Blockbuster 'Superman' Sparks Another ‘Woke' Debate—Between Ben Shapiro, Hasan Piker, Others
Director James Gunn denied the movie is a metaphor for conflicts in the Middle East. (Photo by Samir ... More Hussein/WireImage) Samir Hussein/WireImage
Left- and right-wing 'Superman' viewers have debated whether the conflict between fictional nations Boravia and Jarhanpur, in which Superman stops the more powerful Boravia from invading the poorer and largely defenseless Jarhanpur, is a metaphor for Israel and Gaza.
Hasan Piker, a left-wing Twitch streamer and YouTuber some tout as the left's answer to Joe Rogan, suggested Sunday night that Boravia could be an analogue for Israel, noting the fictional country is depicted as a military power and ally of the United States, while comparing its attempted takeover of Jarhanpur to Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
Piker objected to an earlier video by conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, who said the conflict portrayed in the movie does not compare to Israel and Gaza because it 'does not match up to the facts' and can only be seen that way by those with 'left-wing brain.'
Shapiro said he does not think the movie has a political agenda, denying other theories the movie is pro-immigration, or offers commentary on Russia and Ukraine, saying these interpretations are caused by 'politics on the brain.'
Conservative YouTuber Tim Pool also disagreed that the movie was a metaphor for the conflict in Gaza, pointing out the two countries are portrayed in the movie as a wealthier Eastern European nation and a poorer South Asian nation.
Writer-director James Gunn has denied the movie is about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, though he has admitted it has political undertones. 'When I wrote this the Middle Eastern conflict wasn't happening. So I tried to do little things to move it away from that, but it doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East,' Gunn told Comicbook.com. Gunn said the movie depicts an 'invasion by a much more powerful country run by a despot into a country that's problematic in terms of its political history, but has totally no defense against the other country,' which he said 'really is fictional.' Gunn admitted the movie is 'about politics,' but said the movie is largely about morality and kindness. Gunn told previously sparked controversy after telling The Sunday Times Superman is an 'immigrant that came from other places,' stating 'Superman is the story of America.' What Have Critics Said About The Politics Of 'superman?'
Film critic G. Allen Johnson wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle it is 'chilling how many scenes reflect current reality,' calling the Boravia-Jarhanpur conflict 'very reminiscent of the Israel-Hamas conflict.' William Bibbiani, a critic for The Wrap, said Gunn may have written a fictional conflict between made-up nations for the film, but 'but we know he's talking about' the war in Gaza. Mashable critic Siddhant Adlakha said the movie has 'unavoidable parallels' to Israel-Hamas.
'Superman' has been branded as 'woke' by some conservative critics over Gunn's immigration comments. A Fox News chyron that aired last week called the movie 'Superwoke,' as guest Kellyanne Conway said people 'don't go to the movie theater to be lectured to and to have somebody throw their ideology onto us.' Superman, however, has long been described by fans and critics as an immigrant. Central to his story is his birth on the dying planet Krypton and his arrival as an outsider to Kansas, and the creators of the comic, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, are children of European Jewish immigrants. Frank Miller, a comic book artist who has written Superman comics, said in 2019 he aimed to 'portray Superman as the ultimate immigrant' in his comic series, 'Superman: Year One.' How Is 'superman' Faring At The Box Office?
'Superman' had a big opening weekend, grossing $122 million at the domestic box office and $217 million worldwide. The movie's success is a win for DC Studios, which has not had a box office hit in years. The studio faced back-to-back flops with 'Shazam! Fury of the Gods,' 'The Flash' and 'Blue Beetle,' as well as the critically panned 'Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom,' which had a moderate box office performance. 'Superman' received positive reviews, scoring an 83% on Rotten Tomatoes, making it one of DC's better-reviewed films in recent years. 'Superman' continues a hot streak for the summer box office, which has seen consecutive hits including 'Jurassic World: Rebirth,' 'F1' and 'How To Train Your Dragon.' Further Reading
Superman's An Immigrant? Director James Gunn Faces Right-Wing Backlash For Claim (Forbes)
'Superman' Makes Huge $22.5 Million Debut—Can It Revive The DC Film Franchise? (Forbes)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
20 minutes ago
- The Verge
Superman is a box office hit, but the hard part comes next
