Jes Staley fails to have ban over Epstein links scrapped
The former boss of Barclays has lost his bid to overturn a decision by the City regulator to ban him from holding senior positions in the financial services for 'recklessly' misleading it about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
The ruling by a court in London deals a severe blow to Jes Staley, who had been seeking to salvage his reputation by challenging the findings of an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority, which concluded in October 2023 that Staley had 'acted with a lack of integrity'.
The case revolved around a letter that Staley, 68, allowed Barclays to send to the authority in October 2019, in which the bank told the regulator that Staley 'has confirmed to us that he did not have a close relationship' with the sex offender and that his 'last contact' with the paedophile was 'well before' he joined the lender in December 2015.
In a 93-page ruling handed down on Thursday, the Upper Tribunal said: 'On the basis of our findings Mr Staley failed to disclose appropriately information of which the authority would reasonably expect notice.'
Although it upheld the regulator's decision to ban Staley, it told the authority to reduce a fine it had imposed on the Barclays boss to £1.1 million from £1.8 million. The court decided that the financial penalty should be lowered to account for the fact that Staley had forfeited deferred shares from Barclays as a result of the affair.
It is a legal battle that has engrossed the City of London. Staley spent five days in the witness box in March as part of a 12-day hearing on his case. Andrew Bailey, the governor of the Bank of England, and Nigel Higgins, the chairman of Barclays, were also among the witnesses and the tribunal concluded that both had been 'straightforward' with the court.
Judge Timothy Herrington concluded, however, that there were occasions when Staley 'did not do his best to assist the tribunal in his answers'.
He said: 'Although we do not consider that Mr Staley sought deliberately to mislead the tribunal we have found that some of his evidence lacked credibility.'
The court was also critical of the authority over the way it initiated its inquiry in 2019. The regulator's work started when Jonathan Davidson, who at the time was a senior official at the watchdog, contacted Higgins, who was on holiday, to ask him what the bank had done to understand Staley's Epstein links.
A note of this call dictated by Davidson was 'clearly inadequate', the court said. 'It did not meet the standards prescribed by the authority for what is described as a 'note for the record'.'
Staley, an American, was once one of Britain's top financiers and ran Barclays for six years until November 2021.
Before joining the FTSE 100 bank he had spent most of his career at JPMorgan, America's biggest lender, and it was while rising through the ranks of the group that he met Epstein, an influential financier who was a client of the Wall Street giant's private banking division.
The paedophile died in prison in 2019 awaiting trial on federal charges of sex trafficking under-age girls. Epstein had in 2008 also pleaded guilty in Florida to procuring a minor for prostitution.
Staley has said that he met Epstein in either 1999 or 2000 and the tribunal heard that the former Barclays boss had maintained a relationship with the sex offender after he was first jailed in 2008.
The FCA did not allege that Staley was aware of, or involved in, Epstein's crimes that came to light in 2019, when the sex offender was arrested again.
Staley said on Thursday that he was 'disappointed by the outcome and the time it took for this process to play out, that was entirely beyond my control.
'As the tribunal accepted, I was never dishonest, it took years of arguing with the authority and until November 2024 to establish that fact and it took more time for the financial penalty to be reduced by 40 per cent.'
