
Pakistan welcomes UN decision to remove references in child conflict report
Listen to article
Pakistan on Friday welcomed a decision by the United Nations secretary general to remove references to the country in the annual report on Children and Armed Conflict, calling it a recognition of Islamabad's efforts to protect child rights.
In a statement issued by the Foreign Office on Friday, Pakistan termed the development a 'significant outcome' and a testament to its 'constructive, sustained, and intensive engagement' with the United Nations, particularly the Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (SRSG-CAAC).
The UN's Children and Armed Conflict (CAAC) agenda monitors six grave violations against children in conflict zones: killing and maiming, recruitment and use of children, sexual violence, abduction, attacks on schools and hospitals, and denial of humanitarian access.
PR No.1️⃣9️⃣1️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣
Pakistan Welcomes United Nations Secretary General's Decision to Remove References to Pakistan from the Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict
🔗⬇️https://t.co/cl1edtKFeS pic.twitter.com/19HAtFzbfC — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) June 27, 2025
The report, published on June 17, acknowledged the agreement between Pakistan and the United Nations on a child protection roadmap, formalised in June 2025, and urged its effective implementation.
While noting progress, the UN secretary general expressed concern over reports of grave violations, including attacks on schools—particularly girls' schools—health workers, and incidents along the Afghan border.
However, he added that, given Pakistan's cooperation and preventive measures adopted under the agreement, the country would not be listed in the next annual report.
'In view of the level of grave violations in Pakistan and the preventive measures adopted as agreed by the Government in June 2025 in cooperation with the United Nations to protect children, the situation of Pakistan will be removed from my next report,' the secretary general noted.
Also Read: Trump ends trade talks with Canada over tax on US tech firms
The FO said the decision reflects international recognition of Pakistan's legislative, institutional, and policy measures to protect and promote the rights and well-being of children while reaffirming country's commitment to aligning national frameworks with international norms and best practices in child protection.
Pakistan, it added, remains committed to close cooperation with the UN to ensure a safer and brighter future for children.
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, in a statement on X, also welcomed the UN secretary general's decision, calling it 'a reflection of our sustained, constructive engagement and Pakistan's unwavering commitment to child protection.'
He added, 'It also marks a significant recognition of Pakistan's national efforts to uphold child rights and ensure their well-being. Pakistan remains committed to working with the United Nations and international partners to secure a safer, more hopeful future for all children.
Pakistan welcomes the UN Secretary General's decision to remove references to Pakistan from the Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict. This reflects our sustained, constructive engagement and reaffirms Pakistan's commitment to child protection.
It also marks a significant… — Ishaq Dar (@MIshaqDar50) June 27, 2025
Report reveals grave violations against children
According to the United Nations report, violence against children in armed conflicts surged to record levels in 2024, with a 25% increase in grave violations compared to the previous year.
The report, prepared following consultations and in line with UN Security Council Resolution 2427 (2018), covers the period from January to December 2024. It outlines trends in the impact of armed conflict on children and includes a list of parties involved in violations such as recruitment and use, killing and maiming, sexual violence, abductions, and attacks on schools and hospitals.
The UN verified 41,370 grave violations, including 36,221 that occurred in 2024 and 5,149 from previous years that were verified during the reporting period. At least 22,495 children were affected.
Among the most widespread violations were the killing and maiming of children, with 4,676 children killed and 7,291 injured. Other grave violations included 7,906 incidents of denied humanitarian access, 7,402 cases of child recruitment and use, and 4,573 abductions.
Read More: Israeli soldiers ordered to shoot at unarmed aid seekers in Gaza: report
The report also noted that 3,018 children were detained in 2024, often for alleged or actual ties to armed groups — including those sanctioned by the UN Security Council — or on national security grounds, raising serious concerns about violations of their rights.
The highest numbers of violations were recorded in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (8,554), followed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (4,043), Somalia (2,568), Nigeria (2,436), and Haiti (2,269). The largest percentage increases occurred in Lebanon (545%), Mozambique (525%), Haiti (490%), Ethiopia (235%), and Ukraine (105%).
Sexual violence against children rose by 35%, including a sharp increase in cases of gang rape. The report described sexual violence as being used deliberately as a tactic of war — to terrorize populations, assert control over territory, displace communities, or target children based on ethnicity or gender.
The denial of humanitarian access also reached unprecedented levels in 2024. The report said more humanitarian workers, including UN staff, were killed last year than ever before. Aid convoys and personnel were attacked, humanitarian workers were arbitrarily detained, and numerous bureaucratic and administrative barriers were imposed, severely disrupting operations.
