
Trump's next health nominee in the hot seat
With help from Simon Levien
Driving the Day
CHRISTINE FACES QUESTIONING — President Donald Trump's choice for a top post at HHS, Dr. Brian Christine, goes before senators today for a confirmation hearing.
Christine will face questioning from the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee as lawmakers consider his nomination to be assistant secretary for health — one of the highest-ranking jobs at HHS and a position often held by admirals in the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service.
Why it matters: If he advances through the committee and is eventually confirmed by the full Senate, Christine, a men's sexual health doctor and GOP donor, would oversee thousands of uniformed public-health service members and be charged with carrying out Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s public health agenda, Simon reports. One of the highest-ranking positions at the agency, the assistant secretary for health advises the HHS secretary and recommends policy related to public health matters like disease prevention, vaccine programs and health disparities.
He would also help lead a new HHS office called the Administration for a Healthy America, which consolidates existing agency offices to focus on primary care, maternal and child health, mental health, environmental health, HIV/AIDS and workforce development.
Background: Christine, a urologic surgeon at Urology Centers of Alabama, has previously criticized the acceptance of transgender health care and the federal government's response to the Covid-19 pandemic. He's expressed opposition to trans athletes competing in women's sports and has said on his podcast — called 'Common Sense,' and last airing two years ago — that children experiencing gender dysphoria should seek counseling or 'pastoral care,' not gender-affirming treatments.
He's also come under scrutiny after The Wall Street Journal reported in March that his Alabama urology practice advertised its work treating transgender men with erectile dysfunction. Christine has denied treating trans patients.
Since taking office, Trump has directed HHS to restrict access to gender-affirming care treatments for children and teens.
The Alabama GOP has praised Christine's nomination, calling him 'a longtime Conservative grassroots activist and dedicated supporter of the Alabama Republican Party.' In 2024, Christine contributed more than $8,500 to Trump's campaign.
Key context: Dr. Rachel Levine, a pediatrician and the highest-ranking openly trans person to serve at the federal level, held the job during the Biden administration. Levine, who used the post to advocate gender-affirming care, was frequently the target of anti-trans attacks from Trump and his allies.
WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. Today marks the third anniversary of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, and awareness of the hotline is up dramatically from 2022, according to a new National Alliance on Mental Illness poll. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@politico.com and sgardner@politico.com, and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj.
HAWLEY'S ABOUT-FACE — Just weeks after voting for massive cuts to Medicaid in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill,' Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley introduced a bill Tuesday that would walk back those cuts.
Hawley repeatedly voiced his opposition to deep Medicaid cuts throughout the megabill negotiation process, specifically provisions that would hit rural hospitals. But he ultimately voted 'yes' on the recently enacted legislation, which contains more than $1 trillion in health care cuts and a provision that would cap state provider taxes — a move that hospitals have said could deeply reduce their revenue and limit access to health care for millions of Medicaid enrollees.
Hawley said he voted for the bill's passage after negotiating for the inclusion of a $50 billion rural hospital fund but said at the time that he would 'continue to do everything in my power to reverse future cuts to Medicaid.'
His new legislation, the Protect Medicaid and Rural Hospitals Act, would repeal the megabill's moratorium on taxes that states impose on providers to generate more Medicaid funding, which helps boost payments to hospitals. Hawley's bill would repeal megabill provisions that reduce state-directed payments — which enable states to increase the rates that privately run Medicaid managed care plans reimburse providers.
His legislation would also double the megabill's investment in the rural hospital fund to $100 billion and extend the fund from five to 10 years.
'President Trump has always said we have to protect Medicaid for working people. Now is the time to prevent any future cuts to Medicaid from going into effect,' Hawley said in a news release.
Global Health
PEPFAR U-TURN — Senate Republicans on Tuesday stripped cuts to global AIDs funding from the White House's $9.4 billion spending clawback request, POLITICO's Jordain Carney and Cassandra Dumay report.
