
Torfaen council leader: 'We don't own Pontypool town centre'
But its leader Anthony Hunt said people often think the local authority owns more buildings in Pontypool than it does.
The grade-II listed Pearl House building in the centre of Pontypool has been refurbished as temporary homeless accommodation and is owned by Torfaen council.
He was speaking as the council's Labour cabinet approved an asset management strategy for buildings, both in and out of use, it does own and which has identified a maintenance backlog or around £19 million.
'Most capital money has gone to schools in the past 20 years and that has left a backlog there and how do we start to address that and change perceptions?' said Cllr Hunt.
'Sometimes there is a perception that we own far more than we do such as Pontypool town centre, we don't own 95 per cent of Pontypool town centre. It's about not setting unrealistic expectations on buildings owned by other people.'
Gareth Beer, the council's head of economy and place, said: 'There is a perception the council owns pretty much everything within any town centre, we don't. Cwmbran being a good example.
A disused shop in the centre of Pontypool.
'In Pontypool we're working very closely with the task group that's been established. I think it's really about managing the messaging. The council owns key assets within Pontypool town centre so our investment in those assets is really important in terms of changing hearts and minds. Those are regeneration elements that sit alongside but are beyond the pure asset management approach.'
Mr Beer said local communities and businesses need to understand plans for town centres and 'who owns what' and said the council will work with property owners and developers to bring forward regeneration plans.
The officer also said the council has now identified around £4m in its budget, including Welsh Government funding for schools, to address maintenance issues.
Torfaen council is currently leading an £11m investment in Pontypool, supported by £7m from the UK Government and private finance, to redevelop the public toilets in Hanbury Road into a cafe and revamp the Glantorvaen car park, both of which are council owned buildings. The scheme will also bring the derelict and privately owned St James Church back into use as an events venue.
The regeneration project is intended to attract footfall from Pontypool Park into the town centre, much of which is a conservation area, and support a night time economy.
The vacant George pub in Pontypool where police raided a cannabis factory on Valentine's Day 2024.
The council's agreed assets management strategy will establish a 'corporate landlord' model for the council which will have ownership of all its assets, other than schools, rather than individual service areas.
READ MORE:
The council owns and manages more than 1,000 assets valued at around £332m and they will now be divided into seven classes.
One of those is development and regeneration which are buildings that support economic growth and include Pontypool Indoor Market and Cwmbran's Springboard Innovation Centre.
The other categories are operational from which the council and its partners deliver services, education for schools, green spaces including local nature reserves and Cwmbran Boating Lake, community and heritage including libraries, leisure centres and cemeteries and investment which generate income for the council such as industrial units, shops and commercial offices it lets.
There will also be a disposal class of buildings that could be sold and data such as around their use and condition will help determine if properties should be considered for disposal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Labour's 'nuclear tax' to cost Scots £300m to fund Sizewell C
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has imposed a new levy on energy bills to fund the spiralling costs of the Sizewell C power station in Suffolk. Billpayers will be charged an extra £12 per year to fund the project, which has almost doubled in price to £38 billion. The UK Government has also committed to a loan facility worth £36.6bn, which means the total cost could top £47.7bn. That is more than the final cost of Hinkley Point C, which Greenpeace once dubbed "the most expensive object on Earth". READ MORE: Quarter of Keir Starmer's Cabinet blasted Donald Trump's last UK trip It comes despite Labour's election pledge to cut energy bills, with the energy price cap rising consistently since October. Graham Leadbitter (below, left), the SNP's energy spokesperson, said 'This toxic overspend now totals £48bn and Anas Sarwar has serious questions to answer as to whether he thinks it's acceptable for Scots to foot the bill through higher energy bills – it is an absolute disgrace that energy rich Scotland will see Scots face higher energy bills because of a nuclear plant running over budget in Labour-run England. (Image: Jeff) 'The Labour Party promised they'd cut energy bills by £300 yet they've soared on their watch – now we have the absurd situation where they've chosen to pile money into extortionate nuclear energy and are asking Scots to pick up the tab. 'Independent analysis shows this will cost Scottish households £300m in higher bills through a decade-long 'nuclear tax' all the while Scottish Labour refuse to acknowledge the white elephant in the room that they support these disastrous plans.' Leadbitter said that Scotland 'produces far more electricity that we can hope to use and our future is in renewables' and so had no interest in nuclear power. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' He added: 'We were told Grangemouth refinery in Scotland couldn't be saved, yet we see a refinery in England protected, a steel works in Scunthorpe bailed out and now a nuclear power plant running twice over budget – it's no wonder Scots are increasingly asking how long we stay tied to this so called 'Union of Equals'?' The UK Government was approached for comment.


