logo
JNU during Emergency: When Maneka Gandhi was left fuming and a case of mistaken identity

JNU during Emergency: When Maneka Gandhi was left fuming and a case of mistaken identity

Indian Express27-06-2025
Three months after the Indira Gandhi government imposed Emergency, on September 25, 1975, a black Ambassador drove into the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) campus and stopped near its School of Social Sciences. In the car were policemen led by DIG P S Bhinder, who was close to Congress leader Sanjay Gandhi, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's younger son. They were looking for JNU Students' Union president D P Tripathi but ended up detaining the wrong man.
'Bhinder virtually kidnapped me. They were looking for D P Tripathi, who looks quite different, but arrested me instead,' recalls journalist Prabir Purkayastha. At the time, he was a PhD scholar at the School of Computer Sciences and, like Tripathi, a member of the CPI(M)'s student wing SFI.
The incident took place while the students were on strike following the expulsion of student leader Ashoka Lata Jain, Purkayastha's fiancée. 'We had stopped Maneka Gandhi, the then PM's daughter-in-law, from going to her class,' he says, remembering what triggered the police response.
In Emergency Chronicles: Indira Gandhi and Democracy's Turning Point, historian Gyan Prakash writes, 'On the day Prabir was abducted, Maneka arrived on campus just before 9:00 a.m. for her class in the School of Languages. She got out of her black Ambassador and walked to the elevator to go up to her classroom. As she waited, Tripathi, accompanied by other students including Prabir, asked her to heed the strike call and boycott classes. 'You are one of us, Mrs. Gandhi Junior!' Maneka exploded in anger. 'Just you wait and see. Your heads will roll on the ground!' Then she stomped off. An hour later, another Ambassador entered JNU, and Prabir was whisked off.'
In his statement to the Shah Commission, which the Janata Party government set up in 1977 to investigate the excesses of Emergency, Additional District Magistrate (South) P Ghosh said South Delhi SP Rajendra Mohan had told him that Bhinder had gone to JNU to arrest Tripathi because Maneka Gandhi complained to her husband about the 'anti-government activities in JNU and Sanjay Gandhi had summoned Shri Bhinder and had asked him to take drastic action'.
Tripathi, meanwhile, went into hiding, holed up in a washerman's house behind the Statesman Building on Barakhamba Road in the Capital for a few days. Two months later, he was arrested and sent to Tihar Jail, where he remained till the end of Emergency with other political detainees, including Arun Jaitley.
'Frankly, the imposition of Emergency was a surprise to all of us,' says Purkayastha. 'The Supreme Court had partially stayed her (Indira Gandhi's) disqualification as an MP and allowed her to continue as Prime Minister. But these developments happened against the backdrop of various protests, by students, youth, and workers.'
The news of Emergency broke not in print, but on the radio on June 26. 'It is difficult for people today to imagine a life without cellphones and social media. So, we discovered Emergency only the next morning, without newspapers. All newspaper publications had been halted by cutting off electricity to their printing presses. We learned the news on All India Radio when Mrs Gandhi announced it,' recalls the 75-year-old.
At JNU, student organisers regrouped immediately. 'The immediate response of the SFI was to create new structures that would operate during the Emergency. We began to function as smaller, more decentralised groups while coordinating our resistance,' says Purkayastha.
As Opposition leaders and activists were rounded up, a politically active campus such as JNU — the irony was that it is named after the PM's father — was also targeted. On July 8, Prakash writes, the police raided the campus around 3 am and arrested around 25 students, most of them randomly.
'We had one major crackdown when a large number of policemen surrounded the campus and hostels, conducting room-to-room searches. By then, none of the student leaders were sleeping in their rooms. The few taken away were released shortly, as police had failed to net the big fish they were hoping to get,' says Purkayastha.
Political life on campus was as much about discourse as it was about mobilisation. 'One thing that demarcated student politics in JNU was a vibrant culture of debate and discussion combined with mass actions. Prakash Karat, D P Tripathi, and Sitaram Yechuri were all active in student politics,' he says.
The faculty also played a crucial role in campus life. 'We had Professor Bipan Chandra, who often disagreed with us but would debate as an equal; Professor Sudipto Kaviraj; Professor Romila Thapar, Professors Prabhat and Utsa Patnaik, whose writings helped us understand history and the political economy of the country,' says Purkayastha.
He was detained under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA), a preventive detention law widely used during Emergency, and taken to Tihar. 'The difference in jail then was that we were treated as political prisoners … At present, there is no distinction between political prisoners charged under criminal laws and other undertrials.'
Purkayastha's detention triggered protests at JNU. 'There was widespread protest against my arrest from students and teachers. Tripathi was arrested a couple of months later. For some time, both of us shared a ward with Professor M M P Singh, the President of the Delhi University Teachers Association; Nanaji Deshmukh; and Arun Jaitley.'
After six months, he was shifted to Agra Jail, 'a jail which was supposed to have been closed and demolished, but continued for the period of Emergency'. 'Even though there is no distinction between those who are targeted for political reasons and others, there was camaraderie in prison. It cut across politics, class and even the kind of offences people were charged with. The isolation was worse in Agra, where we also faced solitary confinement. For families, it became harder to visit, though Ashoka, my fiancée, still came every fortnight.'
Looking back, Purkayastha says the experience strengthened his political views. It ended up not being his last brush with the law. He went on to establish the NewsClick website and was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA in 2023, accused of receiving foreign funds for pro-China propaganda. In May 2024, days after the Supreme Court invalidated his arrest, a Delhi court granted him bail.
'I was already a student activist of the SFI from my pre-JNU days. My jail period (during Emergency) confirmed my views of the nature of the State and the importance of various freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution. There is no question that the freedom of the press is intimately linked to our right to speak as citizens, to our freedom of speech and expression,' he says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'A Quiet Crisis': Deepak Nayyar on the State of Higher Education in India
'A Quiet Crisis': Deepak Nayyar on the State of Higher Education in India

