
Toddlers in India are missing key developmental milestones due to excessive screen time; parents, mental health experts weigh in
'Parents used screen time for their own rest, to carry out household chores, or to pacify their children,' the study noted. Many believed this was beneficial, but the trade-off was clear: reduced verbal interaction, physical activity, and developmental play.
Speech and hearing specialist Priyank Bhutani, a co-author of the study and PhD scholar at Tezpur University, said the research was driven by a lack of Indian data on how screen time affects early development. 'About 13 per cent of children were getting up to eight hours of screen time daily, and 70–80 per cent of parents didn't even know what the guidelines were,' he told indianexpress.com.
This stands in stark contrast to World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend zero screen time for children under 2, and no more than one hour of supervised, high-quality content for ages 2–5. Instead, activities like reading or storytelling with a caregiver are encouraged.
'Screens were being used to feed, soothe, and occupy kids,' Bhutani said. 'Children with higher screen time were found to engage less in talking with parents and peers, had reduced outdoor play and were less likely to participate in creative activities,' the study mentioned.
Bhutani describes screens as 'digital helpers' that became indispensable during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 'They became the easiest way to keep children occupied while parents focused on daily responsibilities.'
This resonates with many urban parents. Natasha Puri, a mother of two toddlers aged two and four, admitted, 'With two young kids, a job, and trying to protect my mental health, screen time is a crutch. We're way over the 20-minute recommendation, but it's the best I can manage.'
Similarly, Ratish Sreekumar, 41, father to two children aged two and five, said: 'It started with the intention of augmented learning, but yes, I'd be lying if I said entertainment, convenience and simply keeping him occupied didn't play a role.'
What makes this trend particularly concerning is how screens are infiltrating critical learning moments. The damage isn't just about time spent on screens, it's about what that time is replacing. 'When a child eats while staring at a screen, they're not experiencing the food –– how it smells, tastes, feels,' Bhutani said. 'Gone is the baby talk: 'Open your mouth, it's yum!' There's no interaction.'
This loss of communication is being seen in clinics. 'As a speech and language therapist, I've seen a surge in parents reporting delays in speech and language,' Bhutani said.
The underlying issue, he explained, is fundamental: 'Language is a learned behaviour. It doesn't happen automatically. A screen cannot give you two-way communication. You need a social environment to learn.'
Mental health professionals are observing similar patterns. Dr Sakshi Mehrotra, an existential humanistic therapist and founder of Mindlogs, noted a rise in toddlers with 'delayed speech, reduced eye contact, poor frustration tolerance, and difficulties engaging in imaginative play or independent exploration, all foundational to healthy emotional and cognitive development.'
'Often, these signs get misread —– parents might assume the child is just shy or independent,' she said. 'Reduced curiosity or playfulness – the child preferring passive screen time over exploring toys, nature, or social spaces – difficulty tolerating boredom, meltdowns when the screen is turned off, inability to self-soothe without digital distraction are all red flags.'
Counselling psychologist Rajvi Turakhia describes this as 'digital dysregulation.' Children exposed to fast-paced screen content become desensitised to normal stimuli. 'The brain begins craving the dopamine hit of quick cuts, loud sounds, and instant gratification. Once the screen's off, regular life feels boring or even frustrating.'
Many parents are aware of the risks but feel stuck. Neha Popli Dhamija, a teacher and mother of a 4-year-old, said, 'My daughter started mimicking cartoon characters and behaving like them. That's when I cut back and focused on play instead. It made a big difference in her mood and attention span.' She also said, 'In hindsight, too much screen time hindered development, not just for my daughter but many kids around. I've seen cases where children face speech delays or show signs of autism linked to excessive screen exposure.'
Abhilasha Daga, mother of a 3-year-old, said, 'On high screen time days, he's more irritable, less responsive, and harder to settle at bedtime. It's like he's overstimulated.'
