logo
Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere

Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere

RNZ News3 days ago
Max Siqueira (second from right), during his New Zealand citizenship ceremony - he has now moved to Australia.
Photo:
Neil Macbeth / SUPPLIED
Nearly half of the New Zealanders applying for Australian citizenship weren't born here, according to data from the Australian government.
Between July 2023 and June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand citizens applied for Australian citizenship, its Department of Home Affairs said.
The figures raised questions about whether New Zealand had become a
launch pad for migrants aiming to settle in Australia
.
When Max Siqueira moved from Brazil to New Zealand in 2016, he had no firm plans.
He arrived on a visitor visa, but after landing a job, he stayed long enough to gain permanent residency and eventually became a New Zealand citizen last year.
Soon after, his family went on holiday to Australia - they liked it so much they decided to move there and now live on the Gold Coast.
Australia's Gold Coast. (File photo)
Photo:
123rf
"It's really easy once you get the New Zealand passport," Siqueira said.
"I just bought a plane ticket. At the airport, I gave them my passport and said I was moving to Australia. They said 'Welcome, good luck' - that's it. The next day, I applied for a tax number and started working. It was that easy."
His case was not unique.
In 2024 alone, nearly 30,000 New Zealanders moved to Australia - the
highest number in more than a decade
.
Since July 2023, New Zealand citizens on a Special Category Visa (SCV) had been able to apply directly for Australian citizenship after four years of residence, without first needing to become permanent residents.
Australia did not cap the number of SCVs issued, and nearly every New Zealand citizen was eligible for one upon arrival.
While Siqueira believed most migrants came to New Zealand intending to settle, he agreed some planned to move on.
"It happens, but not as much as people might think. I know a few who had that plan from day one, go to New Zealand, then move to Australia once they get the passport.
"But most didn't plan that. They were happy in New Zealand and only thought about moving once they visited Australia or realised how easy it would be with the passport.
"I can't speak for all nationalities, but among Brazilians I know, the main reason people move to Australia is the weather. It reminds us of home," Siqueira said.
Stats NZ said since the early 2000s, migrants born outside of New Zealand have made up a
growing share of New Zealand citizens moving
across the Tasman.
Of New Zealand citizens who migrated to Australia in 2024, 35 percent were foreign-born.
Data form the Department of Home Affairs showed, from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand nationals who hold a Special Category Visa (SVC) applied for Australian citizenship.
Of these, 48 percent were born outside of New Zealand.
Emeritus Professor Richard Bedford, a population geographer, said while New Zealand had a net loss of citizens to Australia, it had also a considerable net gain of citizens from other countries during the same period.
"There's sometimes an assumption all the people going to Australia are highly skilled, and those coming here are not, but that's incorrect", he said.
"We bring in many highly skilled migrants, and it does help balance the overall flow."
But retaining that talent was a real challenge, he said.
"We need to take very seriously the factors that attract skilled migrants. It's not always about money, but money is a big one.
"We must ensure that highly skilled migrants we bring in get good jobs and are well paid. But we're a small country with a smaller economy, and we can't compete on everything.
"What we can offer is a good lifestyle, a welcoming environment, and a strong sense of community, things that also matter to many migrants."
Immigration rules were an important factor, he said.
"Many barriers to skilled employment in New Zealand come from our own professional associations, like medical or engineering boards.
"If we're not letting these skilled people work, we shouldn't be inviting them in the first place.
"And once someone has residency, they have the same rights as anyone else. If they don't want to stay in the job they came for, or if they want to move to Australia, they have every right to do so.
Bedford, who had been working on migration issues since the 1960s, said it's too difficult to tell if more immigrants are using this country as a stepping stone across the Tasman.
He said the real challenge was making New Zealand a place people want to stay.
"Not just with good pay, but with access to housing, a welcoming culture, and opportunities. If we want migrants to commit to staying, we have to make it worth their while beyond just the job offer."
Emeritus Professor Jacques Poot, a population economist at the University of Waikato, said New Zealand and Australia had long functioned as two closely linked labour markets, and New Zealand had typically come out on the losing side.
"Australia's economy is about five times bigger, and wages tend to be higher due to slightly greater productivity."
Poot said it was unfair to assume migrants who left had always intended to do so.
"People migrate for all kinds of reasons. Some move on, some return home, and others stay. There's a lot of churn in modern labour markets. Migration today is often temporary."
Still, he said New Zealand should improve its ability to retain people who wanted to settle.
"We should revisit our pathways to residency. We need to make sure people who want to settle here have every opportunity to do so."
He also pointed to New Zealand's wage gap as a long-standing push factor.
"Australia offers higher wages, and that's tied to their larger economy and more populous cities. Cities like Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane generate what we call 'agglomeration advantages', with more productivity, more opportunities, better pay."
Even so, he said the narrative of a mass exodus from New Zealand was overstated.
"If you look at the numbers in proportion to our total population, the real exodus happened in the late 1970s, when we only had 3 million people. Now we have over 5 million. So while the numbers may look big, they're not records in relative terms.
"One of the things that struck me in 1979 was the big headline in two papers in Wellington: 'Last one to turn off the light.' Because they were really amazed about the out migration from New Zealand.
"Well, since then, we're still having the lights on in New Zealand, so I wouldn't worry too much about it."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Call me Mr Cash Man': MP seeks protection for hard currency
'Call me Mr Cash Man': MP seeks protection for hard currency

