
Coal mines on Alberta's eastern slopes could push fishery ‘beyond recovery': study
It also suggests any new coal developments could result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake.
The findings were made in a provincial government study posted online May 27. The paper is awaiting peer review. The scientists who authored it were not made available to speak to reporters.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The other authors not employed by the province did not respond to requests for comment.
Alberta has responded to the study with an advisory saying people should consider 'limiting consumption' of three fish species drawn from Crowsnest Lake, a fishing spot downstream from the coal mines.
Those species were found to have dangerously high levels of selenium, a mineral found in coal-rich deposits, in their body tissue.
The authors write the study shows that 'biological impacts of (mountaintop removal) coal mining can persist long after mining operations end.' They suggest that 'any further coal mine development may well push the Crowsnest fishery beyond sustainability.'
The study comes after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes. The project was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed potential economic benefits.
But the regulator said last month it's possible there will be runoff from the nearby pit lake that Northback Holding Corp. is using. It ultimately concluded the project won't have any effect on the water quality downstream.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The AER said that 'out of an abundance of caution,' Northback will have to comply with a directive for managing drilling waste in response to concerns over selenium.
The new study measured selenium levels in fish from Crowsnest Lake, which is fed by creeks connected to Tent Mountain and Grassy Mountain – both former coal mine sites.
Alberta has a fish tissue selenium guideline of four micrograms per gram. The authors write that every single fish sample analyzed exceeded this value.
Average selenium concentrations were highest in Brown Trout, coming in at 18 micrograms per gram.
The authors write that the selenium levels could lead to 'behavioural changes, physical symptoms ... respiratory issues, reproductive issues and ultimately population collapse.' Accumulating fluid in body tissue or fin and tail damage are among other side effects.
Most people are exposed to healthy levels of selenium through grains and flours, but Health Canada says elevated consumption can lead to hair loss, decreased cognitive function and gastrointestinal disorders.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The high selenium concentrations can only be explained by 'the incorporation of legacy coal mine pollution,' the authors write.
The study goes on to say selenium levels in fish in Crowsnest Lake are similar to those found in water bodies near Fernie, B.C., that resulted in Teck Mining Company, which owned and operated a nearby mine, being forced in 2021 by B.C. provincial court to pay a $60 million fine – the largest fine ever imposed under the Fisheries Act.
Fish populations in those mining-impacted streams were found in 2011 to have an average selenium concentration of 7.6 micrograms per gram. Nine years later, the adult westslope cutthroat population had suffered a 93 per cent decline, the study says.
The authors conclude that factors including the emergence of Whirling Disease, drought conditions, high fishing activity — and now high selenium levels in fish — make the Crowsnest Lake and River 'an especially vulnerable system.'
'Any new development of coal mining along the eastern slopes may well push the Crowsnest fishery beyond recovery,' they write.
Colin Cooke, one of the authors, published a 2024 study that found a former coal mine in the Crowsnest River watershed was releasing selenium to fish at rates more than dozens of times higher than federal and provincial guidelines.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Cooke is a senior aquatic scientist with the Alberta government, according to LinkedIn.
Peter Doyle, CEO of Evolve Power Ltd., formerly Montem Resources Ltd., which previously sought to restart an old mine on Tent Mountain, said in an email that the company is complying with terms set out by the AER.
'As reflected in other work by the author, there are numerous contributors to water quality in the Crowsnest River valley, not related to Tent Mountain, including changes in upstream conditions, changes in weathering rates and other anthropogenic changes in the watershed,' Doyle wrote, referring to Cooke's 2024 study.
That report notes those factors, among others, could be contributing to contaminant levels and concluded that coal mining activities in the Crowsnest River watershed 'have been impacting ecosystems downstream for decades.'
Northback, in an email, wrote that Crowsnest Lake is unrelated to its Grassy Mountain project.
'However, with our own project, Northback is committed to adhering to the highest environmental standards and ensuring a safe water supply.'
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Ryan Fournier, press secretary for Alberta's environment ministry, deferred questions about monitoring and enforcement to the AER. He said the province is funding a series of studies and submitting them to peer-reviewed academic journals as the province revises its coal policy.
He also said the authors were not available to speak to media because they 'are not trained spokespeople.'
The AER told The Canadian Press that it has directed Evolve Power, the Tent Mountain owner, to submit a 'selenium management plan proposal' that targets reductions in selenium in mine-affected water.
Evolve was to submit that plan by July 31 of last year, but the AER said it granted the company an extension to March 31, 2026.
The energy regulator also said that while selenium levels are elevated, 'there is no evidence of non-compliance on monitoring or selenium management requirements at this time.'