For Sreekumar, the effects were behavioural. 'My 2-year-old becomes more stubborn and unruly after screen time, so we've started capping it and being more selective about the content.'
The study found that what children watch is just as important as how long they watch. The WHO guidelines specify that even the permitted hour for two-five year olds should be 'assisted'. Bhutani stressed that screen time must be interactive and supervised. 'It should be co-viewed, not passive,' he said. 'We must pay attention to both duration and content.'
Puri noted changes in her son's behaviour depending on what he was watching. 'He was more aggressive when watching angry dinosaurs. I had to ban that content.'
Despite widespread awareness that excessive screen time isn't ideal, parents consistently report a lack of practical, accessible guidance. 'I don't think there's enough clear or accessible guidance for Indian parents. Most information is either too technical or hidden behind paywalls/paid subscribers. There's also a lot of conflicting advice online,' said Abhilasha.
This echoes the research findings. 'There's a huge gap,' Bhutani said, adding, 'There should be an Indian-based, Indian context on Indian data guidelines. And there should be programmes to train parents what to do if you're not giving a screen.'
Turakhia said, 'There's a serious lack of accessible, non-judgemental psychoeducation for parents. Many don't have the information they need to make informed choices or aren't sure what realistic alternatives look like.'
Mental health professionals stressed that addressing this issue requires understanding, not condemnation. 'Parents are doing their best with limited tools,' said Dr Mehrotra. 'Many believe that educational apps compensate for real-life interaction, but they don't.'
Turakhia points out that modern parenting is uniquely challenging. 'Dual-income homes, limited support, and digital distractions have reshaped the parenting landscape. Rather than strict prohibitions, we need small, sustainable shifts –– like screen-free meals, bedtime routines, or co-viewing on weekends.'
The good news is that it's not too late. 'Children's brains are incredibly plastic in the early years,' Turakhia explained. 'Even small changes can yield significant improvements –– if parents have the right tools.'
Bhutani emphasises the bigger picture. 'If this continues unchecked, screen exposure could become a public health crisis. We need awareness campaigns, government-led initiatives, and most importantly, support for parents who want to do better but don't know how.' He also said, 'Most parents know there's a problem. They're not in denial, they just need help navigating it.'
As India continues its digital transformation, the goal, experts agreed, is to help families make informed choices. The challenge isn't to eliminate screens entirely but to find a sustainable balance. 'It's about slowly reclaiming space for shared, screen-free moments that nurture both parent and child,' Dr Mehrotra said.
Swarupa is a Senior Sub Editor for the lifestyle desk at The Indian Express. With a passion for storytelling, she delves into the realms of art & culture, fitness, health, nutrition, psychology, and relationships, empowering her readers with valuable insights. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
Goa Targets Malaria-Free Status by 2025–26: Health Minister Rane Outlines Roadmap
Goa has embarked on an ambitious mission to eradicate malaria by 2025–26, marking a significant shift in the state's public health strategy. Health Minister Vishwajit Rane announced that the state has officially entered the elimination phase of malaria, with coordinated efforts now underway to completely eliminate the disease over the next year. Key measures include mandatory screening of all labourers at construction sites and the issuance of health cards under the Goa Public Health Act—an area often identified as a high-risk zone for mosquito breeding. The Directorate of Health Services (DHS) has also issued advisories to departments across the board to strengthen sanitation practices in both urban and rural pockets. 'Goa is in the elimination phase of malaria, with a goal to achieve complete eradication by 2025–26,' Rane said. 'This is not just a departmental effort—it requires coordination between government bodies and active involvement from the public.' To ensure the momentum continues, the state has submitted a proposal for the Sub-National Malaria Elimination Award for South Goa district, covering performance across 2022, 2023, and 2024. The award recognizes regions demonstrating measurable progress in malaria control and elimination. Public awareness is also a central component of the strategy. The health department is urging citizens to help eliminate mosquito breeding sites by maintaining clean surroundings. 'Public participation is key. Let us work together to make Goa free of vector-borne diseases,' Rane added. Officials say the move reflects the state's larger health vision, with an emphasis on early detection, prevention, and sustained surveillance. If successful, Goa would become one of the first Indian states to achieve malaria eradication under the national framework. With a clear timeline and multi-stakeholder approach, Goa's fight against malaria is being closely watched by public health experts and other states working toward similar goals.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Three COVID-19 patients die in Indore in 48 hours; no need to panic, says official