Republicans will remove a $400 million cut to the global AIDS program known as PEPFAR, reducing the amount of cuts in the package to $9 billion, said Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), who's leading the rescissions effort in concert with the White House.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he expects the removal to be the only change made to the rescissions package, adding that there was a 'lot of interest' among Senate Republicans to address the cut to the program created under then-President George W. Bush and credited with saving tens of millions of lives.
News of the change came after White House Budget Director Russ Vought briefed senators during a closed-door lunch Tuesday. Schmitt said the White House is on board with the change.
'We're fine with adjustments,' Vought told reporters. 'This is still a great package, $9 billion, substantially the same package. The Senate has to work its will, and we've appreciated the work along the way to get to a place where they think they've got the votes.'
Background: Several GOP senators, including Appropriations Chair Susan Collins of Maine, had raised concerns about the AIDS funding cuts. It's unclear whether the $400 million rollback will be enough to secure her vote, but it might placate enough Republicans to advance the package through the Senate. Other Republicans being watched closely are Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell and Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran.
At the Agencies
HOSPITAL PAY CUT — The Trump administration is proposing cutting $280 million in payments to certain hospital clinics for administering drugs to patients, POLITICO's Robert King reports.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said the cut would ensure that Medicare beneficiaries aren't charged more for the same service at a hospital than at an independent clinic. The proposed rule is likely to generate fierce pushback from the hospital industry, which has successfully fought similar congressional efforts.
The rule also outlines 2026 Medicare payment rates for hospital outpatient services and ambulatory surgical centers and includes new changes to boost price transparency.
'These reforms expand options and enforce the transparency Americans deserve to ensure they receive high-quality care without hidden costs,' CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz said in a statement.
Background: The first Trump administration adopted a policy in 2019 to lower payments for outpatient hospital clinics to align them with those of independent clinics. Now, CMS wants to expand that policy to include services for storing or administering pharmaceuticals to patients.
The agency estimates the change will reduce Medicare spending by $280 million, with $210 million allocated to Medicare and $70 million to Medicare beneficiaries thanks to lower co-insurance rates, according to a fact sheet on the rule.
Key context: Site-neutral payments — when Medicare pays the same amount for the same service regardless of where it's provided — have gotten bipartisan support on Capitol Hill. But packages have never made it across the finish line partly due to fervent lobbying from the hospital industry, which argues the payment cuts would imperil the finances of vulnerable hospitals.
What's next: The rule has a 60-day comment period before final approval.
WHAT WE'RE READING
POLITICO's Lauren Gardner reports on Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal suggesting he's open to changing the federal vaccine injury program.
KFF Health News' Darius Tahir reports in NPR that researchers fear a program that collects DNA data from millions of retired military service members could be in limbo.
Endpoints News' Jared Whitlock reports on the Trump administration's disbanding of a newborn screening panel for rare conditions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration pulls $4B in federal funding for California's bullet train project
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The Trump administration revoked federal funding for California's high-speed rail project on Wednesday, intensifying uncertainty about how the state will make good on its long-delayed promise of building a bullet train to shuttle riders between San Francisco and Los Angeles. The U.S. Transportation Department announced it was pulling back $4 billion in funding for the project, weeks after signaling it would do so. Overall, a little less than a quarter of the project's funding has come from the federal government. The rest has come from the state, mainly through a voter-approved bond and money from its cap-and-trade program. President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy both have slammed the project as a 'train to nowhere." 'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.' The loss marks the latest blow to California by the Trump administration, which has blocked a first-in-the-nation rule to phase out the sale of new gas-powered cars, launched investigations into university admission policies and threatened to pull funding over transgender girls being allowed to compete in girls sports. It also comes as rail project leaders are seeking private investment to help pay for its estimated price tag of more than $100 billion. Voters first approved the project in 2008 and it was supposed to be operating this decade. But cost estimates have consistently grown and its timeline pushed back. State officials are now focused on building a 119-mile (192-kilometer) stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced that is set to be operating by 2033. The California High Speed Rail Authority is slated to release a report this summer to state lawmakers with an updated funding plan and timeline for the project. Authority officials wrote in a letter earlier this month that the Trump administration made up its mind about revoking funding before thoroughly reviewing the project. They noted that more than 50 structures have already been built, including underpasses, viaducts and bridges to separate the rail line from roadways for safety. 'Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong — it's illegal,' authority CEO Ian Choudri said in a statement Wednesday. 