HSBC Lowers Financial Advice Fee to 1% for UK Premier Clients
HSBC UK, a subsidiary of HSBC Holdings PLC HSBC has lowered its financial advice fee for premier customers as a part of promotional discount available until the end of the year.
The bank will now charge a 1% fee (with a minimum of £960) for customers taking advice, down from the typical 2.75% rate previously charged, with some exceptions.
Xian Chan, head of Premier Wealth at HSBC UK, said: 'There are numerous scenarios where a customer might benefit from receiving financial advice, for example if they are planning for the long-term, have more sophisticated financial needs, or are facing a life milestone such as buying a home or preparing to retire.'
Rationale Behind HSBC's Move
The move aligns with HSBC's broader strategy to boost its offerings for 'mass affluent' clients, including the relaunch of its Premier account in February 2025.
The bank recently reduced the minimum asset requirement to access its premier investment management service from £250,000 to £100,000. Additionally, it has introduced a switching incentive for new premier customers, offering eligible individuals a 'VIP shopping experience' at Selfridges, which includes a £500 gift card and other perks.
Moreover, earlier this month, HSBC UK Private Banking adopted Addepar platform to enable wealth managers to provide robust services to ultra and high net worth clients. In mainland China, HSBC is growing its wealth business through lifestyle-focused centers and acquisitions like Citigroup's retail wealth arm, digital upgrades and hiring talent.
HSBC Price Performance & Zacks Rank
Over the past six months, shares of HSBC have rallied 19.7%, underperforming the industry 's growth of 24.6%.
Currently, HSBC carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Efforts to Expand Offerings by Other Finance Firms
Earlier this month, Carlyle Group Inc. CG announced a collaboration with Citigroup Inc. C to expand asset-backed financing opportunities within the fintech specialty lending space.
The collaboration will integrate Carlyle's extensive investment network with the expertise of Citigroup's Spread Products Investment in Technologies team, a leading venture equity investor in fintech specialty lending.
Similarly, U.S. Bancorp USB entered a partnership with Fiserv to integrate its Elan Financial Services credit card program into the latter's Credit Choice solution. The collaboration aims to enhance digital card issuance capabilities, providing financial institutions with a seamless, integrated experience.
The integration of Elan's credit card program into Fiserv's Credit Choice solution strengthens USB's digital-first strategy. This integration will enable consumers and small businesses to access both debit and credit card account details within a unified digital platform for consumers and small businesses. This will create a better user experience, allowing customers to manage both types of cards in one place.
Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock
It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom.
With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028.
See This Stock Now for Free >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days.
Citigroup Inc. (C): Free Stock Analysis Report
U.S. Bancorp (USB): Free Stock Analysis Report
Carlyle Group Inc. (CG): Free Stock Analysis Report
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC): Free Stock Analysis Report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
G7 agrees to exempt U.S. companies from higher taxes
The United States and the Group of Seven nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt U.S. companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday. The group has created a 'side-by-side' system in response to the U.S. administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency. The G7 said the plan recognizes existing U.S. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system. Opinion: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6 U.K. businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from Mr. Trump's tax and spending bill. Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed. 'Today's agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns,' Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance. G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is 'acceptable and implementable to all.' In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the U.S., effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries. He had also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on U.S. firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the U.S.
CTV News
10 hours ago
- CTV News
Agriplex now known as J-AAR Expo Centre, new sponsor wants to expand trade shows
London based J-AAR Construction is the new sponsor for the Western Fair Agriplex. The facility will now be known as the J-AAR Expo Centre.
CTV News
18 hours ago
- CTV News
Scales of Justice: Lawsuits between Reptilia and Westmount Shopping Centre concern animal welfare group
The embattled reptile zoo in Westmount Mall has landed in court over a rent dispute with its landlord. CTV London's Daryl Newcombe explains. The claws are out in a legal dispute over Reptilia's 20-year lease at Westmount Shopping Centre and allegations that the reptile zoo owes the mall unpaid rent. In February, a Statement of Claim was filed by 785 Wonderland Road Inc. (Westmount Shopping Centre) against Reptilia that alleges, 'The tenant failed to pay the full rent to the landlord for the months of October, November and December 2024, as well as January and February 2025.' The mall is seeking rent arrears of $153,348 plus interest, and a $100,000 payment based on a Minutes of Settlement reached in August 2024. On June 20, Reptilia responded in a Statement of Defence that denies the allegations. The indoor reptile zoo also launched a Counterclaim against the mall for more than a million dollars. Reptilia's filing refers to its lengthy legal dispute with the City of London about whether the provincially licensed reptile zoo must comply with London's Animal Control By-Law that forbids displaying exotic species. Specifically, Reptilia refers to a clause in its lease agreement, 'In the event that the City of London or any other authority having jurisdiction requires any amendments to the zoning by-laws or regulations to permit the Tenant's use set out in this Section 9.01 (a) of this Lease, the Landlord shall be responsible, at its sole cost and expense' Reptilia's Counterclaim against Westmount Shopping Centre alleges it has suffered 'significant operational losses' directly resulting from the property not being zoned for its use. The reptile zoo is seeking $1 million for negligent misrepresentation and $275,000 for breach of contract. 'The decision from the City of London and the application commenced by the City of London garnered significant media attention, which negatively impacted Reptilia London's operations including the number of visitors to its facilities,' the Counterclaim states. 'Additionally, as the result of the decision by the City of London, many educational facilities, including School Boards, refused to work with Reptilia London based on concerns of Reptilia London's operations being in contravention of the Animal Control By-Law. Reptilia's educational programs usually make up a significant portion of its revenues.' Zoocheck Canada says the legal documents are another cause for concern among animal welfare advocates. 'Our biggest concern is the animals that are located at that facility,' said Julie Woodyer of Zoocheck Canada. 'Obviously that's a great concern to us whenever we start hearing that there's these ongoing battles in court and assertions that the finances just aren't there.' Reptilia continues to operate its zoo inside the mall. John Winston, who has been engaged with Reptilia since the business arrived in London tells CTV News in a statement, 'This is a landlord/tenant dispute. Rest assured that care of the animals is not, and would never be, compromised.' Winston emphasizes, 'Ontario Animal Welfare Services has inspected the facility three times since opening and determined it was operating to provincial standards.' Zoocheck Canada obtained emails between the Thames Valley District School Board and representatives of Reptilia through a Freedom of Information Request. The correspondence focusses on the school board's resistance to bringing students to Reptilia based on concerns about accreditation and the dispute with city hall regarding the Animal Control By-Law. 'The school boards, rightly so, do not consider it a proper way to educate children,' added Woodyer. CTV News has yet to receive a response from the operator of Westmount Shopping Centre about the court documents filed by Reptilia. Allegations made in the Statement of Claim, Statement of Defence, and Counterclaim have not been tested in court.
