logo
Is YOUR neighbourhood a premature death hotspot? Interactive map reveals the areas of England and Wales where men are most likely to die young

Is YOUR neighbourhood a premature death hotspot? Interactive map reveals the areas of England and Wales where men are most likely to die young

Daily Mail​18-05-2025
Dozens of areas of England and Wales have today been flagged as premature death hotspots.
Blackpool South has the highest premature mortality rate, MailOnline analysis shows. For every 100,000 men living there, nearly 730 died last year before turning 75.
Although that rate appears small, it is 3.4 times higher than in North East Hampshire (214.3 per 100,000) – the area of the country where men have the best chances of avoiding an early grave.
Professor Karol Sikora, an oncologist with 40 years of experience who once advised ministers and acted as the World Health Organization 's cancer chief, described the rate in Blackpool South as 'dreadful'.
He added: 'Anything above 500 is bad news.'
Yet Government figures suggest 76 of the 575 parliamentary constituencies – or one in eight – exceed that rate.
All rates are age-standardised, meaning they factor in the age distribution of different areas, this is because comparing two populations that have different age structures is not fair.
How are premature deaths calculated?
Someone is counted as dying prematurely if they die before the age of 75.
Statisticians use age-standardised mortality rates to allow comparison between populations which may contain different proportions of people of different ages.
This is because age is the biggest factor when it comes to mortality rates.
For example, a neighbourhood home to swathes of over-60s would, in theory, record more premature deaths than a student hotspot.
Therefore, factoring in the ages of the two places would allow a fairer comparison on relative mortality experience in each area, according to experts.
The rate is usually per 100,000 population.
Professor Sikora said: 'These scores reflect poverty.
'People with less money have less education, and they tend to have more unhealthy lifestyles, from everything to smoking, alcohol, obesity, everything you can imagine, lack of exercise, poor diets, poor housing conditions.
'All this leads to illness, and that leads to earlier mortality.
'It is bound to get worse without major policy changes.'
However, Professor Sikora points out that not all communities face the same outcomes.
He said: 'There are some exceptions. I mean, it's quite amazing. For example, the South Asian population in Slough live remarkably long, and they do remarkably well, and they tend not to be obese. So it's not just poverty, it's a whole series of things around it.'
The original mortality data, held by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), lay bare a clear North-South divide.
Out of the 20 constituencies with the worst premature death rates, 13 of them were in the north and three in the Midlands.
For comparison, 16 out of 20 areas with the lowest figures were in the south.
Behind Blackpool South came Middleborough and Thornaby East (685.8) and Leeds South (670.4).
Premature deaths may happen from illnesses such as cancer, heart disease, injuries, violence and even suicide.
Although Professor Sikora explains the main driver of premature mortality is lifestyle, he says a secondary factor is access to healthcare.
He said: 'We have a free system, the NHS. But we know that poorer people access it differently from wealthier people, even though it's free.
'So it's not so much wealth. It's education. The better educated people can use a complex system more effectively than people who have no education.
'They just know how not to get aggressive, because getting aggressive doesn't help, but how to push for what they want in a quiet sort of way, and so access to health care.'
Professor Sikora also points out that the best specialists and the best GPs often choose to live in the most desirable areas, not in deprived areas.
The ONS data, which defines a premature death to be anything before 75, does not include Scotland or Northern Ireland.
The analysis comes after a study last year concluded one in four premature deaths will be due to cancer between 2023 and 2050.
This equates to around 50,000 per year, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
It warned that the 'current trajectory of cancer costs is unsustainable'.
Professor Sikora says cancer deaths often follow the same pattern as other deaths, with lifestyle factors such as smoking, alcohol, obesity, lack of exercise, poor quality, diet, all posing risks.
He also said poorer people are less likely to access treatment as they don't go for screening, don't have mammograms and don't turn up for tests when they're asked to.
'They often just don't bother going to the hospital, or when they do, they go when it's late. They haven't got the money to get on public transport and get there. So they just skip the hospital appointments and so on', he said.
Peter Matejic, chief analyst at the poverty fighting charity Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said: 'It's heartbreaking that some areas have such high rates of premature deaths.
'We have known that there are links between poverty and worse health outcomes for decades, and as a nation that is a gap we should be narrowing.
'Many factors throughout your life can lead to dying prematurely, but your economic situation affects your health at every stage, from what you eat as a child to whether you can afford essentials as an adult.
'The nation's health needs a real focus from the government but this isn't just about the NHS – it's about whether people are able to lead healthy lives with dignity and hope.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Scotland regularly fills a 'mass grave' of drug victims who might have lived
How Scotland regularly fills a 'mass grave' of drug victims who might have lived

