Danger of nasal tanning sprays that can cause skin cancer
The unregulated sprays - which claim to accelerate tanning - may also trigger nausea, vomiting, and high blood pressure according to the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI).
The CTSI is now urging the public to avoid any tanning product that is 'inhaled or ingested'.
The sprays claim to work by delivering a substance known as Melanotan 2, a chemical that darkens skin pigmentation and which is banned in the UK.
While this creates a tan it 'may also encourage abnormal skin cell changes in response to UV exposure', according to the Melanoma Fund.
It's these changes that can potentially lead to melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer.
However, as the sprays are marketed as a cosmetic product rather than a medicine, they are not as tightly regulated and have surged in popularity.
According to the British Beauty Council, the self-tan market is set to hit $990million by 2027.
The CTSI also raised the alarm on the growing trend of people using flavored nasal tanning sprays, drops and gummies.
They warned that 'unscrupulous' sellers on Facebook and TikTok were posting pictures of the products available in child-friendly flavors such as peach, bubblegum, grape, strawberry and lime.
The regulator said it feared they could become the latest 'must have' products among young people 'leading to a youth epidemic as we saw with disposable vapes'.
Susanna Daniels, chief executive of the skin-cancer charity Melanoma Focus, said: 'We're becoming increasingly concerned about the use of both nasal tanning sprays and tanning injections and their potential links with melanoma skin cancer.
'These unregulated and illegal products not only pose serious health risks but also encourage harmful behaviors, particularly among young consumers.
'We urge the public to consider the long-term impacts on their health and avoid using these substances altogether.'
Gary Lipman, chairman at the Sunbed Association, added: 'Nasal sprays have absolutely no place in a professional tanning salon.
'We fully support CTSI's campaign to heighten awareness of the dangers of using them.'
Some British patients have already been harmed by the products.
Jen Atkin, a former Miss Great Britain winner from Grimsby, Lincolnshire, said she has been permanently scarred after using a nasal tanning spray she bought on Instagram.
'Unfortunately, I decided to go to extra lengths and fell into the trend of nasal tan,' she said.
Atkin used the product twice and a dark brown mark appeared 'out of absolutely nowhere' on her forehead.
She added: 'It scared the life out of me. It made me feel so nauseous and weird.'
Melanoma is a serious form of skin cancer that begins in melanocytes, cells found in the upper layer of skin that produce melanin, which gives skin its color.
While less common than other types of skin cancer, it is more dangerous because of its ability to spread to other organs more rapidly if it is not treated at an early stage.
Around 17,000 people are diagnosed with melanoma each year, according to the latest figures published on the Cancer Research UK website.
Almost nine in ten people diagnosed with melanoma survive ten years or more.
There is an annual average of 2,300 deaths from the skin cancer, according to the charity, with it accounting for around 1 per cent of cancer deaths.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Women can now claim almost £1,000 for 'gifting' their eggs and demand has never been greater. But for many the procedure is painful, has been linked to serious health conditions and leaves a lifetime of troubling questions
Leena Khan was a 21-year-old university student when she saw the Facebook advert seeking egg donors: giving would be a selfless act, the fertility clinic said. 'I've always gone out of my way to help people,' says Leena – and with £750 expenses offered, the money would help fund her studies. As far as ideas go, she says, 'it didn't seem crazy'. Within months of donating, however, Leena started suffering painful, heavy periods.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I forced my reluctant husband to take my placenta home and blend it into a smoothie - I was out of hospital the next day
When I saw DJ Calvin Harris ' picture of his partner and Radio 1 host Vick Hope 's placenta pills on Instagram it brought back so many memories. I was 32 and pregnant with my first baby when I heard about the concept of consuming your placenta after the birth. I was taking birth classes with a midwife who was very into the natural birth movement, and she told me about a theory that eating the placenta could prevent post-partum depression, ease bleeding after delivery and improve your iron levels. Although there is no scientific evidence that eating the placenta after childbirth is beneficial, many animals including cattle, goats, horses and dogs, do it as it's supposedly an amazing source of nutrition. I was intrigued by the idea and figured that anything that might make me feel better or make the early days of life with a newborn easier was worth a try. I already knew the placenta - a temporary body organ that develops during pregnancy - had lots of beneficial ingredients in it as I once got talked into buying a £400 moisturiser which contained sheep's placenta. The midwife leading my birth classes introduced me to a woman who lived nearby who was a doula and birth coach, and she also offered a placenta encapsulation service. For £150 she would take my placenta, dehydrate it and turn it into little vitamin-like pills and a tincture which I could add to water. I'd also heard of people taking their fresh placenta and putting it into smoothies to drink after the birth. Although I'd planned a natural home birth, my waters broke and there was meconium in them, and when I went to the hospital they told me I'd have to stay there and be induced. While we were waiting for the induction, my partner Andy and I went for a walk and I suddenly remembered my plans for my placenta. We popped into