Conman who faked cancer and dead son admits throttling woman
Scott Fraser admitted a charge of intentional strangulation of his partner at the time on September 25 last year.
Fraser, of Aberdeen, flew into a rage at the couple's home after an argument over a birthday card at a restaurant.
• Non-fatal strangulation offence would be a deterrent, mother says
He lifted his victim off the floor by the lapel of her dressing gown before threatening to kill her family, Crewe magistrates' court was told. Fraser pleaded guilty to the offence as the trial hearing was due to start on Monday.
The court heard how Fraser met his then partner online and had been in a relationship with her for two and a half years.
The relationship had been happy but in the six months leading up to the attack there had been regular arguments and verbal abuse from Fraser.
Fraser, now of Nantwich, Cheshire, was out with the woman for dinner, having travelled to the venue in a separate car. The victim showed him a birthday card written to one of her friends, who was turning 70.
It was signed from the victim and her two daughters, which prompted Fraser to become angry. The court was told that the 57-year-old said: 'You've done it again. F*** off.'
The prosecutor told the court: 'She believes that the defendant was referring to her annoying him. She then decided to leave, got in her car and drove off. She went home, and the defendant arrived immediately after her.'
Changing into her dressing gown and making tea, the victim tried to be civil with Fraser and calm him down. Fraser would not be placated and became angry about the fact the woman had said she would not accompany him to Aberdeen, where he was due in court for other offences.
He told her: 'I'm going to drag you there kicking and screaming.'
Fraser, who is 6ft 5in, then grabbed her on the collar of her dressing gown and lifted her off the floor into the air. He added: 'You're coming to Aberdeen with me, or I'll kill your f***ing family.
'I won't do it. I'll get someone else to do it. I've got people on speed dial.'
The victim grabbed her phone and went to the bathroom to call her adult daughters but Fraser grabbed it from her and told her she was 'not going anywhere'. He pinned her against a wall by her throat and repeated: 'You're not going anywhere'.
Eventually, the woman apologised for upsetting him and he calmed down.
Fraser had earlier pleaded guilty to other offences from the same set of charges. He admitted driving without insurance and driving without a licence after being caught behind the wheel of the woman's car on his way to a meeting with his probation officer.
The driving offences were heard at Warrington magistrates' court in February and Fraser was disqualified from driving for 12 months. He was also fined £700 and given six penalty points on his licence.
• Serial abuser beat his partner to death while on curfew
Fraser was already serving a community sentence after being convicted in September last year at Aberdeen sheriff court of abducting his then partner in Aberdeen and defrauding her of £50,000.
The court heard Fraser had a tattoo of a baby, which he claimed to be his dead son despite actually having one daughter. He also falsely claimed to have prostate cancer.
He was arrested and charged with the driving offences seven days later, having told the sheriff in the Scottish court he had 'turned over a new leaf'.
Crewe magistrates referred the case to Chester crown court for sentencing in July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
37 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (24) who dragged visually impaired child away from her mother avoids jail
A man who dragged a visually impaired child away from her mother has been given a suspended sentence. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard that Stephan Obelngoa (24), of Deerpark Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, pleaded guilty to assault causing harm, assault of a peace officer and resisting arrest at The Square, Tallaght, Dublin, on October 2nd, 2023. He has six previous convictions and was on bail at the time of this offence. Advertisement Judge Sinéad Ní Chúlacháin handed down an 18-month prison sentence but suspended it in full on strict conditions. Obelngoa was suffering from a mental illness at the time and had not been taking his medication, the court heard. Garda Sergeant Gemma Collins told Shaun Smyth BL, prosecuting, that an 11-year-old girl, her mother and little brother were leaving the shopping centre on the day in question when they noticed a man later identified as Obelngoa. He was topless, and the mother described his movements as 'unnerving' and said he seemed 'aggressive'. The court heard the mother intended to walk on and avoid Obelngoa, but she suddenly noticed that her daughter had disappeared from her peripheral vision. Advertisement The woman turned around and saw her visually impaired daughter being dragged away by Obelngoa. The little girl was screaming, crying and struggling to get away. The mother described her daughter as 'bouncing off the ground'. Obelngoa then threw the girl into a concession stand. Gda Sgt Collins said two security guards immediately subdued Obelngoa. When gardaí arrived, they found Obelngoa was shouting, roaring