Could US involvement pull more countries into the Israel-Iran war?
China has denounced the US strikes as "a dangerous turning point" and Russia has warned of nuclear risks, yet both have avoided direct military intervention so far.
The two nuclear-armed nations have used a UN Security Council meeting on Monday to call for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war.
Meanwhile, Iran has reportedly vowed to enact "a response" against the US, prompting concern that it will retaliate against US military bases hosted in neighbouring Arab countries.
Here's an updated look at the key alliances in the Israel-Iran war and how they might come into play.
Russia, China unlikely to use force
China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — or "CRINK" for short — have become increasingly supportive of each other as part of an informal alliance that seeks to challenge the US-led world order.
Unlike the Western NATO alliance, there is no formal agreement between the CRINK countries to come to each other's help in a crisis and their responses so far suggest they will not intervene militarily in the Israel-Iran war.
Rather, China and Russia have renewed their calls for a diplomatic solution after strongly condemning US involvement.
"We're unlikely to see global countries like China and Russia get involved, unless it's to supply weapons," says Mohammed Alsudairi, a lecturer in politics and international relations at the Australian National University who specialises in China's ties with Arabic-speaking countries.
"But even then, their likelihood of supplying weapons is quite low."
Click on the cards below to read more on how global allies have aligned themselves with Iran.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has secured a third leadership term. ( Reuters: Jason Lee )
Iran has a primarily economic relationship with China, which is one of Iran's largest sources of foreign direct investment (FDI) in exchange for a steady supply of Iranian oil.
But Dr Alsudairi says China has little appetite to be embroiled in the region's conflicts.
"At best, the Middle East is of third or fourth-tier strategic importance to China," he says.
"China has already obtained a lot of what it needs through its existing relationships in the region. It doesn't need to embed itself in architectures of security."
Like Russia, China has positioned itself as a peace broker between Iran and Israel after denouncing the US strikes as a violation of international law.
"China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible, ensure the safety of civilians and start dialogue and negotiation," a foreign ministry spokesperson said.
"China stands ready to work with the international community to pool efforts together and uphold justice, and work for restoring peace and stability in the Middle East." Russia pushes for diplomacy Russian President Vladimir Putin sent a delegation to Istanbul for peace talks with Ukraine. ( Reuters: Sputnik/Alexander Kazakov )
Russia and Iran are long-term allies whose security relationship has deepened in recent years with the supply of Iranian drones for Russia's own war against Ukraine.
The country has strongly condemned the US strikes on Iran, calling them "irresponsible" and a violation of international law.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Monday that he would hold "serious consultations" with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
"Russia is a friend of Iran and we enjoy a strategy partnership, and we always consult with each other and coordinate our positions," he said.
It is not clear yet what will come out of this meeting, though we know Russia has been pushing for diplomacy after offering to mediate between Israel and Iran.
"We call for an end to aggression and for increased efforts to create conditions for returning the situation to a political and diplomatic track," Russia's foreign ministry said in an earlier statement on Sunday.
Janatan Sayeh, a research analyst focused on Iran at the US Foundation for Defense of Democracies, says even if Russia wanted to offer Iran military support, it would not have the material capacity.
"[Russia has] been reliant on Iranian drones and missiles so it's not necessarily in a position to weigh in on another conflict, given the war in Ukraine is not really going to their plan," he says. Pakistan breaks ranks
Pakistan is the only Muslim country in the world with a recognised nuclear weapons program.
While it is a long-time US ally, Pakistan broke ranks by condemning the strikes ordered by President Donald Trump.
At the UN Security Council meeting on Monday, Pakistan joined Russia and China in saying the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities "violate all norms of international law" and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the war.
"We are gravely concerned," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in an earlier statement on Sunday.
"The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran, is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond."
Also on Sunday, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to "convey Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks", a statement from the Pakistani leader said.
Yet the day before, Pakistan had said it was nominating Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month.
It said on Saturday he had "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship".
Pakistan's information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to Reuters requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country's positions over the weekend.
Meanwhile, in Pakistan's largest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the US and Israeli strikes on Iran.
A large American flag with a picture of Mr Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over.
