logo
EU wants UN backing for Rwanda-style migrant ‘return hubs'

EU wants UN backing for Rwanda-style migrant ‘return hubs'

Times3 days ago
The European Union is seeking United Nations support for plans to forcibly deport failed asylum seekers or illegal migrants to 'return hubs' outside Europe, to avoid the legal challenges that sank Britain's Rwanda scheme.
European interior ministers will hear presentations from the UN on the conditions for its refugee agency to take part in, and approve, deportation or 'place of safety' centres in countries such as Tunisia, Mauritania, Jordan, Egypt or Uganda.
The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, last year called for an exploration of return hubs in a letter to the EU's national leaders, citing a deal between Italy and Albania as a possible model.
Kaare Dybvad, the Danish immigration minister, who is chairing the talks in Copenhagen, stressed that the plans were urgently needed to 'get control of migration flow back into the democratic sphere', as European elections show increasing gains for nationalist and populist parties.
'The European asylum system is broken and we need innovative solutions,' he said before the talks. 'We are under pressure. We need to return people faster, we need to make innovative solutions and agreements outside of the EU.'
Up to 80 per cent of failed asylum seekers — half of those who apply — who were ordered to leave countries across Europe have not done so, including dangerous criminals and terror suspects who have gone on to carry out attacks.
While the EU is moving towards plans similar to the British Rwanda model — of setting up centres outside Europe to deter asylum seekers — governments want to ensure that plans are legally watertight, especially after judicial challenges to the Italian scheme in Albania.
Crucially, under these plans, migrants housed in the 'return hubs' would already have been refused asylum — unlike those covered in Britain's Rwanda plan or Italy's Albanian asylum centres.
'It is part of the legislative work that we have to do now and to make sure it is possible,' said Dybvad. 'Return hubs are about returning people who are already rejected as asylum seekers. Reception centres as in Albania … as in Rwanda, that is about processing asylum claims. We need to make our own European model for these solutions.'
On top of deportations, the EU is additionally looking at 'places of safety' centres for temporary reception and screening of refugees. UN involvement is seen as vital to making these proposals legally watertight and preventing judges from striking down plans.
A 2023 ruling in the British Supreme Court against the Rwanda scheme followed a warning from the UN's refugee agency, the UNHCR, that it potentially breached the international conventions that set rules for asylum.
A diplomat said: 'It is about showing that this is not a taboo with the UN and that we can work with them to make it more legally viable.'
The UNHCR has not ruled out supporting the EU deportation centres but has asked for many legal safeguards that would water down and restrict the powers that national governments would have to detain and deport failed asylum seekers.
Under a new EU return directive, tabled in March, deportations will be carried out either to the migrant's country of origin, or a country they transited through as well as a new option of a 'return hub' — an idea that was previously ruled out as illegal.
The UN is opposed to EU proposals that failed asylum seekers or foreign criminals will no longer be able to have their deportations suspended while their appeal is heard, a loophole that often allows people to disappear upon their release.
Bruno Retailleau, the French interior minister, warned that the status quo was not an option. He said: 'Today our states are totally disarmed, especially for forced removals. Throughout Europe, whether governments are conservative or social democrat, all the peoples have the same demand: control of mass immigration that has completely escaped us.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michael Flatley revealed as surprise contender to challenge Connor McGregor for Irish presidency after Lord of the Dance's political ambitions were inadvertently disclosed in High Court planning battle
Michael Flatley revealed as surprise contender to challenge Connor McGregor for Irish presidency after Lord of the Dance's political ambitions were inadvertently disclosed in High Court planning battle

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Michael Flatley revealed as surprise contender to challenge Connor McGregor for Irish presidency after Lord of the Dance's political ambitions were inadvertently disclosed in High Court planning battle