The Wire

time3 hours ago

  • The Wire

'A Quiet Crisis': Deepak Nayyar on the State of Higher Education in India

Professor Deepak Nayyar speaks on pressing questions, challenges and concerns over higher education in India. Deepak Nayyar speaking at the B.G. Deshmukh Lecture 2025 at IIC, Delhi. Photo: YouTube New Delhi: At the 2025 BG Deshmukh Memorial Lecture at the India International Centre in New Delhi on July 9, Deepak Nayyar, Emeritus Professor of Economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University and former vice-chancellor of Delhi University, reflected on the challenges facing India's higher education system. He cautioned that a combination of structural neglect, political intervention and institutional decline has brought public universities to a point of serious concern. Placing higher education within the broader developmental trajectory of nations, Nayyar said that while foundational schooling is critical, it is universities that enable the skills and ideas necessary for long-term economic and social progress. He described India's limited investment in higher education as one of the country's most significant post-independence shortcomings. Describing the issue as a 'quiet crisis', Nayyar traced its evolution over several decades. He highlighted the growing gap between demand and supply for quality higher education, the decline of academic standards, and the erosion of previously well-regarded institutions. "The challenges confronting higher education in India are clear. It needs a massive expansion to educate much larger numbers without diluting academic standards," he said. While expressing caution over global university rankings, he acknowledged that India's poor performance on these indices pointed to wider structural issues. He also raised concerns about the rapid expansion of elite institutions such as the IITs and IIMs, noting that it had created challenges around quality control and institutional coherence. "Alas, the comparative advantage that India had, at least in a few of its universities, has been slowly yet surely squandered over time. And sadly, even that little that remains is being progressively undermined by the growing intrusion of politics in universities," he argued. By contrast, countries like China and others in Asia, he said, had managed more effective reforms. Nayyar also discussed the trend of Indian students seeking higher education abroad. In 2023, over 900,000 students reportedly studied overseas, spending close to USD 27 billion – roughly equivalent to India's foreign exchange earnings from tourism, Nayyar noted, adding that such a significant outflow of resources could have been channelled into building and improving domestic institutions. A major portion of the lecture focused on political and bureaucratic interference in public universities. Nayyar described how, since the 1970s, central and state governments have increasingly influenced key academic appointments and policy decisions, often prioritising political alignment over academic merit. He noted that the period after 2014 had seen this trend accelerate, adding that "The past five years since 2019 have witnessed a rapid acceleration in this process. It has now reached a stage where the future of public universities in India is at grave risk, if not already over the edge of the precipice." Nayyar also expressed concern about the functioning of the University Grants Commission (UGC), calling it an institution with significant power but limited accountability. He argued that its emphasis on standardisation has often come at the cost of institutional diversity and academic excellence. In several cases, he said, leadership roles were filled based on loyalty rather than expertise and mechanisms for academic dissent were steadily weakening. Even the IITs and IIMs, which traditionally had more institutional autonomy, were now increasingly subject to central oversight, he explained. On the subject of academic freedom, Nayyar underlined the importance of open inquiry, critical thinking, and independent research. He described a growing culture of self-censorship and administrative scrutiny, sharing instances where faculty were required to sign undertakings to not criticise the government in order to attend international conferences. He also noted that private universities were not immune, often adopting restrictive internal policies in response to external pressures. For Indian universities to flourish, he argued, academic spaces must be protected from both political and commercial influence. Stressing that the health of the education sector is connected to India's long-term development goals, he said, "I'd like to examine the implications and consequences of the crisis in higher what this might mean for realising the aspiration of a Viksit Bharat, a developed high income country, in 2047." "Indeed, selections are shaped by political preferences and political networks. The quality of those appointed to leadership positions in higher education, even if for limited tenures, is critical, because they willingly cede the autonomy of their institutional space for their political commitment, or simply their career paths. The quality of those appointed to faculty positions is perhaps even more critical, because it will shape the future of higher education," he noted. Without serious investment in knowledge systems and the protection of institutional autonomy, he argued, the country's vision of becoming a developed economy by 2047 would remain difficult to achieve. He said that innovation, productivity and technological advancement are all linked to a strong higher education framework. Ending on a note of cautious hope, Nayyar urged academic communities to actively reclaim their role in shaping institutions. 'Autonomy,' he said, 'is not given – it is taken.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