The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan's regional enemy, India. North Korea on the periphery Kim Jong Un has ruled North Korea since 2011. ( KCNA via Reuters )
Iran and North Korea have long been reported to share missile technology and nuclear research.
But there has been no indication so far that North Korea will get involved in the Israel-Iran war.
A press statement released by the country's foreign ministry on June 20 condemned Israel's initial strikes on Iran as a "crime against humanity".
"The present grave situation witnessed by the world clearly proves that Israel … is a cancer-like entity for peace in the Middle East and the chief culprit in destroying global peace and security," the statement said.
"The international community is strictly watching the US and Western forces fanning up the flames of war, taking issue with the legitimate sovereign right and exercise of the right to self-defence of Iran."
North Korea reiterated its condemnation following the US strikes against Iran on Monday.
So how might Iran retaliate?
Iran has spent decades propping up militant groups across the Middle East, forming its so-called "Axis of Resistance", which it could potentially activate to strike US military bases in the region.
This network of Iranian "proxies" includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, some armed groups in Iraq and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza and the West Bank.
But over the past two years, Iran's regional allies have been dealt some severe blows, with Israel significantly degrading Hezbollah and Hamas's fighting capabilities.
According to Janatan Sayeh, a research analyst focused on Iran at the US Foundation for Defense of Democracies, that leaves the Islamic Republic largely on its own.
"However, we might see Iraqi militias that are backed by Tehran attack US bases as they have recently escalated their threats against US interests in the region," he said.
Iran could also still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea — a crucial global trade route — if the US entered the war.
Both the Iraqi militias and Yemen's Houthi rebels have the drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the US and its allies in the region.
Click on the cards below to read more about how Iran's regional allies are responding.
Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem vowed retaliation for recent Israeli strikes in Lebanon would be carried out in central Tel Aviv. ( Reuters: Al Manar TV )
Hezbollah has long been considered Iran's first line of defence in case of a war with Israel, but the Lebanese militant group has stayed out of the latest conflict.
At one point, Hezbollah was believed to have around 150,000 rockets and missiles, and its former leader, Hassan Nasrallah, once claimed to have 100,000 fighters.
The group was drawn into a full-scale war with Israel last September after it tried to help its ally, Hamas, fight off Israel's offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian militants' October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel.
A daring attack by Israel, which involved remotely detonating pagers and walkie-talkies armed with explosives that had been distributed to Hezbollah members, killed key members of the armed group as well as some civilians.
While a US-brokered ceasefire halted the Israel-Hezbollah conflict last November, Israel continues to occupy parts of southern Lebanon and carries out near-daily air strikes.
Hezbollah's current leader, Naim Qassem, has condemned Israel's attacks on Iran and offered condolences for the senior Iranian officers who were killed.
But Qassem did not suggest Hezbollah would take part in any retaliation against Israel.
According to Ian Parmeter, a Middle East scholar at the Australian National University (ANU) and a former Australian ambassador to Lebanon, Hezbollah is still reeling from its losses.
"Hezbollah has been very badly degraded, and Iran hasn't been able to resupply it with rockets and missiles," Mr Parmeter says.
"So Hezbollah is not able to create a diversionary attack on Iran's behalf."
Still, Qassem Qassir, a Lebanese analyst close to Hezbollah, told the Associated Press a role for the militant group in the Israel-Iran conflict should not be ruled out.
"This depends on political and field developments," he said. "Anything is possible." Iran-backed: Iraqi militias show solidarity The US launched strikes against the Iranian-backed group Kataib Hezbollah. ( Reuters: Thaier al-Sudani )
Unlike Hezbollah, whose military wing has operated as a non-state actor in Lebanon, the main Iraqi militias are members of a coalition that is officially part of the state defence forces.
For their part in Iran's "axis", the Iraqi militias have occasionally struck bases housing US troops in Iraq and Syria.
One of these militias, Kataib Hezbollah, said it was "deeply regrettable" that Israel allegedly fired at Iran from Iraqi airspace in the last week.
The armed group called on the Iraqi government to "urgently expel hostile forces from the country," which is a reference to US troops in Iraq, but it made no threat of force.
Renad Mansour, a senior research fellow at the British think tank Chatham House, told the Associated Press that Iraq's militias did not want to pull their country into a major conflict.