'These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025." The authority has asked potential private investors to express their interest by the end of the month. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will keep 'all options on the table' to fight the revocation of federal funds. 'Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him," he said in a statement. The state has 'no viable plan' to complete even the Central Valley segment, said Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the transportation department's Federal Railroad Administration, in a report released last month. He called the project a 'story of broken promises' and a waste of taxpayer dollars. California Democrats also have criticized project spending. Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan said at a budget hearing earlier this year that her constituents 'overwhelmingly believe' high-speed rail spending 'has been irresponsible.' Newsom plans to extend the state's cap-and-trade program, a key funding source for the project which is set to expire at the end of 2030, through 2045. The program sets a declining limit on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions large emitters can release. Those polluters can buy allowances from the state needed to pollute, and about 45% of that money goes into what's known as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, according to the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, a group of experts that reviews the program. The fund helps pay for climate and transportation projects, including high-speed rail. The bullet train project receives 25% of the money from the fund, which ends up being a little less or a little more than $1 billion annually, depending on the year. Newsom in May proposed guaranteeing $1 billion a year for the project from the fund, but lawmakers have not agreed to that. ___ Austin is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Austin on X: @sophieadanna Sophie Austin, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration pulls $4b in federal funding for California's bullet train project
'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.' Advertisement The loss marks the latest blow to California by the Trump administration, which has blocked a first-in-the-nation rule to phase out the sale of new gas-powered cars, launched investigations into university admission policies and threatened to pull funding over transgender girls being allowed to compete in girls sports. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It also comes as rail project leaders are seeking private investment to help pay for its estimated price tag of more than $100 billion. Voters first approved the project in 2008 and it was supposed to be operating this decade. But cost estimates have consistently grown and its timeline pushed back. State officials are now focused on building a 119-mile (192-kilometer) stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced that is set to be operating by 2033. The California High Speed Rail Authority is slated to release a report this summer to state lawmakers with an updated funding plan and timeline for the project. Advertisement Authority officials wrote in a letter earlier this month that the Trump administration made up its mind about revoking funding before thoroughly reviewing the project. They noted that more than 50 structures have already been built, including underpasses, viaducts and bridges to separate the rail line from roadways for safety. 'Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong — it's illegal,' authority CEO Ian Choudri said in a statement Wednesday. 'These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025.' The authority has asked potential private investors to express their interest by the end of the month. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will keep 'all options on the table' to fight the revocation of federal funds. 'Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him,' he said in a statement. The state has 'no viable plan' to complete even the Central Valley segment, said Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the transportation department's Federal Railroad Administration, in a report released last month. He called the project a 'story of broken promises' and a waste of taxpayer dollars. California Democrats also have criticized project spending. Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan said at a budget hearing earlier this year that her constituents 'overwhelmingly believe' high-speed rail spending 'has been irresponsible.' Newsom plans to extend the state's cap-and-trade program, a key funding source for the project which is set to expire at the end of 2030, through 2045. Advertisement The program sets a declining limit on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions large emitters can release. Those polluters can buy allowances from the state needed to pollute, and about 45% of that money goes into what's known as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, according to the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, a group of experts that reviews the program. The fund helps pay for climate and transportation projects, including high-speed rail. The bullet train project receives 25% of the money from the fund, which ends up being a little less or a little more than $1 billion annually, depending on the year. Newsom in May proposed guaranteeing $1 billion a year for the project from the fund, but lawmakers have not agreed to that.


