logo
Appeals court overturns Right-wing influencer's conviction for spreading 2016 election falsehoods

Appeals court overturns Right-wing influencer's conviction for spreading 2016 election falsehoods

Al Arabiya3 days ago
A federal appeals court on Wednesday overturned a self-styled right-wing propagandist's conviction for spreading falsehoods on social media in an effort to suppress Democratic turnout in the 2016 presidential election. The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ordered a lower court to enter a judgment of acquittal for Douglass Mackey, finding that trial evidence failed to prove the government's claim that the Florida man conspired with others to influence the election.
Mackey, 36, was convicted in March 2023 in federal court in Brooklyn on a charge of conspiracy against rights after posting false memes that said supporters of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton could vote for her by text message or social media post. He was sentenced to seven months in federal prison.
'HALLELUJAH!' Mackey wrote on X after the 2nd Circuit's decision was posted Wednesday. In follow up messages he thanked God, his family, wife, lawyers, and supporters, and threatened legal action over his conviction. One of Mackey's lawyers on his appeal was Yaakov Roth, who is now principal deputy assistant US attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's Civil Division. The federal prosecutors office in Brooklyn that brought the case declined to comment.
In charging Mackey, prosecutors alleged that he conspired with others between September and November of 2016 to post memes such as a photo of a woman standing in front of an African Americans for Hillary sign. 'Avoid the Line. Vote from Home,' the tweet said. 'Text Hillary to 59925.' About 5000 people followed the memes' instructions, according to trial testimony. Nearly all of them received an automated response indicating that the social media posts were not associated with the Clinton campaign, and there was no evidence at trial that Mackey's tweets tricked anyone into failing properly to vote, the 2nd Circuit found.
Mackey, who had 58000 followers at the time, posted under the alias Ricky Vaughn, the name of Charlie Sheen's character in the movie Major League. In overturning Mackey's conviction, a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel wrote, 'the mere fact that he posted the memes, even assuming that he did so with the intent to injure other citizens in the exercise of their right to vote, is not enough standing alone to prove a violation of the conspiracy law.'
'The government was obligated to show that Mackey knowingly entered into an agreement with other people to pursue that objective,' Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Judges Reena Raggi and Beth Robinson wrote. 'This the government failed to do.' Livingston and Raggi were appointed by President George W. Bush, a Republican. Robinson was appointed by President Joe Biden, a Democrat.
At Mackey's sentencing, the trial judge Ann M. Donnelly said that he had been one of the leading members of a conspiracy that was nothing short of 'an assault on our democracy.' The 2nd Circuit disagreed, ruling that the prosecution's primary evidence of a conspiracy was 'flimsy at best.' At Mackey's trial, prosecutors showed messages exchanged in private Twitter groups that they said proved an intent to interfere with people exercising their right to vote. However, the three-judge panel ruled that prosecutors failed to offer sufficient evidence that Mackey even viewed — let alone participated in — any of these exchanges. 'In the absence of such evidence, the government's remaining circumstantial evidence cannot alone establish Mackey's knowing agreement,' the judges wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US appeals court scraps 9/11 mastermind's plea deal
US appeals court scraps 9/11 mastermind's plea deal

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

US appeals court scraps 9/11 mastermind's plea deal

WASHINGTON: A US appeals court on Friday scrapped 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's plea agreement that would have taken the death penalty off the table and helped conclude the long-running legal saga surrounding his case. The agreement had sparked anger among some relatives of victims of the 2001 attacks, and then-US defense secretary Lloyd Austin moved to cancel it last year, saying that both they and the American public deserved to see the defendants stand trial. Austin 'acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment,' judges Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao wrote. Plea deals with Mohammed as well as two alleged accomplices — Walid bin Attash and Mustafa Al-Hawsawi — were announced in late July last year. The decision appeared to have moved their cases toward resolution after years of being bogged down in pre-trial maneuverings while the defendants remained held at the Guantanamo Bay military base in Cuba. But Austin withdrew the agreements two days after they were announced, saying the decision should be up to him, given its significance. He subsequently said that 'the families of the victims, our service members and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out in this case.' A military judge ruled in November that the deals were valid and binding, but the government appealed that decision. The appeals court judges on Friday vacated 'the military judge's order of November 6, 2024, preventing the secretary of defense's withdrawal from the pretrial agreements.' And they prohibited the military judge 'from conducting hearings in which respondents would enter guilty pleas or take any other action pursuant to the withdrawn pretrial agreements.' Much of the legal jousting surrounding the 9/11 defendants' cases has focused on whether they could be tried fairly after having undergone torture at the hands of the CIA — a thorny issue that the plea agreements would have avoided. Mohammed was regarded as one of Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden's most trusted lieutenants before his March 2003 capture in Pakistan. He then spent three years in secret CIA prisons before arriving at Guantanamo in 2006. The trained engineer — who has said he masterminded the 9/11 attacks 'from A to Z' — was involved in a string of major plots against the United States, where he attended university. The United States used Guantanamo, an isolated naval base, to hold militants captured during the 'War on Terror' that followed the September 11 attacks in a bid to keep the defendants from claiming rights under US law. The facility held roughly 800 prisoners at its peak, but they have since slowly been sent to other countries. A small fraction of that number remains.

Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder
Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Colorado dentist accused of poisoning his wife's protein shakes going on trial for murder

DENVER: Just days before she died after suffering symptoms that mystified her doctors, Angela Craig confronted her husband, James, in their suburban Denver kitchen over his lack of support. In that 2023 argument captured on home surveillance video, she accused him of suggesting to hospital staff that she was suicidal, court documents show. Prosecutors say James Craig caused the ailments that ultimately killed his wife by poisoning her protein shakes and trying to make it look as if she killed herself. His trial on murder and other charges is set to begin Monday with the questioning of potential jurors. Angela Craig, 43, died in March 2023 during her third trip to the hospital that month. Toxicology tests later determined she died of poisoning from cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, an ingredient that is found in over-the-counter eye drops. The couple were married 23 years and had six children. Craig has pleaded not guilty to charges including first-degree murder, solicitation to commit murder and solicitation to commit perjury. Police say Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself The 47-year-old dentist allegedly bought arsenic online around the time his wife began to experience symptoms like dizziness and headaches for which doctors could find no cause, prosecutors say. At the time of his arrest, police said Craig was trying to start a new life amid financial troubles and appeared to be having an affair with a fellow dentist. Prosecutors said he had affairs with two other women, but they have not detailed a motive in his wife's death. Craig's attorneys have argued police were biased against him and claimed testing of his wife's shake containers did not turn up signs of poison. They've questioned the reliability of a jail inmate who said Craig offered him $20,000 to kill the case's lead investigator, an alleged plot for which Craig is also on trial. To avoid being held accountable, prosecutors said, Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself. He tried to get another fellow inmate to plant fraudulent letters at Craig's home to make it look like his wife was suicidal, prosecutors said. Then, in the weeks before Craig had been set to stand trial in November, prosecutors said he also sent letters to the ex-wife of the inmate he allegedly tried to get to kill the investigator, offering her $20,000 for each person she could find to falsely testify that his wife planned to die by suicide, they said. Previous Craig attorneys withdraw from case As jury selection was about to begin, his lawyer at the time, Harvey Steinberg, asked to withdraw, citing a rule allowing lawyers to step down if a client persists in actions considered criminal or that they disagree with. Another attorney for Craig, Robert Werking, later argued that investigators did not look into whether Craig wrote the letters or check them against his handwriting. Werking also said that the inmate and his ex-wife were prosecuted for forgery for their roles in an alleged fraud ring in 2005, suggesting they could not be trusted. Werking withdrew from the case himself this month after being charged with arson of his own home, leaving his wife and law partner, Lisa Fine Moses, to defend Craig. Werking's attorney, David Beller, said he was getting mental health treatment and asked the public to show him grace. Moses did not immediately return telephone and email messages seeking comment. Prosecutors plan to show video of couple's argument Over the objections of the defense, prosecutors plan to show the video of the argument in the kitchen to jurors. 'It's your fault they treated me like I was a suicide risk, like I did it to myself, and like nothing I said could be believed,' Angela Craig told her husband after her first trip to the hospital. Prosecutors convinced the judge jurors should see the video because they said it disproves potential claims that Angela Craig poisoned herself — possibly while trying to dissuade him from divorcing her — or to frame him and gain an advantage over him if they did divorce. 'Her mental state is anger and frustration, not suicidality or desperation to keep the defendant in the marriage,' Senior Chief Deputy District Attorney Michael Mauro wrote in a recent court filing. One of Angela Craig's siblings, Mark Pray, said last year that James Craig not only orchestrated the 'torment and demise' of his sister but had shown disregard for others, including their children. An online search Prosecutors say James Craig searched online for answers to questions such as 'how to make murder look like a heart attack' and 'is arsenic detectable in an autopsy?' After Craig's initial attempts to kill his wife failed, prosecutors allege, he ordered a rush shipment of potassium cyanide, supposedly for surgery. The shipment was accidentally discovered by an employee at his dental practice in the Denver suburb of Aurora on March 13, 2023. The employee reported it to the office manager two days later when Angela Craig returned to the hospital for a third and final time. Craig's business partner, Ryan Redfearn, told a nurse treating Angela Craig that he was concerned she could have been poisoned with the cyanide. The nurse reported that to police, who began their investigation the same day. Angela Craig died days later.