a Pound Shop and bought a cool bag to take the placenta home with us. The birth was chaotic and not at all how I'd imagined, but I remember Andy pointing to my placenta and saying to the doctor: 'We need to take that'. When he got home, he stuffed it in the fridge. The days after my birth were really hard and I felt terrible, so while I was still recovering on the ward, I asked Andy to go home and rip off a bit of my placenta and put it into a smoothie for me. I'd read that it was full of stem cells which can help a woman's body to replenish itself after birth. Andy was sceptical, but I felt so rotten I forced him to do it: 'You have to do it for me and the baby'. He later told me that he got the placenta out of a tupperware in the fridge and tried to cut it with a knife but it was too thick, so he just ripped some off with his hands. He put it in the Nutribullet with a load of frozen berries. I drank it in the hospital. It didn't really taste that different from a normal smoothie. I don't know if it was just a placebo effect or if it really helped, but not long afterwards, I stopped bleeding and was allowed to go home the next day. The early days of having my daughter Wren were a blur, but I did take the placenta pills - religiously at first and then less as time went on. I remember there were some moments where I had a bit of a wobble about whether to take them or not, as I'd had drugs to induce labour and did wonder if they'd gone into the placenta. I also had a lot of problems with breastfeeding and there are mixed reports about whether consuming the placenta increases or decreases your milk supply. My family weren't that surprised when they heard I was taking pills made of my placenta - they already think I'm quite hippy and woo woo. But I remember my mother-in-law was shocked and a bit mortified when we told her. I think in other cultures it's a normal practice and people have been doing it for decades. My French friend Alexia told me that her mother made granules of her placenta nearly 40 years ago. Alexia's mother gave them to her when she was a child and told her if she ever felt unwell, she could take them to get better. When I had my daughter Alba two years later, in 2018, I would have done it again, but she was born at 36 weeks so we weren't organised enough. She was born in the bath at home and I do remember looking at my placenta and marvelling at what my body had created. You've grown a baby and a whole new organ. I can see why in many cultures the placenta is treated as a sacred thing. The other day I was having a clear out and I found the little brown bottle of tincture which we'd had made all those years ago. It's supposed to be great for rebalancing hormones, so I've just started taking it again to help with perimenopausal symptoms. I have 10 drops in a glass of water every morning. It's too soon to really feel an effect, but it feels positive to try something. I hope it works for Vick and helps her recover from the birth. There's nothing to be squeamish about. I think anything that makes people feel good is worth the effort.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'
Verbal abuse of children could be as damaging to their mental health in adulthood as physical abuse, according to researchers. A study of more than 20,000 adults in England and Wales found that people exposed to verbal abuse in childhood were likely to feel disconnected, pessimistic, and emotionally unwell in later life. Adults who were physically abused as children had a 52% higher chance of experiencing low mental wellbeing, and this stood at around 64% for those who had been subjected to solely verbal abuse. While verbal abuse did show as having a marginally higher impact in this study, the researchers said the difference was not statistically significant and that further studies would be needed perhaps with a larger sample size to confirm the validity of the difference. Being exposed to both types of abuse compounded the risk even further, at 115% higher, the study led by Liverpool John Moores University found. Lead author, Professor Mark Bellis, who is director of research and innovation at the university, said: 'Our research shows that verbal abuse in childhood may inflict mental health scars as deep and enduring as those caused by physical abuse. Important progress has been made in reducing physical abuse, but verbal abuse is often overlooked.' The study, published in the BMJ Open, also suggested the prevalence of verbal abuse has risen in recent decades 'eroding the long-term mental health benefits we should see from reducing physical abuse'. The authors worked alongside Bangor University and Public Health Wales to pool data from seven relevant studies, involving 20,687 adults from England and Wales and looking at birth cohorts from the 1950s onwards. They found that the prevalence of child physical abuse halved from around 20% among those born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% among those born in 2000 or later. But when it came to verbal abuse, the prevalence rose from 12% among those born before 1950 to around 20% among those born in 2000 or later. The researchers said an estimated one in six children endure physical abuse, primarily from family members and caregivers, but one in three are subjected to verbal abuse. Jessica Bondy, founder of Words Matter, an organisation focused on ending childhood verbal abuse by adults said: 'This study confirms what survivors and professionals have long known: words can wound deeply and have a lasting impact on a child's mental health and development. We all get overloaded sometimes, but too many adults are turning to harsh words without realising the lasting damage they cause to children. 'Any gains made in reducing physical abuse risk being undone by rising rates of verbal abuse. We must act now to confront the lasting harm caused by cruel, critical or controlling language. We need to build children up – not knock them down. The mental health of the next generation and our shared future depend on it.'