1News

time5 hours ago

  • 1News

'Call me Mr Cash Man': MP seeks protection for hard currency

Self-proclaimed cash advocate and MP Jamie Arbuckle believes his proposed law protecting hard currency transactions is about more than accessibility — it's also about privacy and preventing "Big Brother" surveillance. The New Zealand First MP's members' legislation, the Cash Transactions Protection Bill, would require vendors to accept cash up to the value of $500, with no limits on the amount of cash that must be accepted for essential items like fuel and food. 'There's a real concern across New Zealand that we're becoming a cashless society, and we've got a lot of people who depend on cash,' the MP told Q+A. He said that particularly applied to people living in rural areas, the elderly who are more comfortable using cash than digital systems, and those on low incomes. A self-professed fan of using cash, Arbuckle said, 'cash is king, and you can call me Mr Cash Man if you like.' ADVERTISEMENT 'I've got to tell you right now, I don't like walking into a shop and not being able to pay cash for a coffee.' Composite image by Vania Chandrawidjaja (Source: iStock/1News) But he said in an increasingly digital world, there was a more serious point to be made about the ability to make anonymous payments. 'People are telling me they want to have the ability to use cash, it's a freedom of choice issue.' 'It's really the only true way of having privacy in a transaction. You don't get that with electronic payments. There's always the concern that Big Brother or someone is able to look at where you've been, what you've purchased, so the majority of people have been very positive about protecting cash use.' A Reserve Bank survey released in June 2025 found that — while electronic and debit card use was by far the most common method of making payments — a significant minority of the country continued to use cash regularly. Around 46% of respondents said they used cash 'to pay for everyday things', down slightly from 48% which an equivalent survey found in June 2023. ADVERTISEMENT The survey also found a majority had used cash at least once in the seven days preceding the survey being taken, with approximately 33% of respondents saying they hadn't used cash in the last week, and a further 3.6% saying they would never use cash. Further research undertaken last year by the Reserve Bank found Kiwis value being able to use physical cash. Director of money and cash Ian Woolford said, '84% of respondents were worried about losing access to banknotes and coins, and want assurance that cash will still be issued by the Reserve Bank and not reduced or replaced by digital cash.' 'We'll keep issuing cash for as long as New Zealanders want to use it," he said in December. "We're doing a lot of work to redesign the cash system, including helping retailers through community cash services trials next year in several rural communities lacking over-the-counter bank or ATM services.' Some businesses have moved to being cash-free, but Arbuckle said in his view, it couldn't be an opt-in and opt-out system. 'The majority of businesses hold cash, so we're only talking about a small amount of businesses that would have to change. ADVERTISEMENT "Cash is legal tender, and you should be able to purchase with cash.' He said if the bill is pulled out of the member's bill biscuit tin, he'd welcome feedback from businesses that might be affected during the select committee process. Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air

YouTube threatens to sue Aus govt if roped into social media ban
YouTube threatens to sue Aus govt if roped into social media ban

