
Urbana Dems, the county board has a spot for you
The Champaign County Board has a vacancy to fill, prompting the local Democratic Party to solicit applications from individuals interested in serving from District 10 in Urbana.
The vacancy was created by board Democrat Chris Stohr's decision to resign after he was appointed to serve on the board of the local sanitary district.
Local party officials have set a July 6 deadline for submission of an application. A link to the application can be found on the party's website.
District 10 is located in east central Urbana. Specifically, party officials said it is "generally bound by Airport Road to the north, County Road 2000 E to the east, Homer Lake Road and Windsor Road to the south, and Cedar Street, Vine Street, and Anderson Court to the west."
Applications will be reviewed by Democratic precinct committee members, and the name of the preferred applicant will be submitted to Jen Locke, who heads the county board.
She, in turn, is expected to ask the full county board to approve the nomination.
The individual who is nominated and confirmed will be required to run for the post in the November 2026 general election. That individual might, if another Democratic chooses to seek the office, be required to run for the party's nomination in the March 2026 primary election.
Campaign calumny
There may be no cryin' in baseball, but there definitely is lyin' in politics.
That's why a recent Cook County jury award of $1.475 million to a defeated Chicago aldermanic candidate is stunning.
A jury ordered the political organizations of Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle and Alderman Lamont Robinson to pay the punitive damages for making defamatory statements about Ebony Lucas, a real-estate lawyer who ran and lost for Chicago City Council.
Lucas charged the pair made repeated false statements about her in campaign mailers and text messages. The effect was a "coordinated smear campaign alleging Lucas had unpaid liens and fines" for business-related misconduct.
Lucas said the jury decision represents a "stand for truth in our elections," expressing gratitude to jurors for "seeing through the falsehoods and delivering justice."
Robinson vowed to appeal, charging the lawsuit was "politically motivated."
Well, of course it was. The lawsuit was about tawdry tactics in an election campaign.
Preckwinkle also promised to appeal and expressed confidence the jury's verdict will be overturned.
Perhaps. But in the meantime, the jury's decision not only raises questions of law, but also questions of political tactic.
The lie is a politician's best friend.
What exactly are candidates for public office supposed to do in a campaign if lying about their opponents is off limits? Perhaps, as an alternative, they could tell lies about themselves by vastly exaggerating their qualifications and abilities.
Blast from past
Anyone remember a guy named Joe Walsh?
No, not the aging rock star or the British soccer player.
The Joe Walsh in question is the former one-term Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives (2010-12) whose incendiary conservative rhetoric foreshadowed his political doom. He was defeated in his bid for re-election by current Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth.
The former social worker-turned-politician-turned-radio show host later left the GOP to become an independent. Now he says he's a Democrat.
Walsh recently announced he's moving from Illinois to South Carolina and said he may run for the U.S. Senate against GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham.
Given Walsh's history, the Dems may not want him. But what's done is done, at least for now.
Walsh said he's still a conservative but hates President Trump, whom he called a "tyrant," and the Republican Party.
Capitol Hill showdown
Gov. J.B. Pritzker was loaded for bear when he appeared last week before a hostile GOP congressional committee looking into sanctuary policies for illegal immigrants in various cities and states.
The subject of crimes committed by those in the country illegally came up, one involving the death of Katie Abraham in an Urbana car crash.
She was killed in January by a suspected drunken driver illegally in the United States. He was subsequently arrested and faces trial.
Illinois U.S. Rep. Mary Miller attempted to question Pritzker about "rolling out the red carpet" for the many thousands of illegal immigrants in Illinois. But Pritzker ignored her question and launched an obviously pre-planned rhetorical counter-attack.
"I am not going to be lectured to by someone who extolled the virtues of Adolf Hitler," Pritzker said, alluding to Miller's 2021 comments referencing the German dictator's emphasis on presenting propaganda that was embraced by young people.
The hearing turned into a political game of "gotcha," with Pritzker, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz exchanging insults and observations on a variety of subjects with GOP committee members.
Walz was not as well prepared in the sound-bite game as Pritzker, as indicated by an exchange with Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina.
Another Republican asked Pritzker if he had ever used women's bathrooms.
"Not that I recall," he replied.
On the down low
When Gov. J.B. Pritzker runs for president in 2028, there's one study of Illinois' economic health he'll forget to mention.
The personal finance website WalletHub released its list of best and worst state economies.
Illinois ranked 40th for its state economy but dead last in the economic health category.
A Center Square news account said researcher Chip Lupo established three key categories focusing on "economic activity, economic health and innovation potential."
"Then we applied 28 relevant metrics, and those run everything from GDP growth, start-up activity and share of jobs in high-tech industries," said Lupo.
He said, "Illinois ranked 48th in change in non-farm payrolls, 41st in economic activity, and scored poorly for high foreclosure rates and the state's unemployment rate."
Illinois' unemployment rate is 4.8 percent, one of the highest in the country, and is in the top 10 for states with the biggest increases in unemployment claims.
WalletHub said Massachusetts has the best state economy while Iowa has the worst.
"Illinois will under-perform the region and the U.S. in 2025, with gross state product, employment, and income increasing less than elsewhere," the report's summary said.