Iconic Riverdance star Michael Flatley could challenge MMA champion Conor McGregor in a bid to become the next president of Ireland. The Lord of Dance's political ambitions were revealed during a High Court planning battle concerning his Castlehyde mansion in Cork. Flatley, 67, who held the Guinness World Record for tap dancing 35 times per second, notified the court of a 'material change in circumstances'. In doing so, he gave away his plan to move back to Ireland to run in the October 2025 presidential elections. An affidavit, signed by Flatley's solicitor Maxwell Mooney, was submitted to the court stating that the Irish-American is 'to seek nominations to run for president of Ireland'. But he's not the only celebrity running for president. In March, days after a controversial trip to the White House Conor McGregor, 37, announced his bid to become Ireland's President. The MMA fighter, who was found to have raped a woman in a civil case in November, announced his plans with an Instagram post which shows him standing in front of a private jet and wearing a Make Ireland Great Again cap. Riverdance star Michael Flatley (pictured) is to seek a nomination to become Ireland's next president It came after he spoke of an 'illegal immigration racket ravaging our country' at the White House. Meanwhile, last week on a radio interview, Flatley said he did not believe the Irish people 'have a voice, not a true proper deep voice that speaks their language.' But the face off may not happen as it is unclear if Flatley will have sufficient support and if McGregor will clear the threshold necessary to qualify for the race. Candidates need to be nominated by at least 20 members of the Irish parliament or at least four local authorities. They must also be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older. The role of president is mainly ceremonial but carries symbolic weight. The next election has to happen 60 days before the current President Michael D Higgins's term ends on November 11. So far, two candidates have secured sufficient backing to enter the race. McGregor announced the plans in an Instagram post where he is stood ahead of a private jet and wearing a Make Ireland Great Again cap Former farming journalist and EU commissioner Mairead McGuinness, who is the Fine Gael nominee. And Catherine Connolly, a left-wing independent and former Galway mayor who has received the backing of opposition parties and independents. At the High Court on Friday, defence barristers in Flatley's case argued against the affidavit being accepted by the court, and stated that it was an attempt by Flatley to 'move the goalposts'. Andrew Fitzpatrick SC said Flatley had said before in 2024 that he intended to move to Paris and then Valencia. 'That didn't happen,' he told the court. He also said that if the court was prepared to admit the affidavit, it would undermine previous assertions made by Flatley's side that the reason he is living in Monaco and cannot return to the state is because of the condition of the Castlehyde. Ms Justice Eileen Roberts said that as Flatley's residence 'is so central to the issue of security of costs' in the case, she would allow the affidavit to be taken into account, but said she 'entirely' heard submissions made by the defence about the characteristics of the affidavit and what weight it should be afforded. She said she expected the judgment in relation to the costs application to be delivered in a 'reasonably short period', and that it would be given 'shortly after' the end of the courts term.

Now that even South Park is mocking Trump over Epstein, he knows he's facing a scandal he can't control: ANDREW NEIL
Now that even South Park is mocking Trump over Epstein, he knows he's facing a scandal he can't control: ANDREW NEIL

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Now that even South Park is mocking Trump over Epstein, he knows he's facing a scandal he can't control: ANDREW NEIL

Donald Trump touched down in Scotland last night, the controversy swirling around the so-called ' Jeffrey Epstein files' in such hot pursuit that it threatens to disturb what is essentially a five-day golfing holiday and plunge him into something of a pickle. The President's MAGA base of true believers refuses to accept the official reasons why the files on the late notorious paedophile can't be made public.

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Keir Starmer is rudderless in a sea of troubles
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Keir Starmer is rudderless in a sea of troubles

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Keir Starmer is rudderless in a sea of troubles

So ends Sir Keir Starmer's first parliamentary year; not with a bang but a whimper. As the PM drifts rudderless in a sea of troubles, those happy days of July 2024 must seem like some faraway dream. Days when all he had to do was say ' Tory chaos' to win a general election landslide, and when 'change' still sounded like a promise rather than a threat. When his grateful party hailed him as glorious victor and he looked forward to 'a new era of partnership' with his union comrades. The smuggling gangs would be smashed, growth turbocharged, violent crime halved, confidence in the justice system restored and NHS waiting lists slashed. His stated mission was national renewal. If he has learned anything in the past 12 months, it's that opposition and government are two very different things. We suspected all along there was less to Sir Keir than met the eye. But few predicted he would fall so far so quickly. Growth is flatlining, thanks largely to his Chancellor's £40billion Budget tax raid and crippling green levies on energy bills. Unemployment and inflation are rising and borrowing is at record levels. Is this what Rachel Reeves meant by 'fixing the foundations' of the economy? Her tears in the Commons earlier this month perfectly reflected the angst of Middle Britain, braced for yet more tax rises. Meanwhile, for all the empty rhetoric about tackling the people smugglers, illegal Channel crossings are more frequent than ever, and the public is increasingly angry about the consequences. In Epping, Canary Wharf and elsewhere citizens concerned about the influx of young male asylum seekers are taking to the streets in protest. It is no longer enough to pin this unrest on the 'far-Right'. These are ordinary people worried about their families and their communities, which are undergoing radical change without their consent. Police are gearing up for a summer of discontent, and they are right to do so. Then there is the bitter schism with the unions. Just days after coming to power, Ms Reeves signed off inflation-busting pay hikes for public sector workers, including a whopping 22 per cent rise for junior doctors. If she was expecting gratitude, she has been sorely disappointed. The junior (renamed 'resident') doctors are back on strike in pursuit of another ludicrous 29 per cent claim, while teachers and nurses are also expected to ballot on industrial action. Labour's biggest financial backer, Unite, is threatening to pull funding and has suspended the membership of Deputy PM Angela Rayner over her failure to back the Birmingham bin strikes But perhaps most worrying for Sir Keir is that his MPs are in open revolt. Having forced a U-turn on winter fuel payments and scuppered plans for welfare reform they are intoxicated with their new-found power. Most come from a background of Left-wing activism and favour tax, borrow and spend socialism over economic prudence. It is the economics of the madhouse from which we will all suffer. Add in the Chagos Islands surrender, two-tier justice, soaring crime rates, an Attorney General who appears to despise his country, giving 16-year-olds the vote, and rampant anti-Semitism and it's no wonder the public feel so thoroughly let down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store