Hegseth Uncorks Deranged Early-Morning Rant About Iran Raid Leak
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has mounted a furious early morning rant over the U.S. strikes against Iran, accusing the press of trying to 'manipulate the public's mind' about the success of the attack.
As Iran's supreme leader downplayed the impact of the strike with a social media post on Thursday morning, a very animated Hegseth held an 8 am press conference at the Pentagon to once again insist the country's nuclear facilities were 'decimated' and lash out at a leaked intelligence report suggesting otherwise.
But in his angry tirade, Hegseth took particular aim at the press in the room for covering the leaked preliminary intelligence report, even citing his former employer, Fox News.
'You cheer against Trump so hard; it's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad that you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes,' he told them.
'How many stories have been written about how hard it is, I don't know, to fly a plane for 36 hours? Has MSNBC done that story? Has Fox? Have we done the story?' he added.
'How about how difficult it is to shoot a drone from an F15 or 16 or F22 or F35? Or what it's like to man a patriot battery, or how hard it is to refuel mid-air?'
Later, when his former Fox News colleague, Jennifer Griffin, one of the Pentagon's most respected reporters, asked whether uranium had been moved from Fordo before the U.S. strikes, Hegseth did not answer and instead attacked her personally.
Griffin, looking momentarily stunned, clapped back. 'I was the first to describe the B2 bombers, the refueling, the entire mission with great accuracy. So I take issue with that,' she said.
The tone of the press conference was emblematic of the fury within the White House over the leaked intelligence assessment, which suggested that the strikes only set Iran's enrichment program back by six months but did not destroy its core components.
The preliminary analysis was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm, and reportedly found that the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites sealed off the entrances to two of the facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings.
But during the press conference, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, showed a video that appeared to show the entrances or tunnels into the Fordo nuclear facility collapsing by the force of 30,000-pound bunker bombs unleashed on Saturday.
He also praised the Pentagon analysts who spent years assessing the Fordo nuclear site buried in the Iranian mountains, along with the men and women who took part in the mission.
The presentation was not as muted as the response Caine gave on Sunday, when he told reporters that, while there was 'severe damage and destruction' at Fordo, it would take time for the final battle damage to be fully assessed.
But when a reporter later asked him whether he would use the word 'obliterated', Hegseth intervened before the highly respected general could answer.
'I can say obliterated,' Hegseth said. 'He's not involved in politics; he didn't do politics. That's my lane to understand and translate, and talk about those types of things.
'So I can use the word obliterated. He could use: 'defeat, destroy, assess'–all of those things."
Another reporter asked Caine if he had been pressured to shift his stance, to which he replied: 'No, I have not... I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking.'
The news conference came hours after Iran's supreme leader made his first comments on the strikes since they took place, claiming they did 'nothing significant' to the regime's nuclear facilities.
'For a great country and nation like Iran, the very mention of surrender is an insult,' he added.
Donald Trump has also spent days pushing back against the intelligence report, which he branded as 'fake news' that had demeaned U.S. pilots.
'These Patriots were very upset! After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times. They felt terribly!' he said in a Truth Social post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Iran Holds State Funeral for Military Commanders and Nuclear Scientists
Thousands of mourners thronged the streets of Iran's capital, Tehran, on Saturday at a funeral procession for about 60 people killed in the war with Israel, including some of the country's top military commanders and nuclear scientists. Live coverage by Iranian state television showed streets that were barren during the 12-day war now packed for the state funeral. Participants waved green, red and white Iranian flags, red banners with religious slogans or branches of white flowers. The often-heard public chants in the Islamic Republic, 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel,' rang out as trucks with caskets in the back inched along the route between two of Tehran's main squares. From there, the caskets were expected to be transferred for burial at various cemeteries. Some of the deceased will be interred with their families. There was no sign of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but President Masoud Pezeshkian marched in the procession. The funeral was a reminder of the heavy toll Iran had paid not only in losses from the top echelon of its military forces, but also from its contentious nuclear program. Among more than 600 people killed in the Israeli attacks, 90 of them were military personnel, according to Iranian state television. The dead included at least 11 prominent nuclear scientists. The coffins were covered in a clear wrap over an Iranian flag and scattered with rose petals. One truck held the caskets of children, according to Press TV, a state media outlet. As the dead passed, mourners reached out to kiss or touch the coffins. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oregon lawmakers rush to finalize $11B transportation package
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Time is running out on the Oregon legislative session, and lawmakers are still working on a . With just three days to go, questions remain about what it will include and if they can finish in time. Wyden doubles down on fight to keep Trail Blazers in Portland in Rolling Stone interview On Wednesday night, a was introduced under House Speaker Julie Fahey's name. Republican lawmakers said they are not thrilled about the timing. The Joint Committee on Transportation Reinvestment met Thursday for a public hearing and work session to discuss the amendment — the committee elected to advance the plan with the amendment on Thursday evening. This new version cut out a lot of tax increases the original had, but it still would raise over $11 billion over 10 years. The amendment includes a bump to the gas tax. The original would raise it to 55 cents by 2028, but the new version raises it to 52 cents next year. KOIN 6 News asked what sticking points remain as the deadline approaches. 'I think it's just the size and the scope of the tax,' Sen. Bruce Starr (R-Rural Polk & Yamhill Counties) said. 'It's a massive tax, over $11 billion that they're going to pull out of Oregonians' pockets. I think that's really the issue.' 'Not working': Gov. Kotek responds to criticism over attempt to ditch Preschool for All Democrat Sen. Khanh Pham, the co-chair of the transportation committee, shared the following statement. 'Ultimately, is a compromise bill that provides some resources, at least for the next few years, to maintain our existing roads and keep our buses running at just current service levels, no extension, and just invest in safer streets in our communities.' If this bill does pass the House, it still has to go through the Senate. Stay with KOIN 6 News as this story develops. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Saw Up Close Exactly Why Zohran Mamdani Won—and Why the Attacks Don't Work on Him
