Independents unite to demand home support for 20,000 after aged care delay
The government announced in early June it was delaying by five months big changes to aged care, which had been due to start mid-year, to give service providers more time to prepare.
But 10 crossbenchers have teamed up to express concern about the impact of the postponement on the nearly 83,000 elderly Australians on the waiting list for home care.
"Research shows that the longer people go without appropriate home care supports, the higher their risk of injury or hospitalisation," the MPs said in a June 10 letter to Health Minister Mark Butler and Aged Care Minister Sam Rae.
"This delay will also imperil your government's commitment that by 2027 no one will wait more than 90 days for a package.
"On behalf of people in our communities, we are calling on the Albanese government to, at a minimum, fund 20,000 new packages to commence on 1 July 2025 under the current home care packages scheme, which can then be rolled over onto the new support at home program when it eventually commences," the letter reads.
The call for bridging support to cover the delay is supported by both Council on the Ageing (COTA) and the Older Persons Advocacy Network.
"I regularly have families contacting me about the excessively long wait times for home care packages," ACT independent senator David Pocock said.
"We can't afford to delay this further."
Dr Helen Haines, the member for Indi in north-east Victoria, said waiting times were lengthened by a lack of qualified people to provide care in regional areas.
"We also can't delay the rollout of a pricing framework that fairly reflects the travel costs to deliver care in rural areas," she said.
Any setback for older people who wanted to stay at home was "unacceptable", Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie said.
"Both sides of politics have dropped the ball on this issue over the last ten years," she said.
"What the minister calls 'a brief deferral' will directly impact the lives of older Australians."
Sydney-based Allegra Spender said she had heard "heartbreaking" stories of elderly people forced into nursing homes due to the long wait for assistance at home, while Dr Monique Ryan in Melbourne said "older Australians shouldn't suffer because of the aged care system's failures".
Andrew Gee, the newly re-elected independent MP for Calare in NSW, also put his name to the letter in a sign the former National - who quit the party over its opposition to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - will work with the so-called teals in this parliament.
The other signatories were Sydney's Dr Sophie Scamps and Zali Steggall, Andrew Wilkie from Tasmania, and Kate Chaney from Western Australia.
Given Labor's thumping majority win at the May election, the independents will have less sway in this parliament, but the letter is the first indication they will nonetheless use their numbers to lobby together.
Home care packages are a form of commonwealth assistance designed to help people aged 65 and over to stay at home longer by providing assistance with household tasks, personal care and some medical care, such as that provided by nurses.
The government has pledged to switch to a $5.6 billion "support at home" system, promising to be "the greatest improvement to aged care in 30 years" designed to slash waiting lists.
The health minister's office has been contacted for comment.
In their first flex of group political muscle since the federal election, Australia's independent MPs have teamed up to call on the government to fund - within weeks - at least 20,000 extra aged care home support packages.
The government announced in early June it was delaying by five months big changes to aged care, which had been due to start mid-year, to give service providers more time to prepare.
But 10 crossbenchers have teamed up to express concern about the impact of the postponement on the nearly 83,000 elderly Australians on the waiting list for home care.
"Research shows that the longer people go without appropriate home care supports, the higher their risk of injury or hospitalisation," the MPs said in a June 10 letter to Health Minister Mark Butler and Aged Care Minister Sam Rae.
"This delay will also imperil your government's commitment that by 2027 no one will wait more than 90 days for a package.
"On behalf of people in our communities, we are calling on the Albanese government to, at a minimum, fund 20,000 new packages to commence on 1 July 2025 under the current home care packages scheme, which can then be rolled over onto the new support at home program when it eventually commences," the letter reads.
The call for bridging support to cover the delay is supported by both Council on the Ageing (COTA) and the Older Persons Advocacy Network.
"I regularly have families contacting me about the excessively long wait times for home care packages," ACT independent senator David Pocock said.
"We can't afford to delay this further."
Dr Helen Haines, the member for Indi in north-east Victoria, said waiting times were lengthened by a lack of qualified people to provide care in regional areas.
"We also can't delay the rollout of a pricing framework that fairly reflects the travel costs to deliver care in rural areas," she said.