Therese Chambers, the regulator's joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight, said: 'Mr Staley chose to take a calculated risk that we would take his inaccurate account of his relationship with Mr Epstein at face value. He hoped that the truth would never come to light and that he would get away with it. Such a serious lack of integrity flies in the face of the requirements we place on those at the top.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
I spent weeks identifying 7/7 victims – the atrocity still haunts me 20 years on
HERO Scots cops who identified victims of the London 7/7 terror attacks last night revealed they are still haunted by the atrocity 20 years on. Paul Clements, 67, recalled his 'traumatic' five-week deployment in a mortuary holding commuters killed when terrorists detonated suicide bombs on three trains and a bus. 4 4 4 The retired Met Police officer revealed he still struggles to board the Underground due to painful memories of the rush-hour tragedy — when 52 people lost their lives and 784 others were wounded. He had grown used to dealing with the 'ugly side' of life in the force but nothing prepared him for his work helming a team of Disaster Victim Identification officers. Days from the 20th anniversary of the attack on July 7, 2005, dad-of-one Paul, from Stranraer, said: 'I spent five weeks in a mortuary with a team trying to identify victims. 'It was traumatic, of course it was. Each body part or each person is also a crime scene. 'Obviously we had to recover any forensic evidence. We had to look for SIM cards, or bits of circuit board, for evidential purposes, because we were trying to find out what type of detonators were used. 'You're dealing with an ugly side of life — and as a police officer you do deal with the ugly side of life — but this was on a fairly massive scale. 'It took most people by surprise. You do have to be professional.' Three bombs were detonated on board Underground trains within 50 seconds of each other as Londoners headed to work. An hour later a fourth explosive ripped through the top of a No30 double-decker bus. Recalling his struggles later to catch the tube, with the memory of the attacks fresh, Paul said: 'I remember later walking to the tube station. 7/7 survivor Dan Biddle and his rescuer Adrian interview 'I got to the entrance and I just couldn't walk in it. I got a mental flashback of everything I'd just dealt with. 'I thought, no, I cannot go on the tube. And strangely enough, I got a bus, and the bus took me probably three or four times the length of time. 'Although obviously a bus was bombed as well, it didn't have the same mental impact as the tube did. 'For about a year I just refused to go on the tube. Needs must and eventually I faced up to it and jumped on the tube. But even now it just brings back all those memories. 'I'll do it, but I never feel comfortable going on the tube — and that's 20 years later.' Three suicide bombers launched the deadliest terror atrocity on British soil — setting off from Leeds around 4am in a hired Nissan Micra then driving to Luton to meet their fourth accomplice. Scots Victim Tragedy ACCOUNTANT Helen Jones was the only Scot to die in the terror attack. Helen, 28, was killed in the Piccadilly line bombing just weeks after moving into a North London flat with her boyfriend. She grew up in Templand, near Lockerbie, Dumfries-shire, and went to Aberdeen University aged just 16. After leaving school, she also spent time working with prostitutes and drug addicts at Glasgow's city mission and volunteered at homeless hostels. She'd texted her partner just before the bomb was detonated. Three of the men, Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, and Germaine Lindsay, 19, entered the Underground and boarded separate trains. Ringleader Khan got into the second carriage of a westbound Circle line train heading to Paddington and detonated his device near double doors at Edgware Road station. Tanweer boarded an eastbound Circle line train and set off his device at the rear of the second carriage between Liverpool Street and Aldgate at the same time. Meanwhile, Lindsay caused the most devastation when he exploded his bomb on a southbound Piccadilly Line service between King's Cross and Russell Square. An hour later Hasib Hussain, 18, launched a fourth attack on boarding a bus at Tavistock Square. Retired Detective Sergeant Callum Sutherland, 67, from Greenock, led units working with pathologists to identify the deceased in a makeshift mortuary. The crime scene manager and his officers had to search for bits of explosive devices — a job so grim that many opted to stay in a hotel for five weeks rather than return to their families and discuss the devastating details. Callum endured harrowing shifts with fellow officers within the temporary morgue in the gardens of the Honourable Artillery Company. Netflix Doc Details Horror Attack A NEW Netflix documentary will offer inside accounts of the horrific day. Attack on London: Hunting The 7/7 Bombers features exclusive interviews with witnesses, including survivors and police. Former Prime Minister Tony Blair, 72, also contributed to the programme. And relatives of Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, pictured, who was shot dead after being wrongly suspected of being a terrorist, also have their say. The documentary will launch on the streaming service on Tuesday. He admitted: 'A girl was meant to be getting married there over the weekend. The police or the government paid for her wedding to be somewhere else so they could use this as a temporary mortuary. 'It's later it affects you. You'll hear police officers say, it doesn't bother me, it's just a job. 'Well, rubbish. It does. Not necessarily at the time, or the next day, or a few days later, but at some point it will.' Family man Callum has also worked with crime author and scriptwriter Lynda La Plante on TV shows Prime Suspect and Trial & Retribution. He added: 'You have the occasional nightmare. I've always felt if it doesn't bother you, then you're not the right person for the job. 'One of the things that was different as well is, generally, in a murder, you don't know who did it, or you don't know the exact cause of death until you have a post-mortem. But with the bombings, you knew how those people had died from the word go. 'It's tiring because you were doing 12-plus hour days, day in, day out, but we had an important job to do.' He and colleague Paul remain proud of how they handled the toughest days of their careers. Paul said: 'It doesn't feel like 20 years. It seems in some instances almost like a couple of years ago. We all felt very proud. I think we're all professional, and it was a multi-team sort of effort because it wasn't just Met officers and we worked exceptionally well.' Callum added: 'You should be thinking about people who've lost their loved ones, giving family comfort and finding out who did it.'
