
US Support For Israel Comes At A Staggering, Multifaceted Price
Since its 1948 founding, Israel has been far and away the largest recipient of American foreign assistance. Though the Ukraine war created a brief anomaly, Israel generally tops the list every year, despite the fact that Israel is among the world's richest countries — ranked three spots below the UK and two spots above Japan in per capita GDP. Driving that point home, even when using the grossly-understating $3.8 billion figure for US expenditures on Israel, America gave the Zionist state $404 per person in the 2023 fiscal year, compared to just $15 per person for Ethiopia, one of the poorest countries on Earth and America's third-largest beneficiary that year.
Israel's cumulative post-World War II haul has been nearly double that of runner-up Egypt. What most Americans don't realize, however, is that much of Egypt's take — $1.4 billion in 2023 — should be chalked up to Israel too, because of ongoing US aid commitments rising from the 1978 Camp David Accords that brokered peace between Egypt and Israel. The same can be said for Jordan — America's fourth-largest beneficiary in fiscal 2023 at $1.7 billion. US aid to the kingdom surged after it signed its own 1994 treaty with Israel, and a wedge of Jordan's aid is intended to address the country's large refugee population, comprising not only Palestinians displaced by Israel's creation, but also masses who've fled US-led regime-change wars pursued on Israel's behalf.
Then there's the supplemental aid to Israel that Congress periodically authorizes on top of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) commitment. Since the October 7 Hamas invasion of Israel, these supplements have exceeded the MOU commitment by leaps and bounds. In just the first year of the war in Gaza, Congress and President Biden approved an additional $14.1 billion in 'emergency' military aid to Israel, bringing the total for that year to $17.9 billion.
One must also consider the fact that, given the US government runs perpetual deficits that now easily exceed $1 trillion, every marginal expenditure, including aid to Israel, is financed with debt that bears an interest expense, increasing Americans' tax-and-inflation burden.
On top of money given to Israel, the US government spends huge sums on activities either meant to benefit Israel or that spring from Israel's actions. For example, during just the first year of Israel's post-Oct 7 war in Gaza, increased US Navy offensive and defensive operations in the Middle East theater cost America an estimated $4.86 billion.
Those Gaza-war-related outflows have not only continued but accelerated. For example, earlier this year, the Pentagon engaged in an intense campaign against Yemen's Houthis. In proclaimed retaliation for Israel's systematic destruction of Gaza, the Houthis have targeted Israel, and ships the Houthis said were linked to Israel. In response, America unleashed 'Operation Rough Rider,' which often saw $2 million American missiles being used against $10,000 Houthi drones, and cost between one and two billion dollars.
President Trump's military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — amid a war initiated by Israel on contrived premises — cost America another one to two billion dollars, according to early estimates. Even before the attack on a nuclear program the US intelligence community continues to assess is not aimed at producing a weapon, the Pentagon was already spending more money on Israel's behalf, helping to defend the country from Iran's response to Israel's unprovoked aggression. The run-up to US strikes itself entailed a massive and costly mobilization of American forces and equipment to the region, as the Pentagon readied for multiple scenarios.
Propelled by Israel's powerful US-based lobby, by Israel-pandering legislators, and by a revolving cast of Israel-favoring presidents, cabinet members, and national security officials, the United States has consistently pursued policies in the Middle East that place top priority on securing Israel's regional supremacy.
Among the many avenues used to pursue that goal, none has been more costly than that of regime change, where an outcome that results in a shattered, chaotic state is seemingly just as pleasing to Israel and its American collaborators as one that spawns a functioning state with an Israel-accommodating government — and where the cost is often measured not only in US dollars but in American lives and limbs.
Of course, the most infamous such regime-change effort was the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. 'If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region,' current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured a US congressional hearing. Doing his part to aid a Bush administration dominated by Israel-aligned neoconservatives bent on taking out one of Israel's regional adversaries, Netanyahu also said there was 'no question whatsoever' that Hussein was 'hell-bent on achieving atomic bombs.'
The drive to topple Syria's Iran-allied Assad government is another prominent example of regime change on behalf of Israel, as the two countries sought to sever the 'Shia Crescent' that — due in great part to Saddam's ouster — presented a continuous pipeline of Iranian influence extending to Israel's borders. To the contentment of the US and Israeli governments, Syria is now led by an al Qaeda alumnus who's reportedly poised to relinquish Syria's long-standing claim on the Golan Heights, which Israel captured in 1967.