Any setback for older people who wanted to stay at home was "unacceptable", Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie said.
"Both sides of politics have dropped the ball on this issue over the last ten years," she said.
"What the minister calls 'a brief deferral' will directly impact the lives of older Australians."
Sydney-based Allegra Spender said she had heard "heartbreaking" stories of elderly people forced into nursing homes due to the long wait for assistance at home, while Dr Monique Ryan in Melbourne said "older Australians shouldn't suffer because of the aged care system's failures".
Andrew Gee, the newly re-elected independent MP for Calare in NSW, also put his name to the letter in a sign the former National - who quit the party over its opposition to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - will work with the so-called teals in this parliament.
The other signatories were Sydney's Dr Sophie Scamps and Zali Steggall, Andrew Wilkie from Tasmania, and Kate Chaney from Western Australia.
Given Labor's thumping majority win at the May election, the independents will have less sway in this parliament, but the letter is the first indication they will nonetheless use their numbers to lobby together.
Home care packages are a form of commonwealth assistance designed to help people aged 65 and over to stay at home longer by providing assistance with household tasks, personal care and some medical care, such as that provided by nurses.
The government has pledged to switch to a $5.6 billion "support at home" system, promising to be "the greatest improvement to aged care in 30 years" designed to slash waiting lists.
The health minister's office has been contacted for comment.
In their first flex of group political muscle since the federal election, Australia's independent MPs have teamed up to call on the government to fund - within weeks - at least 20,000 extra aged care home support packages.
The government announced in early June it was delaying by five months big changes to aged care, which had been due to start mid-year, to give service providers more time to prepare.
But 10 crossbenchers have teamed up to express concern about the impact of the postponement on the nearly 83,000 elderly Australians on the waiting list for home care.
"Research shows that the longer people go without appropriate home care supports, the higher their risk of injury or hospitalisation," the MPs said in a June 10 letter to Health Minister Mark Butler and Aged Care Minister Sam Rae.
"This delay will also imperil your government's commitment that by 2027 no one will wait more than 90 days for a package.
"On behalf of people in our communities, we are calling on the Albanese government to, at a minimum, fund 20,000 new packages to commence on 1 July 2025 under the current home care packages scheme, which can then be rolled over onto the new support at home program when it eventually commences," the letter reads.
The call for bridging support to cover the delay is supported by both Council on the Ageing (COTA) and the Older Persons Advocacy Network.
"I regularly have families contacting me about the excessively long wait times for home care packages," ACT independent senator David Pocock said.
"We can't afford to delay this further."
Dr Helen Haines, the member for Indi in north-east Victoria, said waiting times were lengthened by a lack of qualified people to provide care in regional areas.
"We also can't delay the rollout of a pricing framework that fairly reflects the travel costs to deliver care in rural areas," she said.
Any setback for older people who wanted to stay at home was "unacceptable", Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie said.
"Both sides of politics have dropped the ball on this issue over the last ten years," she said.
"What the minister calls 'a brief deferral' will directly impact the lives of older Australians."
Sydney-based Allegra Spender said she had heard "heartbreaking" stories of elderly people forced into nursing homes due to the long wait for assistance at home, while Dr Monique Ryan in Melbourne said "older Australians shouldn't suffer because of the aged care system's failures".
Andrew Gee, the newly re-elected independent MP for Calare in NSW, also put his name to the letter in a sign the former National - who quit the party over its opposition to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - will work with the so-called teals in this parliament.
The other signatories were Sydney's Dr Sophie Scamps and Zali Steggall, Andrew Wilkie from Tasmania, and Kate Chaney from Western Australia.
Given Labor's thumping majority win at the May election, the independents will have less sway in this parliament, but the letter is the first indication they will nonetheless use their numbers to lobby together.
Home care packages are a form of commonwealth assistance designed to help people aged 65 and over to stay at home longer by providing assistance with household tasks, personal care and some medical care, such as that provided by nurses.
The government has pledged to switch to a $5.6 billion "support at home" system, promising to be "the greatest improvement to aged care in 30 years" designed to slash waiting lists.