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'
Sir Keir Starmer has been put on notice of a fresh Labour rebellion over the Government's 'family farm tax'. More than 40 Labour MPs are said to be considering a bid to water down looming changes to agricultural and business inheritance tax relief. It comes after the Prime Minister performed a trio of embarrassing U-turns in recent weeks. Sir Keir has reversed his position on axing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners, a national grooming gangs inquiry, and welfare cuts. This has left Labour rebels feeling emboldened that they can force the Government into further policy changes. According to the Telegraph, a group of Labour backbenchers are considering using amendments to legislation to exempt small family farms from a planned tax raid. At last year's Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced farmers will pay a 20 per cent rate of inheritance tax on land and property they inherit worth more than £1million. The Government has insisted the measures - dubbed the 'family farm tax' and set to be in place from April 2026 - will only affect the wealthiest quarter of landowners. But the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and others say the impact of Ms Reeves' measures will be much more widespread. Critics claim the move could wipe out family-run farms with tight margins, as they will be forced to sell up in order to pay death duties. There have been months of demonstrations by farmers in response to the Chancellor's tax raid, including tractor protests in Wesminster. A 'rural growth group' of Labour MPs is now proposing the raising of the £1million cut-off point at which estates lose their tax reliefs. They have suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10million, 50 per cent to £20million, and nil thereafter. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, told the newspaper they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government. 'I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' Ex-Cabinet minister Louise Haigh, who was a leading rebel over the Government's now partially-reversed welfare cuts, has called for Sir Keir to 'reset' his relationship with the British public. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC in the wake of the PM's climbdown on welfare changes. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour Party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.' The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England. It also cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. But, after Sir Keir offered concessions to rebel MPs, the changes to PIP will now only be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only. All existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tesco shoppers baffled as more products now bizarrely given security tags including HAM - as new anti-shoplifting measures hit stores
Packets of ham have been fitted with security tags in the latest anti-shoplifting measures to hit supermarkets. Tesco have put yellow stickers reading 'security protected' on a range of their lunch meats. Some of the items they were on included £2.50 honey roast ham, chicken fillets priced at £2.75, Tesco Finest Wiltshire Cured Ham for £3.75, blocks of £3.35 cheddar cheese, £2.75 roast beef slices and £4.50 gammon. Mince meat and pork were also slapped with the same yellow stickers. Tesco shoppers were left baffled by the decision to put security tags on the pocket-friendly every day items. Dylan John, 48, said: 'It's like Fort Knox in there. You can't move without security keeping a beady eye on you. 'I only pooped in for a lettuce and felt like Ronnie Kray walking round the aisles.' They were spotted in Tesco Express, in Central Drive, Blackpool, Lancashire. The mini supermarket is in the shadows of the town's seaside resort's Blackpool Tower. Shoppers have been spotting yellow anti-theft stickers appearing on all sorts of items in the last few months. On X, one wrote: 'I just had to get a security tag removed from a £4 bottle of washing detergent at my local Tesco. What is going on??' Another wrote: '@Tesco I bought some pyjama bottoms at a Tesco Extra yesterday (I have the receipt!) using a self service till & there's a security tag still on it! How do I get it off, given that I live miles from any Tesco stores that sell clothes' 'I bought a bottle of wine for £7.50 in a Tesco Express in Coleford in the Wye Valley last week. It also had a security tag. I was surprised by that,' said a third. A fourth wrote: 'In Tesco in London yesterday I saw a Chomp with a security tag and an armed guard protecting it. London is finished.' It comes after Tesco introduced new anti-shoplifting devices on their shelves which left customer's wondering how the contraptions could possible deter thieves. The plastic flaps are positioned loosely in front of store items and in footage uploaded to social media are seen being freely slid from left to right to uncover the goods. A strange creaking noise is also a feature of the appliances which in the video shield boxes of chocolate like Ferrero Rocher and Milk Tray. Taking to TikTok, many users had strong opinions on Tesco's latest initiative. One person said: 'How does this stop shoplifting?' Tesco's new anti-shoplifting devices have left customers bewildered as they question how a piece of plastic could deter would-be thieves The contraptions are positioned loosely in front of store items and in footage uploaded to social media are seen being freely slid from left to right to uncover the goods Others said they believed a solution would be to make the items more 'affordable' rather than upping the security. Someone said sarcastically: 'Let's not try and just simply make this affordable so people buy instead of stealing.' A study in March found nearly a quarter of the UK population have witnessed shoplifting in the last 12 months. The figure is the equivalent of more than 16 million people seeing such an event, according to the British Retail Consortium (BRC)-Opinium poll. It is perhaps no surprise as the statistic follows figures revealed by the Mail on Sunday in September 2023 that theft takes place every two seconds in Britain.