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

How Scotland regularly fills a 'mass grave' of drug victims who might have lived

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There are roughly 91 days in every statistical quarter of the year. In the quarter from March 1 to May 31, 2025, there were 312 suspected drug-related deaths. That's more than three a day, every day. Over the 13 weeks, it is 24 every week. It is an increase of 15 per cent over the last 13-week quarter. It is similar (4 per cent lower) than the same period in 2023 but 7 per cent higher than that period in 2024. Whatever year you want to take, it is a harrowing number, especially when you give it some perspective. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Just imagine, every week, for 13 weeks in a row there was a train crash between Glasgow Central and Paisley Gilmour Street, or Haymarket and Dundee, or anywhere in Scotland for that matter – and the result was 24 deaths. Every week. For 13 weeks. And it is getting worse. What do you think the public response would be? Would we not be demanding that the Scottish Government do something to prevent the mounting loss of life? Would any politician be able to look in the mirror and say 'I am doing my best to prevent this daily and weekly roll-call of death' if the numbers just kept being added too? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A heroin addict lies sprawled on a mattress (Picture: Chris Young) | Universal Images Group via Getty SNP's perverse policies It's all very well saying that people should not get on the train that might take them to an early death, but few if any of those who make that journey expect early death to be the outcome for them. More often than not, people starting out on this journey think it's always going to happens to someone else. By the time they realise they are watching in slow motion their own but sadly inevitable demise, they are often beyond having the capacity to get off that train. They need help. They need to be helped out of their addiction and they need rehabilitation so they don't think one day they can easily have a day trip without any consequences. Currently, instead of trying to improve our drug rehabilitation, the policy of the Scottish Government is quite the reverse; indeed it's perverse. The Scottish Government is trying to make it easier for those addicted to take their daily journey just that little bit smoother, a little less of a trouble. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There's a pilot in Glasgow for a 'drug consumption room', where addicts are given a safe place to take their drugs – the provision of such a service consumes scarce resources that could instead be used to provide rehabilitation that can help people making that daily commute to catastrophe. It's like taking away the ticket inspectors, removing the barriers and saying here, try first class instead, it's a more comfortable journey. When the train crashes, it doesn't matter which carriage you are in. You are a fatality, another addition to the statistics – even if the journey was that little bit easier because you could inject the drug of your choice or the addictive substitute of the authorities' choice, you still end up at the destination of death. Bully-state interventions Many of the people advocating an easier journey – essentially in the so-called public health specialism – are also quite sanguine if not openly supportive of making access to drugs easier too. Various narcotics would be declassified and in other ways made easier to come by. Likewise, by making the base cost of alcohol higher through minimum pricing legislation, there is evidence on the street that various drugs are now intentionally made available by suppliers at a cost lower than alcohol so new entrants to drugs become addicted and board that train. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What is the public health response to an alcohol policy that has failed while persecuting responsible drinkers and lining the pockets of the supermarkets? Why, it is to go into denial – for they themselves are addicted to bully-state interventions of directing the behaviour of the law-abiding majority – and increase the minimum price further. Annemarie Ward, chief executive of the charity Favour UK, which seeks to improve the provision of drug rehabilitation services across the country, has found the Scottish Government to be profoundly difficult to work with, often talking of providing better services only to reduce the number of rehab beds available. Ward notes that the number of suspected drug deaths in the last three quarters is: Q4 2024: 215 deaths; Q1 2025: 272 deaths (+26 per cent); and Q2 2025: 312 deaths (+15 per cent). That's a 45 per cent surge in six months. 'The flames are rising, the bodies are stacking up, and the state has the audacity to rebrand failure as calm,' says Ward. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The campaigner regularly takes the Scottish authorities to task for saying the situation is 'stable' – responding that it is 'an obscenity, like calling a mass grave this year as similar to one last year'. Over 1,200 people needlessly dying last year was a mass grave of great shame to Scotland and will become another such mass grave of shame if, as seems likely, it is repeated this year too. 18 years of failure Scotland having the highest drug-related deaths in Europe is a failing of devolution because, despite having the same laws regarding drug enforcement, the Holyrood parliament has the powers to deal with Scotland's own problems. It is also a failure for the prevailing 'whae's like us' culture in Holyrood, where trying to do things differently from England is given preference – even when their policies work – and comes at the price of needless deaths. Most obviously though, it is a failure of the SNP government, now in power for some 18 years and clearly in control of rehabilitation services that it has failed to develop – while focussing on its own addiction towards holding referendums. What an utterly awful trip Scotland is on, and until the SNP is removed that train will crash every week.