Over the weekend, DC Studios' new Superman feature became this year's third-biggest box-office debut in the US. The movie's success is a sign that theatergoers might actually not be quite as tired of superheroes as people tend to think, and that's particularly notable for Warner Bros., given the studio's plan to build a new cinematic universe of DC Comics adaptations for the big screen. But making interconnected film franchises work is easier said than done. And even though Superman is putting up numbers, DC might have a much harder time doing the same with its next couple of cape movies. Though it fell short of A Minecraft Movie's and Lilo & Stitch's domestic opening weekends, Superman raked in $125 million stateside and another $95 million internationally, making it WB's strongest superhero debut since Matt Reeves' The Batman in 2022. You can see those numbers reflected in the sheer amount of Superman hype (some of which has been weird and gross) that has overtaken social media since the movie first premiered. Because of Superman's success, DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn is reportedly thinking about a couple of spinoff series revolving around Edi Gathegi's Mister Terrific and Skyler Gisondo's Jimmy Olsen. But before any of that comes to fruition, the studio first has to sell the public on its next two big tentpole features due out next year: Craig Gillespie's Supergirl and James Watkins' Clayface. Following the disaster that became known as the DCEU, WB was in desperate need of a fresh start and a vision for how it could use DC characters in ways that audiences would actually like. That need led to the creation of DC Studios with Gunn and co-CEO Peter Safran guiding the whole endeavor. Though Gunn had worked on previous DC projects, his DC Studios' appointment felt like a power move on WB's part that spoke to its desire to push back against Marvel's box-office dominance. And while it seemed a little odd that Gunn wanted to launch his new DC Universe with an animated Creature Commandos streaming series for (HBO) Max, it was easy to understand the logic behind his plan to make a new Superman the franchise's centerpiece. Superman has always been a pillar of the DC Comics brand and embodied much of what makes the company's characters compelling across different mediums. In a universe full of gods, alien monsters, and supervillains, Superman represents hope and humanity at its best. He's a near-indestructible powerhouse, but he's also just a dork from Kansas who loves his family and believes in the importance of journalism. He's got a bunch of superfriends, but he also has major beef with deranged billionaires who can't wrap their minds around the concept of immigrants being people who make valuable contributions to society. Those basic beats have defined Superman stories ever since the character first appeared back in 1938. And part of what makes Gunn's new film so excellent is the way it weaves all of those ideas together into a colorful, optimistic joyride that feels nothing like WB's other recent takes on the Man of Steel. Some of Superman's success can also be attributed to the basic fact that he's a character whose lore most people are familiar with — something the movie acknowledges by glossing over Clark Kent's tragic backstory and dropping you right into his life as an established superhero. But the same can't exactly be said for Superman's cousin, Kara / Supergirl, and B-tier Batman villain Clayface. Thanks to CBS' Supergirl and HBO Max's Harley Quinn animated series, Kara and Clayface have had pretty big presences on the small screen in recent years. But the characters have always had somewhat lower profiles compared to DC's other heroes and villains. Viewed through one lens, DC Studios following Superman up with Supergirl and Clayface reads as a calculated move to avoid following in the examples of the MCU and DCEU, which were both fleshed out with a series of features focused on the kinds of A-list characters you see on lunchboxes and bookbags. But the upcoming features also feel, at least on paper, informed by the way that studios like Marvel and Disney have gotten into the habit of expanding their genre franchises with ill-conceived spinoffs. That's kind of the general vibe you get from the full slate of DC Studio's projects that are currently in development, which includes a stop-motion movie about two of Batman's Robins, a True Detective-style Green Lantern show for HBO Max, and a feature about Bane and Deathstroke. A sequel to The Batman — which predates the DCU and exists in its own continuity — is also due out in 2027. And at some point down the line, the studio intends to introduce a new Bruce Wayne who will presumably link up with Superman and Wonder Woman (whose reboot is also in the pipeline) to form some sort of Justice League. Most of DC Studios' far-off films and series feel like the kinds of projects you would expect a studio to lead with — ones with instantly recognizable characters whose stories are well known enough to get audiences curious and excited about how they could be done differently. Milly Alcock's Supergirl, who gets a brief and fantastic Superman cameo, seems a bit better suited to keep the franchise's current momentum going. But given that we're so early in this DCU's existence, a body horror like Clayface, about an actor who becomes a murderous mud monster, feels like a tougher sell (even if Mike Flanagan is writing the script). It's easy to imagine Supergirl and Clayface revealing that what audiences have grown weary of isn't comics-inspired narratives, but sprawling, interconnected franchises more concerned with growth than being made up of good movies. That energy is what dragged the MCU into its flop era and made most of Disney Plus' Star Wars series slogs to get through, and DC Studios clearly doesn't want to wind up in a similar position. Turning Clark's cousin and a lesser-known DC villain into box-office juggernauts might be an even bigger challenge — but Superman at least shows that Gunn and Safran know where to start. And if the studio plays its cards right, this really might be the start of a new golden age for DC.
