Spider season: BBC researcher confirms tarantulas are in UK
The purseweb spider is Britain's only tarantula and a member of the family that contains these 'tropical giants'.
Although the word 'tarantula' still strikes fear into hearts, you needn't worry.
What is the purseweb spider?
According to Adele Brand, a wildlife researcher at BBC's Countryfile, the purseweb is a stay-at-home spider.
It spends most of its life inside that silken tube, which has been compared to an old purse and a dirty sock—hence its name.
The whole structure can be up to 25cm long but only a small part protrudes above the soil surface.
Are purseweb spiders dangerous?
The Missouri Department of Conservation says: "Purseweb spiders have large, imposing chelicerae, and like nearly all other spiders, they possess venom to subdue their prey and can potentially bite a human if mishandled.
"But purseweb spider bites do not pose a danger to people, except for the rare cases of people who are highly sensitive to spider bites."
Recommended reading:
400-year-old sharks lurking in the depths of British waters
Great white sharks could migrate to UK waters by next year
40ft sharks may arrive in the UK as early as next month
Native wild animals in the UK
What do purseweb spiders look like?
While much smaller than a true tarantula, it has some of their characteristics and still looks distinctively 'different' from our other British spiders with its heavy-set legs and large 'fangs' (properly called chelicerae).
The spider operates these like parallel daggers, rather than the pincer-like movement of other British species.
The body of a purseweb ranges from 1 to 3.8cm
What parts of the UK does the purseweb spider inhabit?
Sightings are possible in the North and South Downs, New Forest and other south-eastern sites, but a few are found as far north as Cumbria and south-western Scotland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Stoke scrapyard blaze sees six fire engines attend
Multiple fire engines were deployed to a scrapyard in Staffordshire last night, the fire service has said. In total, six crews were sent to the scene in Cobridge, Stoke-on-Trent, some time before 20:30 BST. At the time of the incident, a Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service spokesperson said: "Please avoid the area, and if you are local to the area, close all windows and doors as a precaution."The BBC has contacted the fire service for a further update. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bayeux Tapestry should be re-named the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was probably made in Kent and ISN'T a tapestry, historian says
The Bayeux Tapestry should be renamed the 'Canterbury Embroidery' because it was almost certainly made in Britain and isn't technically a tapestry, a historian has said. Dr David Musgrove said the 230-foot long artefact was most likely woven in Kent rather than France and was created using an embroidery technique, meaning it is not a tapestry. The academic, who has a PhD in medieval landscape archaeology, spoke after news that the 11th-century work depicting the 1066 Norman Conquest is to go on display at the British Museum next year. The expert said the artefact's trip presents academics with a chance to confirm that the treasure was created in the UK. Dr Musgrove is host of the BBC 's History Extra podcast. He said on the latest episode: 'It's an embroidery, so you've got woven elements on a linen backing. 'The wool has been dyed, so there's various different colours that are used. 'So you could make the argument that it should be called the Canterbury embroidery rather than the Bayeux Tapestry, because it was probably made in Canterbury. 'That's what most people would think and it's an embroidery, not a tapestry. 'But that's just not quite as snazzy, is it? 'You're not going to get people queuing around the block at the British Museum to go and see that.' The Bayeux Tapestry depicts the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England, led by William, Duke of Normandy challenging Harold II, King of England. When the artefact returns to Britain, Anglo-Saxon treasures from the Sutton Hoo ship burial will go in the other direction to France for a temporary period. French president Emmanuel Macron revealed during his trip to Britain last month that King Charles helped secure a deal to return the tapestry to England. He claimed France did its best not to loan the artwork but that His Majesty helped get the deal over the line. The embroidery is thought to date to within a few years of the Battle of Hastings. Dr Musgrove told the podcast: 'We know a lot about the way it would have been produced, because people have had a chance to study it. 'We know that there were different panels that were stitched together. 'And you can see actually that they must have been made separately because there were mistakes in the way that the panels are aligned so they're kind of little bits which don't stack up. 'So people, we assume, were probably working in separate teams. 'It was probably women who were doing it, Anglo-Saxon seamstresses who were probably doing it. 'There was a rich tradition of Anglo-Saxon seamstresses working here so we assume it was probably them.' When the embroidery comes to Britain, academics will have a rare chance to look at the back of it, Dr Musgrove said. He continued: 'And it's been quite hard to get to the back of it because there's various different layers that have been added onto it in the intervening century. 'So it's quite hard to actually get there. 