report stated, adding that the necessary personnel were alerted about the problem in real-time.
As no aerial refuelling aircraft was available to the fighter jets on the mission, a plan was devised to dispatch one to resolve the issue.
Also Read | Caught on camera: Israeli fighter jet refuels mid-air over Syria; likely on way back after Iran strike
Under an alternative plan, which would have been followed in case the refuelling aircraft failed to reach the malfunctioning F-15, the jet was to cross the border and make an emergency landing in a "neighbouring country", to avoid the risk involved in landing inside the Islamic Republic.
However, the report did not identify the neighbouring country.
Ultimately, the refuelling craft made it in plane and resolve the issued, and the F-15 pilot was not required to pull out of the mission.
The mission, too, was carried out successfully, without any additional issues.
Did Israel estimate loss of jets within the first three days?
The report further claimed that prior to the start of Israel's surprise June 13 attack, which launched the war with Iran, Israeli Air Force commander Tomer Bar had presented an estimate in 'internal forums' that 10 Israeli planes could be downed within the first 72 hours of the attack.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Earn Upto 5k Daily By This Method of Intraday Trading
TradeWise
Learn More
Undo
Also Read | Nasrallah-style operation: Israel plotted to kill Iran's President Pezeshkian? Report claims secret plan
Bar's estimate was proven wrong, however, and no Israeli planes were downed throughout the war, despite Iranian state media claiming at one point that the country's forces shot down two Israeli fighter jets and captured a pilot.
The report was dismissed by the Israel Defense Forces' spokesman, Colonel Avichay Adraee, as 'fake' and 'completely baseless.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Qatar to compensate residents affected by debris after Iranian missile strike; 2-day deadline to submit claims
Qatar has given residents exactly two days to submit damage claims through the Metrash app for missile debris-related compensation. (Representative image) TL;DR Qatar will compensate residents for property damage caused by debris from intercepted Iranian missiles during the recent missile strike. Claims must be filed within two days via the Metrash app to qualify for compensation. The compensation covers residential, commercial, industrial properties, and vehicles affected by the missile interception debris. Qatar has launched a nationwide compensation program for citizens and residents whose properties were damaged by falling shrapnel from Iranian missiles intercepted over its territory. The announcement came on Sunday, July 13, from the Ministry of Interior, following direct instructions from His Highness the Amir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. The damage resulted from an Iranian missile attack targeting the Al Udeid US Air Base in Qatar, an incident that unfolded during a sharp escalation in the Middle East. The missile launch was a direct retaliation by Iran after the United States carried out strikes on multiple Iranian nuclear facilities during a broader 12-day war between Israel and Iran, which took place from June 13 to June 24, 2025. U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that 14 Iranian missiles were fired toward the Al Udeid base. Thirteen were intercepted, while one missile was intentionally allowed to fall harmlessly to avoid provoking a larger confrontation. Though no casualties were reported, the debris from the intercepted missiles caused minor but widespread damage across parts of Qatar, particularly to homes, vehicles, industrial sites, and businesses. Though no casualties were reported, the debris from the intercepted missiles caused minor but widespread damage across parts of Qatar, particularly to homes, vehicles, industrial sites, and businesses. In response, the Qatari government quickly mobilized through an emergency meeting of the Civil Defence Council, chaired by Sheikh Khalifa bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. Following the meeting, the Ministry of Interior officially confirmed that compensation would be extended to all affected individuals, provided they had filed official damage reports with the relevant security departments. The Ministry stated: 'Compensation will be provided to citizens and residents whose private properties, residential buildings, vehicles, industrial facilities, and commercial establishments, have sustained damages as a result of falling shrapnel from the interception of Iranian missiles.' To ensure swift and orderly disbursal, the government: Reviewed all prior emergency protocols Approved a new compensation mechanism (active since July 13) Prioritized both Qatari citizens and resident expatriates The Civil Defence Council has begun contacting affected individuals directly to complete claim procedures according to Qatari law. For those who have not yet reported damage, a strict 2-day window has been provided (from the date of the announcement) to file a claim via the Metrash app. The steps are: Open the app and go to 'Communicate with Us' Tap 'Requests' Select the relevant compensation service Provide your details, a description, and address Upload images or documents (if available) Confirm and submit Note: No claims will be accepted after the deadline. In addition