I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?
I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?

If there was a five-minute nuclear warning, I'd run straight to my local shop and buy a pack of cigarettes. Even now, after all these years. I stopped more than a decade ago – note that I say 'stopped' rather than 'gave up' because the latter implies a sacrifice, and I have been brainwashed (OK, hypnotised) not to use the term. But you are never really a non-smoker. You are just a smoker who is currently not smoking. In your soul, you are forever one of the people who leave the table after eating to go and have a conversation outside, even if you physically stay put these days. So, as someone who found it difficult to quit, it's baffling to hear that although two stop-smoking medications have been available in the UK since 2024, only 0.2% of those attempting to give up have used them, according to an analysis of NHS data on smoking in England. Cytisine (which also goes by cytisinicline) is a plant-based product that has been used in eastern Europe since the 70s and may appeal to those who prefer a natural option over a synthetic drug. It mimics the effects of nicotine, and tricks your brain into thinking you've had a cigarette. Varenicline – withdrawn in 2021 over concerns about impurities, but now reformulated and rereleased – can apparently reduce the urge to smoke, make you enjoy it less when you do and ease withdrawal symptoms. I tried everything when it came to my struggle with Silk Cut. Patches, gum, lozenges – I carried on smoking while I wore, chewed and sucked them all. I read the world-famous success story The Easy Way to Stop Smoking by Allen Carr (no, not that one). I attended the NHS in-person sessions, three times, to no effect. I was a triple failure, and oddly proud of it for a reason I still don't quite understand. I had neurolinguistic programming, where the man shook my hand as he greeted me, asking, 'And how long was it that you smoked for?' 'Oh, I still smoke now. I just had one outside,' I volunteered cheerfully. He tutted and told me that for some clients, talking about smoking in the past tense like that was all it took. I scoffed at those weaklings as I walked to my train afterwards – in a cloud of smoke, obviously. The closest I came to victory back then was a hypnotist recommended by a friend, with the caveat that he sounded so much like Cliff Richard it was hard to take him seriously. She didn't mention that he worked out of an extremely insalubrious portable cabin at the back of a building site. As I knocked on the tin-can door (while simultaneously putting out yet another last ever cigarette), I reasoned that if he murdered me, I would technically have given up smoking, therefore this would have been a success. Reader, he did not murder me. In gentle, dulcet tones, he told me I felt sleepy, while I felt embarrassed for him because I definitely wasn't hypnotised. When he 'brought me round' he asked me how long I thought I'd 'been under'. I'd been thinking about what to have for dinner the whole time, so stifled a giggle as I told him: about 10 minutes. He replied that it had been two hours. The next morning, it occurred to me that I hadn't even thought about smoking, let alone done it. Thrilled, I sent another friend, who had the same experience. However, a year later, almost to the day, we both started smoking again. I went back for a do-over but it didn't work. In the end, I probably spent about as much on trying to stop smoking as I had on cigarettes, and the thing that finally worked was free: boring old willpower. It was agony. Personally, I would have bitten the doctor's hand off if they could have given me a treatment that worked. And while of course no treatment is 100% effective, as I found out, stopping smoking is hard and gruelling. The more options people have, and the more visible and accessible these options are, the better. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

I've been left with a gigantic hernia the size of a football – docs said my symptoms were just a ‘bad back'
I've been left with a gigantic hernia the size of a football – docs said my symptoms were just a ‘bad back'

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

I've been left with a gigantic hernia the size of a football – docs said my symptoms were just a ‘bad back'

