Police Commissioner Richard Chambers says recruits know money is 'not everything' as new police college opens
Richard Chambers made the comments at the opening of a new police college campus in Auckland, alongside Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Associate Police Minister Casey Costello.
The campus opening comes after controversy over training and admission standards, amid a government commitment to recruit 500 more police officers by November.
An audit
into
recruitment standards at the Royal New Zealand Police College
found a significant number of applicants were allowed into the college, despite failing preliminary tests. And a review revealed than 300 police officers
were not assessed on their swimming abilities before graduating
.
At new facility, leased from Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa Massey University, Chambers said he could not remember a time when there were more than 350 recruits going through training, after 60 more began on Monday in Porirua and 40 on Tuesday in Auckland.
"Over the 20 weeks, 15 of those weeks will be spent here in the Albany campus. Five weeks, they will travel down to Porirua… and then they will return here to finish, in 20 weeks' time."
The new Auckland-based training facility was announced in June, Chambers at the time saying many potential recruits were put off joining the force by having to spend five months away from home.
"Since December 2023 over 980 new police officers have graduated. That is a massive number, and I do want to acknowledge my staff in recruiting and the selection processes that have enabled those 980 new police officers to get underway with their careers.
"Of course through that same period staff attrit, and we have had a little over 900 staff leave police for whatever reason that may be."
Chambers said only one out of every 10 people who express an interest in joining the police actually make it through the recruitment process.
"People change their mind, but also along the way, we do have, you know, processes in place that shine the spotlight on those who are keen to join New Zealand police in terms of whether or not they're suitable… do whilst we have a healthy pipeline, we continue to work hard to grow that pipeline because 10 percent really only make it to either Porirua or now here at Massey."
Police Minister Mark Mitchell, Police Commissioner Richard Chambers and Associate Police Minister Casey Costello at the opening of Auckland's new police college campus, 1 July 2025.
Photo:
RNZ
A difficulty in retaining the existing force, Chambers acknowledged, was pay. Asked about his comments earlier this year that some of his former colleagues now based in Australia had expressed interest in resuming their careers at home, he said that remained the case.
"There's still lots of my former colleagues who have elected to go across to Australia and, you know, get underway in law enforcement over there. There's still a number of them reaching out to me wanting to come home, which is pretty good actually."
But he would not say how many.
"I can't put a number on it. I know they don't all reach out just to me personally, they do reach out to others.
"But at the moment, we have over 100 wanting to rejoin and, and quite a healthy cohort of that 100 are people who have left New Zealand police to head offshore, looking to come back. But I can't give you an exact number today…
"New Zealand Police is not perfect and New Zealand's not perfect, but actually, when you step outside of your own country and your own organisation, you go and see what law enforcement might look like in another part of the world, you actually reflect and realise how lucky we are in New Zealand and New Zealand Police."
He credited the force's technology, camaraderie, values and priorities as contributing to that potential influx from offshore.
"There's all sorts of reasons, but I'm pretty proud to have a lot of colleagues reaching out to me saying, 'Actually, you know what, we miss New Zealand and we miss New Zealand Police and we want to come home.'"
Asked directly about remuneration, Chambers said that was a "challenge".
"We can't compete with the Australian jurisdictions, let's be frank about that. But, you know, when police people do shift to somewhere else, Australia, they soon realise that, you know, money is certainly very important - but it's not everything."
The new facility in Auckland included multiple classrooms, a locker room, storage space, offices, car parks and dorm rooms, as well as access to other facilities - including a gym and recreation centre.
Neither he nor Mitchell would comment on the costs of the new training base, calling it commercially sensitive and a contractual arrangement between police and the university.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
No penalty clauses paid on stalled Waiouru army base housing project
Waiouru military training camp Photo: Google Maps The Defence Force (NZDF) says it has not paid any penalty clauses associated with its housing project at Waiouru army base . Penalty clauses can be paid when contractors or subcontractors sign up to projects that do not then go ahead. The $50 million-plus project has stalled , though both defence and Ngāti Rangi iwi consider it urgent, and the force issued a tender over a year ago for 50 new homes. No building has taken place. The NZDF once again refused to tell RNZ why it was still in negotiations with the iwi over the housing. It had appeared the talks were settled before it issued last year's tender. "Negotiations in relation to this matter remain underway. Accordingly, this information is withheld in full... to enable negotiations to be carried out without prejudice or disadvantage," it said in a response to a request under the Offiicial Information Act. "The NZDF's relationship with local iwi has not changed and remains vital to our use of the Waiouru Military Training Area," it added. It also said no penalty clauses had been paid, either related to the new builds or the retrofit upgrade of existing army rental houses. Defence housing and other facilities were very rundown, interfering with its military performance and leading to some personnel quitting, its own reports showed. It had an Estate Investment Committee that "provides performance monitoring, oversight, and direction", according to its annual report. But when RNZ asked for the latest three performance management reports by the committee, NZDF replied: "No reports are generated by the New Zealand Defence Force's Estate Investment Committee." It repeated this in relation to its Technology Governance Committee, when RNZ asked for its latest reports, too. A lot of the NZDF's information technology was old and needed replacing, or were in the middle of years-long projects. Funding was set aside in Budget 2025 for this.

RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tāmaki Makaurau candidate Peeni Henare says government playing 'silly games'
Tāmaki Makaurau candidate Peeni Henare campaigning at Ōtara Market. Photo: RNZ/Jessica Hopkins The Labour party says Aucklanders are tired of the government's "silly games". The party was drumming up support for their candidate in the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election in South Auckland on Saturday. Peeni Henare will contest the seat for Labour against Te Pāti Māori candidate, former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara, after the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Tarsh Kemp in June. Henare, who narrowly lost to Kemp at the last election, spent Saturday morning at the bustling Ōtara Market. He was joined by Labour leader Chris Hipkins and other party members, including Georgie Dansey, who will enter parliament on Labour's party list if Henare is successful. Speaking on the government redesigning New Zealand's passport to place the English words above the te reo Māori text, Hipkins said he was opposed to the change. "It's a massive step backwards. We can be proud to have Aotearoa, New Zealand on our passports. It has been there for decades, and no one has complained about it." Henare said the government was not focusing on what mattered. "I'm a big advocate for te reo Māori. It's concerning that the government isn't focused on real issues hurting our people, the cost of living. It's absolute silly games... from this government." Henare said he got a clear vibe from South Aucklanders that people wanted a change in government. "The message was very clear as we walked around the Ōtara Market that people want to see the back of this government." Henare said the passing of Takutai Kemp was very sad. But he said that did not mean Labour should not contest the Tāmaki Makaurau seat. "Anybody who thinks a green seat in the chamber of Parliament is a free pass for anybody is absolute folly. "Should I be successful at this by-election, our tuahine Georgia Dansey, a wahine Māori, will be coming into Parliament." He said Labour was seeking a clear mandate to represent Tāmaki Makaurau in the by-election and the 2026 elections. A 2016 and a 2023 New Zealand passport. The older passport features the English words first - a design the government says it will change back to with new passports from 2027. Photo: Natalie Akoorie Chris Hipkins said they would be vigourously campaigning for Henare over the next few weeks. Those on the Māori roll will vote in the Tāmaki Makauru by-election is on 6 September, 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Lawyer censured for slapping one colleague's bottom, touching another's back
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter of File photo. Photo: 123rf A lawyer who slapped a junior male colleague on the bottom and touched a female colleague's lower back during a social function has been censured. The lawyer, a partner at an unnamed firm, urged a New Zealand Law Society standards committee to consider his behaviour in context, stating that more freedom should be allowed for conduct at an out-of-office social function than during the usual working day. However, the committee found his conduct was disrespectful and discourteous towards the employees, who were both junior to him. According to a recently released decision, the behaviour occurred in the context of socialising by some staff members after a team function arranged by their firm. The partner generally accepted that some of his behaviour was inappropriate, that he had blurred professional boundaries, and had consumed excess alcohol that night. However, he did not see that as a breach of professional standards or an abuse of power towards either colleague. According to the standards committee's decision, the lawyer submitted that slapping the male employee on the bottom was "paying [him] respect" and "blokey", and that he was behaving as a friend rather than a partner in the firm. "The committee sees absolutely no circumstance in which physical contact of this type towards any colleague could be described as respectful behaviour. "The committee also considers this behaviour risks perpetuating a workplace culture that the profession is at pains to transform in relation to interactions between colleagues." The lawyer accepted that he placed his hand on the female employee's lower back as she passed through a door. In his view, doing so was "an innocuous courtesy", and he intended "nothing sexual or sinister" by it. The committee did not ascribe any sexual intent to the lawyer's actions, but found it was clear that the female employee was uncomfortable at the time and afterwards. The committee considered that physical touch on the lower back carried an element of intimacy and overfamiliarity that may reasonably have been interpreted as inappropriate by her or a reasonable observer. While there were some contexts in which this would be acceptable to both parties involved, it was likely to be perceived as flirtatious and inappropriate in others, the decision said. The lawyer's evidence was that she approached him to show him a team photograph on her phone, and he assumed her reason for doing so was for him to comment on it. Referring to the photo, the lawyer commented that the woman was "beautiful" and said that, in that context, it was not intended to be disrespectful or discourteous. The committee accepted that the woman was anticipating a comment on the group photo, but not that she was inviting a comment on her own appearance to the exclusion of others (when there was nothing to draw attention to her over any other team member in the photo). The lawyer's contention that his comment was respectful and courteous in the context was not accepted. The committee considered it was more likely than not that the lawyer's judgement about what was appropriate was impaired. "When coupled with his admitted blurring of professional boundaries, his consumption of alcohol meant he was not well placed to exercise the judgement required of him." While the committee did not identify a specific abuse of any power imbalance, it said that didn't mean an imbalance did not exist "by virtue of their roles as partner and junior members of staff". The committee considered that the team's social function, including ongoing socialising that occurred after the formal portion of the function, was a professional, collegial occasion. It found that the lawyer's conduct across the three incidents demonstrated conduct towards both employees that was disrespectful and discourteous. It was generally conduct "that would be regarded by lawyers of good standing as being unacceptable and unprofessional". Due to mitigating factors present in the case, the committee said it did not consider it necessary to impose any penalty. This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.