"Things in Iraq are good for them right now, they're connected to the state — they're benefiting politically, economically," Dr Mansour said.
"They've seen what's happened to Iran, to Hezbollah, and they're concerned that Israel will turn on them as well." Iran-backed: Houthis still attacking The strike was the third US attack on Houthi targets in Yemen in recent days. ( AP Photo )
The Houthis remain the only Iran-backed group still firing missiles at Israel as part of a campaign that began with the Gaza war in solidarity with Palestinians.
"Triumphing for the oppressed Palestinian and Iranian peoples … This operation was coordinated with the operations carried out by the Iranian army," a military spokesperson said after targeting central Israel's Jaffa.
The Houthis are mountain fighters who have been battling Saudi-led forces for control of Yemen in what is widely seen as a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran.
They have been the de facto government in north Yemen since a 2022 ceasefire.
The group has a large arsenal of armed drones and ballistic missiles, largely supplied by Iran, which it has previously used to fire at ships in the Red Sea, a crucial global trade route.
But the ANU's Mr Parmeter says the Houthis are too geographically removed to strategically harm Israel beyond the rebels' sporadic missile attacks.
"Yemen is certainly supported by Iran, but it's too far away to be able to do much damage to Israel," he says.
The US has thwarted most of the previous attacks and carried out retaliatory strikes with Israel on Houthi bases.
Iran's retaliation often to 'save face'
The US has around 40,000 troops currently stationed in the Middle East, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), according to the Council of Foreign Relations.
These bases boast the same kinds of sophisticated air defences as Israel, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones.
Even Israel, which is several hundred kilometres further away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire.
Iran could also choose to target key oil and gas facilities in those countries with the goal of exacting a higher price for US involvement in the war.
A drone attack on two major oil sites in Saudi Arabia in 2019 — claimed by the Houthis but widely blamed on Iran — briefly cut the kingdom's oil production in half.
In a similar vein, Iran has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, which is a crucial choke point for oil shipping.
"What we have seen so far with Iran's retaliation is, it's oftentimes in a timely manner. However, it's usually contained," Mr Sayeh says.
For example, he says when Mr Trump ordered in 2019 the assassination of Iran's top commander, Qasem Soleimani, Iran called ahead to make sure the US base it would target in Iraq was evacuated to avoid further escalation.
"Usually, the retaliation has been just to save face domestically in front of their support base. What is likely to happen right now — and it is in their best interest — is they will take their losses and continue their attacks against Israel."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff deadline looms amid inflation concerns
With the implementation of US President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs, some countries are now scrambling to reach a deal. Few countries have managed to make secure deals with the US ahead of the deadline, raising concerns for the global economy. On the 2nd of April this year, United States President Donald Trump stoked panic among global leaders, announcing sweeping tariffs on all imports to the US. After upending global financial markets and igniting a global trade war, only a few days passed before the administration ordered a 90-day pause on the measures. With an end to the ninety days fast approaching and only a few deals reached, fears are mounting over potential impacts on the global economy. Donald Trump says he's signed and is ready to send letters to 12 countries so far, outlining the various tariff levels they'll face. "I did, I signed some letters, and they'll go out on Monday, probably 12. Twelve different amount of money, different amounts of tariffs, and somewhat different statements. " JOURNALIST : "Mr. President, which countries will receive those letters on Monday?" TRUMP: "It'll be announced, I have to announce it on Monday, I can't do it now." Despite the administration's claims a pause would allow ample time to strike their goal of 90 deals in 90 days, most of those deals never materialised. Agreements were made with some countries, first with the U-K, then China, and most recently Vietnam. After a pact was made with Vietnam however, Chinese officials raised concerns about it's impact on Chinese trade. Chinese Ministry of Commerce spokeswoman He Yongqian says China may take countermeasures. "The imposition of the so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' by the United States on its global trading partners is a typical unilateral and bullying act. China has always firmly opposed it. We have noticed the relevant situation and is assessing the deal. China's position is consistent. We are happy to see all countries resolving economic and trade disputes with the United States through equal-footed consultation, but we firmly oppose any country reaching trade deals by sacrificing China's interests. If