logo
Florida man broke into random house, ran bath, cooked dinner to avoid going home to angry wife

Florida man broke into random house, ran bath, cooked dinner to avoid going home to angry wife

New York Post20-06-2025
He traded the ball and chain for handcuffs.
A Florida man broke into a random house and hung out there for several days to avoid going home to his angry wife after the couple had a fight, according to officials.
Polk County sheriff's deputies were called to the home in Davenport by a neighbor who was tasked with watching over the residence while the homeowner was away — and who noticed a flurry of suspicious activity on June 9, according to a release from the department.
Advertisement
A cartoon graphic of the arrest created by the Polk County Sheriff's Office.
Polk County Sheriff's Office/Facebook
The breakin happened at a residential home in Davenport, Florida on June 9, 2025.
Google Maps
When cops walked in, the man, identified as Joe, 44, was cooking himself dinner and had just run a luxurious bath.
Advertisement
'We assume the bath temperature was not too hot, nor too cold, but juuuuust right,' Polk County officials joked, referencing the fable 'Goldilocks and the Three Bears.'
Joe admitted to cops that he did not have permission to be there and that he had no idea who owned the home, the release said.
The 44-year-old justified the infraction by revealing that he had gotten into a fight with his wife four days earlier and broke into the random house to avoid returning home to face her wrath.
Despite the excuse, Joe was hit with felony unarmed burglary, misdemeanor petit theft, and domestic battery, the Miami Herald reported.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bay Area radio legend denies diverting GoFundMe donations to pay daughter's legal bills
Bay Area radio legend denies diverting GoFundMe donations to pay daughter's legal bills

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Bay Area radio legend denies diverting GoFundMe donations to pay daughter's legal bills

Bay Area radio personality Ronn Owens has denied using donations meant to assist with his mounting medical expenses to pay off his daughter Laura Owens' legal bills. 'Laura has not received, requested, or accessed any of the GoFundMe contributions, and none of them have been — or will be — used for her legal matters,' the former KGO on-air host wrote in a Facebook post shared on Sunday, June 29. A GoFundMe campaign was launched by friends and family on New Year's Eve to help Owens overcome financial challenges from his ongoing struggle with Parkinson's disease and other 'health battles.' As of Tuesday, July 1, Owens has raised more than $129,000 of his $140,000 goal. Though he is listed as the beneficiary, many have grown skeptical after Laura was indicted in an unrelated high-profile paternity case in May. '(S)ome individuals have made defamatory claims suggesting the fund was created to support my daughter, Laura, and her legal expenses,' Owens wrote over the weekend. 'Those claims are completely false and deeply hurtful.' Laura faces seven felony charges, including fraud and perjury, tied to a 2023 lawsuit during which she claimed she had become pregnant with twins after meeting Clayton Echard from Season 26 of 'The Bachelor.' The reality TV star denied the allegations, stating that their sexual interactions didn't involve intercourse. Though Laura later said she had a miscarriage, officials eventually learned that she had fabricated evidence, including altering an ultrasound image. She has pleaded not guilty to the charges. 'Let me make it clear that I stand with Laura 100% and am disheartened by the online efforts to discredit us both,' Owens wrote. The former radio host was a fixture on Bay Area airwaves for five decades, and retired in 2021 just before KGO discontinued its longtime news-talk format. He has since been open about his financial and physical hardships online. Owens reupped his fundraising efforts last month by resharing the link to his GoFundMe campaign, noting that it 'remains a crucial source of support.'

Local officials grow wary of helping ICE detain immigrants
Local officials grow wary of helping ICE detain immigrants

