Despite the official statement by Babil Khan's team, worried fans express their concerns: 'A 26-year-old boy, who loved his father and lost him, must be dealing with..'
social media video
,
Babil Khan
was seen criticizing the Bollywood industry, and especially a couple of actors like - Ananya Panday, Arjun Kapoor, Shanaya Kapoor, Siddhant Chaturvedi, and Adarsh Gourav.
His meltdown stirred a buzz online. Everyone was worried about the actor, and things took a more suspicious turn when Babil Khan's official account got deactivated. Soon, Babil's team released an official statement saying that Khan was having a difficult day, and his words had been taken out of context. In no time, everyone came in his support, even actors whose name Babil dropped in his video shared that they are with Khan and will always be there for him.
Worried fans express concern for Babil Khan
Though the statement mentioned that Babil's words were misinterpreted, the netizens are worried about the actor. The X has been flooding with messages and posts, where users have expressed their concern for Babil Khan.
'What happened to Babil Khan guys? He is looking so mentally disturbed in that vdo. Hope he is fine. Every time when a talented comes he suffers in #bollywood. What in the world is going on there? Dear Babil pls take care of yourself we are always here to support you Don't worry❤️,' wrote a user.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How can a 3-month-old get cancer? Please help!
Give Hope India
Donate Now
Undo
Another internet user wrote - 'man i just hope Babil Khan is alright and is surrounded by people that love him during difficult times, that guy is such a sweetheart. bollywood truly doesn't deserve him'
An user shared a long post, where it was mentioned - 'Babil Khan was angry and he vented his anger out on social media through a video where he showed his vulnerability as a human being. It was scary. As a parent if I would see my kid in this state of mind I would panic at my own failure as a guardian of my child.
But many good things came out of the video. Many people saw their own vulnerability in Babil Khan and therefore there is hardly any criticism about his behaviour. What Babil did would be wrong in many ways, but it is also right in many ways.
A 26 year old, who loved his father and lost him, must be dealing with tremendous unresolved mental challenges. Plus the pressure of performing and succeeding in a highly competitive industry like Bollywood is not easy. There would also be whispers of nepotism going around Babil which is not easy to deal with. And this pressure came out in a social media post. It is ugly to look at, but such is life. We are not how we project ourselves to be. '
Statement by Babil Khan's team
"Over the past few years, Babil Khan has earned immense love and appreciation for his work, as well as for his openness about his
mental health
journey. Like anyone else, Babil is allowed to have difficult days — and this was one of them. We want to reassure all his well-wishers that he is safe and will be feeling better soon.
That said, a video of Babil has been widely misinterpreted and taken out of context.
In the clip, Babil was sincerely acknowledging a few of his peers whom he believes are making meaningful contributions to the evolving landscape of Indian cinema. His mention of artists like Ananya Panday, Shanaya Kapoor, Siddhant Chaturvedi, Raghav Juyal, Adarsh Gourav, Arjun Kapoor, and Arijit Singh came from a place of genuine admiration — for their authenticity, passion, and efforts to restore credibility and heart in the industry.
We respectfully urge media publications and the public to consider the full context of his words rather than drawing conclusions from fragmented video clips," shared Babil's team.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Tara Sutaria responds to a question on whether she'd marry a foreigner: ‘I need simplicity and comfort'
Actor Tara Sutaria has reacted to a question on whether she would ever get married to a foreigner. In an interview with Ranveer Allahbadia on The Ranveer Show, Tara called herself "very desi (very native)", adding that she would want "desipana (nativeness)". Currently, Tara is rumoured to be in a relationship with Veer Pahariya. Tara Sutaria made her debut with Student of the Year 2 in 2019. Tara Sutaria opens up about whether she'd marry a foreigner Tara shared that she wants "simplicity and comfort" in her life. "I don't think so because I'm very desi actually and I need all this like desipana (nativeness). There's a certain chilled out thing that we have, whether it's food related, whether it's family related, there's a certain way of being here, and I enjoy that, so I would want that. I need simplicity and I need comfort," she said. She said that she wants her partner to be aware of himself. "I need the person to know who they are. If you know who you are, everything else falls into place, I feel. Self-awareness, self-worth to a certain extent and having a sense of self as well are very important. Knowing who you are in essence and knowing your beliefs, what you stand for, what you don't stand for, what you will never stand for, what you could possibly change to stand for, all of these things are so important," she added. About Tara's love life Earlier, Tara dated Aadar Jain in 2019. They parted ways in 2023. Currently, she and Veer are reportedly in a relationship. Recently, they were seen together at an airport. Recently, Tara walked the ramp at the India Couture Week 2025. At the event, she and Veer blew kisses at each other. More about Tara's career Tara made her Bollywood debut with Student of the Year 2 (2019) alongside Tiger Shroff and Ananya Panday. She has since starred in several films, including Marjaavaan, Tadap, Heropanti 2, and Ek Villain Returns. She was last seen in the film Apurva (2023). Tara is yet to announce her next film. She has starred in several music videos, including Thodi Si Daaru with AP Dhillon and Pyaar Aata Hai with Ishaan Khatter.
India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
This Bigg Boss contestant charged Rs 2.5 crore for 3 days, didn't even know who Salman Khan was, the name is...