These actions left countless children without access to healthcare, education, protection services, or life-saving humanitarian aid, the report said.
The report has urged all parties to uphold their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, and to respect the rights and special protections granted to children.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
UN chief slams US-backed Gaza aid plan
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks at the ReutersNEXT Newsmaker event in New York City, New York, US, November 8, 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Friday that a US-backed aid operation in Gaza is "inherently unsafe," giving a blunt assessment: "It is killing people". Israel and the United States want the UN to work through the controversial new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, but the UN has refused, questioning its neutrality and accusing the distribution model of militarizing aid and forcing displacement. Guterres said UN-led humanitarian efforts are being "strangled", aid workers themselves are starving and Israel — as the occupying power — is required to agree to and facilitate aid deliveries into and throughout the Palestinian enclave. "People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence," Guterres told reporters. "It is time to find the political courage for a ceasefire in Gaza."


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
If necessary, will bomb Iran again: Trump
US President Donald Trump walks on the day of a "One Big Beautiful" event at the White House in Washington, DC., US, June 26, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS President Donald Trump said on Friday he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran was enriching uranium to a level that concerned the United States, and he backed inspections of Iran's bombed nuclear sites. "Sure, without question, absolutely," Trump said when asked about the possibility of new bombing of Iranian nuclear sites if deemed necessary at some point. At a White House news conference, Trump said he plans to respond soon to comments from Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei, who said Iran "slapped America in the face" by launching an attack against a major US base in Qatar following last weekend's US bombing raid. Later, the US president responded by saying that he had prevented Ayatollah Ali Khamenei from being assassinated, as he lashed out at Iran's supreme leader for saying Tehran won the war with Israel. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," Trump posted on Truth Social, adding that he had stopped work on easing sanctions against Iran following Khamenei's comments. Trump also said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency or another respected source to be able to inspect Iran's nuclear sites after they were bombed last weekend. Trump said he believes the sites were "obliterated." He has rejected any suggestion that damage to the sites was not as profound as he has said. But Trump said he would support the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, going in to check the sites that were bombed. The agency's chief, Rafael Grossi, said on Wednesday that ensuring the resumption of IAEA inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since Israel began bombing on June 13. However, Iran's parliament approved moves on Wednesday to suspend such inspections. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi indicated on Friday that Tehran may reject any request by the head of the agency for visits to Iranian nuclear sites. Trump also said he does not believe Iran wants to still seek a nuclear weapon after US and Israeli bombing raids. He said Iran still wants to meet about the way forward. The White House had said on Thursday that no meeting between the US and an Iranian delegation has been scheduled thus far. Iran's refusal Iran on Saturday rejected a request by UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi to visit facilities bombed by Israel and the United States, saying that it suggested "malign intent". International Atomic Energy Agency director general "Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent," Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X. "Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty." Araghchi again hit out at Grossi personally for not speaking out against the Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, describing it as an "astounding betrayal of his duties". He charged that the IAEA chief had "directly facilitated... the unlawful Israeli and US bombings" by "obfuscating" Iran's efforts to allay the watchdog's concerns in a May 31 report that accused it of "less than satisfactory" cooperation.


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Supreme Court hands Trump 'giant win'
In a 5-4 unsigned opinion the top US court said that some of New York's restrictions violated the First Amendment's protection of the free exercise of religion. PHOTO: AFP The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of federal judges to impose nationwide rulings impeding his policies but it left unresolved the issue of whether he can limit birthright citizenship. The Republican president welcomed the ruling and said his administration can now seek to proceed with numerous policies such as his executive order aiming to restrict birthright citizenship that he said "have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis". "We have so many of them. I have a whole list," Trump told reporters at the White House. The court's 6-3 ruling, authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, did not let Trump's birthright citizenship order go into effect immediately, directing lower courts that blocked it to reconsider the scope of their orders. The ruling also did not address its legality. The justices granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of three nationwide injunctions issued by federal judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state that halted enforcement of his directive while litigation challenging the policy plays out. With the court's conservatives in the majority and its liberals dissenting, the ruling specified that Trump's executive order cannot take effect until 30 days after Friday's ruling. The ruling thus raises the prospect of Trump's order eventually taking effect in some parts of the country. Federal judges have taken steps including issuing numerous nationwide orders impeding Trump's aggressive use of executive action to advance his agenda. The three judges in the birthright citizenship cases found that Trump's order likely violates citizenship language in the Constitution's 14th Amendment. "No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law. But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation - in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so," Barrett wrote.