Metro
7 hours ago
- Metro
Empty shops to be turned into clubs and bars under new government plans
New clubs, bars and cafes will be able to set up in disused shops more easily under government plans to revitalise the 'buzz of the high street'. It is hoped the move will mean long-empty storefronts can welcome new owners with less hassle and expense from red tape. Changes to licensing and planning laws would also mean permission for al fresco dining and street parties can be fast-tracked in dedicated 'hospitality zones'. The move has been welcomed by the Night Time Industries Association, which represents nightlife and music venues around the UK. CEO Michael Kill said: 'Fast-tracking permissions for al fresco dining, extending trading hours, and protecting pavement pints are not just regulatory changes, they're a reaffirmation of Britain's social identity and our unique nightlife culture.' The government has also committed to extending the 'Agent of Change' licensing principle to bring it into effect nationally. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. This ensures the responsibility for ensuring residents of a new development are not impacted by noise from local pubs or clubs falls to the developer, and not the businesses themselves. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This government has a plan to replace shuttered up shops with vibrant places to socialise turning them into thriving cafés or busy bars, which supports local jobs and gives people a place to get together and catch up over a beer or a coffee. 'Red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long. Today we're slashing those barriers to giving small business owners the freedom to flourish.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves added the 'clunky, outdated rules' dictating what firms can open where will be ditched 'not just for the summer, but all year round'. More Trending But Andrew Griffith, the Conservative Shadow Business Secretary, said the move represented 'pure hypocrisy and inconsistency from Labour'. He said: 'This socialist government is crippling the hospitality industry by doubling business rates, imposing a Jobs Tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape. 'As the result, shorter opening hours, shedding jobs and expensive pints are becoming the norm.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Young people are falling through the cracks when it comes to sexual abuse and it's killing them MORE: Five key takeaways from landmark report into UK's 'broken' water industry MORE: WH Smiths stores begin reopening as TG Jones on UK high streets


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
We can't afford to let London's ‘golden postcodes' go to the wall
The top end of London's property market usually eases into the year, but 2025 has got off to an unusually subdued start. The capital recorded just 34 sales of more than $10m during the first quarter of this year – about a third fewer than the same period in 2024, according to Knight Frank's latest Global Super-Prime Intelligence report. The slowdown stands in stark contrast to a global market that is gaining momentum. Worldwide, 527 super-prime properties changed hands in the first quarter, a six per cent year-on-year increase. By now, we all know what's behind the discrepancy. Labour's heavy-handed taxation of high earners has come at a time when there are more attractive alternatives than ever before. The Dubai lifestyle, light-touch tax in Italy, and the rising stock of true luxury homes in Paris and Madrid are all prompting high-net-worth individuals to hedge their bets on London. Meanwhile, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the Financial Times that more than 70,000 people have applied for Donald Trump's new 'gold card' visa, which grants long-term residency to foreign investors willing to spend and stay in the US. It turns out that the small group of very wealthy individuals living in Britain are flightier than the Treasury expected, and the taxpayer will now have to foot the bill. The government has already lost more than £400m in stamp duty on sales above £5m – overwhelmingly in London's 'golden postcodes' such as SW1 and W1, including prime locations like Mayfair, Chelsea, St John's Wood and South Kensington – since the first non-dom reforms were announced by the previous government, according to analysis by Knight Frank UK research head Tom Bill. The real cost is likely to be much, much higher. Even the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is coming around to that idea. A combination of reforms to the non-dom regime, first introduced under Jeremy Hunt in March 2024 and then expanded by Labour in October, were expected to raise £13.1bn from 10,000 individuals by 2027/28. Capital gains tax reforms were supposed to deliver another £2.5bn by the end of the decade. However, the behavioural assumptions underpinning those numbers haven't held. 'Higher earners' behavioural responses to tax changes are more uncertain and potentially higher than assumed,' the OBR conceded on July 8. 'A growing reliance on this small and mobile group of taxpayers therefore represents a fiscal risk.' The OBR isn't the first to issue that warning – yet, it's not clear whether the penny has dropped for those in Downing Street. Despite rumblings that Chancellor Rachel Reeves was considering reversing parts of her non-dom crackdown to stem departures of high net worth individuals, nothing has materialised so far. Former Labour leader Neil Kinnock also recently called for a two per cent wealth tax on assets above £10m, which may not have been endorsed, but it wasn't ruled out either. Even this kind of speculation is damaging – confidence is fragile, and the message from policymakers matters. Successive governments have treated high-net worth individuals as a dependable source of revenue, but trust has now been eroded. It will take years of predictable, measured policymaking to rebuild it. The silver lining is that many of the highest earners appear to be holding onto their London homes while they weigh up their options. Bill's analysis showed that the number of new sales instructions in the first six months of the year in prime central London (PCL) was 32 per cent higher than the five-year average (excluding 2020). Above £5m, there was an equivalent increase of 14 per cent and above £2m, there was a rise of 22 per cent. In other words, property listings in the first half of 2025 were skewed towards the lower price brackets. Crucially, lenders are playing their part – banks are working on very tight margins and taking a proactive approach to help borrowers reach decisions that work for them. London remains one of the world's most desirable cities, but desirability isn't destiny. The government can't afford to keep learning the same lesson: that you cannot bank on a mobile, globally-minded minority to fund massive imbalances in taxing and spending. What happens next will depend not just on rates and rules, but on tone. The sooner the government steadies the narrative, the faster London can reassert its position as Europe's foremost hub for private wealth.