logo
Big Beautiful Bill: Ray Dalio sounds alarm on soaring US debt, warns of ‘big, painful disruptions'

Big Beautiful Bill: Ray Dalio sounds alarm on soaring US debt, warns of ‘big, painful disruptions'

Mint2 days ago
In a stark warning following the passage of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending package, billionaire investor Ray Dalio has raised red flags about the long-term sustainability of America's fiscal path, forecasting rising debt burdens and severe economic consequences.
The US House of Representatives has approved what Trump has termed 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — legislation that permanently extends his 2017 tax cuts, introduces new tax breaks, and significantly boosts funding for immigration enforcement. But the bill comes at a heavy cost: it will add about $3.4 trillion to the nation's existing $36.2 trillion debt, according to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Reacting to the development, Dalio, the founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, took to social media to highlight what he described as alarming projections. 'The bill is expected to lead to spending of about $7 trillion a year with inflows of about $5 trillion a year,' he wrote in a detailed post on X (formerly Twitter). 'So the debt… will rise over ten years to about 7.5x the money taken in, 130% of GDP, and $425,000 per family.'
Dalio warned that such a trajectory would push the US further into a debt spiral, with annual debt service costs ballooning from $1 trillion in interest today to $2 trillion within a decade. In total, the country would face $18 trillion in interest and principal repayments — a scale of obligation that could force policymakers into difficult choices.
'Either we face a big squeezing out (and cutting off) of spending and/or unimaginable tax increases,' he wrote, 'or a lot of printing and devaluing of money and pushing interest rates to unattractively low levels.'
Dalio cautioned that such monetary measures — essentially debasing the dollar to manage the debt load — would undermine confidence in US bonds and the broader credit markets. 'What's bad for bonds and US credit markets is bad for everyone,' he said, noting that the US Treasury market underpins the global financial system. 'These markets are the backbone of our economic and social conditions.'
He urged swift action to narrow the federal deficit from the current 7% of GDP to a more manageable 3%, advocating for a mix of spending cuts, tax reforms, and interest rate adjustments. Without decisive steps, he warned, 'big, painful disruptions will likely occur.'
Dalio's sobering analysis adds to a growing chorus of concern among economists and market observers about America's fiscal direction, particularly at a time when interest payments are crowding out investments in infrastructure, defense, and social programs.
As debates continue over debt ceilings, entitlement reform, and the Federal Reserve's monetary stance, Dalio's warning underscores the gravity of the choices facing policymakers — and the risks of delay.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'America Party formed to give you back freedom': Elon Musk officially launches new political party amid ongoing feud with Donald Trump
'America Party formed to give you back freedom': Elon Musk officially launches new political party amid ongoing feud with Donald Trump

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'America Party formed to give you back freedom': Elon Musk officially launches new political party amid ongoing feud with Donald Trump

In a major development, tech billionaire and Tesla owner Elon Musk on Friday announced the formation of a new political party under the name 'America Party.' Interestingly, the announcement came just days after US President Donald Trump and Musk's public feud on social media platform X (formerly called Twitter). The 54-year-old Tesla CEO, some days ago, noticed an idea floating on the internet regarding a party formation, to which the billionaire reacted positively and said the decision was made in response to the overwhelming support from the users on the platform. The tech mogul took to his X and shared a post mentioning, "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it!. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. Surprising announcements may stress the tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump The announcement comes suddenly amid the ongoing feud between Musk and Trump, who he once considered a key ally. On the other hand, Elon Musk had also invested about a million in Trump's re-election campaign and even became a major part of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during Donald Trump's presidency. However, the relations between the duo soured last week after Donald Trump signed a sweeping tax cut and spending bill called 'The One Big Beautiful Bill.' According to reports, this was one of the moves that Musk strongly opposed. In response, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO suggested political payback, pledging to use his wealth to campaign against lawmakers who supported the legislation. Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud Following this, the tensions between the duo intensified when Trump threatened to cut off federal subsidies to Elon Musk's companies, which is a significant financial pressure point. However, Musk had earlier said that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat the lawmakers who supported the bill. Meanwhile, before launching his party, Musk shared a poll on the occasion of US Independence Day, when he asked whether respondents "want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" that dominated US politics for about two centuries. The SpaceX owner had a major rift with the president after spearheading the Republican push to reduce spending and eliminate federal jobs while leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The feud flared up again in dramatic fashion late last Monday when Trump urged Republicans in Congress to force through his sweeping domestic agenda, packaged as the One Big Beautiful Bill.