this happens, the Chinese side will resolutely take countermeasures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests." In India, which faces 26 per cent tariffs, officials say they're ready to make deals in the national interest but won't be rushed into reaching the US deadlines. Japanese and South Korea leaders are scrambling to reach a deal, with negotiators engaging in lengthy discussions with US officials over the weekend. South Korean President Lee Jae-Myung says negotiating a deal has been a difficult process. "It's clear that the tariff negotiations are not easy. At this point, I can't confidently say whether they'll be concluded by July 8. We're doing our utmost. What's crucial is that the outcome must be mutually beneficial for both sides. However, even now, it's not entirely clear what each side precisely wants — those details are still being worked out." Officials also say they're closing in on a framework agreement with the European Union, which would avert 50 per cent tariffs. Talks in Washington could go down to the wire, but officials say the E-U is willing to accept 10 per cent blanket tariffs in exchange for an extension and possible concessions on a 25 per cent car tariff. Simon Schuetz is head of communications at the German Association of the automotive Industry. He says the industry will struggle under the proposed terms. "So, for our industry it is very important that in the upcoming week there will be a solution. We are quite aware that it is impossible in this short time to do a whole trade deal with all the details. So we are asking for first deals for the important domains like the automotive industry, because the current tariffs that we are facing are something that we cannot live with in the future that is very toxic for our industry. So Europe is really asked to find a deal with the USA now and then in the aftermath, they can do the details." With European investors bracing for the looming impact of tariffs, European stocks declined on Friday. Poland is Europe's largest furniture exporter and the world's third largest, with the US being one of the country's biggest markets. Dominik Czylkowski is the CEO of NOTI, a Polish furniture company. He says the US market is crucial to success. "That's a big market, and that's a big partnership for us. So, of course, we cannot cut that from day to day. And of course we have to solve the issue together and handle this situation for next few weeks until we will find the best solution for us, but mainly for our customers." Meanwhile, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says he has confidence the US tariffs won't impact Australia's economy. As well as the 10 per cent baseline tariff, Australian steel and aluminium exports to the US face a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Albanese told Sky News he expects the 10 per cent on all Australian imports to stay in place. "We know that no country has a better tariff, if you like, level than ten percent. Now we'll continue to put our case as we as we do, we are in a position where you know on July 9 that won't really have an impact on us, because that's about other countries who have higher rates overnight. " REPORTER: "We won't get a letter on July 9? We won't get a determination?" ALBANESE:" We're on 10 per cent" REPORTER: "That's what we're going to stay on after next week? " ALBANESE: "Well, I assume that will be the case. " Also speaking to Sky News, opposition trade spokesperson Kevin Hogan says the Prime Minister ought to be doing more. "I think he's waving a white flag, Andrew, and I don't know why he'd be saying that before the announcement. We have seen carve outs for some countries. We know the UK have had a bit of a carve out on the steel and aluminum tariffs. Remember, steel and aluminum tariffs have gone up to fifty percent. They're not at ten percent. Countries have got carve outs to that. We've seen carve outs, Mexico have got a few carve outs. Canada have got a few carve outs from what tariffs they initially had as well." While it's clear the tariffs will hit global economies hard, experts say the US economy is already facing the consequences of Mr Trump's policy. According to analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute, mid-sized businesses in the US face an estimated $82.3 billion in additional costs if the US maintains a 10 per cent universal rate on all imports. No senior US official has been more vocal about this than Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve. Despite Mr Trump's public demands and attacks, Mr Powell says he is keeping US interest rates on hold while waiting to see how the administration's trade strategy pans out. Testifying to Congress late last month [[24/06]], he explains why. "The effects of tariffs will depend, among other things, on their ultimate level. Expectations of that level, and thus of the related economic effects, reached a peak in April and have since declined. Even so, increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity. The effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level. It's also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent. Avoiding that would depend on the size of the tariff effects, on how long it pass through fully into prices. And ultimately on keeping longer term inflation expectations well anchored."