The province announced in December it would allow coal mining to take place in Alberta under certain conditions. However, it exempted Northback and Evolve Power's projects from those rules because they were considered 'advanced.'
Fisheries and Oceans Canada said in a statement that it doesn't comment on provincial permitting decisions and it hasn't been asked to review the local impacts to wildlife in the area.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
2 days ago
- Toronto Star
This Toronto entrepreneur is betting millions on getting to space. Inside Canada's space race
July 19, 2025 6 min read Save By Mark ColleyStaff Reporter This might be the biggest gamble Rahul Goel has ever taken. He's always been a risk-taker, like when, as a kid in Toronto, he snuck a TV remote into class and switched the channel to SpongeBob. This time, though, there's a lot more on the line — about $5 million of Goel's own cash, to be exact. And he's using it to fuel his ambitious goal: to build a rocket and send it to orbit. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Mark Colley is a Toronto-based general assignment reporter for the Star. Reach him via email: mcolley@ Related Stories Reaction Dynamics CEO Bachar Elzein speaks with the Star about building a Canadian space company How studying what space travel does to astronauts' health is leading to innovations on Earth She dreamed of going to space. After her death, her husband is making sure she gets there 'He had the weight of Canada on his shoulders': An oral history of Canada's first trip to space, 40 years later Report an error Journalistic Standards About The Star More from The Star & partners


CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
For these dolphins, using sponges to dig up fish is a family tradition
In a marine-protected area off the coast of Australia, there are bottleneck dolphins swimming around with sponges on their noses. But unlike orcas wearing salmon on their heads or chimps putting grass in their ears and anuses, "sponging" isn't a fashion statement or a cultural trend. Rather, it's a sophisticated foraging technique passed down through generations to drudge up tasty snacks from the seafloor. "It's likely that sponging arose from a single dolphin having this creative event where they had a sponge on their face and they realized it was really effective for scaring up fish," Ellen Jacobs, a marine biologist at Denmark's University of Aarhus, told As it Happens host Nil Kӧksal. "Then maybe this dolphin had an offspring who saw this was how mom was foraging, so that's how she's going to forage, too. And then it kind of snowballs." Jacobs is the lead author of a new study, published in Royal Society Open Science this week, that examines the pros and cons of sponging to figure out why the technique is limited to a small population of genetically related dolphins in the marine-protected environment of Shark Bay. Oddly exclusive Here's how sponging works: A dolphin puts a sea sponge on its nose like a glove, then cruises along the sea floor using it rustle up fish hiding among the rocks and shells in the sediment. "Then the dolphin drops the sponge, grabs the fish, and then picks up the sponge and keeps going," Jacobs said. First reported in the 1984, the behaviour has continued through the decades. But only five per cent of the dolphin population studied by the researchers in Shark Bay do it, or roughly 30 dolphins in total. And it's strictly a family affair, with calves learning it from their mothers. "All of the dolphins that we see ... sponging are all related matrilineally," Jacobs said. The researchers were curious why sponging had not taken off more widely among dolphins. It appears to only spread vertically, from adults to juveniles, and never laterally, from peer to peer or group to group. Sponging, it turns out, comes with some trade-offs. First of all, it's time-consuming. Dolphins who sponge spend more time looking for food than dolphins who use other hunting and foraging techniques, Jacobs said. What's more, it's a complicated skill that takes years to master. "Sometimes you'll see juvenile spongers who get frustrated, throw their sponge away and pick up a new one," Jacobs said. "But as they age, they get more efficient with their sponge use." Why is it so hard to learn? The researchers discovered the sponges distort the echolocation that dolphins use to navigate their environments. Jacobs used an underwater microphone to confirm the dolphins still use echolocation clicks to guide them while sponging. She then modelled the extent of the sound wave distortion from the sponges. "It's similar to if you were wearing a pair of glasses with the wrong prescription," she said. "You're going to be kind of uncomfortable and everything is going to look a little bit weird, but you can kind of make it through your day, just maybe with a headache." Mauricio Cantor, a marine biologist at Oregon State University, who was not involved in the study, likened it to "hunting when you're blindfolded." "You've got to be very good, very well-trained to pull it off," Cantor said. And not everyone has what it takes to wield the sponge, or the patience to perfect it. "It takes them many years to learn this special hunting skill [and] not everybody sticks with it," said Boris Worm, a marine biologist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, who was not involved in the study. Why bother? But those who do master the art of sponging reap the benefits of their hard work. "They can get a lot of fish all year round because the fish that they're primarily hunting for are not migratory," Jacobs said. " And there's not a lot of dolphins that do it so they don't have a lot of competition for those fish." Earlier research also suggested the fish in the sediment may even be more nutritious than other kinds of fish. Sponging isn't the only example of tool use documented among bottleneck dolphins. In 2020, researchers published a study documenting dolphins teaching each other how to use sea shells to scoop fish into their mouths, a technique they dubbed "shelling" or "conching." And just like the spongers, the shellers reside in Shark Bay, a marine protected area off Western Australia. "Sponging is such a complex interaction between a lot of different parts of the ecosystem, and that's only possible because it is a very pristine ecosystem," Jacobs said. What's more, she says dolphins in Shark Bay don't suffer stresses related to pollution and overfishing like many other dolphins around the world. "That really gives them the opportunity to be dolphins the way that dolphins should be without anthropogenic impacts," she said. "It's a really great opportunity for us to understand: What is a dolphin supposed to be?"


Global News
3 days ago
- Global News
8 babies born using 3-parent IVF method to prevent fatal genetic disease
Eight babies in the United Kingdom have been born using DNA from a third person to eliminate the risk of them developing an often fatal genetic disease. The method, referred to by the BBC as the three-person technique, was pioneered by a group of Newcastle-based British scientists and combines the egg and sperm of a mother and father with the healthy DNA of a second egg, donated by a woman to eliminate the risk of a baby developing mitochondrial disorders. The technique has been legal in the U.K. for 10 years, but proof that it is effective and leading to children being born without the disease is just beginning to emerge. Mitochondrial disorders are only passed down from the mother to the baby, and deplete the body of the energy it needs to sustain life. It can also cause severe disabilities, with some babies dying within days of birth. Story continues below advertisement The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke says that such disorders can affect one or many parts of the body, including the brain, muscles, kidneys, heart, eyes and ears. While children born through the three-person technique inherit the majority of their DNA from their parents, about 0.1 per cent is passed on through the donor egg, and then through future generations. About one in 5,000 babies are born with mitochondrial disease, but this new technique means couples who may have lost one or multiple children to the fatal disorder before can try again while eliminating the risk of passing on the disease. View image in full screen Embryo selection for IVF, light micrograph. While the eight couples who used the method to have children have chosen to remain anonymous, they have shared statements detailing their experiences through the Newcastle Fertility Centre, where the procedures took place. Story continues below advertisement 'After years of uncertainty this treatment gave us hope — and then it gave us our baby,' the mother of a baby girl said, as reported by the BBC. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We look at them now, full of life and possibility, and we're overwhelmed with gratitude,' she continued. Another mother of a baby boy said, 'Thanks to this incredible advancement and the support we received, our little family is complete.' 'The emotional burden of mitochondrial disease has been lifted, and in its place is hope, joy and deep gratitude,' she added. How the procedure works The science was created over a decade ago at Newcastle University and the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, in northern England, with a specialist NHS service opening in 2017. The eggs from the mother and the donor woman are fertilized in a lab using the dad's sperm. Two embryos develop until the DNA from the sperm and egg can be extracted from a structure known as the pronuclei, which determines features such as hair colour and height. The pronuclei are then removed from both embryos, and the parents' DNA is put inside the donor embryo with healthy mitochondria. Story continues below advertisement Two reports in the New England Journal of Medicine recorded 22 families who have undergone the process at Newcastle Fertility Centre, leading to the birth of four boys, four girls, a set of twins and an existing pregnancy. 'To see the relief and joy in the faces of the parents of these babies after such a long wait and fear of consequences, it's brilliant to be able to see these babies alive, thriving and developing normally,' Prof. Bobby McFarland, the director of the NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders, told the BBC. All the babies born so far were born without mitochondrial disease and have met their developmental milestones. One child was born with epilepsy, which reportedly went away on its own, and another had an abnormal heart rhythm, which is being effectively treated. Neither is thought to be connected to defective mitochondria, though it is not known if they are related to the risks of IVF, the three-person method, or something that has been detected due to intense medical observation. There is also still doubt over whether defective mitochondria could be transferred to the healthy embryo and the potential consequences. In five cases, the diseased mitochondria were undetectable. In the other three, between 5 per cent and 20 per cent of mitochondria were defective in blood and urine samples. Story continues below advertisement Nonetheless, the rate of detection is below the 80 per cent level thought to cause the disease. Still, further research is needed to understand why the defective transfer occurred and if it can be prevented. Prof. Mary Herbert, from Newcastle University and Monash University, told the BBC: 'The findings give grounds for optimism. However, research to better understand the limitations of mitochondrial donation technologies will be essential to further improve treatment outcomes.' The U.K., as well as developing the science, was the first country in the world the legalize the procedure, which happened in 2015. The procedure is illegal in Canada and most other countries, but is also available in Australia and Ukraine. Global News reached out to Health Canada for comment but did not hear back by publication time.