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump terminates federal funding for California's $135B high-speed rail ‘boondoggle': ‘TRAIN TO NOWHERE'
President Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced Wednesday that about $4 billion in unspent federal funding for California's significantly delayed and overbudget high-speed rail project has been terminated. 'To the Law abiding, Tax paying, Hardworking Citizens of the United States of America, I am thrilled to announce that I have officially freed you from funding California's disastrously overpriced, 'HIGH SPEED TRAIN TO NOWHERE,'' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'This boondoggle, led by the incompetent Governor of California, Gavin Newscum, has cost Taxpayers Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and we have received NOTHING in return except Cost Overruns,' the president fumed, using his preferred nickname for Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will.' 4 Trump described the project as a 'boondoggle' and blamed Gavin Newsom for its failure. Getty Images Originally passed as a ballot initiative in 2008, the 800-mile rail line was supposed to be completed in two phases on a $33 billion budget by 2020, with a main line connecting San Francisco with Los Angeles and branches stretching north to Sacramento and south to San Diego. By 2019, Newsom announced that there was no path forward after costs ballooned to $77.3 billion and the project was drawn down to a 171-mile section between Merced and Bakersfield. California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) officials later applied for $8 billion in grants from former President Joe Biden's 2021 infrastructure law to help complete that Central Valley Segment, which has since been abbreviated further — to just 119 miles. CHSRA blew through nearly $7 billion in taxpayer funds over a decade and a half without laying a single foot of track, according to the Department of Transportation, which notes the projected cost of the project has since risen to $135 billion. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) acting administrator Drew Feeley notified CHSRA CEO Ian Choudri of the decision to 'de-obligate' federal funds for the project in a letter Wednesday. Feeley noted that FRA determined that CHSRA 'breached the commitments made' in a 2010 agreement with federal government for funding and based on California's 'inability to complete' the project by a revised Dec. 31, 2033 deadline, the project 'does not adequately serve the purpose of the statute under which the FY10 Agreement was authorized and funded.' 4 Trump announced the termination of federal funding for California's high-speed rail project in a Truth Social post Wednesday. Truth Social/@realDonaldTrump Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, whose department oversees FRA, has further directed the agency to consult with the Department of Justice on possibly clawing back federal funds for the failed high-speed rail project. 'This is California's fault,' Duffy said in a statement. 'Governor Newsom and the complicit Democrats have enabled this waste for years.' 'Federal dollars are not a blank check – they come with a promise to deliver results,' the transportation secretary continued. 'After over a decade of failures, CHSRA's mismanagement and incompetence has proven it cannot build its train to nowhere on time or on budget.' 'It's time for this boondoggle to die. President Trump and I will always fight to ensure your tax dollars only go to projects that accomplish great, big, beautiful things.' 4 Duffy ordered a review of the project earlier this year. Getty Images 4 Newsom signaled that California might sue the Trump administration to keep federal funds for the project flowing. REUTERS Duffy's efforts to pull the plug on the project date back to February, when he announced a review of the CHSRA's plan after the authority released a report indicating that it would be unable to meet future deadlines. In June, Duffy released a report determining that there was 'no viable path to complete this project on time or on budget.' The compliance review, conducted by FRA, also found that CHSRA's high speed rail project was in default of the terms of its federal grant awards, missed deadlines, budget shortfalls and overprojected ridership. Unsatisfied with CHSRA's response to the compliance review, the Trump administration officially scrapped all future federal funding for California high-speed rail on Tuesday. 'This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED,' Trump said. 'Thanks to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, not a SINGLE penny in Federal Dollars will go towards this Newscum SCAM ever again.' 'This was an ill-conceived and unnecessary project, and a total waste of Taxpayer money — But no more!' Newsom teased that California may challenge the Trump administration's action in court. 'Round of applause for [Trump] and [Duffy] on handing China the future and abandoning the Central Valley — again!' the Golden State governor wrote on X. 'But sorry to disappoint: We're not letting that happen.' '[California High Speed Rail Authority] is entering the track-laying phase and actively building across 171 miles — with 50 major railway structures and 60 miles of guideway already completed,' Newsom claimed. 'We will be exploring all options to fight this illegal action.'