
New payment scheme for farmers unveiled amid industry doubts
The SFS will replace EU-era subsidies, which farmers had received for decades based largely on how much land they had. Most rely on these payments - an average of 67% of Welsh farm income - came from subsidies in 2020-21.
The SFS aims to reward farmers and land managers for 'public good' practices such as like wildlife habitat and soaking up carbon in the land.
Wildlife groups warned the new plan fell "far short" of helping farmers to successfully tackle climate change and nature loss.
For their initial 'universal' payment, farmers will have to agree to carry out 12 actions ranging from soil health planning and habitat maintenance, to online courses to enhance knowledge and skills related to sustainable farming.
There will also be funding to recognise "social value" - something farmers had called for - and which aims to recognise what are described as the wider benefits that sustainable agriculture provides to society, from food production to sustaining rural communities.
An extra £1,000 will go to smaller farms in 2026 as a one-off stability payment to acknowledge the uncertain period of transition.
A further optional layer of the scheme is intended to top up farm incomes for further environmental work, including woodland creation, improved public access to the countryside and support to go organic.
A collaborative payment will also be available in future to support farmers working together on landscape-scale projects.
The Welsh Government has said it will commit £238m in 2026 for the universal payments - equivalent to the current, main subsidy farms receive, known as the Basic Payment Scheme (BPS).
'Significant' funding for optional and collaborative work is also promised - with an overall budget similar to the £340m currently designated to farming.
But farming unions and environmental groups alike said far more was required - closer to £500m, to account for rising costs in agriculture and the scale of what was now being asked of farmers to deliver.
The Welsh Government said its plans will support food production and address environmental concerns
A requirement for 10% tree cover has ben dropped.
Instead the government said it was asking farmers to plant at least 0.1 hectares - or 250 trees by the end of 2028.
There would be "generous support for tree and hedgerow planting" in the optional layer, including a higher payment rate for tree planting during the first three years of the scheme.
The government is also targeting 1,500km (932 miles) of hedgerow extension by 2030, with an aspiration of achieving 2,000km (1,243 miles).
NFU Cymru said the Welsh Government's decision to slash the Basic Payment Scheme (BPS) by 40% for 2026 overshadows much of the positive work undertaken to improve the new Sustainable Farming Scheme (SFS).
NFU Cymru President Aled Jones said: 'This unwelcome decision by Welsh Government is extremely worrying for farmers in Wales who had previously been informed that those opting not to enter the new Sustainable Farming Scheme in 2026 would receive 80% of their BPS. Farming businesses have forward planned on this basis.
'This development is even more of a blow given significant guidance and technical detail is yet to be published which farmers need if they are to make informed decisions about whether to enter the scheme from 1st January 2026.'
He also argued that '… the level of detail, constraints, administration, costs and bureaucracy attached to the SFS is significant and far greater than anything seen before. We remain deeply worried about the burden this scheme will place on a sector low in confidence and already dealing with a mountain of red tape.'
Farmers Union of Wales President Ian Rickman the scheme marked a generational milestone for the future of Welsh agriculture.'
'To highlight some of the key successes, we have secured a total budget for the Universal Baseline Payment and BPS taper combined of £238 million, providing workable payment rates and much needed stability for the sector,' he said.
'This includes the provision of universal payments for common land rights holders.