Lupo said, "the best state economies encourage growth by being friendly to new businesses and investing in new technology that will help the state deal with future challenges."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says the UFC Will Host a Championship Fight at the White House
The UFC is coming to The White House. President Trump, speaking at an event in Iowa on Friday night, said that he was hoping to host a mixed martial arts promotion event on the grounds of the White House, as part of the plans to celebrate America's 250th anniversary. Advertisement More from The Hollywood Reporter A spokesperson for the UFC confirmed the plan to The Hollywood Reporter, with UFC CEO Dana White expected to reveal more on the event soon. 'All of our national park battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250 and I even think we're going to have a UFC fight,' Trump told the crowd. 'Does anybody watch UFC the great Dana White? We're going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there.' He added that it will be 'a championship fight, full fight, like 20, 25,000 people.' Advertisement It isn't clear where on the grounds the fight will take place, or what type of structure will be built to host it. In the past, the UFC has held multiple events in Washington, D.C., at the Capitol One Arena. Trump, of course, is close to White, who was a vocal and early supporter. The President has also been a frequent guest at UFC fights, including after taking office this year. UFC is part of TKO Group Holdings, which is led by Ari Emanuel and Mark Shapiro, and controlled by Endeavor, the company that also owns the (now-private) talent agency WME. White is also no stranger to spectacle, turning his fights into cultural events where the location is as much a part of the story as the bouts. During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the UFC created what it called 'Fight Island' in Abu Dhabi where it could safely hold events, and last year it took over the Sphere in Las Vegas, with White telling THR at the time that the company spent north of $20 million to produce the event. 'If you take what U2 did and multiply it by a million, that's where we are,' he said. Advertisement Still, the grounds of the White House would set a new bar for an event location, one that is unlikely to be replicated by any other sporting venture anytime soon. White also recently joined the board of directors of Meta, invited by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who has become a fan of MMA. Trump also announced another event as part of the America 250 celebration, a 'nationally televised' competition called the 'Patriot Games' that will pit youth athletes from all 50 states against each other. Trump said that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will lead the Patriot Games, though he did not reveal any more details, including on which platforms the games will air. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Advertisement Sign up for THR's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
You Can Keep Your Shoes On During Airport Security Screenings Now—Here's What To Know
The Transportation Security Administration has reportedly begun allowing travelers at some airports in the country to complete their pre-flight security screening without removing their shoes, ending a nearly two-decade-long rule. TSA agents verify passengers identities on a checkpoint at Miami International Airport. TNS The White House on Tuesday morning seemed to confirm the rule change that TSA has reportedly begun implementing at several major airports, including New York's La Guardia and Los Angeles International Airport. CBS News reported the rule change is being rolled out in a phased manner, starting with Baltimore/Washington, Fort Lauderdale, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky, Portland, Philadelphia and Piedmont Triad international airports. On Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted to X 'Big news from @DHSgov!' in response to a reporters tweet about the change. The TSA told various outlets that it and the Department of Homeland Security are 'always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture.' The travel newsletter Gate Access was the first to report the internal TSA move over the weekend, which said the White House will officially announce the change in protocol. The report noted that the TSA has updated its guidance on the matter internally, has begun informing TSA officers nationwide, and is revising its Standard Operating Procedures. The TSA implemented the rule requiring passengers to take off their shoes before their pre-flight security scan in 2006. At the time, the TSA stated that the shoe removal rule applied to all types of footwear and said it was being implemented after the DHS raised the threat level for the U.S. aviation sector. The rule came in nearly five years after authorities uncovered the 'Shoe-Bomber' plot, where a British man named Richard Reid, who was a self-proclaimed al-Qaeda operative, attempted to detonate explosives hidden inside his shoe while flying onboard an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami. The plot was foiled and the plane was able to safely land in Boston after other passengers and the cabin crew subdued Reid. Were There Any Exemptions To The Shoes-Off Policy? In 2011, the TSA updated its rules to allow children who are 12 and younger to go through screening without removing their shoes. The agency said: 'Intelligence and history have shown that allowing (young) passengers to leave their shoes on poses little risk.' Travelers who signed up for the T.S.A.'s PreCheck trusted traveler program were also allowed to keep their shoes on during security screenings. The end of the shoe removal policy comes a couple of months after another significant change, which now requires travelers to carry a 'REAL ID' or one of a few other compliant forms of identification to move through security checkpoints at the airport. The TSA told Forbes that travelers without a REAL ID or approved alternative documents will be subject to extra screening at airports which could cause them to miss their flights. Further Reading Passengers at some U.S. airports no longer have to remove footwear, sources say (CBS News) T.S.A. to Let Travelers Keep Their Shoes On, Ending Hated Rule (New York Times) REAL ID Deadline Is Today–Here's What You'll Need To Fly (Forbes)


The Verge
19 minutes ago
- The Verge
Supreme Court gives Trump the green light to cut down the federal workforce
In a significant albeit preliminary win for the president, the Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to go ahead with its plans to drastically reshape federal agencies by laying off employees en masse. The unsigned decision lifts a lower court ruling that briefly stopped the Trump administration from cutting down the federal workforce while a legal challenge worked through the court system. The Supreme Court is now allowing federal agencies to slash jobs even before the legality of Trump's plan has been decided. A February executive order directed the heads of federal agencies to 'promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force (RIFs).' A coalition of unions, local governments, and nonprofit organizations soon filed suit, alleging that Trump's attempt to reorganize the federal government was unlawful. 'Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy.' In May, a US District Court Judge Susan Illston from San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction pausing the mass layoffs while the lawsuit proceeds. 'Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress,' the order reads. The Supreme Court is now lifting that injunction on the basis that the Trump administration is 'likely to succeed' in its argument that the executive order is lawful. But it chose not to weigh in on the legality of any individual agency's RIF plan for now. 'Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy,' the coalition of groups that sued Trump said in a press release today.