GRAHAM Shepherd has been left with a hernia the size of a football after doctors dismissed his symptoms as a "bad back". While the 65-year-old has been awarded a payout after suing the NHS, he's said his and his family's lives "will never be the same again". 5 5 5 Graham developed the gigantic bulge - described as the biggest doctors had ever seen - when it ballooned after an aneurysm ruptured. He had visited his GP multiple times and gone to hospital twice complaining of severe back pain as well as weight loss over a nine week period. Graham said a lump on his stomach was also pulsating - but doctors failed to carry out a full examination and sent him home with painkillers. The result of an MRI scan was incorrectly recorded as clear before he was eventually diagnosed with an 11.5cm abdominal aortic aneurysm 64 days later. The dad-of-one was told by doctors he had been a "walking time bomb" and underwent emergency surgery. But he developed complications, including a torn bowel, suspected to have been caused by painkillers he had been advised to take for his back pain. Graham spent more than seven weeks in intensive care and has been left permanently disabled as a result of his ordeal. The former chief foreman is unable to work after being left with a stoma, mobility problems and the large abdominal hernia. Graham's wife, Sarah, 44, has also been forced to give up her job as a healthcare assistant to become his full-time carer. Lawyers have now secured Graham an undisclosed settlement after two doctors and a hospital trust involved in his care denied liability. I lost 14 stone and finally had my loose skin removed, but it was totally botched and I look like I've been left with a permanent hernia Graham, of Stourbrige, West Mids., said: "I was in pain for months. "It started in my back and gradually spread to my abdomen, groin, and down my left leg. "I could barely move and spent most of my time lying on the settee. "I knew something wasn't right and the lump I found in my stomach was pulsating in time with my heartbeat. "When they diagnosed my aneurysm, the doctors told me it was one of the biggest they'd ever seen and I was a walking time bomb. "They believed it had already ruptured several times. "Because it was leaking it had probably relieved some of the pressure and had stopped it fully rupturing and killing me. "I was told that you could probably only fit a cigarette paper between the aneurysm and my spine and that it had worn my spine down." Graham's emergency surgery went well, but afterwards he felt three pops inside of him. It turned out his bowel had perforated. He continued: " I needed another emergency surgery and was told I'd need a stoma. At first, I refused. I was devastated. "Sarah had to convince me it was the only way to save my life. "It wasn't a case of staying in hospital, getting better and going home. "I've been left with permanent nerve damage, muscle wasting in my leg, I can't work and Sarah has had to give up her job to care for me. "My stomach is unsightly and I have a stoma that can't be reversed. I've been told any further surgery on my abdomen would be very risky and complicated. "Our lives will never be the same again. "I just hope that by sharing what happened to me I can help raise awareness so others don't have to suffer." 5 5 Jenna Harris, the lawyer at Irwin Mitchell representing Graham, said: "We firmly believe that those involved in Graham's care failed to conduct appropriate examinations and arrange and report back on a MRI scan in a timely fashion, especially in light of Graham complaining of symptoms associated with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. "If Graham had received the care we say he should, we believe his condition would have been diagnosed sooner and he wouldn't have gone to suffer life-changing complications. "Nothing can make up for Graham's ordeal but we're pleased to have secured this settlement allowing him to access the ongoing support he requires. "An abdominal aortic aneurysm can be life-threatening, especially if they rupture. "Therefore, it's vital people are aware of the possible signs. Early detection and treatment are crucial in managing the condition and preventing potentially fatal complications." What is an abdominal aortic aneurysm? AN abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a swelling in the aorta, the artery that carries blood from the heart to the tummy (abdomen). Most aneurysms do not cause any problems, but they can be serious because there's a risk they could burst (rupture). They often have no symptoms, but when they get bigger, you might notice: tummy or back pain a pulsing feeling in your tummy You should see a GP if: you have tummy or back pain that does not go away or keeps coming back you feel a lump in your tummy These symptoms can be caused by lots of things and do not mean you have an abdominal aortic aneurysm, but it's best to get them checked. Call 999 if you or someone else: have sudden, severe pain in your tummy or back are struggling to breathe or have stopped breathing have pale or grey skin (on brown or black skin this may be easier to see on the palms of the hands or soles of the feet) lose consciousness These could be signs of an abdominal aortic aneurysm bursting (rupturing). This is a life-threatening emergency that needs to be treated in hospital as soon as possible. Source: NHS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store