Indore: Three women who had tested positive for COVID-19 infection died here within two days, a health official said on Tuesday while clarifying that they were suffering from other serious ailments and there was no cause for panic. A 64-year-old woman and a 55-year-old woman died on Sunday, while a 50-year-old woman died on Monday, said district Chief Medical and Health Officer (CMHO) Dr Madhav Prasad Hasani. "All three women were already suffering from different diseases due to which their immunity had decreased. These included diseases like blood cancer, TB, diabetes and thyroid disorder," said the CMHO. "At present, only seven COVID-19 patients are undergoing treatment in the district. We did not find a single case of the epidemic on Tuesday. There is no need to panic," he said. Since January 1, a total of 187 residents of the district have been found infected with coronavirus, of which four died during treatment. "The first death of a COVID-19 patient in the district this year was recorded on April 21, when a 74-year-old woman died in hospital. She was suffering from a serious kidney ailment," said Dr Hasani.>
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Indian-origin Sabih Khan appointed Apple COO in major leadership shift
Apple has appointed Sabih Khan, an Indian-origin executive and 30-year veteran of the company, as its new chief operating officer. The announcement was made in a company statement on Monday. Khan will succeed Jeff Williams, a longtime Apple executive who is stepping down from the role this month and retiring later this year. The transition marks a major shift in leadership during a turbulent period for the iPhone maker, which is grappling with tariff challenges and slowing iPhone growth. Jeff Williams to retire after nearly three decades at Apple Williams, who has served at Apple for more than 27 years, will continue to oversee the company's design team and health initiatives until his retirement. In the interim, he will report to chief executive officer Tim Cook. Following his departure, the design team will report directly to Cook. Cook praised Williams for his contributions, saying, 'Jeff and I have worked alongside each other for as long as I can remember, and Apple wouldn't be what it is without him. He's helped to create one of the most respected global supply chains in the world; launched Apple Watch and overseen its development; architected Apple's health strategy; and led our world-class team of designers with great wisdom, heart, and dedication.' Khan to oversee operations, likely to add AppleCare portfolio Khan joined Apple's executive team in 2019 as senior vice-president of operations. Since then, he has managed procurement and manufacturing, taking charge of the company's global supply chain. Positioned as Williams' successor, Khan will report to Cook and is likely to assume responsibility for additional divisions such as AppleCare. Commenting on Khan's appointment, Cook said, 'Sabih is a brilliant strategist who has been one of the central architects of Apple's supply chain. While overseeing Apple's supply chain, he has helped pioneer new technologies in advanced manufacturing, overseen the expansion of Apple's manufacturing footprint in the United States, and helped ensure that Apple can be nimble in response to global challenges.' Cook added, 'He has advanced our ambitious efforts in environmental sustainability, helping reduce Apple's carbon footprint by more than 60 per cent. Above all, Sabih leads with his heart and his values, and I know he will make an exceptional chief operating officer.' Leadership change amid broader industry and regulatory headwinds The leadership transition comes as Apple faces significant external pressures. The company is attempting to shift parts of its production from China to India to mitigate the effects of tariffs imposed by the US administration under President Donald Trump. Additionally, Apple is under regulatory scrutiny, including enforcement actions in the European Union that require changes to its App Store operations. It is also the subject of a US Department of Justice lawsuit, which could jeopardise a $20-billion-a-year deal with Google, Bloomberg reported.