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Iranian supreme leader makes first public appearance since war with Israel
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has made his first public appearance since the 12-day war between Israel and Iran began, according to state media. A video carried by Iranian TV on Saturday showed the ayatollah waving to a chanting crowd, which rose to its feet as he entered and sat at a mosque next to his residence in Tehran. The dozens in attendance were there to mark Ashura, the holiest day of the Shiite Muslim calendar, which commemorates the death of Prophet Mohammed's grandson, Hussein. There was no immediate report of the ayatollah making a public statement. For apparent security reasons, the Ayatollah had avoided public appearances and issued pre-taped messages during the war with Israel, which started on June 13. The 86-year-old reportedly spent the war in a bunker as threats to his life escalated. After the US inserted itself into the war by bombing three key nuclear sites in Iran, President Donald Trump warned the Iranian leader he knew where he was but did not plan to kill him, "at least for now". On June 26, shortly after a ceasefire began, the ayatollah made his first public statement in days, saying in a pre-recording that Iran delivered a "slap to America's face" by striking a US air base in Qatar. He also warned the US and Israel would pay a "heavy price" for any further attacks on Iran. Mr Trump replied in remarks to reporters and on social media: "Look, you're a man of great faith. A man who's highly respected in his country. You have to tell the truth. You got beat to hell." Iran has acknowledged the deaths of more than 900 people in the war, as well as thousands of injured. It also has confirmed serious damage to its nuclear facilities. However it has denied inspectors from the UN nuclear watchdog access to the facilities. Iran's president on Wednesday ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The move further limits inspectors' ability to track a program that had been enriching uranium to near-weapons-grade levels. Israel launched its war on Iran saying that the country was trying to develop atomic weapons. It remains unclear just how badly damaged the nuclear facilities are, and whether any enriched uranium or centrifuges had been moved before the attacks. It also remains unclear whether Tehran would be willing to continue negotiating with the US over its nuclear program. Israel also targeted defence systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists during its attacks. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of them intercepted, killing 28 people and causing damage in many areas. NetBlocks, a global internet monitor, reported late on Saturday that there was a "major disruption to internet connectivity" in Iran. It said the disruption corroborated widespread user reports of problems accessing the internet. The development came just weeks after authorities shut down telecoms during the war. Despite the ceasefire agreement pausing halting the war, Israel's military said on Sunday it intercepted a missile the Houthis, an Iran-aligned group in Yemen, fired at Israel. Sirens were activated across several areas in Israel in accordance with protocol, it said. Israel threatened the Houthis with a naval and air blockade if the attacks persisted. Since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, the Houthis have been firing at Israel and at shipping in the Red Sea, disrupting global trade. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones they have launched have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes. ABC/wires

ABC News
12 hours ago
- ABC News
The Dalai Lama marks his 90th birthday with celebrations and an answer on Tibetan Buddhism's future
The 14th Dalai Lama has celebrated his 90th birthday and marked the occasion with a long-awaited announcement about the future of the Tibetan Buddhist spiritual tradition. On Wednesday, His Holiness announced via video message that the institution of the Dalai Lama would continue after his death. It put to rest speculation over whether he might be the last of his lineage. This week, Tibetans and Buddhists have gathered around the world to mark the milestone and express their admiration for the longtime advocate for the Tibetan people. The Dalai Lama was appointed to Tibet's highest spiritual role at the age of two and has spent nearly a century navigating the fraught political terrain between Tibet and China, despite living in exile for 66 years. He is the first Dalai Lama to achieve global influence and has been instrumental in bringing contemporary Buddhism into the mainstream. And it all began in a small, remote village in north-eastern Tibet. According to Tibetan Buddhism, Dalai Lamas are the spiritual leaders and protectors of Tibet. The doctrine states that when a Dalai Lama dies, he may choose the subject of his reincarnation and direct his senior spiritual guides to identify their next leader. The process can take some time. When the 13th Dalai Lama died in 1933, a regent was appointed until a successor was found. Search parties scoured Tibet for two years before they landed on a boy living in a small hamlet called Taktser