Bigg Boss is one of the most loved reality shows which garners impressive TRPs every time it is aired. Since people have grown so fond of drama, romance, juicy gossip, and fights, the makers of Bigg Boss are now all set to return soon with a brand-new season. Bigg Boss Season 19 is highly anticipated, and fans are eagerly waiting for any official announcement. As we discuss one of the most renowned shows, do you know that during one of the seasons of Bigg Boss, there was an actress who took Rs 2.5 crore for 3 days? This Actress Didn't Even Know Who Salman Khan Was? In 2010, when Season 4 of Bigg Boss aired, many different celebs such as Ashmit Patel, Dolly Bindra, The Great Khali, and Shweta Tiwari became a part of it. Among them was Pamela Anderson. Anderson is one of the most famous Hollywood celebs. This was the first season of Bigg Boss to be hosted by Salman Khan. At the time, Pamela didn't even know who Salman Khan was. Although Bigg Boss is often referred to as a family show, Pamela's expressions and choice of clothing stirred quite a bit of controversy. What truly surprised people was her statement before entering the Bigg Boss house. In a media interaction, she said, 'I've heard about Salman from the media, but the truth is, I don't know who he is.' Trying to cover up her remark, she added that she had watched a few Bollywood films but couldn't recall the name of any actor. However, Salman did not like the fact that Pamela had no idea who he was. As per PTI, Pamela said, 'Maybe if I see him, I will recognize him.' She also said, 'I like doing housework, I do this work at my home too, so I have no problem with it.' There was a lot of discussion about her fees. It was reported that she was paid more than Rs 2.5 crore for three days.
The Print
8 hours ago
- The Print
Stranded in the desert of pop culture
The rise of science and technology has transformed the way we live and the way we engage with culture. Entertainment is now just a click away. From curated Spotify playlists and YouTube shorts to Netflix recommendations, we are constantly surrounded by algorithm-driven choices that fit neatly into our fast-paced lives. We've taken convenience for granted, and in doing so, culture — once rooted in tradition, lived experiences, and community memory — has been reduced to surface-level aesthetics. Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: Tradition today is increasingly absent from daily life. Songs at weddings, once filled with meaning and memory, have become just another background track. The dhol and algoza have been replaced by speakers and DJs blaring Bollywood remixes. Even the role of music has shifted; no longer a medium of storytelling or shared emotion, it is now about volume, beats, and engagement. Loud, fast, westernised rhythms dominate. Entertainment is customisable, quick, and disposable — a reflection of the broader consumerist culture we inhabit. The Manganiyar community of western Rajasthan stands as a poignant example of this shift. A Muslim folk group known for their innate talent for music, the Manganiyars once held a place of honour in Rajput courts. Their songs echoed through grand events, royal gatherings, and crowning ceremonies. Their music was not entertainment; it was legacy, memory, emotion, and devotion. But today, that legacy stands diluted and is struggling to survive. Once royal performers, the Manganiyars are now mostly reduced to singing for tourists in desert camps and hotels. While a handful of Rajput families still call upon them for special occasions such as childbirths, weddings, and religious festivals, the regular patronage that sustained their dignity and livelihood has shrunk drastically. The transformation is stark and painful. Worse than the loss of income is the loss of dignity. Some Manganiyar families now survive by working under MGNREGA as daily wage labourers. For a community whose identity was once steeped in art, being forced to dig roads to make ends meet is not just an economic blow but a deep cultural wound. Yet, despite this erasure, the community remains determined. Children are still taught the ragas, rhythms, and instruments of their ancestors. They sit with their elders, learning not from apps but through oral tradition. Their art is a gift, one they want to pass on, regardless of how the market values it. They refuse to 'sell out' or remix their music to suit the tastes of modern audiences. They resist commercialization, even when it costs them everything. And it does cost them. There are almost no buyers for pure, authentic Manganiyar music anymore. The generation that grew up on Bollywood dance numbers, EDM beats, and viral remixes no longer connects with the slow, emotive storytelling of folk. The little space that remains for folk performances is in tourist camps, where even there, the Manganiyars are now asked to perform filmy songs, sometimes molding their music to include item numbers just to hold the crowd's attention. This is not just the story of a community. It reflects a broader cultural shift. Rising pop culture and Western influence, along with fast, urban lifestyles, have altered our tastes. We are a generation of quick fixes — fast food, short videos, 30-second songs. Traditional art and cultural engagements are now confined to occasional stage shows, often repackaged as 'experiences' for tourists. Art is no longer about connection or emotion; it's about clicks, likes, and views. People have not only lost touch with their roots — they no longer desire to reconnect with them. The authenticity of cultural expression is dying quietly, replaced by hyper-produced imitations that are easier to digest. If this trend continues, future generations will inherit a remix of culture — a distorted version, passed off as heritage, stripped of context, ritual, and depth. They will call it folk, but it will be far from it. The price of convenience is not just economic. It is existential. When a culture is reduced to aesthetics and tradition becomes a performative act, we lose more than music or memory. We lose identity. The Manganiyars still sing, in fading corners of Rajasthan, in quiet ceremonies, and in their homes. They sing not for fame or fortune, but because their art is their inheritance. But for how long can they hold on? And when they are gone, what will remain — a remix? Bio: Mahima Duggal is a researcher and pursuing her PhD at the Department of Political Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh. She focuses on tourism and sustainable tourism practices through field-based studies in Jaisalmer. These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.