The health minister's office has been contacted for comment.
In their first flex of group political muscle since the federal election, Australia's independent MPs have teamed up to call on the government to fund - within weeks - at least 20,000 extra aged care home support packages.
The government announced in early June it was delaying by five months big changes to aged care, which had been due to start mid-year, to give service providers more time to prepare.
But 10 crossbenchers have teamed up to express concern about the impact of the postponement on the nearly 83,000 elderly Australians on the waiting list for home care.
"Research shows that the longer people go without appropriate home care supports, the higher their risk of injury or hospitalisation," the MPs said in a June 10 letter to Health Minister Mark Butler and Aged Care Minister Sam Rae.
"This delay will also imperil your government's commitment that by 2027 no one will wait more than 90 days for a package.
"On behalf of people in our communities, we are calling on the Albanese government to, at a minimum, fund 20,000 new packages to commence on 1 July 2025 under the current home care packages scheme, which can then be rolled over onto the new support at home program when it eventually commences," the letter reads.
The call for bridging support to cover the delay is supported by both Council on the Ageing (COTA) and the Older Persons Advocacy Network.
"I regularly have families contacting me about the excessively long wait times for home care packages," ACT independent senator David Pocock said.
"We can't afford to delay this further."
Dr Helen Haines, the member for Indi in north-east Victoria, said waiting times were lengthened by a lack of qualified people to provide care in regional areas.
"We also can't delay the rollout of a pricing framework that fairly reflects the travel costs to deliver care in rural areas," she said.
Any setback for older people who wanted to stay at home was "unacceptable", Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie said.
"Both sides of politics have dropped the ball on this issue over the last ten years," she said.
"What the minister calls 'a brief deferral' will directly impact the lives of older Australians."
Sydney-based Allegra Spender said she had heard "heartbreaking" stories of elderly people forced into nursing homes due to the long wait for assistance at home, while Dr Monique Ryan in Melbourne said "older Australians shouldn't suffer because of the aged care system's failures".
Andrew Gee, the newly re-elected independent MP for Calare in NSW, also put his name to the letter in a sign the former National - who quit the party over its opposition to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - will work with the so-called teals in this parliament.
The other signatories were Sydney's Dr Sophie Scamps and Zali Steggall, Andrew Wilkie from Tasmania, and Kate Chaney from Western Australia.
Given Labor's thumping majority win at the May election, the independents will have less sway in this parliament, but the letter is the first indication they will nonetheless use their numbers to lobby together.
Home care packages are a form of commonwealth assistance designed to help people aged 65 and over to stay at home longer by providing assistance with household tasks, personal care and some medical care, such as that provided by nurses.
The government has pledged to switch to a $5.6 billion "support at home" system, promising to be "the greatest improvement to aged care in 30 years" designed to slash waiting lists.
The health minister's office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
34 minutes ago
- Perth Now
AI gives birth to fresh hope against male infertility
Artificial Intelligence is could make all the difference for would-be parents undergoing IVF who are struggling with the most severe forms of male infertility. The first Australian study of new technology has led to one live birth and five pregnancies in 12 months among 35 couples who would previously be considered infertile. "These are the most difficult cases that we see at an IVF clinic, so it's very motivating to be able to help people that in a normal world, naturally would never ever be able to have their own children," IVF Australia embryologist Dale Goss told AAP. "It's great to see translation from a science project essentially a few years ago and a proof of concept into something that's delivered in the clinic and actually see a healthy baby boy born." The NeoGenix Biosciences employee presented the findings from the first AI SpermSearch clinical study to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology conference in Paris overnight. The system works by searching for the best sperm in semen samples taken from biopsies, offering embryologists another tool to select the most appropriate sperm to be used in IVF. Mr Gross said embryologists could often spend up to six hours looking for enough of the right tiny swimmers but the technology was shown to reduce search times by 75 per cent. "We found that our reducing the time to search, we were able to get through more samples, find more sperm and give these patients a better chance at having their own biological children," he said. The technology was given early access approval for research purposes at Sydney-based Virtus Health but Mr Goss hopes it could be approved for wider use across Australia by the end of the year. About 16 per cent of couples struggle with fertility, according to Family Planning NSW, while 1 in 18 babies in Australia are born through IVF each year. NSW couple Marcela and Rowan Moon experienced infertility until tests confirmed Mr Moon's semen had no sperm because of a genetic condition. "When they told us that Rowan was infertile I thought 'oh my God I can't have a child with Rowan being the father biologically' and then they said 'no, it's not like that, we can still do it'," Ms Moon said. Mr Moon had a biopsy as a day procedure and doctors took a sample, which was then used to create embryos. The first transfer was hailed a success and the couple later welcomed son Leo. "We were so lucky to get Leo first off the bat ... I don't think we really realised the rollercoaster that it was going to be," Mr Moon said.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Will Netanyahu's Iran ‘win' lead to a Gaza ceasefire?