1News

time10 hours ago

  • 1News

YouTube threatens to sue Aus govt if roped into social media ban

Google has been warned its threats to sue won't sway the potential late inclusion of YouTube in Australia's world-first social media ban for children. The tech giant wrote to Communications Minister Anika Wells declaring it was considering its legal position if its video sharing platform was included in the ban for children 16 and under. The letter, first reported by the Daily Telegraph, flagged the ban could be challenged on the grounds it restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Signals the Australian government was contemplating an "abrupt policy reversal" prompted Google to seek further clarity. "YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians," a YouTube spokesperson said. ADVERTISEMENT "We have written directly to the government, urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process and protect the age-appropriate experiences and safeguards we provide for young Australians." The social media ban is due to come into effect in December. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat were among platforms covered when legislation passed parliament. YouTube was exempted, in a move TikTok described as a "sweetheart deal". "The government was firm in its decision that YouTube would be excluded because it is different and because of its value to younger Australians," a YouTube spokesperson told AAP. "This intention was repeatedly made clear in its public statements, including to the Australian parliament." But e-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has recommended a rethink, citing research showing children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than any other platform. ADVERTISEMENT "The new law will only restrict children under the age of 16 from having their own accounts — not accessing content on YouTube or any other service through links from the school or in a 'logged-out' state," she told the National Press Club in June. "There is nothing in the legislation that prevents educators with their own accounts from continuing to incorporate school-approved educational content on YouTube or any other service just as they do now." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese took a dim view of Google's attempt to muscle in on the decision-making process. "The minister will make these assessments... independent of any these threats that are made by the social media companies," he told ABC TV on Sunday. "I say to them that social media has a social responsibility. "There is no doubt that young people are being impacted adversely in their mental health by some of the engagement with social media and that is why the government has acted." The early findings of an age-verification trial found technologies could block young kids from social media platforms, but not without loopholes. ADVERTISEMENT Platforms will face penalties worth up to AUS$50 million (NZ$54.5 million) if caught not taking reasonable steps to prevent children 16 and under from creating accounts.

Winston Peters immigration comments labelled ‘divisive rhetoric', ‘cynical politicking'
Winston Peters immigration comments labelled ‘divisive rhetoric', ‘cynical politicking'

NZ Herald

time13 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Winston Peters immigration comments labelled ‘divisive rhetoric', ‘cynical politicking'

The remarks have not gone down well with two of the Opposition parties. The Greens' immigration spokesman Ricardo Menendez March said Peters' 'tired, decades-old playbook of blaming migrants' was a 'distraction' from other actions the coalition Government had taken, such as changes to pay equity rules and tightening emergency housing settings, which critics argue has led to an increase in homelessness. 'We aren't waiting for [Prime Minister Christopher] Luxon to show leadership and shut down this divisive rhetoric, which is why we are fighting to create 40,000 new jobs through a Greens Job Guarantee, build enough public housing and restore pay equity claims,' the Green MP told the Herald. 'We will also ensure every migrant worker is treated with respect and is free from exploitation.' The Greens' Ricardo Menéndez March was critical of the comments. Photo / Mark Mitchell Phil Twyford from Labour told Newstalk ZB it was 'cynical politicking' by Peters. 'Instead of focusing on the things that I think are important to New Zealanders, like the cost of living, they are resorting to imported culture wars that, frankly, New Zealand just doesn't need,' Twyford said. While he said there was always more to be done to improve the system, Twyford said New Zealand 'is completely reliant on immigration for our economy to work and for our society to work'. 'Migrants make a hugely positive contribution to this country. They enrich our communities. It's not helpful for politicians, for their own political purposes, to be trying to divide the community and turn one group of people against another.' Luxon on Sunday said it was important immigration was linked to 'our economic agenda and our ability to support immigration with good infrastructure'. 'Those are the three things that have to come together for any country, and certainly here in New Zealand as well,' the Prime Minister said. 'We have accelerated pathways for residency through the Green List for when we have got job shortages that we desperately need to get into our communities.' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said immigration needed to be linked to the country's economic agenda. Photo / Mark Mitchell Peters told the Herald NZ First believed immigration should not be used as an 'excuse for our failure to train, skill and employ our own people'. That was one of the party's founding principles 32 years ago and remained 'as much a principle now as it was back then', Peters said. 'We, like wise countries, have always believed we should be training and employing our own people first and not use immigration as an excuse not to do that. That is still our plan.' He said New Zealand still didn't have strong enough initiatives to 'take people from secondary school into employment' and stressed the need for appropriate infrastructure to be in place to support migrants. 'There was a time when we were getting people from around the world putting down £10 to get here. They were coming to a job and a house and infrastructure, schooling, everything. Teachers and doctors and all sorts of people were coming here.' In the year to May 2025, there was a net migration gain of 15,000, driven by 140,000 arrivals and offset by 125,000 departures. The number of arrivals is down from a peak of roughly 235,000 in late 2023, but still above the long-term average of 119,000. However, due to the large number of departures, the net gain is below the average of nearly 28,000. Jamie Ensor is a political reporter in the NZ Herald press gallery team based at Parliament. He was previously a TV reporter and digital producer in the Newshub press gallery office. In 2025, he was a finalist for Political Journalist of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store