in the country's northeast. His name was Lhamo Dhondup. After putting the two-year-old through spiritual and supernatural tests, the lamas confirmed him as a "tulku" or Dalai Lama incarnate. In 1939, he was formally recognised as the 14th Dalai Lama and given the name of Tenzin Gyatso. He began his monastic education when he was just five years old, studying Tibetan Buddhist philosophy along with logic, fine arts, medicine, poetry and other subjects. Despite his elevated status, His Holiness says he was treated as "an ordinary young monk". In 1950, the newly established People's Republic of China invaded and subsequently annexed Tibet. As political unrest and violence escalated, the 15-year-old Dalai Lama was asked to assume the role of head of state. But in May 1951, Tibetan representatives, under significant pressure from Chinese authorities, ceded control of Tibet to China. While His Holiness later formed an unlikely relationship with Mao Zedong — whom he describes as "like a father" — their bond over communist ideology could not stave off rising tensions between their two cultures. In the late 1950s, communication between Chinese and Tibetan representatives broke down, and rumours circulated that Chinese authorities planned to kidnap the Dalai Lama. Driven by famine, growing fear for their leader's safety and resentment toward Chinese control, Tibetans staged a wave of protests in the city of Lhasa that escalated into the 1959 Tibetan Uprising. Over 10 days, pro-independence demonstrators clashed with the Chinese People's Liberation Army, which responded with tanks and heavy artillery. Tibetan authorities estimate that 87,000 Tibetans were killed during this period. "Everything was uncertain, except the compelling anxiety of all my people to get me away before the orgy of Chinese destruction and massacre began," His Holiness wrote in his autobiography. The Dalai Lama disguised himself as a soldier and escaped the city under the cover of darkness, accompanied by guerilla fighters. For two weeks, they journeyed on foot through the Himalayas, pursued by Chinese troops, until, on May 31, 1959, they entered India and were granted asylum. In 1960, the Dalai Lama established a base in Dharamshala, a hill town in the northern Indian state of Himachal Pradesh. The following year, tens of thousands of Tibetans followed their leader into exile. "I consider my involvement in the Tibetan freedom struggle … part of my spiritual practice," His Holiness told the ABC in 1996. Later, he reflected: Over a decade beginning in 1966, Mao Zedong spearheaded the Cultural Revolution, a political campaign aimed at rooting out capitalist ideology and reinforcing communist orthodoxy. According to Tibetan records, more than 6,000 monasteries and religious institutions were destroyed, millions of manuscripts were burnt, and around 173,000 Tibetans died in prison or labour camps during this period. From his government in exile, the Dalai Lama continued to advocate for Tibetan culture and the rights of its people. "Tibetans were compelled to live in a state of constant fear, while the Chinese government remained suspicious of them," His Holiness wrote of the period. "However, instead of cultivating enmity towards the Chinese leaders responsible for the ruthless suppression of the Tibetan people, I prayed for them to become friends." He grew to believe that Tibet, despite its "rich and ancient cultural heritage", was too "materially underdeveloped" to pursue independence from China. In the late 1980s, the Dalai Lamai presented a new peace proposal, first at the US Congressional Human Rights Caucus and later at a session of the European Parliament. The Buddhist leader advanced what he called the Middle Way Approach; a proposal for Tibetan autonomy within China rather than full independence, with protections for Tibetan people's rights and freedoms. "Our proposal is the best way to achieve harmony, stability and unity," His Holiness said of the plan in 2007. But critics have argued the Dalai Lama's approach falls short and he should advocate for full independence rather than autonomy. His Holiness has said even his older brother accused him of "selling out their right to independence". In 2011, the Dalai Lama resigned as political leader of the Tibetan government in exile, but continued to advocate for the Middle Way in his capacity as religious leader. Since its inception, however, Chinese leadership has been unwilling to entertain the plan. The CCP has long maintained that Tibet is an "inalienable part of China", and that the Dalai Lama must "thoroughly correct" his political views if he wishes to maintain communication with the Chinese state. "The Chinese government considers me [to be] a splittist. In recent years, it has even described me as a demon," the Dalai Lama told the ABC in 2013. Lobsang Sangay, who was the leader of the Central Tibetan Administration in India for 10 years, says the CCP's political resistance to the Middle Way distracts from the bigger picture. "These are all lame excuses that they use to distract from talking about the real issue, which is the destruction of Tibetan culture, identity and religion," he told ABC Radio National's God Forbid. "They're doing exactly what colonial powers have done