Starmer: Palestinians have inalienable right to statehood
The Prime Minister made the comment on Thursday evening as he came under growing pressure from Labour MPs over the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.
In a statement, Sir Keir also condemned the 'unspeakable and indefensible' suffering in the strip and called it a 'humanitarian catastrophe'.
The Labour Government backs Palestinian statehood but has argued for months that it should be formally recognised at the right moment to further peace in the region.
The statement falls short of a promise to declare Palestinian statehood – something the French are pushing to be done next month.
Sir Keir said: 'We are clear that statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. A ceasefire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.'
Cabinet ministers have reportedly been pushing privately for Sir Keir to announce UK recognition while Sir Sadiq Khan, Labour's London mayor, publicly joined the calls this week.
Pressure on Sir Keir is likely to intensify after Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana launched a new hard-left party to challenge Sir Keir.
The pair have accused the Government of enabling genocide and are expected to link up with several independent pro-Gaza MPs.
A UN conference on the issue, planned for June but delayed by the Israel-Iran war, is now due to take place next week.
Critics of immediate recognition have said that it should not happen until Hamas is removed from any leadership role in Gaza and all Israeli hostages are released.
Israel's government has characterised any recognition by the UK and France as a 'reward' for Hamas 's Oct 7 atrocities.
The US had been leading efforts to broker a Gaza ceasefire in recent months but Steve Witkoff, Donald Trump's Middle East envoy, cut them off on Thursday.
He said the US was bringing home its negotiators, saying Hamas 'clearly shows a lack of desire to reach a ceasefire'.
Mr Witkoff added that the US would now 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home', without clarifying what they would be.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
6 minutes ago
- Metro
UK and France's migrant deal comes into force - here's what it means
A deal to return migrants who arrived in the UK illegally in small boats back across the Channel to France is coming into force today. The 'one in, one out' agreement was announced during a state visit from French President Emmanuel Macron last month, as a new means of deterring people from taking the hazardous journey over the water. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said at the time it would begin 'within weeks' – and today is the first day it is fully in effect, after it gained the blessing of the European Commission and other EU countries. However, no returns will be made straight away. Instead, detentions are expected the start within the next few days in preparation for the next step. By the end of July, more than 25,000 people had made the crossing over the English Channel in flimsy small boats. That's almost 50% more than the number who had crossed by the same time last year. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. The government hopes the risk of being sent straight back across to continental Europe will put people off risking their lives to reach the UK. The logic behind the deal is simple – adult migrants who arrive here illegally will be sent back across the Channel, and for every person returned, the UK will take in an asylum seeker from Europe. Those asylum seekers must not have attempted to come over illegally, and will be subject to security and eligibility checks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It doesn't take a degree in maths to realise this would result in the same number of people coming over to the UK, on the face of it. But the Home Office believes fewer people will make the journey if they think they might not end up being able to stay, and this will end up bringing down the numbers. That could depend on how many people are impacted, though, as not every arrival will be sent back immediately. Reports suggest the initial phase of the scheme could return 50 people each week – meaning just one in 17 would be affected, at the current rate of crossings. The question of whether would-be migrants might think those figures are worth the gamble remains. Government figures on both sides of the Channel are, unsurprisingly, keen to sing the praises of the new agreement. Starmer said it was the 'product of months of grown-up diplomacy', and would 'strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model'. The PM added: 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the UK would 'always be ready to play its part alongside other countries in helping those fleeing persecution and conflict', but it must be done 'in a controlled and managed legal way'. Her French counterpart Bruno Retailleau wrote in a post on X that the agreement is 'a first step in addressing a challenge that calls for the mobilization of the entire European Union'. Opposition politicians, on the other hand, have been scathing. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp argued: 'Returning just 50 illegal immigrants a week, and probably less, will make no difference whatsoever. This amounts to just 6 per cent of illegal arrivals. 'Allowing 94 per cent to stay in the UK will be no deterrent at all. This is a gimmick which won't work.' Charity Freedom from Torture has also raised reservations over the plan, which will result in the detention of arrivals. Natasha Tsangarides, the group's Associate Director of Advocacy, said: 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery.' The deal with France is a central pillar of a wider government effort to 'smash the gangs' who are behind the small boats. More Trending In the past couple of days, the Home Office has also revealed a £100 million boost in funding for border security specifically to tackle small boats crossings. At the weekend, the creation of a new offence was announced targeting people who promote the crossings on social media. They now face up to five years in prison. When Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited the UK the week after Macron, he committed to a change in German law aiming to prevent people in the country facilitating illegal migration to the UK. According to statistics from the Home Office, 898 migrants arrived on 13 boats on July 30, but none at all arrived in the four days afterwards. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Truth revealed about why farmers sprayed manure on 'illegal campers' MORE: 'I create fake IDs of your MP so you can get round Online Safety Act' MORE: Risk and reward, Trump's Mini-Me and planting trees for the planet