to compensation, Qatar has also: Waived all traffic violations recorded on the day of the missile strike Taken measures to ease bureaucratic stress on affected residents This rapid mobilization reflects the Qatari leadership's intent to not only assess and repair physical damage but also provide prompt support to mitigate disruption to daily life. As part of these relief efforts, Qatar has also waived all traffic violations recorded on the day of the missile strike, easing bureaucratic stress on residents affected during the heightened security alert. The compensation initiative, deeply rooted in the directives of His Highness the Amir, is the latest in a series of measures aimed at shielding the population from the consequences of regional instability. While Qatar was not a primary actor in the 12-day Iran-Israel war, its strategic positioning and role as host to key military infrastructure meant that the impact of the conflict inevitably reached its soil. FAQs: Q. Who is eligible for compensation? All Qatari citizens and residents whose properties were damaged by debris from intercepted Iranian missiles, provided the damage was documented officially. Q. What types of property damage are covered? Compensation covers damages to residential buildings, vehicles, industrial facilities, and commercial establishments. Q. How can affected individuals submit claims? Claims must be submitted through the Metrash app by selecting the appropriate service under 'Communicate with Us' > 'Requests,' then filling in details and uploading any supporting documents. Q. 1What is the deadline for submitting compensation claims? Claims must be submitted within two days from the official announcement date, July 13, 2025. No late claims will be accepted. caused the property damage in Qatar? A: Property damage was caused by falling shrapnel from Iranian missiles intercepted over Qatar after Iran's missile attack on the Al Udeid US Air Base, during the June 2025 Iran-Israel conflict.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
India should pursue services-focused trade deal with US: NITI Aaayog
NITI Aayog on Monday suggested that India should follow the model of the India-UK agreement to pursue a services-oriented trade deal with the US, with special focus on information technology, financial services, professional services, and education. The Aayog in its third edition of 'Trade Watch Quarterly' said there will be significant opportunities for India in the US markets both in terms of the number of products and volume of the US market. "Building on the model of the India-UK agreement, India should pursue a services-oriented trade deal with the US, placing strong emphasis on key sectors such as information technology, financial services, professional services, and education," it said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Victoria Principal Is Almost 75, See Her Now Reportingly Undo The government think tank said the agreement should include robust provisions for digital trade, creating a framework for enhanced cross-border service delivery. The Aayog also emphasised that India must advocate for improved visa access for its professionals, particularly under H-1B and L-1 categories. "This should include provisions for intra-corporate transferees and independent service providers, which are crucial for maintaining India's competitive edge in the global services industry," it said. Live Events With growing global demand for Digitally Delivered Services (DDS), the Aayog said India should seek firm market access commitments from the US in high-growth areas such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, telecom, and design services. "Leveraging India's strengths in these sectors can help increase bilateral trade and innovation-led growth," it said. Observing that regulatory barriers such as inconsistent data compliance and intellectual property concerns hinder Indian service exports, the Aayog said joint efforts between India and the US are needed to simplify licensing procedures and address cross-border data flow issues, enabling smoother market access for Indian firms. The government think tank also said that to expand professional opportunities, India should push for broader Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) that cover a wider range of professions, including engineers, architects, and healthcare workers. "These agreements would streamline certification processes and facilitate the mobility of Indian professionals to the US," it said. According to the Aayog, India should focus on diversifying its trade partners and becoming integral to larger global supply chains and production networks. "Fast-tracking free trade agreements, time-bound negotiation roadmap, is essential," the Aayog said, adding that these agreements should prioritise the reduction of non-tariff barriers and facilitate smoother trade in services, a key strength for India. Simultaneously, the Aayog said deeper trade engagement with countries such as Australia, Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN nations can be highly beneficial, especially in sectors where India's export strengths, such as pharmaceuticals, automobiles, and IT, match their import needs. "Additionally, pivoting towards African markets by developing a structured India-Africa trade corridor focused on pharmaceuticals, education services, IT, and cost-effective machinery will tap into the growing demand