Sydney Pead: Fresh from a military win against Iran, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is turning his focus back to the conflict in Gaza, where he still faces immense public pressure to bring home Israeli hostages and end the war with Hamas. Today, Hussein Ibish from the Arab Gulf States Institute on whether new talks with the US could deliver a lasting ceasefire. I'm Sydney Pead, filling in for Sam Hawley. On Gadigal land in Sydney, this is ABC News Daily. Hussein, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he's going to visit the White House next week for talks with President Donald Trump. And that comes after Sunday, when Donald Trump took to social media to declare, in all caps, make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back. So, Trump fancies himself a peacemaker. What do you make of this meeting and Trump's words? Hussein Ibish: Well yeah, and in fact, Netanyahu has similarly been talking about opportunities having been opened up for ending the conflict, for getting hostages out and for resolving the war. He's been very vague. He hasn't said what they are. He hasn't drawn a direct line between the bombing campaign between Israel and Iran. But there is the implication that that somehow opens new possibilities. And that's what he said. It's pretty vague. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister: We have fought with strength against Iran and achieved a great victory. That victory opens an opportunity for a dramatic expansion of the peace agreements. We are working vigorously on that, along with the release of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas. There is a window of opportunity here that must not be wasted. Hussein Ibish: I'm not sure exactly what they're talking about, but Israel does seem to think that its success against Iran has created a new aura of strength and a new freedom of action. And that's, I think, an intimidating thought, especially given the intensification of the war. Sydney Pead: There has been an intensification just overnight. There's been a wave of fresh Israeli attacks across Gaza. And they came after one of the largest evacuation orders was issued in the Strip since fighting resumed in March. So, you know, while the world's attention has been on Iran in that so-called 12-day war, things are going from bad to worse in Gaza. Hussein Ibish: In Gaza, it's been an utter disaster, right? And we've absolutely lost track of how many people have been killed. You know, to give you a sense of how bad things are in Gaza, 74 people have been killed in the past 24 hours, including a strike on a cafe where people were sheltering. ABC Newsreader: The cafe had become a well-known spot for journalists and activists with seating and internet access among the dead, women and children. Hussein Ibish: And again, you know, huge numbers of people and dozens of people killed at these food distribution centres. One of the things the Israelis have done is virtually eliminate the activities of the UN and credible humanitarian aid agencies that are usually responsible for distributing food in these situations. And they've kind of replaced that with a shadowy fund called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund, which is overseen by the Israeli military. And almost 600 Palestinians have been killed since late May at these food distribution centres because if the least thing seems to go wrong, the Israeli military just opens fire. ABC Newsreader: Anger is palpable. Hunger, hunger, hunger, this man yells. These people had gone to eat. They went to get a morsel of food to eat. They said they were distributing aid. How do you call it aid and then shoot at people's children, he said. Sydney Pead: The Israeli Defence Force has now acknowledged what it called inaccurate and uncalculated fire did kill civilians over the past month. It also says aid sites have now been reorganised and access improved to prevent further incidents. Benjamin Netanyahu has said all along the war could end tomorrow if Hamas surrenders and lays down its arms and all the hostages are returned. But what's changed for Israel's leaders? One major success for Netanyahu was that he was able to draw Trump into the Iran conflict and convince him to use the US military to pound Iran's nuclear sites. So how significant was that? Hussein Ibish: Well, I think it looks great on paper because on paper you would say, well Israel has been trying to get the US to strike Iranian nuclear sites for 20 plus years and it never happened and then Netanyahu got it to happen. So good on Netanyahu. But that is a superficial reading. Because the one time, one strike, one and done as we say in the US, deal that Trump entered into with Iran and then enforced a ceasefire on the Israelis, which is not really what they were looking for, is not the strike at all that they