'We have retained and strengthened the application of capped and redistributive payments, a longstanding policy position for the FUW and one that maximises the amount of money going to typical Welsh family farms and rural communities.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
24 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
ECB leaves interest rates unchanged as it assesses impact of Trump tariffs
The bank's governing council announced on Thursday at its headquarters in Frankfurt that it would leave its benchmark deposit rate at 2%. 'The economy has so far proven resilient overall in a challenging global environment,' said bank president Christine Lagarde at her post-decision news conference. 'At the same time, the environment remains exceptionally uncertain, especially because of trade disputes.' The ECB has already cut rates eight times since June of last year and Ms Lagarde said after the last policy meeting on June 5 that the central bank is 'getting to the end of a monetary policy cycle'. US President Donald Trump sent the EU a letter informing officials of a potential 30% tariff (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) The monetary authority for the 20 countries that use the euro currency has been lowering rates to support growth after raising them in 2022-2023 to snuff out inflation caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the rebound after the pandemic. With the benchmark rate now at 2%, down from a record high of 4%, analysts think there could be one more rate cut coming, but only in September. The reason, say analysts: The ECB's policymakers simply do not know the outcome of talks between the EU's executive commission and the Trump administration. Mr Trump first set a 20% tariff for EU goods, then threatened 50% after expressing displeasure at the pace of talks, then sent the EU a letter informing officials of a potential 30% tariff. EU officials earlier held out hope of winning at least the 10% baseline that applies to almost all trade partners, and analysts think the actual rate may be lower than Mr Trump's tariff threats. The talks are up against an August 1 deadline, but earlier deadlines have slipped as the sides kept talking. With signs of economic activity holding up reasonably well, the ECB can afford to wait and see what the outcome of trade negotiations will be. Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods would mean sellers would have to either increase prices for US consumers – risking loss of market share – or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. In either case, higher tariffs would hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy, which would strengthen the case for another rate cut in September. The ECB's rate cuts have helped support economic activity by lowering the cost of credit for consumers and businesses to purchase goods. Higher rates have the opposite effect and are used to cool off inflation by reducing demand for goods. Growth in the eurozone was relatively strong at 0.6% in the first quarter – though that was partly thanks to rushed shipments of goods trying to beat the tariffs. Inflation has fallen from double digits in late 2022 to 2% in June, in line with the ECB's target. A stronger euro, which lowers the price of imports, and softer global prices for oil have helped keep inflation moderate. The stronger euro, up 13% this year at 1.17 dollars, has attracted attention as a potential damper on growth and ECB vice president Luis de Guindos said any rapid moves over 1.20 dollars could be 'much more complicated'. But the ECB typically does not target the exchange rate, and the euro's rise is considered to be less the result of Europe's strength and more the result of a weaker dollar weighed down by investor uncertainty about the future path of inflation, growth and government debt in the US.


Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU regulators to investigate if KKR provided misleading information in Telecom Italia deal
BRUSSELS, July 24 (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators will investigate whether U.S. investment firm KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab provided incorrect or misleading information in its 22-billion-euro ($26 billion) acquisition of Telecom Italia's (TIM) ( opens new tab fixed-line network deal, the European Commission said on Thursday. The Commission, which acts as the competition enforcer in the 27-country bloc, approved the deal unconditionally in May last year, attributing this in part to long-term agreements between FiberCop and telecoms companies Fastweb and Iliad. FiberCop is Telecom Italia's last-mile grid unit. "Under the investigation opened today, the Commission will assess whether KKR provided incorrect or misleading information about these agreements," the EU watchdog said in a statement. The Commission has in recent years cracked down on companies providing misleading information during merger reviews and handed out hefty fines.


Spectator
42 minutes ago
- Spectator
The UK and India sign their trade deal
The UK has finally signed a free-trade deal with India after three-and-a-half years of negotiation. The agreement will open up trade for cars, whisky, clothing and food products, with ministers claiming it will boost the British economy by £4.8 billion. For Keir Starmer, it offers much-needed economic and political good news. For Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, it shows that the £3 trillion Indian economy is willing to shake off its protectionist tradition and open up to international investors. The trade deal is an all-too-rare example of Labour getting things right in opposition. Jonathan Reynolds, the Trade Secretary, met with his Indian counterpart, Piyush Goyal, in February last year. He made it clear that Labour would support the Conservative government if it finalised a trade deal with India – and would pick up the negotiations after the election if it didn't. Despite much ground being covered, Rishi Sunak could not succeed where Boris Johnson and Liz Truss failed and get the talks over the line by July 2024. At that point, Reynolds took over, wrapping up the deal in just 12 months. Talks have been protracted for multiple reasons. India's average tariff rate is 13 per cent, compared with the UK's 1.5 per cent. Immigration has previously been a major sticking point, according to Kemi Badenoch, with today's deal facilitating some 1,800 annual extra visas for Indian yogis, chefs and musicians. Then there was the exemption on national insurance contributions: a subject of some controversy back in May. Today's agreement means staff from Indian companies who are temporarily transferred to the UK, and staff from British firms who are temporarily working in India, will only pay social security contributions in their home country, rather than in both places. The UK already has similar reciprocal 'double contribution convention' agreements with 17 other countries including the EU and the US. But that reaction was one reason why few in London and New Delhi expected this deal to be done so soon. The best testament to Labour's success is evidenced in the reaction of the opposition. In his reaction, Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, admitted today's agreement is 'a step in the right direction' – before claiming that Labour's Employment Rights' Bill will outweigh any potential wins. For the government, securing this deal offers a winning narrative. Starmer will cite it as proof that hard work and careful planning can produce results in office. It also can help build relations between his party and British Indians, following the 2019 outcry over Jeremy Corbyn's perceived support for Pakistan over Kashmir.