and expand India's export footprint into emerging regions," it said. Meanwhile, an Indian commerce ministry team has reached Washington for another round of talks on the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA), which will begin on Monday. The visit assumes significance as both sides have to iron out issues in sectors like agriculture and automobiles. It is also important as the US has further postponed the imposition of additional tariffs on several countries, including India, until August 1. Earlier this month, the Indian team was in Washington for talks, with negotiations taking place from June 26 to July 2. The team has once again reached the US for negotiations. India has hardened its position on the US demand for duty concessions on agri and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, has not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector. India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (26 per cent). It is also seeking the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent) and the auto (25 per cent) sectors. Against these, India has reserved its right under the WTO (World Trade Organization) norms to impose retaliatory duties. US President Donald Trump announced heavy tariffs on a number of countries, including India, on April 2. However, it was soon postponed for 90 days until July 9 and later to August 1. The two countries are looking to conclude talks for the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) this year. Before that, they are looking for an interim trade pact.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Harvard is under fire for erasing its DEI presence and what it means for US students
Harvard's digital purge of DEI resources signals shift in US university policies Harvard University has come under intense scrutiny following the removal of multiple Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) websites from its official College webpage. This digital purge included the deletion of entire offices dedicated to supporting women, LGBTQ+ students, and students of colour. The pages for these offices now redirect to a general site with a neutral statement about embracing community values, a move that has raised concerns about the university's commitment to its publicly stated principles. This action is not merely a cosmetic or administrative update. It is seen as a significant shift in how Harvard approaches identity-based support for its student body. Observers and affected students note that this erasure of web presence could foreshadow deeper changes such as the dissolution of programmes, reassignment or dismissal of trained staff, and the gradual dismantling of spaces that have historically served marginalised students. Removal of DEI offices and webpages The removed websites belonged to offices that provided vital resources and advocacy for women, LGBTQ+ students, and students of colour. Previously, these offices offered not only support services but also community-building activities and programmes tailored to diverse identities. The deletion of their pages means that information about these resources is no longer publicly available, which many interpret as a retreat from institutional support. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In April, the university renamed its central Office of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging to the less specific 'Community and Campus Life.' This change coincided with increasing federal scrutiny and political pressure on DEI initiatives across the US. Around the same period, Harvard also withdrew support for identity-based graduation ceremonies, which included celebrations for Latinx, Black, LGBTQ+, and veteran students. Impact on student organisations and funding The consequences of these changes extend beyond webpages. Questions remain about the future funding, recognition, and programming of student organisations such as the Queer Students Association (QSA). The lack of communication from the university leaves student leaders uncertain about whether advisory meetings, support staff, and dedicated spaces will continue to be available. According to reporting by the Harvard Crimson, student representatives have sought clarity from university directors but have received no official updates. Concerns have been raised that these decisions were made behind closed doors, without meaningful consultation with those directly affected. Administrative response and future implications The university's actions have sparked debate about transparency and accountability within higher education institutions, particularly in relation to supporting marginalised groups. While Harvard's official messaging emphasises a commitment to community values, critics argue that the removal of these offices and programmes undermines those commitments. This situation occurs amid a broader national discourse on the role of DEI in US education under President Trump's administration, which has seen increased federal scrutiny and opposition to certain diversity initiatives. Harvard's recent decisions, including the quiet removal of DEI resources from its digital platforms, serve as a notable case study in how political pressures are influencing university policies. The effects on students, staff, and wider campus culture remain to be seen as the institution continues to navigate these changes. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