were hoping for. This is not what they wanted to draw the United States into. They wanted to draw the United States into a protracted campaign of a couple of weeks to a month or even two months to destroy, really destroy Iran's nuclear facilities, not damage them. There's a great deal of damage but it's not smouldering embers. Sydney Pead: Well, the US officials are pushing back on reports that doubted the level of damage to the Iranian nuclear program. The Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was adamant about that. Pete Hegseth, US Secretary of Defense: There's been a lot of discussion about what happened and what didn't happen. Step back for a second. Because of decisive military action, President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating, choose your word, obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities. Sydney Pead: But even if the conflict wasn't everything Netanyahu was hoping for, he was quick to play it off as a win. So how did it play out domestically for him? Because he's been under a lot of pressure from the Israeli public. Hussein Ibish: Well, it looks great. It looks wonderful. It looks like Israel, and in fact it's true, that Israel itself went to war against Iran's nuclear facilities and scored terrific victories. We really don't know much about the impact of Iran's retaliation because of the extent of Israeli censorship. But it was, whatever it was, it was well within the acceptable range from an Israeli point of view. So this was highly successful. And so Netanyahu right now is in a great situation politically in Israel. He looks like the man who took the war to Hezbollah and won, to Iran and won, who was there when Assad fell, and who now only has to deal with Hamas to have dealt comprehensively with all of Israel's enemies one after another. And that's a very strong position for him to be in. The problem is he hasn't finished the Gaza war. There are still these hostages, and the war is by no means resolved. And it's just much harder to see how that finishes in a satisfactory way. Sydney Pead: I guess I'm wondering if that sort of apparent success in the conflict has strengthened his political position within Israel, and will it enable Netanyahu to push back against some of the people within his own government who want to continue to expand the war? Hussein Ibish: Yeah, I think so. I think he has the upper hand in Israel, and I think he has, to a very large extent, the upper hand against people inside his cabinet. On the other hand, he is still beholden to a couple of extremist parties, and they can bring him down, and he is still on trial. ABC Newsreader: The Prime Minister has been on trial for corruption charges, which he denies, since 2020. Mr Netanyahu argued that he needs to deal with pressing national security and diplomatic matters, sparking speculation a Gaza ceasefire may be imminent. Hussein Ibish: He still has a tiny majority, which means that small groups of extremists can really twist his arm, and he dare not fall, because he faces the prospect of conviction and incarceration. Sydney Pead: Okay, so Hussein, Netanyahu, he's sort of been facing unpopularity among his own people because of his inability to bring all the hostages home, but he's had what looks like this successful campaign in Iran, and he's convinced Trump to get involved. Now there are these new talks which will happen between Trump and Netanyahu next week. So where does he stand now with the US President? Because Trump was extremely angry when it looked like the ceasefire he brokered was on shaky ground. So what does that relationship look like now? Hussein Ibish: Yeah, well, Trump had a fit. I mean, let's face it. Donald Trump, US President: We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing. Do you understand that? Hussein Ibish: We've never seen a public meltdown like that, with Trump swearing at Netanyahu. He pretended he was swearing at the Iranian leaders too, but he really wasn't. He was swearing at Netanyahu, and that public swearing on television was followed by angry social media posts, and then finally an angry phone call. So personally, I think the relationship is very weak. But that doesn't matter, because politically, it's strong because both men needed to be strong. And as long as that's the case, it'll remain functional, and, you know, they don't have to like each other. They need each other to do what they need the other one to do. Sydney Pead: At the NATO conference last week, Trump said he thought that he was very close to striking a deal on the conflict in Gaza. Donald Trump, US President: I think great progress is being made on Gaza. I think because of this attack that we made, I think we're going to have some very good news... Sydney Pead: There were two months of relative peace earlier this year when they came to a ceasefire