Taken together, the price tag of US military operations in Iraq and Syria, including past and future medical and disability care for veterans, totals $2.9 trillion, according to Brown University's Costs of War Project. The human toll has been even more mind-boggling: upwards of 580,000 civilians and combatants killed, with perhaps two to four times that number indirectly perishing from displacement, disease and other factors. More than 4,600 US service-members died in Iraq, and 32,000 were injured, many of them enduring amputations and burns. Alongside mass suffering, these and other US interventions undertaken to ensure Israel's regional supremacy have fomented enormous resentment of the United States across the region.
Click here to read more…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
10 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
BRICS Leaders Warn US Tariffs Could Harm Global Economy
Leaders from the BRICS group of nations — which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — gathered in sunny Rio de Janeiro on Sunday with a serious message: US President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade tariffs could damage the global economy. Together, the BRICS countries represent nearly half the world's population and around 40% of global economic output. While they differ on many issues, they stand united in their concerns over the US's growing use of tariffs. In a draft statement prepared for the summit, the group expressed "deep concern" over the rise of one-sided tariff and trade restrictions. They described these measures as unfair and harmful, suggesting they break international trade laws. Earlier in April, President Trump had announced new tariffs on both allies and rivals, but later paused some of them after stock markets reacted negatively. However, he and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that unless new trade deals are made by August 1, the tariffs could return. The BRICS nations argue that such tactics could weaken global trade and slow down worldwide economic growth. Although the statement doesn't name the US or Trump directly, it clearly targets recent American trade actions. Experts at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington say these tariffs might reduce the US economy's growth and negatively affect other nations — from neighboring Mexico to oil-producing countries in the Gulf region.


Daily Tribune
16 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Israeli negotiators due in Qatar for Gaza truce talks
TDT | Manama An Israeli delegation was expected in Doha on Sunday for talks on a Gaza truce and hostage release deal, ahead of a visit by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House. Netanyahu had earlier announced he was sending a team to Qatar, a key mediator in the conflict, though he said that Hamas's response to a draft US-backed ceasefire deal included some "unacceptable" demands. Faced with mounting calls to end the war that is nearing its 22nd month, Netanyahu is due to meet on Monday with US President Donald Trump, who has been making a renewed push to end the fighting. On Saturday, protesters gathered in Israel's coastal hub of Tel Aviv for a weekly rally demanding the return of hostages still in the Gaza Strip since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war. Macabit Mayer, the aunt of captives Gali and Ziv Berman, called for a deal "that saves everyone". Hamas said Friday it was ready "to engage immediately and seriously" in negotiations. A statement from Netanyahu's office said that "the changes that Hamas is seeking to make in the Qatari proposal... are unacceptable to Israel", while also sending negotiators to discuss "the Qatari proposal that Israel has agreed to". On the ground, Gaza's civil defence agency said 14 people were killed by Israeli forces on Sunday. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency.


Daily Tribune
16 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Elon Musk Announces New Political Party After Rift with Trump
Billionaire Elon Musk says he's launching a brand-new political party in the US, just weeks after a very public fallout with former President Donald Trump. In a post on his platform X (formerly Twitter), Musk said he's forming the "America Party" — an alternative to the current two-party system made up of Republicans and Democrats. However, it's still unclear if this party has been officially registered with US election authorities. Also, since Musk was born outside the US, he can't run for president himself. He hasn't said who might lead the new party. The idea first came up during Musk's public spat with Trump. Once a strong supporter — even dancing with Trump at rallies and bringing his young son to the White House — Musk later stepped down from his role in Trump's administration and the relationship soured. During that time, Musk ran a poll on X asking people whether the US needed a new political party. On Saturday, referring to that poll, he wrote: 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party — and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and corruption, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' So far, the Federal Election Commission hasn't released any documents confirming the party's official formation. In the past, smaller parties like the Libertarian, Green, and People's Parties have tried to break through America's two-party stronghold — but none have made significant national progress. Musk's shift is a major turnaround. Just last year, he poured $250 million into Trump's campaign and was even appointed to lead the 'Department of Government Efficiency' — a group focused on cutting government spending. Now, he's turning his back on that world to try and reshape American politics.