BRICS nations voice 'serious concern' over Trump Tariffs as China skips the Summit in Brazil
BRICS nations voice 'serious concern' over Trump Tariffs as China skips the Summit in Brazil

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

BRICS nations voice 'serious concern' over Trump Tariffs as China skips the Summit in Brazil

Emerging nations, which represent about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output, have united over 'serious concerns' about US import tariffs read more A photo ceremony before a plenary session of the Brics summit in Kazan, Russia. File Image /Reuters BRICS leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday are expected to decry US President Donald Trump's 'indiscriminate' trade tariffs, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Emerging nations, which represent about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output, have united over 'serious concerns' about US import tariffs, according to a draft summit statement obtained by AFP on Saturday. Since coming to office in January, Trump has threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive duties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His latest salvo comes in the form of letters informing trading partners of new tariff rates that will soon enter into force. The draft summit declaration does not mention the United States or its president by name, and could yet be amended by leaders gathering for talks Sunday and Monday. But it is a clear political shot directed at Washington from 11 emerging nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO (World Trade Organization) rules,' the draft text says. It warns that such measures 'threaten to further reduce global trade' and are 'affecting the prospects for global economic development.' Xi no show Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power. But the summit's political punch will be depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president. That absence has prompted fevered speculation in some quarters. 'The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing,' said Ryan Hass, a former China director at the US National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank. The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay away, but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Hass said Putin's non-attendance and the fact that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be a guest of honor in Brazil could also be factors in Xi's absence. 'Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi,' who will receive a state lunch, he said. 'I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors.' Still, the Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage. In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G20 summit, a BRICS summit, and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections next year, in which he is expected to run. Lula warmly welcomed leaders and dignitaries on Saturday, including China's Premier Li Qiang, as the leftist president hosted a pre-summit business forum in Rio. 'Faced with the resurgence of protectionism, it is up to emerging countries to defend the multilateral trade regime and reform the international financial architecture,' Lula told the event. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel, is also skipping the meeting and will be represented by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. A source familiar with the negotiations said Iran had sought a tougher condemnation of Israel and the United States over their recent bombing of Iranian military, nuclear and other sites. But one diplomatic source said the text would give the 'same message' that BRICS delivered last month. Then Iran's allies expressed 'grave concern' about strikes against Iran, but did not explicitly mention Israel or the United States. Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit. Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia.

Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire
Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire

The Wire

timean hour ago

  • The Wire

Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire

Inderjeet Parmar 3 minutes ago Presented as a 'beautiful' fix for growth and security, HR 1 actually funnels wealth to America's richest, arms a $1 trillion war machine and thickens domestic repression, all with the aim of propping up a waning imperial hegemony. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (H.R. 1), heralded as a transformative economic and security package for the United States, is less an economic stimulus than a manifesto for American supremacy. It weds two imperatives of the US ruling class: an upward transfer of wealth and a vast expansion of militarised power, thereby entrenching its domestic and global dominance. Cloaked in rhetoric about jobs, growth and border security, the Bill arrives at a moment when Washington's hegemony is fraying thanks to rising multipolarity, domestic inequality is at an all time high fast – the top 1% hold 32% of wealth – and popular discontent is increasing. Ruling elites secure dominance not merely through coercion but by manufacturing consent via ideological control over civil society—media, politics, and cultural institutions. The Big Brutal Bill, framed as a 'beautiful' solution to economic and security challenges, exemplifies this process. Its proponents, including Republican leaders and sections of the corporate media, have deployed neoliberal and nationalist narratives to mask the legislation's true aims: redistributing wealth upward, strengthening coercive state mechanisms and escalating militarism to sustain US global primacy. This demands the US power elites discipline both domestic and global populations. The bill's economic provisions constitute a brazen transfer of wealth from the working and middle classes to the ultra-rich. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill reduces household resources for the poorest 10% by 4% ($940 annually) while boosting incomes for the richest 0.1% by $389,000 for those earning over $4.3 million. Extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which directed two-thirds of benefits to the top 20%, the bill amplifies a historical trend: since 1975, the top 1% have sapped $79 trillion from the bottom 90%. Cuts to Medicaid ($930 billion) and SNAP (affecting 4.5 million people) further impoverish the working class, with 15–16 million potentially losing healthcare. This wealth transfer is not merely economic but ideological. Ruling elites, through Fox News and various well funded corporate think tanks, frame the bill as a universal economic boon, echoing neoliberal myths of 'trickle-down' prosperity. Yet, the bill's regressive tax structure and social cuts weaken the economic base of the working and middle classes, limiting their capacity for resistance. Such policies fragment the potential for a radical 'historic bloc' – a unified working-class alliance capable of challenging capitalist dominance. The bill's economic impact aligns with America's global imperial strategies. By prioritising corporate tax breaks, it mirrors US strategies in the Global South, where austerity and privatisation entrench elite power. This domestic imperialism treats the US working class as a colonised population, extracting wealth while offering ideological platitudes about 'growth.' Militarism and War: Coercive Pillars of Hegemony The bill's $1 trillion military budget, the largest in US history, is a cornerstone of its aggressive imperial agenda, escalating war risks while consolidating ruling-class power. Allocating $400 billion for nuclear warheads, hypersonic missiles, and 200 new bombers, the budget aims to counter multipolar rivals like China and Russia. Yet, this spending dwarfs the military budgets of the next ten states across the world. What this bill shows is the degree to which the US empire relies on military dominance and violence to maintain its increasingly precarious global hegemony. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute notes that such military modernisation lowers conflict thresholds, with arms races historically preceding wars 70% of the time. This leads to escalating fears of military miscalculation in regions like the South China Sea. The budget has a dual role: coercion abroad and control at home. Abroad, it reinforces U.S. primacy by projecting power against adversaries, a response to the declining legitimacy of the US-led liberal imperial-international order. Domestically, $50 billion for militarised police and National Guard equipment, alongside $8 billion for 10,000 new ICE agents and private prisons, equips the state to suppress dissent. The bill's provision barring courts from holding officials in contempt further enables authoritarianism, echoing post-9/11 trends where domestic repression accompanied foreign wars (e.g., Iraq). Imperialism is not solely an external phenomenon; it disciplines domestic populations to ensure compliance with elite agendas. The military-industrial complex benefits immensely, with $250 billion in contracts to firms like Boeing and Raytheon. Since 2001, some arms firm stocks have outperformed the Standard & Poor 500 by 600%, and contractor CEOs earn $20–$30 million annually. This economic-militaristic nexus incentivises instability, geopolitical tensions, and war, as historical examples like Iraq ($39 billion to Halliburton) demonstrate. Ruling elites are leveraging coercion to secure economic power, with war profits reinforcing their hegemony. Ideological Consent: Nationalism and Distraction The bill's militaristic and economic aims are cloaked in nationalist ideology, a classic tactic to secure consent. Its $10 billion for 'countering foreign disinformation' doubles as domestic propaganda, while border wall and ICE funding ($8 billion) symbolise 'defending America.' These measures rally nationalist sentiment, particularly among the 55% of Republicans who support the budget for 'security'. Such symbols unify subordinate classes under ruling-class leadership, diverting attention from wealth transfers and social cuts. Put crudely, American elite nationalism is little more than an instrument to mask class conflict. By demonising immigrants and foreign adversaries, the bill aligns segments of the working class with elite interests, dampening class consciousness. SIPRI data suggests nationalist surges increase war risks by 15–20% within five years, as publics tolerate aggression. The bill's narrative of 'preventing a recession' and 'securing borders' obscures its role in impoverishing millions, a hegemonic sleight of hand. Crisis of Hegemony and Resistance It is not a coincidence that the bill has emerged in a moment of hegemonic crisis. Rising inequality, multipolarity and public opposition signal eroding consent. Yet, the ruling elite counters this through intensified coercion (military, police) and ideological manipulation (nationalism, neoliberalism). Crises of hegemony require constant renewal, explaining this aggressive consolidation. However, cracks exist: there are widespread denunciations of the bill as a 'wealth transfer' and 'war machine'. Without a unified and organised counter-hegemonic movement, however, this resistance remains fragmented. The Big Brutal Bill is a masterclass in imperial hegemony, blending wealth transfers, militarism, and nationalism to entrench the power of the American Establishment. Its $1 trillion military budget escalates war risks by fuelling arms races and domestic repression, while its economic provisions siphon wealth from the working and middle classes to the ultra-rich. The bill is an example of what Gramsci would call a 'war of position' – fortifying US capitalism amid crisis, reflecting the American state's dual nature: coercive abroad, exploitative at home. Resistance requires exposing these truths and building a historic bloc to challenge the ruling class's grip. Inderjeet Parmar is a professor of international politics and associate dean of research in the School of Policy and Global Affairs at City St George's, University of London, a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, and a columnist at The Wire. He is an International Fellow at the ROADS Initiative think tank, Islamabad, and author of several books including Foundations of the American Century. He is currently writing a book on the history, politics, and powers of the US foreign policy establishment. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store