The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Labour's 'cruel' asylum returns deal with France comes into force
The treaty was published by the Home Office on Monday morning and it sets out how migrants will be detained on arrival in England to be sent back to France. In return, France will send over asylum seekers to the UK, if they pass security and eligibility checks, including having documentation. The trial will run until June 2026 and only some people arriving in small boats on the southern coast of England will be at risk of being returned. It has led to accusations that Labour are 'just as unprincipled and impractical' as the Tories before them, while concerns have also been raised about the effect of detaining people who have already fled wars and torture. Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty International UK's refugee and migrants' rights director, said: 'When it comes to asylum policy, this Government is proving to be just as unprincipled and impractical as its predecessor.' (Image: Supplied) He argued that rather than 'smashing the gangs', as Labour have pledged, the policy only further entrenches the role of people-smugglers in the asylum system. 'A returns deal with France that makes access to safety in the UK – even for those with close family or connections here – dependent on someone else risking their life to cross the Channel only cements the role of smugglers in how people fleeing war and persecution must seek asylum in the UK,' said Valdez-Symonds. 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy. READ MORE: Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails he sent to Israeli politicians 'The UK shares the same duty as other countries to provide asylum. But instead of facing that responsibility, this Government continues to swap one unworkable gimmick for another – aligning itself with the smugglers and the chaos they exploit. 'If the aim is to truly reduce dangerous journeys and the profits of organised criminal gangs, the answer is clear: we need safe accessible routes between countries not miserable deals that trade in human lives.' Natasha Tsangarides, associate director of advocacy at Freedom from Torture, said the policy relied 'on the mass detention of survivors of torture and persecution'. She added: 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery. A more secure world for everyone depends on international cooperation not only to ensure safety for survivors but also to stop repression.' In a statement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the deal was the result of 'months of grown-up diplomacy delivering real results for British people as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model'. He added: 'This government has been fixing the foundations of the broken asylum system we inherited and today we send a clear message – if you come here illegally on a small boat you will face being sent back to France.' Not all those who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, however. It is estimated that around 50 arrivals per week will be returned, which is around one in 17 of all people who make the crossing at the current rate, according to Politico.
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Murderer who used GB News to call for death to ‘all Muslims' jailed
A murderer who called for the killing of Sir Keir Starmer and 'all Muslims' has been jailed for more than three years under Scotland's hate crime laws. Stewart Cochrane was out of prison on lifetime licence when he made what a sheriff called 'repulsive' comments under videos from the right-wing TV station GB News. Cochrane, 60, was jailed for 12 years in 2004 for stabbing a man called John Peoples through the heart a year earlier within earshot of the victim's children. He was out on licence and living alone in Dundee when, according to his lawyer, he started spending an 'unhealthy amount of time' watching YouTube videos and posting comments on them. The remarks, according to local paper The Courier, included: 'F*** Starmer, I'd rather shoot him anti-British Muslim convert' and 'Assassinate Starmer now'. Cochrane pleaded guilty to threatening behaviour, aggravated under the 2021 Hate Crime and Public Order Act, by prejudice relating to both sexual orientation and race, colour or nationality. Sheriff Tim Niven-Smith said he believed the posts were intended to stir up racial hatred, a crime which long predates Scotland's hate crime legislation passed in 2021 and introduced in April 2024. Citing the murders of MPs Jo Cox and Sir David Amess and recent riots in England and Northern Ireland, Niven-Smith said: 'Recent history tells us that members of parliament are targeted and murdered often for no more than standing up for others and what they believe in. 'I am certain when you posted your remarks you intended to stir up racial hatred. Your actions in making the posts that you did were not reckless but intentional. 'There is no place in a civilised society for the utterly repulsive posts that I have heard today.' Niven-Smith sentenced Cochrane to three years and four months, reduced from five years because of his guilty plea. British courts have handed down a series of lengthy sentences for people who threaten or incite violence, including against minorities, in recent months. The wife of a Tory councillor who called for rioters to 'set fire' to hotels housing asylum seekers during last summer's mass public disorder was jailed for 31 months. Lucy Connolly, a 41-year-old childminder from Northampton, became an international cause célèbre after her case was taken up by Donald Trump's White House. She has, however, lost her appeal against her sentence. Cochrane made his posts between April and early June of this year. Police raided his Dundee flat and seized his phone. Cochrane told officers 'multiple times' he that would never carry out the threats. The court heard that he added: 'It's been more an act of stupidity than serious.' Neil Shand, his defence defence advocate, told the court: 'He lives alone and spent an unhealthy amount of time watching YouTube videos and posting comments.' Cochrane admitted killing Peoples in a Salvation Army hostel in 2003 when he was 39. He had been in a jealous rage with his victim who shared the same counsellor. Peoples' family were angry with what they saw as a short minimum sentencing for the killing.