deal and there were some hostages released by Hamas. What do we know about what this meeting between Trump and Netanyahu could deliver? Could they secure another ceasefire deal? Hussein Ibish: I guess so. You know, it's definitely possible. Look, that ceasefire held until Netanyahu decided to break it. Steve Witkoff, who is Trump's envoy for these negotiations, has apparently issued another proposal calling for a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of 10 living hostages and 18 corpses, and for also Palestinian prisoners. And then during that 60-day ceasefire, the two sides would negotiate a comprehensive ceasefire to end the war, which I think is necessary for Hamas to agree to anything. Hamas is not going to agree to anything that doesn't have the possibility of ending the war at some future extrapolated date. And, you know, Netanyahu wants nothing to do with a ceasefire that does not involve some form of categorical defeat for Hamas. I don't know what that looks like, frankly, because Hamas is not a list of people who can be killed or captured or a list of objects that can be destroyed. It's a brand name. It's a political brand. So you can't really defeat it in the long run. And certainly as long as there are a group of Palestinians in Gaza who say they're Hamas, then there is a Hamas. Sydney Pead: Hussein Ibish is a resident senior scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington DC. This episode was produced by Kara Jensen-Mackinnon, audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I am Sydney Pead. ABC News Daily will be back on air tomorrow. Thanks for listening.
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Calls for Government action to tackle crisis level of drug deaths after Penington Institute findings
A planeload of Australians are dying every month to drug overdoses, a new analysis of fatality statistics has shown, sparking calls for more work from governments to tackle the crisis. A new snapshot by the Penington Institute found while overall numbers of drug-induced deaths fell slightly in 2023, there was a growing share of those over 50 dying from unintentional overdoses. The 2272 Australians killed by an overdose in 2023 marked a 10th consecutive year of more than 2000 deaths — roughly the equivalent of a Boeing 737 once a month — and almost twice the national road toll of 1315. Opioids were the most common drug overdosed on, at 43.9 per cent, while benzodiazepines overtook stimulants as the second-placed drug. The snapshot comes ahead of a full report in August, which last year showed WA had recorded the highest per capita rate of overdoses for more than 10 years. Penington Institute chief executive John Ryan said the figures showed how persistent overdoses were in Australia. 'A decade of losing more than 2000 Australians to overdose annually marks a sombre milestone,' he said. 'Governments need to tackle overdose with the same level of energy and enthusiasm used to reduce alcohol and tobacco harm in Australia. We need a comprehensive national overdose response strategy to end the overdose crisis. 'We already know what works to reduce overdose deaths. 'The data tells us that opioids remain the largest contributor to fatal drug overdoses. One relatively cheap and easy solution is giving potential overdose witnesses wider access to naloxone, a life-saving opioid reversal treatment already proven to save lives.' The alarming figures come as a new study will be released on Wednesday showing Generation Xs — those born between 1962 and 1982 — are more likely to die from methamphetamine use. The study, published in the journal Addiction, found the demographic experienced the highest risk of dying from methamphetamine-related causes, such as overdose and cardiovascular disease. While meth deaths have increased fourfold since the start of the century, the rates among younger users declined. Among the reasons for the broader rise were a stigma around drug use, misinformation and limited access to tailored support services. 'Many people who use drugs are ageing, and the support systems in place are not designed with their needs in mind,' study author Oisin Stronach said. 'These deaths are complex, often involving multiple substances. Yet much of our service sector remains geared toward people using opioids, leaving people who use methamphetamines — particularly older people — underserved.' Burnet Senior Research Fellow Dr Amanda Roxburgh said the societal stigma around methamphetamine use was a clear barrier to accessing care. 'Methamphetamine is arguably the most stigmatised drug in Australia. That stigma not only isolates people but also deters them from seeking help,' Dr Roxburgh said. 'If we want to save lives, we need to ensure equitable access to health services for all people who use drugs — regardless of their age or substance of choice.'