'Then we will probably find out lots of really interesting things about the way it was produced. 'And if we can do any sort of scientific analysis, and I can't imagine for one moment there will be an opportunity to do anything which is in any way destructive to it. 'But if we can do any scientific analysis to kind of see where these woollen threads came from, where the sheep came from that produced it, where the dyes were from, where the flax for the linen was grown, then that will really sort of help to give us a clue to if that idea that it was made in England is actually true.' Artificial intelligence could even be used to analyse the features, the expert added. 'If you can feed it into a computer and get it to sort of correlate and work out similarities between bits, then we might learn an awful lot of things. 'But we haven't had the chance because it's been rightly in a climate-controlled case and you can't get to it. 'So this is a real opportunity to learn some stuff about it.' The tapestry will be on display at the British Museum in the autumn of next year until July 2027. Timeline of the Bayeux Tapestry 1066: Between seven and twelve thousand Norman soldiers defeat an English army of a similar size at what is now Battle, East Sussex 1476: The embroidered cloth depicting the battle is referred to for the first time in an inventory of Bayeux Cathedral 1732-3: Antiquarian Smart Lethieullier writes the first detailed English account of the tapestry while living in Paris - but it is not published till 1767 1792: During the French Revolution, the precious artwork was declared public property and confiscated to be used as a covering for wagons - but it was saved by a lawyer who hid it in his home 1804: In a move dripping in symbolism, Napoleon - under the impression France was about to invade and conquer Britain - had the tapestry temporarily moved to Paris for display 1870: The tapestry is removed from Bayeux once again during the Franco-Prussian War - but it is moved back two years later 1944: The Gestapo removed the tapestry to the Louvre in Paris - just days before the German withdrawal. A message from Heinrich Himmler - who coveted the cloth because it is a part of Germanic history - is believed to imply the Nazis planned to take it to Berlin
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Captives and Companions by Justin Marozzi: Everywhere had slaves - it wasn't just the West
Captives and Companions: A History of Slavery and the Slave Trade in the Islamic World by Justin Marozzi (Allen Lane £35, 560pp) They were all borne down with loads of fire-wood, and even the poor little children, worn to skeletons by fatigue and hardships, were obliged to bear their burden, while many of their inhuman masters rode on camels, whips in hand.' So wrote British naval officer Captain G. F. Lyon in 1819, a witness to the Islamic slave trade in the Sahara. Even worse, the Swiss explorer Johann Burckhardt observed that 'very few female slaves who have passed their tenth year, reach Egypt or Arabia in a state of virginity'. While the West has, quite rightly, hung its head in shame over the transatlantic slave trade, open discussion about the vast Islamic trade in both African and European slaves remains rare. Justin Marozzi has set out to correct this in a new work, mixing appalling accounts of inhumanity with more heartening tales of slaves who overcame adversity. Most notable, perhaps, are the famous concubines of the glittering courts of Baghdad and Istanbul, slave-girls who became the pop stars and pin-ups of their day – though their lives remained risky. 'They could just as easily make life-changing fortunes from a bawdy joke as lose their heads from a slip of the tongue.' One such was the brilliant poet and slave, Inan, a concubine in Abbasid Baghdad, both 'flawlessly beautiful' and skilled in the 'public cut and thrust of poetic jousting, a good deal of it coarse and sexually explicit'. She specialised in mocking her numerous lovers' disappointing, ah, physiques. Much here is grim reading though. For centuries, Islamic slavers preyed brutally upon their neighbours, especially black Africans but also white Europeans. Devon and Cornwall were both subjected to repeated slave raids in the 1620s, the demand for fair-skinned slave girls being high, and in 1627 slavers raided Iceland, taking more than 400 men, women and children into captivity. Witnesses described how one woman 'unable to walk was thrown into the flames with her two-year-old baby'. And slavery is still with us today. In Mali, Marozzi meets a man called Hamey who was beaten by a mob in his native village. No one intervened, many laughed and filmed it. He had tried to resist his own hereditary slave status. Driven from the village, he and his family now live in penury in a shack on the edge of Bamako, Mali's capital. Yet he remains magnificently unbroken. 'Deep down, I'm free. Whatever my financial worries, I'm free. I'll never be a slave again.' While Hamey was enslaved by his own countrymen, most states largely enslave foreign peoples, a 'tradition' dating back a thousand years or more. King Hassan II of Morocco, who only died in 1999, owned around 80 slaves and concubines, none of the latter over 15. Today, the Walk Free human rights organisation estimates there are still some 740,000 slaves in Saudi Arabia alone. Captives And Companions is a scrupulously fair, fearless and detailed history, as well as a tacit demand for the world to finally end this horror which we like to imagine is all in the past.
