Man arrested after Utah ‘No Kings' rally shooting is released as investigation continues
Salt Lake District Attorney Sim Gill's office said Friday that it was unable to make a decision on charges against Arturo Gamboa, 24, who had been jailed on suspicion of murder following the June 14 shooting.
Salt Lake City police had said Gamboa brought an assault-style rifle to the rally and was allegedly moving toward the crowd with the weapon raised when a safety volunteer for the event fired three shots, wounding Gamboa and killing a nearby demonstrator, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo.
Gamboa did not fire his rifle and it is unclear what he intended to do with it. His lawyer, Greg Skordas, said Gamboa was lawfully in possession of the rifle at the rally and was walking with it unloaded pointed at the ground before he was shot in the back by the volunteer. Skordas said he does not believe that Gamboa heard anyone tell him to drop the weapon.
'There was never any raising of the gun, any brandishing of the gun, any pointing it toward anyone at all,' Skordas said.
Gamboa had been attending the rally as a supporter, Skordas said, adding that he was not entirely sure why Gamboa brought the rifle.
Skordas said his client, who works at a grocery store and is a part-time musician, had brought a gun at least once in the past to a demonstration, during the Black Lives Matter protests several years ago.
Skordas said the volunteer who shot Gamboa and the demonstrator should face criminal charges, not Gamboa.
His father Albert Gamboa, told The Associated Press earlier this week that his son was 'an innocent guy' who was 'in the wrong place at the wrong time.'
Utah is an open-carry state, meaning people who can legally own a firearm are generally allowed to carry it on a public street. The volunteer has not been publicly identified as investigators have worked to determine who was at fault.
Judge James Blanch said in the release order that Gamboa must live with his father and is forbidden from possessing firearms. The conditions terminate after two months or if criminal charges against him are pursued, Blanch wrote.
Police said the day after the shooting that witnesses reported seeing Gamboa lift the rifle when he was ordered to drop it and that instead he began running toward the crowd. He fled but was arrested nearby, accused of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo's death.
Salt Lake City police said in a statement the next day that Gamboa 'knowingly engaged in conduct ... that ultimately caused the death of an innocent community member.'
But three days after Gamboa was booked into jail, with no formal charges filed, police acknowledged that the circumstances surrounding the shooting remained uncertain. They issued a public appeal for any video footage related to the shooting or Gamboa, and said detectives were still trying 'to piece together exactly what happened.'
The volunteer who confronted Gamboa was described by event organizers as a military veteran whose role as a safety volunteer was to maintain order.
Experts say it's extremely rare for such individuals, often called safety marshals, to be armed. They typically rely on calm demeanor, communication and relationships with police and protesters to help keep order, said Edward Maguire, an Arizona State University criminology and criminal justice professor.
Police said the permit for the protest did not specify that there would be armed security.
Protest organizers have not said whether or how the safety volunteer who shot Ah Loo was trained or explained why he was armed. All attendees, including those in safety roles, were asked not to bring weapons, according to Sarah Parker, a national coordinator for the 50501 Movement.
The demonstration involving some 18,000 people was otherwise peaceful. It was one of hundreds nationwide against President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington, which marked the Army's 250th anniversary and coincided with Trump's birthday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sean "Diddy" Combs acquitted of sex trafficking, convicted on lesser charges
Sean "Diddy" Combs was found guilty Wednesday of transportation to engage in prostitution in his federal trial in New York, but the music mogul was acquitted of the more severe charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs was convicted of two counts of the prostitution-related charge. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. When the verdict was announced, Combs turned around, kneeled down on the ground, put his hands on his chair and prayed. He and his family erupted in loud applause, cheering loudly and whistling. Following the decision, Combs' lawyers argued for him to be released from custody immediately and be able to return to his Miami home, emphasizing that this was his first conviction. Prosecutors opposed the defense's request. The judge asked both the prosecution and defense to submit letters as to why Combs should be released Wednesday or remain detained. Court was expected to resume at 1 p.m. Eastern time. The developments come after jurors said Tuesday they'd agreed on four of the five counts against Combs but disagreed on racketeering conspiracy. They reached a verdict on all five counts Wednesday morning. Jurors began deliberating in U.S. District Court in lower Manhattan on Monday. They said they'd reached a partial verdict Tuesday, but Judge Arun Subramanian sent them back to continue deliberating on the remaining count. What are the charges against Sean "Diddy" Combs? The grand jury indictment against the 55-year-old Combs, unsealed in September 2024, initially charged the hip-hop mogul with three counts following his arrest at a Manhattan hotel. In April, before the trial began, prosecutors filed additional charges, bringing the total number of counts against him to five. Combs pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The charges against Combs are: Count 1: Rackeering