Geek Tyrant
32 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
James Gunn Says He 'Didn't Feel Guilt' Leaving Marvel for DC: 'I Was Fired' — GeekTyrant
James Gunn has officially planted his flag in the DC Universe with Superman , and he's not looking back. During a recent episode of Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard, Gunn was asked if he felt any guilt about leaving Marvel for DC. His response was blunt and honest: 'No, I just shook my head. I didn't feel that way because I was fired. I didn't feel guilt at all. I mean, I had to take a job! I took a job [with] people that I also really liked, and that was it.' Gunn, of course, directed all three Guardians of the Galaxy films, and even shot the Thor: The Dark World mid-credits scene. But back in 2018, things took a turn. Disney cut ties with him over resurfaced tweets, leaving Gunn thinking his career might be done. 'I thought my career was over.' That's when Warner Bros. entered the picture. They initially reached out to him about Superman , but Gunn pitched The Suicide Squad instead. And in a twist of timing straight out of a comic book storyline, the same day Warner called, Disney reached back out, seemingly ready to bring him back into the fold. So Gunn found himself sitting at Kevin Feige's house, being asked if he was going to direct Superman . Eventually, he did return to Marvel one last time to finish Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 , before fully committing to DC, this time as co-head of DC Studios alongside Peter Safran. Despite the rocky exit, Gunn made it clear that the folks at Marvel were never the problem: 'Listen, there are people that I'm not that happy with over there [at Disney], but that certainly wasn't the Marvel guys, you know? They were completely supportive. '[Marvel Studios Co-President] Louis D'Esposito called me all the time. Lou and Kevin were great. So it certainly wasn't them.' Now, Gunn is fully focused on reshaping DC's cinematic universe. Chapter One: Gods and Monsters kicked off with Creature Commandos and now Superman . On deck are Supergirl , Peacemaker Season 2, Lanterns , and more, as DC aims to roll out two movies and multiple shows—live-action and animated—each year. For Gunn, the past is behind him. He didn't burn bridges, he just found a new one to build.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal
Iran on Monday warned that it would retaliate if the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) took steps to impose "snapback" sanctions as nations mull further action to halt Tehran's nuclear development. "The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei claimed during a press conference, according to a Reuters report. Baghaei did not expand on how Iran would retaliate, but his threats come amid repeated warnings from security experts that time is running out to enforce the sanction mechanism by Oct. 18 under terms dictated by the 2015 nuclear deal. The comments coincided with the 10-year anniversary of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was originally intended to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions, but which some have argued was insufficient to adequately deter Tehran. Under the terms of the JCPOA, any signatory can unilaterally call up snapback sanctions if Iran is found to have violated the terms of the agreement. Though the U.S., which, alongside the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia, signed the 2015 deal, was deemed by the U.N. and other JCPOA members unable to utilize the mechanism after Washington withdrew from the agreement in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. Despite repeated calls by the U.S. to enforce snapback – which would legally enforce all 15 U.N. members on the council, including Russia, to reimpose sanctions on Iran – no one on the UNSC or JCPOA has yet taken steps to enforce the sanctions. "I would say one of the few good things about the JCPOA is that it reverse engineers the veto in the sense that you really only need one of the permanent members to be able to do this," Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies' Iran orogram told Fox News Digital. "But why is no one doing it? It's because it's a risky move. "I think it's a worthwhile move, but we have to be honest – it's a risky move," he added. Ben Taleblu explained that Iran's most likely response to the severe sanctions under the snapback mechanism would be its abandonment of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) – an international agreement that over 190 nations have signed, pledging either not to transfer weapons to another recipient by nuclear-capable nations, or not to develop atomic arms by non-nuclear nations, among other commitments. The terms of the agreement are monitored by the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency – which Iran has already suspended cooperation with following U.S. and Israeli strikes against its nuclear program last month. "In a world in which Iran's most likely response is to leave the NPT, one has to be confident in at least the ability of military threats to deter Iran further, or at least the credibility of America's and Israel's, or the international community's, military options against Iran moving forward," Ben Taleblu said. "The problem is the lack of a game plan. Has America provided Europe with a game plan, a road map for post-snapback?" he added, noting there needs to be a much larger strategy for next steps should sanctions be reinforced. Though the U.S. assesses that Iran's nuclear program has been stunted by up to two years, experts remain convinced that Tehran's atomic ambitions have not been deterred, and its ties to terrorist networks and adversarial nations mean it remains a top security concern. Trump has said he is still committed to negotiating with Iran on its nuclear program, though questions remain over how long he will continue to allow negotiations to drag out before a European nation like the U.K., France or Germany must step in to enact snapback sanctions not only before the October deadline, but before Russia takes over control of the UNSC presidency that month. Pushing through the snapback mechanism is expected to be a roughly six-week process. Reports on Sunday suggested that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz could call up the snapback measures as soon as Tuesday, and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee championed the move in a post on X. But Fox News Digital could not independently verify these claims and the German Foreign Ministry told Israeli news outlet JNS that the claims were incorrect. The chancellor's office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's questions.