before." The current Dalai Lama is among the oldest in the lineage, with many of his predecessors passing away before their 30th birthday. Throughout his exile, he has travelled extensively, visiting 67 countries across six continents to meet with senior religious and political figures and give lectures on Buddhism. Interfaith dialogue has featured prominently during his most high-profile visits, which have included meetings with the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and Archbishop Desmond Tutu. He made his first visit to Australia in 1982 and has returned nine times since. This international attention helped reshape the image of the Dalai Lama from the solitary, mystical figure of his predecessors to that of a globally recognised political and spiritual force — a role cemented by his Nobel Peace Prize win in 1989. "I'm Buddhist, [but] I understand the value of different traditions," he told the ABC in 2008. "I am always trying to make clear [that] the ultimate source of a happy life and peace of mind is within ourselves. That is human affection, warm-heartedness or, in other words, human compassion." His Holiness' Buddhist teachings, which centre on compassion, wisdom and kindness, are believed to have influenced rising numbers of Buddhist practitioners and institutions around the world. He has also authored more than 100 books on Buddhism and collaborated with the scientific community to "share a search for the truth". Robert Thurman, an American Buddhist, author and academic who has hosted the Dalai Lama, told the ABC in 2008 that His Holiness's magnetism was undeniable. "The Dalai Lama always has an amazing effect on his audience; whether it's one person or 30,000 people," he said. "People just blossom in his presence." Tenzin Choegyal, a world-renowned Tibetan-Australian musician and composer, agrees the spiritual leader has brought Tibetan Buddhism into the spotlight. "He's probably one of the most recognisable world refugees, who has been living in exile for the last [almost] 70 years," he tells ABC Radio National's Soul Search. "Not many people know about Tibet, but they definitely know about the Dalai Lama." Today, ill health prevents the Dalai Lama from travelling widely or hosting large-scale public events, but for many Tibetans, he remains a hugely significant figure. "For a Tibetan, he's a father, a mother, a leader of the nation and also the spiritual leader as well," Choegyal says. "It's almost like he is the Tibet that resides within us. "His Holiness has been an amazing backbone in keeping everyone's hope and resilience intact." In his last interview with the ABC in 2017, the Dalai Lama expressed hope for future negotiations over Tibetan autonomy and cultural preservation. "If you compare the China of 20 years ago [to today], I think much has already changed … It's only a question of time," he said. "When it becomes a more open society or a more democratic country, then certainly we can easily find a mutually agreeable solution between Tibet and the Chinese." Currently, the Tibetan government in exile is not recognised as a legitimate government by any country in the world. But questions have been raised over the next Dalai Lama — and how many there might be. His Holiness has previously indicated that the 600-year-old institution of the Dalai Lama may not continue after his death, and that he would consult with senior lamas, the Tibetan public and other spiritual leaders on the decision. In his recent announcement, he said this consultation had taken place over the past 14 years and that he had received appeals from Buddhists all over the world to continue the tradition. He confirmed the institution would continue through the process of reincarnation, and that his charitable trust would have "sole authority" to recognise his successor. "No one [sic] else has any such authority to interfere in this matter," he said. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning responded to the announcement by reasserting that the next Dalai Lama and "other great Buddhist figures" must be "approved by the central government". In 1995, the Dalai Lama identified the 11th Panchen Lama, a senior religious leader responsible for helping recognise the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. The six-year-old child, named Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, was detained by the CCP just three days after he was identified. He has not been seen since, although Chinese authorities insist he is "living a normal life". Later that year, the CCP appointed its own choice for Panchen Lama, Gyancain Norbu, who is not recognised by the Central Tibetan Administration and largely viewed as an instrument of the Chinese state. The Dalai Lama has suggested that upon his death, the Chinese government would appoint its own Dalai Lama favourable to the CCP. Dr Sangay agrees this a likely scenario. "For Tibetans inside and outside Tibet, the one selected as per the instruction of the Dalai Lama will be the real one and the one selected by the Chinese government will be a fake one," he says. "You just can't have political leadership deciding on spiritual leadership. "Spirituality is a matter of heart and mind; it's a matter of devotion. It has to come from within."