conspiracyCount 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion (Casandra Ventura)Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution (Casandra Ventura)Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion ("Jane")Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution ("Jane") "Jane" is a pseudonym used in court for an ex-girlfriend of Combs who testified against him. What is the Mann Act? The prostitution-related charges allege violations of the Mann Act, a law that makes it a federal crime to transport someone across state lines for prostitution. The charge of racketeering conspiracy requires prosecutors to prove a number of elements: that there was an agreement among two or more people to participate in a pattern of activity that would affect interstate commerce; that the defendant willfully joined it; and that members of the conspiracy committed two or more racketeering acts. The charging document lists a number of alleged racketeering acts, including kidnapping, bribery, sex trafficking and forced labor. Prosecutors alleged that Combs' business empire created a criminal enterprise that he used for years to cover up acts of violence and abuse and to coerce women into fulfilling his sexual desires. Jurors heard from more than 30 witnesses over the course of seven weeks as the prosecution went through its case. Combs denied the accusations but chose not to take the stand to testify in his defense. His attorneys did not call any witnesses during the trial, though they did conduct extensive cross-examinations of the government's witnesses. Combs' lawyers argued the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. "Freak-offs" part of emotional and graphic testimony The high-profile trial, which started in May, included graphic and emotional testimony from two of Combs' former girlfriends. Casandra Ventura, the R&B singer known as Cassie who spent more than a decade with him, testified about drug-fueled sex sessions that Combs allegedly referred to as "freak-offs." Ventura testified that he directed all the encounters, which could last for days, and that she felt forced to participate to make him happy. Ventura testified that Combs controlled every aspect of her life, and that she often did things out of fear, since physical abuse was "frequent." Combs' attorneys argued that the encounters were consensual. During cross-examination, the defense showed the jury a 2009 message from Ventura to Combs that read, "I'm always ready to freak off." Ventura also testified about a 2016 incident which was caught on surveillance video showing Combs beating and kicking her in a California hotel hallway. Combs apologized at the time, saying his behavior was "inexcusable" and that he took "full responsibility" for his actions. Ventura testified that the attack happened as she was trying to leave a "freak-off" that had turned violent. A former hotel security officer testified that Combs offered him cash after the attack, which the officer said he understood to be a bribe. Ventura had filed a civil lawsuit against Combs in 2023, accusing him of physically and sexually abusing her. Combs denied the claims and quickly reached a settlement with her. In his closing argument to the jury Friday, defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said, "If you had to pick a winner in this whole thing, it's hard not to pick Cassie." Another former girlfriend of Combs testified under the pseudonym "Jane" to protect her identity. She told the court she often participated in what she called "hotel nights," which also involved drugs. Jane testified she would have sex with a male escort while Combs watched. She said she told Combs many times that she didn't want to have sex with other men and didn't like the "hotel nights." Combs' lawyers displayed messages showing her setting up "hotel nights." Jane said she felt pressured and that she had grown financially dependent on Combs. In the prosecution's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik described Combs as "the leader of a criminal enterprise. He doesn't take no for an answer. And now you know about many crimes he committed with members of his enterprise." She said he used a "small army" of employees to harm women and then cover it up. "He thought that his fame, wealth and power put him above the law," Slavik said. Agnifilo countered by arguing that prosecutors "badly exaggerated" evidence of a swinger lifestyle and threesomes, combining it with recreational drug use and calling it a racketeering conspiracy. "He did not do the things he's charged with. He didn't do racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking," Combs' lawyer said. "Sean Diddy Combs: The Verdict," a one-hour special on the case, will air on CBS News 24/7 at 9 p.m. ET the night of the jury's decision. Download the free CBS News app to watch on your mobile or streaming device, or stream on Paramount+. Split verdict in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial | Special Report General David Petraeus weighs in on global conflict and U.S. strategy Tiny eyelash mites can cause a common eye disease. How can we protect our eyes?


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
10:35 AM ET: Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty on prostitution charges, acquitted on others - CNN Breaking News Alerts - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
10:35 AM ET: Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty on prostitution charges, acquitted on others CNN Breaking News Alerts 10:43 AM EDT It's a mixed verdict for Sean "Diddy" Combs. Listen for more details.

Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Acquitted of Racketeering and Sex Trafficking
Music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs was found not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking but convicted of less serious offenses of transportation to engage in prostitution. Photo: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters