UK airport shuts for good after 95 years to make way for thousands of homes – despite ‘contamination' fears
GROUNDED UK airport shuts for good after 95 years to make way for thousands of homes – despite 'contamination' fears
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A UK airport has closed for good after 95 years to make may for thousands of homes – despite fears the area is "contaminated".
The privately-run airport shut on June 6 after a developer served notice on the operator of the site.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Nottingham City Airport also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance
The Vistry Group, which owns Tollerton Airfield In Nottingham, plans to build 1,600 homes and a school at the site.
Home to Nottingham City Airport and a number of other businesses, the site also provides a landing zone for the air ambulance.
Vistry served notice on operator Truman Aviation to vacate the site, but said it would continue to provide a landing zone for the air ambulance during the initial phase of development.
The site's closure follows a year-long battle from campaigners against Vistry.
Campaigners believe that more than 1,200 aircraft containing radioactive materials were burnt and buried at the ex-RAF base leading to contamination.
Concerns were raised after campaigners found evidence that the ex-RAF base in Nottinghamshire had been used after the Second World War to dismantle hundreds of Lancaster Bombers and other aircraft that contained glow-in-the-dark dials made out of radium -226.
Site owner Brian Wells, who was sent notice to vacate the area in March, previously said developers were "determined to have everywhere shut down for when they came to planning".
"We agreed we'd have two to five years here before they would take over," he told NottinghamshireLive. "They even suggested they could keep one runway open for us.
"But the main board of developers say they've had enough of all these people protesting and decided to shut it down sooner rather than later."
David Lammy confirms first batch of Brits have left Tel Aviv by RAF plane amid boiling tensions in the Middle East
He added that "it's very sad" how things have developed much quicker than hoped for, and said the closure will mean "numerous redundancies".
The airfield dates back to the 20th century, when it was home to several flying clubs, and then as a commercial airport until the late 1940s.
During World War 2 it was acquired by the Air Ministry and became RAF Tollerton.
What would happen if the site is contaminated?
Campaigners for the airport have referred to other cases where ex-RAF airfields like Tollerton were used as "burn, bash, and bury" sites and then deemed potentially hazardous.
If the grounds were disturbed, an extensive clean-up process would have to be done.
An example of this is Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland, a stretch of coastline used for the same purposes as Tollerton AIrfield.
Traces of radium-226 found in the ground required a two-year clean-up project at the site. Other examples include RAF Newton, RAF Carlisle and RAF Kinloss.
A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: 'Our Environment Agency officers advised Rushcliffe Borough Council (the planning authority) in May 2024 that a condition of planning permission is that developers have a plan in place to identify and deal with the risks associated with potential contaminants.
"In addition, we have advised that the site will need to be assessed for potential contaminants at routine stages as the development progresses.'
Rushcliffe Borough Council has confirmed applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments.
A spokesperson for Rushcliffe Borough Council said: "We are aware of the previous uses of the wider site, including the airfield and the potential for land contamination associated with these uses.
"Both current applications for the site include initial land contamination assessments".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Woman blows whole £100k inheritance on failed court row with sisters to keep mum's home for her ‘emotional support' dogs
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WOMAN has blown her entire £100k inheritance on a "wasteful" legal battle against her sisters for her late mum's home. Sharon Duggan tried to block her siblings, Brenda 55, and Ann, 60, from their inheritance, arguing she needed the £420,000 house for her therapeutic rescue dogs. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Sharon claimed she needed the house because she could not bear living in a flat Credit: Champion News Service The "noise sensitive" 49-year-old claimed the property in Crawley, West Sussex, for herself after mum Agnes passed away in 2018 and refused to move out. She said should be allowed to stay in the property, claiming she needed it for her and her emotional support dogs because she could not bear living in a noisy flat. Former NHS worker Sharon then took her older sisters to court after they tried to claim their equal third share in the home, which was left to all three daughters. But she now faces a "grim reality" after her case at the Central London County Court was kicked out last month, with a judge ruling in favour of her siblings. Judge Alan Johns KC accepted that Sharon had "particular issues," but concluded a flat could not be ruled out as "suitable" accommodation for her. It means she must now foot a hefty lawyers bill for the "extremely wasteful and expensive" dispute. Ordering her to stump up the costs, which are yet to be calculated, he said: "This marks a sad end to a sad case. "It is likely that Sharon will be left with nothing of the £100,000 or more that otherwise would have been her inheritance. "The grim reality of this litigation is likely to be that all of Sharon's share will be burned up by the costs, so she will end up with nothing "That is the heavy price to be paid by her for pursuing this litigation to trial." Sibling Brenda, who was supported by third sister Ann, fought the case and won after Judge Johns threw out Sharon's claim. Sharon had used the 1975 Inheritance Act to argue she deserved "reasonable provision" above her one-third share of her mum's money. Parents Sue Charity Over £100k Fund After Losing Son and Facing Daughter's Illness She claimed her special sensitivity and medical ailments, including dyslexia, fibromyalgia, depression, anxiety, insomnia, PTSD and long Covid, meant she was entitled to the house. Sharon argued that her problems far outweighed those of her sisters and told how she had "sacrificed" her career to move in and help out her mum in 2014. Most of Agnes' estate was tied up in her house, where Sharon had lived and cared for her during her final dementia-stricken years. She went on to claim that Agnes had plans to change her will to ensure the house was left to her. As well as helping her mother out with her daily needs, she claimed to have spent £30,000 of her own money on funding Agnes' hefty vet bills for her beloved Jack Russell/Chihuahua cross, Lady. In her written arguments to the court, Sharon insisted that "psychologically she could not cope with living in a flat again". Her barrister added: "She is anxious that neighbours may cause disturbances and impact upon her ability to sleep. "She now has two rescue dogs, which help with her mental and emotional well-being, but which makes finding suitable alternative accommodation difficult. "The claimant maintains that moving from the property would affect her mental health greatly and that having to move into rented or temporary accommodation would further affect her health negatively." But Brenda insisted that Sharon would be fine to live in a flat. 4 Sharon's sister Brenda, 55, led the legal fight against her Credit: Champion News Service 4 Ann, 60, supported Brenda as the family dispute went to court Credit: Champion News Service Finding in favour of Sharon's sisters, Judge Johns continued: "It's my judgement that there has been no failure to make reasonable financial provision for her. "I am not satisfied there was any promise that the property would be Sharon's - and certainly not a promise that Sharon was confident would be carried out. "This is a modest estate and Agnes had two other daughters to think of. "Essentially, provision was made for Sharon by giving her one third of the estate. "Given the circumstances in which Sharon occupied the property with Agnes, there's no moral claim strong enough to deprive her sisters of their share of this modest estate." Returning to court to decide who should pay the costs of the trial, lawyers for Brenda and for their mum's estate argued that neither should be left out of pocket when it was Sharon who brought the case. Brenda's barrister told the judge that offers had been made to Sharon pre-trial which would have seen her receive extra money, but she had refused. Judge Johns ordered that she pay the lawyers' bills of both Brenda and their mum's estate, with the sums to be assessed at a later date. He added: "It is submitted that Sharon should not be allowed to walk away without any costs order being made. I agree." Sharon was not present in court for the costs hearing.
Wales Online
10 hours ago
- Wales Online
Just 15pc of us feel confident in kitchen as we stick to Bolognese
Just 15pc of us feel confident in kitchen as we stick to Bolognese Food experts are urging people to break out of the rut and try something new The kitchen is at risk of being side-lined as busy schedules and a lack of cooking confidence take their toll. A study of homeowners found that just 15% of Brits feel confident in their kitchen space. Nearly a quarter of people view cooking as a chore according to research from AEG, although people still spend nearly three hours a day in the kitchen. Many reported feeling stuck in repetitive routines with cooking, with nearly a third rotating through the same 5–10 meals. Spaghetti Bolognese emerged as the nation's most overplayed dish, with over one in six admitting it's their go-to fallback. AEG has teamed up with bestselling cookbook author and sustainability champion Melissa Hemsley. She said: 'The kitchen has long been revered and romanticised as the emotional centre of the home - and for good reason. Cooking is one of the few activities that engages all five senses and invites both creativity and connection. Yet, many people have lost that sense of purpose and presence in the kitchen. The good news is it doesn't take much to get it back and that's exactly what we aim to help people do' The brand is offering a set of challenges designed to encourage more inspired cooking. From ditching the 180-degree setting for a week to breaking free from the usual meal rotation. Article continues below AEG's Kitchen Cure:
South Wales Guardian
10 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Exact date for next emergency alert test on phones confirmed
The system was first tested in April 2023 and found some problems with specific networks, as some mobile phones did not sound. The system has already been used in several scenarios, including storms, flooding and in one case when an unexploded Second World War bomb was discovered. The emergency alert is used to warn if there is a danger to life nearby, in instances like extreme weather. What does the alert look and sound like? 🚨 Emergency Alerts will appear on the home screen of your device and you will hear a loud siren-like sound and feel a vibration for up to 10 seconds. Watch the video below 📽️👇 The next emergency alert system will be tested at around 3pm on September 7, in its second-ever nationwide drill. During the test, the UK's approximately 87 million mobile devices will ring out with a high-pitched alarm and vibrate for approximately 10 seconds, while a message will appear on the screen, making it clear the alert is only a test. Ahead of the national test, ministers are spearheading a public awareness campaign to ensure people understand when it is taking place. It will also aim to draw attention of the test to vulnerable groups like those facing domestic abuse, who may have secret mobile phones which they want to remain hidden from their partners. People who find themselves in this situation are being told to consult details about opting out from alerts on the Government website. Mobile phones will ring out with an alarm this September. (Image: Joe Giddens/PA Wire) Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, is the Cabinet Office minister who has taken charge of efforts to boost national resilience against crises. Speaking as the Government announced the test is to take place, he said: 'Emergency alerts have the potential to save lives, allowing us to share essential information rapidly in emergency situations, including extreme storms. 'Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test the system so that we know it will work if we need it.' Recommended Reading Met Office emergency alerts gives Brits 'heart attacks' as they expect 'WW3' Virgin Media O2 to continue switch off next month leaving customers with no internet BBC iPlayer to stop working on select TV boxes from next month - is yours one? Some five alerts have been issued since the system was first created. These included when 3.5 million people across Wales and the South West of England received an alert during Storm Darragh in December 2024, which went on to kill two people. Localised flash flooding in Cumbria and Leicestershire, and the discovery of a Second World War bomb in Plymouth in February 2024, also triggered the alert for nearby residents.
