
State-subsidised restaurant to open in Dundee to help Scots access healthy food
A state-subsidised restaurant is to open in Dundee to provide deprived households with access to nutritious food in a social setting, as part of a new government initiative.
It is one of two restaurants of its kind due to launch next summer, the other being in Nottingham. Both form one of six newly-announced projects that will receive £8.5 million in funding from the UK Government to tackle food inequality.
According to Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, they will provide "universal access" to healthy, sustainably-produced food, and particularly meet the needs of deprived households with children.
Other projects in Scotland will assess the role of community food markets in areas of Glasgow with limited access to grocery stores, known as 'food deserts'.
They will survey food pantry users to find out about other activities and support they would like to see on offer, such as cooking sessions or recipe boxes, and improving the nutritional content and take-up of free school meals.
Elsewhere in the UK, a mapping tool will direct a mobile greengrocer to visit areas of Liverpool where social housing residents have limited access to fresh fruit and vegetables.
Under the Liverpool initiative, expected to begin in spring of next year, research will direct the 'Queen of Greens' bus, which has delivered fresh fruit and vegetables to communities across Liverpool and Knowsley since 2022, to residents in social housing who may find it harder to access healthier options in their neighbourhoods.
In some areas, residents will receive vouchers to buy fruit and vegetables from the bus.
Researchers will measure how the diet and health of recipients change as a result of the initiative in order to predict the effect of it being rolled out across the country.
It follows the launch of the Government's 10-Year Health Plan, which last week included the announcement that supermarkets could be fined if they do not sell healthier food.
Mr Kyle said: 'No one in this country should be left unable to access the healthy food they need – which is why interventions like the Queen of Greens are so important – and measuring their impact is so vital.
'These projects will draw on the power of research to actively explore the best ways to get healthy food into the mouths of those who need it, potentially having a transformational effect on people's lives, and fulfilling the missions set in our Plan for Change.'
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Lucy Antal, director of Alchemic Kitchen CIC (Community Interest Company), who runs the Queen of Greens, said: 'We are very much looking forward to working on this new research project with all the team assembled by the University of Liverpool.
'It will be a great opportunity to trial an expansion into supporting social housing tenants to access fresh produce, and to have the health and social impact of this intervention measured and assessed. The Queen of Greens is for everyone, and the data produced will help support our future activity.'
Professor Alison Park, deputy executive chairwoman of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), said: 'Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food but we know the number of food insecure households across the UK is increasing.
'These innovative projects from across the UK – from Wales to Dundee, Nottingham to the Isle of Wight – will go a long way in helping us understand how to tackle food inequalities and what interventions really make a difference.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government suing PPE Medpro because of ‘buyer's remorse', court told
The Government is suing PPE Medpro over 25 million surgical gowns because of 'buyer's remorse', the High Court has heard. It began legal action after it said the company, linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone, breached a contract made during the coronavirus pandemic by failing to follow a validated sterilisation process. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.


Daily Record
34 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Junk food sponsorship deals 'should be banned from 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow'
Obesity Action Scotland said 170 experts had signed its petition demanding no deals with unhealthy food and drink companies at next year's Games. Junk food sponsorship deals should be banned at next year's Commonwealth Games, health campaigners have urged. Obesity Action Scotland said more than 170 individuals and groups had signed its petition demanding the change at the 2026 Games in Glasgow amid "alarming" childhood obesity rates. Twenty per cent of Scottish kids are now at risk of being overweight by the time they enter primary one. The group, which is led by clinicians, said allowing high fat, sugar and salt products to be marketed at sporting events "undermined" public health and risked worsening the obesity crisis. Irn-Bru was the chief drinks sponsor at the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. Writing to Commonwealth Games 2026 CEO Phil Batty, Dr Shoba John, head of OAS and convener of the Scottish Obesity Alliance, called on next year's event to be a "junk-food free event" for families. She said: 'There is overwhelming evidence that advertising and marketing techniques powerfully influence food preference, choice, and consumption in children, thus harming their health. 'We also know that the wider food environment heavily influences what people consume. 'When food marketing and the wider food environment lead us towards increased consumption of soft drinks and junk food, we see corresponding increases in obesity rates. 'Therefore, we need healthy food and drink to be available and affordable, and for it to be front and centre at every opportunity.' Dr John commended the 2022 Birmingham Commonwealth Games, which Mr Batty was also involved in, for ditching junk food sponsors and urged Glasgow to follow suit. She also called for unhealthy food and drinks outlets to be prohibited at or near sporting venues. It follows controversial sponsorship deals at the 2012 London Olympics with brands like McDonald's and Coca Cola. As part of its promotion at the event, McDonald's launched its biggest ever restaurant in the heart of the Olympic village, prompting fury from health campaigners. Latest research shows young Scots from the most deprived parts of the country have double the risk of experiencing obesity than those living in the most affluent areas. Last week, the Food Standards Scotland agency said ministers' efforts to tackle the nation's weight problem was "too slow and not far-reaching enough". It warned public health had been 'taking a back seat to commercial interests' and said Scotland was 'lagging behind' other parts of the UK in measures to tackle junk food. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Scots face some of the poorest diet-related health outcomes in Europe including obesity, type 2 diabetes and other non-communicable diseases. Public Health Minister Jenni Minto said: "Ensuring everyone in Scotland eats well, has a healthy weight and is physically active is a key priority for the Scottish Government 's public health agenda. "As a part of this action, we are restricting the promotion of foods high in fat, salt and sugar." Phil Batty, chief executive of Glasgow 2026, said: "Sporting events play an important role in promoting active and healthy lifestyles. "We met with Obesity Action Scotland and representatives of the NCD Alliance Scotland last month and we look forward to working with them to build shared plans for the Games next summer."

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government suing PPE Medpro because of ‘buyer's remorse', court told
It began legal action after it said the company, linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone, breached a contract made during the coronavirus pandemic by failing to follow a validated sterilisation process. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.