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. This past May, I was outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office on Frelinghuysen Avenue in Newark, New Jersey, where ICE agents had detained Mayor Ras Baraka on a trespassing charge that would later be dropped. The crowd surged, chanting 'Free Mayor Baraka.' Then a familiar voice on a bullhorn cut through the clamor: Zohran Mamdani had taken the train in from New York to join the crowd. Protesters tightened around him. 'At a time when too many think the only option is surrender, we have to show the mayor that we have his back,' Mamdani said, the line aimed squarely at Democratic national leaders. Brad Lander and a handful of other Democrats spoke, too, but every camera, including mine, stayed locked on Mamdani. That burst of authority, in a state where he holds no office and can't even vote, convinced me of his potential, weeks before his upset of Andrew Cuomo in the New York City primary race for mayor. After clinching the Democratic nomination, Mamdani is now on track to become the first Muslim mayor of any U.S. city with a seven-figure population (New York dwarfs the populations of Michigan cities Dearborn or Hamtramck by 30 times). The office he's vying for commands a $100-billion-plus budget and the largest police force in the country. For Muslims like me, that hits hard. We've spent decades under New York Police Department surveillance and 'Demographics Unit' informants. I still remember the anti-terror squad that questioned me for hours about my connections to global jihad after I was arrested on a simple trespassing charge while taking photos. The symbolism of having a Muslim mayor is nice, sure. But it's the control over the NYPD that for me—and likely many more Muslims, especially those who had it much worse—makes Mamdani's victory feel like the impossible has suddenly become possible. Many believed the Democratic primary for mayor would merely be a formality for Cuomo, given his name recognition and despite his disgrace. In his run for the position, the former governor unleashed an establishment-tested megadonor-sponsored blitz, an attempt to win via moneyed brute force. Fix the City, one of several super PACs that funded his campaign, burned through $25 million carpet-bombing voters with TV ads and mailers that characterized his biggest opponent, Zohran, as dangerous. In response, Zohran countered with 50,000 volunteers as his campaign boasted of a remarkable '1.5 million doors knocked.' It's a strategy that appears to have paid off. It should have strategists on both sides of the aisle taking note. I saw that difference up close on the last night of Ramadan earlier this year. I'd tagged along as Mamdani ricocheted between Chaand Raat street fairs in the Bronx and Queens. My ears perked up when the same hushed questions about Gaza surfaced—where other Democrats I've covered slip into canned empathy or pivot to poll-tested 'balance,' Mamdani leaned in. He answered at length, never once glancing at a handler for permission, instead just jumping into clearly genuine thoughts on the moral cost of 'dodging hard truths.' Consultants told Kamala Harris to sidestep that very topic in 2024 and she lost to Donald Trump. I think last night's primary shows that voters can hear the difference between these too-carefully-crafted messages and what Mamdani did. Early analysis says Mamdani's upset was powered by a surge of younger voters. Not only did he go on the record backing the student encampments that Mayor Eric Adams condemned and dispatched an armored NYPD to clear, Mamdani pledged to honor the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Notably, when pressed on fealty to the current state of Israel, he refused to accept anything short of a state 'with equal rights for all.' Polling now shows young Americans likelier to oppose U.S. military aid to Israel than support it, a reality Cuomo and other establishment Democrats miss. By refusing to triangulate, Mamdani left his opponents only one card to play, the ugliest one: Islamophobia. That became the cri de coeur particularly of Republicans who will try to make this victory representative of some kind of imaginary threat. Minutes after the upset, right-wing figures were screaming 'terrorist.' Charlie Kirk invoked 9/11; Elise Stefanik warned of 'dangerous insanity.' The slurs echoed every insult Muslims here have absorbed since the 2000s, only this time it sounds more like pathetic cope than a denouncement of their neighbors. This primary feels like a rebuke of Islamophobia. Finally. Which brings me to the national collision course: Mamdani's win comes right on the heels of Donald Trump's attempts to edge closer to his dream to 'liberate' blue cities with fresh ICE raids, as he's being doing this summer in Los Angeles. Already, Trump has posted a rant on Truth Social about Mamdani's victory, calling him a 'Communist Lunatic.' What does it mean that New York Democrats just nominated the man who vows to 'stand up for our sanctuary city policies which have kept New Yorkers safe, and use every tool at the city's disposal to protect our immigrants'? The man who was literally on ICE's doorstep when his mayoral candidate opponent, Brad Lander, was cuffed and detained for contesting an ICE arrest in a New York City federal building? It means November now looks like a straight referendum on immigrant rights—and whether or not the Democratic Party has any fight left in them. What we saw this week is that Democratic voters certainly do. For Muslim New Yorkers, a massive electorate that also suffers from chronically low turnout, the idea that American politics is designed to exclude us has just been shattered. My own father once voted for George Bush, before the Iraq War. He now writes off voting as 'picking the lighter boot.' But Mamdani's surge might be the kind of thing to give my dad, and my many equally cynical Muslim friends, hope. Those same people are now basking in the delight of watching online trolls spiral as they belch 'terrorist' while reckoning with his likelihood to win the mayorship in November. In Democrat circles, Mamdani is catching more grief for being a socialist than for being Muslim, but once again, he is flipping derision into momentum. The Democratic base in New York isn't allergic to unapologetic Muslim identity—it's starving for moral coherence and material promises on affordability, housing, and public safety. Will Democrats on a national level take cues from his success? It has been a long time since those Democrats have proven themselves to be good listeners. At least Mamdani is speaking so clearly.