Colorado Dentist Accused of Poisoning His Wife's Protein Shakes Going on Trial for Murder
Colorado Dentist Accused of Poisoning His Wife's Protein Shakes Going on Trial for Murder

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Colorado Dentist Accused of Poisoning His Wife's Protein Shakes Going on Trial for Murder

Just days before she died after suffering symptoms that mystified her doctors, Angela Craig confronted her husband, James, in their suburban Denver kitchen over his lack of support. In that 2023 argument, captured on home surveillance video, she accused him of suggesting to hospital staff that she was suicidal, court documents show. Prosecutors say James Craig caused the ailments that ultimately killed his wife by poisoning her protein shakes and trying to make it look as if she killed herself. His trial on murder and other charges is set to begin Monday with the questioning of potential jurors. Angela Craig, 43, died in March 2023 during her third trip to the hospital that month. Toxicology tests later determined she died of poisoning from cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, an ingredient that is found in over-the-counter eye drops. The couple were married 23 years and had six children. Craig has pleaded not guilty to charges including first-degree murder, solicitation to commit murder, and solicitation to commit perjury. Police say Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself. The 47-year-old dentist allegedly bought arsenic online around the time his wife began to experience symptoms like dizziness and headaches for which doctors could find no cause, prosecutors say. At the time of his arrest, police said Craig was trying to start a new life amid financial troubles and appeared to be having an affair with a fellow dentist. Prosecutors said he had affairs with two other women, but they have not detailed a motive in his wife's death. Craig's attorneys have argued police were biased against him and claimed testing of his wife's shake containers did not turn up signs of poison. They've questioned the reliability of a jail inmate who said Craig offered him 20,000 to kill the case's lead investigator, an alleged plot for which Craig is also on trial. To avoid being held accountable, prosecutors said Craig tried to fabricate evidence to make it appear his wife killed herself. He tried to get another fellow inmate to plant fraudulent letters at Craig's home to make it look like his wife was suicidal, prosecutors said. Then in the weeks before Craig had been set to stand trial in November, prosecutors said he also sent letters to the ex-wife of the inmate he allegedly tried to get to kill the investigator, offering her 20,000 for each person she could find to falsely testify that his wife planned to die by suicide, they said. Previous Craig attorneys withdraw from case As jury selection was about to begin, his lawyer at the time, Harvey Steinberg, asked to withdraw citing a rule allowing lawyers to step down if a client persists in actions considered criminal or that they disagree with. Another attorney for Craig, Robert Werking, later argued that investigators did not look into whether Craig wrote the letters or check them against his handwriting. Werking also said that the inmate and his ex-wife were prosecuted for forgery for their roles in an alleged fraud ring in 2005, suggesting they could not be trusted. Werking withdrew from the case himself this month after being charged with arson of his own home, leaving his wife and law partner, Lisa Fine Moses, to defend Craig. Werking's attorney, David Beller, said he was getting mental health treatment and asked the public to show him grace. Moses did not immediately return telephone and email messages seeking comment. Prosecutors plan to show video of couple's argument Over the objections of the defense, prosecutors plan to show the video of the argument in the kitchen to jurors. 'It's your fault they treated me like I was a suicide risk, like I did it to myself, and like nothing I said could be believed,' Angela Craig told her husband after her first trip to the hospital. Prosecutors convinced the judge jurors should see the video because they said it disproves potential claims that Angela Craig poisoned herself – possibly while trying to dissuade him from divorcing her – or to frame him and gain an advantage over him if they did divorce. 'Her mental state is anger and frustration not suicidality or desperation to keep the defendant in the marriage,' Senior Chief Deputy District Attorney Michael Mauro wrote in a recent court filing. One of Angela Craig's siblings, Mark Pray, said last year that James Craig not only orchestrated the torment and demise of his sister but had shown disregard for others, including their children. An online search Prosecutors say James Craig searched online for answers to questions such as 'how to make murder look like a heart attack' and 'is arsenic detectable in an autopsy?' After Craig's initial attempts to kill his wife failed, prosecutors allege he ordered a rush shipment of potassium cyanide supposedly for surgery. The shipment was accidentally discovered by an employee at his dental practice in the Denver suburb of Aurora on March 13, 2023. The employee reported it to the office manager two days later when Angela Craig returned to the hospital for a third and final time. Craig's business partner, Ryan Redfearn, told a nurse treating Angela Craig that he was concerned she could have been poisoned with the cyanide. The nurse reported that to police who began their investigation the same day. Angela Craig died days later.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store