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

Local officials grow wary of helping ICE detain immigrants

A growing number of local law enforcement officials are alarmed about their jails and prisons holding immigration detainees without warrants, saying it exposes their departments to legal risks. Why it matters: It's the latest sign of tension between local authorities and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, whose strong-arm tactics in arresting immigrants have shocked communities across the nation. Zoom in: As part of President Trump 's push to deport "millions" of unauthorized immigrants, ICE has leaned on local agencies to help arrest and temporarily detain unauthorized immigrants. Over the past decade most of ICE's arrests involved people who already were in law enforcement custody, according to a review of 10 years of data from Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). But with ICE arrests soaring to more than 2,000 a day under Trump, local jail and prison officials are increasingly concerned about being liable for detainees' care — particularly when ICE leaves them in local facilities for lengthy periods. The officials note that in the past, lawsuits filed on behalf of ICE detainees wrongly left languishing in local jails have cost local governments enormously — $92.5 million in one New York City case involving 20,000 people who were held in prison for ICE without due process between 1997 and 2012. How it works: ICE can ask a local agency to hold someone they believe isn't legally in the U.S., using a request called a detainer. Usually there's a 48-hour limit on this request. A detainer request from ICE isn't the same as a warrant issued by a judge, which local agencies require to hold their suspects. "The ICE administrative warrant is not enough to hold somebody's liberty away," Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D) told Axios. "It's essentially holding somebody and locking them up when there's no legal, lawful authority to do so." "The risk to the institution that's holding them is civil liability," he added. "They could end up paying a lot of money — and not just money, but injunctive relief." The National Sheriffs' Association has asked the Trump administration to clarify how long someone should be held on ICE's behalf, and has raised the issue with Border Czar Tom Homan. The group also has been lobbying Congress to pass a law addressing the issue for sheriffs, who often manage jails. Between the lines: A few law enforcement officials have spoken publicly about their concerns for ICE detainees' civil liberties under Trump's deportation push — and have faced a backlash from GOP officials for doing so. In February, Sheriff Dan Marx of Winneshiek County, Iowa, aired his concerns about cooperating with ICE detainers in a since-deleted Facebook post. "The only reason detainers are issued is because the federal agency does not have enough information or has not taken the time to obtain a valid judicial warrant," Marx wrote. "These detainers are violations of our 4th Amendment protection against warrantless search, seizure and arrest, and our 6th Amendment right to due process." Marx's post led Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds — a Republican who has ordered the state's local law enforcement to "fully cooperate" with Trump's deportation mission — to file a formal complaint against the sheriff. Marx was investigated by Iowa's attorney general over whether he violated a state law mandating such cooperation. He deleted his first post and issued another statement that said in part: "I do not believe law enforcement officials should have to choose between upholding their sworn duty to the Constitution and following the state statute." He declined to be interviewed because of the investigation. "From a constitutional standpoint, if we're going to hold somebody in jail or detain them, we want to be doing so lawfully and have legal grounds to do so. And I think for a sheriff to ask for a judicial warrant is reasonable," Michael Tupper, a former police chief in Marshalltown, Iowa, told Axios. In a New Orleans court, the Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office is being sued by Louisiana's attorney general for not honoring ICE detainers. Orleans Parish has a policy of honoring ICE detainers only when a detainee has a warrant for a violent offense. The policy stems from has a legal settlement from 2010, when two men in the Orleans jail were held without due process for two months longer than their sentences, waiting for ICE. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R) argues it amounts to a sanctuary policy, in violation of state law. The case is ongoing. Several other jurisdictions nationwide have faced similar lawsuits when people have been held on ICE detainers longer than their sentences or after their cases were dismissed. Some, like Orleans Parish, are changing their policies to limit their exposure to such suits. Montgomery and Delaware counties in Pennsylvania, for example, now require judicial warrants in addition to an ICE detainers to hold immigration detainees. What they're saying: " When a sheriff or a police chief stands up and voices concerns, they are oftentimes painted as soft on crime, or, you know, they don't care about keeping their community safe," Tupper said. "It's really the opposite. These folks are trying to do the right thing for the community."

GameStop customers could receive cash payout following settlement over alleged privacy breach
GameStop customers could receive cash payout following settlement over alleged privacy breach

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

GameStop customers could receive cash payout following settlement over alleged privacy breach

Customers who purchased a video game from the website of popular gaming retailer, GameStop, during the past five years could be eligible for a payout under a recent settlement following an alleged privacy breach. The class-action lawsuit, filed by Alejandro Aldana and Scott Gallie, accused GameStop of sharing customers' personal information without their consent. The document said GameStop 'disclosed its online video game customers' personally identifiable information to Facebook via the Facebook Tracking Pixel without consent, in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA).' As a result of the $4.5 million settlement, impacted customers can receive a cash payment of up to $5 or a voucher worth up to about $10 to use on the retailer's website, according to the lawsuit. Customers can qualify for compensation from the settlement if they bought a game from GameStop's website between Aug. 18, 2020 and April 17, 2025, and have a public Facebook account displaying the name used at the time of purchase. 3 A person walks past a GameStop store in Manhattan on Jan. 29, 2021. REUTERS 3 Customers shop at a GameStop retailer in San Rafael, Calif., on Dec. 8, 2021. Getty Images In order to receive compensation, eligible customers must submit a claim on the settlement's website by Aug. 15. The submission form asks that claimants provide their full name, address, email, phone number and proof of ownership of a Facebook account with either a link or screenshot of the profile. 3 Employees talk with customers at GameStop in New York, New York on Jan. 30, 2021. REUTERS GameStop denies that it violated any law, but has agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with continuing the case, according to the settlement's website. FOX Business reached out to GameStop for comment, but did not hear back by time of publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store