At Right Time...: Jagdeep Dhankhar On His Retirement
At Right Time...: Jagdeep Dhankhar On His Retirement

India.com

time5 hours ago

  • India.com

At Right Time...: Jagdeep Dhankhar On His Retirement

Jagdeep Dhankhar abruptly resigned as the Vice President of India on Monday and cited health concerns as the reason. This comes nearly two weeks after Dhankhar, reportedly at a function at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), discussed his retirement, and it did not seem like he was thinking about calling it quits anytime soon. During the second day of Parliament's Monsoon Session on Tuesday, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Ghanshyam Tiwari, who was in the Chair, announced that Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation as VP has been accepted by the President of India, Droupadi Murmu. The Chair added that the Ministry of Home Affairs has conveyed the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar under 67A of the Constitution with immediate effect. 'I will retire at the right time. August 2027, subject to divine intervention,' he said at the JNU function. On 10th July, 2025, during an event at JNU, Former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar remarked that he would remain in office until August 2027, 'subject to divine intervention.' What led to his sudden resignation just 11 days later? — Aditya Goswami (@AdityaGoswami_) July 21, 2025 "To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the constitution," Dhankar wrote in his resignation letter. PM Modi's Reaction Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a post on X, said that Jagdeep Dhankhar served the nation in various capacities and wished him good health. "Jagdeep Dhankhar has got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities, including as the Vice President of India. Wishing him good health," he wrote. Opposition Vs BJP Labelling Dhankar's resignation as 'sudden and unfortunate', Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi said that the Vice President presided over Business Advisory Committee (BAC) meetings on Monday. He expressed that the relationship between Dhankar and the central government might have taken a hit, given that a Union Minister was also not present in the BAC meeting, which was scheduled for yesterday afternoon. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh claimed that there was more to Dhankar's 'unexpected' resignation as Vice President than meets the eye.

Dhankhar's 'will retire in 2027' video resurfaces day after resignation
Dhankhar's 'will retire in 2027' video resurfaces day after resignation

Business Standard

time5 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Dhankhar's 'will retire in 2027' video resurfaces day after resignation

A recent video of Jagdeep Dhankhar stating that he would retire as Vice President in August 2027 resurfaced on social, a day after he stepped down from the post. The video, posted by news agency ANI, is from his address at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) on July 10. During his interaction with the attendants, Dhankhar said, "I will retire at the right time — August 2027. Subject to divine intervention." However, just 11 days later, on July 21, Dhankhar announced his resignation, citing health concerns. 'To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution,' Dhankhar said in his letter addressed to President Droupadi Murmu. He also conveyed his 'deepest gratitude' for her consistent support and a "soothing wonderful working relationship". Dhankhar also acknowledged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Union Cabinet, stating that their support had been "invaluable" and that his time in office had been a significant learning experience. Following his resignation, PM Modi wished Dhankhar good health. 'Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar Ji has got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities, including as the Vice President of India. Wishing him good health," he said in a post on X. Dhankhar's premature exit makes him only the third Vice President in India's history to step down before completing the full five-year tenure. He assumed office in August 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store