and aggressive as he was being restrained. He then spat a mixture of blood and saliva into the face of one of the gardaí. As gardaí were trying to place handcuffs on Obelngoa, he tried to bite them. Advertisement Specialist gardaí interviewed the young girl, and she described to them 'being dragged like a doll and being dragged on the floor'. She said: 'I thought he was going to drag me away forever and would kidnap me'. The girl was examined the following day by a doctor, and a medical report stated she suffered minor spinal soft tissue tenderness and abrasions. The court heard the young girl had trouble sleeping and was extremely anxious in public places like shopping centres afterwards. Gda Sgt Collins agreed with Ciara Ní Ghabhann BL, defending, that gardaí were unable to interview her client after he was arrested, as he was made an involuntary patient in Tallaght Hospital, where he remained for a period of time. The garda agreed with counsel that CCTV footage obtained by the gardaí shows that the incident lasted a matter of seconds. Advertisement Ms Ní Ghabhann said her client suffers from schizophrenia and is given antipsychotic medication every three months. She said at the time of this incident, Obelngoa had been off his medications for six months and was self-medicating with cannabis. Counsel said her client is currently under the supervision of the Probation Services and has undertaken community response programmes. The Probation Services have said he is at low risk of reoffending. She said Obelngoa has written letters of apology to both the garda and the young girl in this case, outlining his sincere remorse. He does not have a clear memory of the incident, but when shown the CCTV footage, he was embarrassed. She asked the court to take into account that her client was quite young and had an acute mental health issue when this offence was committed. She said her client has taken steps to ensure that nothing like this will ever happen again. Advertisement At a hearing last month Judge Ní Chúlacháin said, 'these are very serious offences,' and adjourned the case for two weeks to consider her sentences and read all documents handed into court. In sentencing, the judge noted that the injured party was walking past him with her mother when he threw her into a concession stand and had to be pepper-sprayed. The judge asked Sgt Collins to explain to the injured party 'that we can't punish people for things that aren't their own fault' and that 'if he takes his medication, he's never going to come near her again.' 'It must be very strange to her that he is not going into prison,' the judge added. She said the onus was on the defence to establish their client was suffering from a mental illness and that she was satisfied they had done so. She noted he was unmedicated for six months and was displaying his genitalia in public while in hospital. Ireland McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP ami... Read More Judge Ní Chúlacháin noted his mental state at the time but said it 'does not reduce all your culpability,' she said. She said the appropriate sentence was 18 months, but she had to take account of his guilty plea, which saved the injured party giving evidence at her young age. The judge noted he was 24 and was in college but dropped out and was on bail for six offences, but there was a 'positive' probation report, and he was at low risk of reoffending if he continued on the same path. She imposed a one-year imprisonment term to run concurrently on each of the assault charges, but in view of the effect prison would have on him, she suspended it for two years on strict conditions.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Diocese appeals for donations to repair vandalised graves
The Diocese of Paisley has appealed for donations to help repair vandalised graves in East Renfrewshire. Around 40 headstones were smashed and a large crucifix set on fire at Barrhead the weekend, in scenes locals previously told the BBC were "horrendous". The diocese announced it would contribute an initial sum of £15,000 to formally launch the appeal, with an online fund set up for future funding that will go towards helping affected families.A 39-year-old man appeared at Paisley Sheriff Court on Monday charged with vandalism and wilful fire raising in connection with the incidents. A spokesperson for the diocese said it was "incredibly grateful" for donations that have already come in, but external funding via other online funds could not have gift aid applied, which would add extra cash to the total spokesperson added: "External funds make it difficult to manage the distribution of donations to the affected families. Donations which come to the diocese allow us to liaise with the owners of the lairs and fund the necessary repairs to their gravestones." The spokesperson also said that the diocese thanked everyone who has already offered support. Word of the vandalism began to spread on social media on Sunday, followed by a statement from the Bishop of Paisley, John Monday the graveyard was filled with families checking whether graves of their loved ones had been affected. A staff member at the cemetery told BBC Scotland on Monday he had never seen vandalism like it in more than 30 years working woman told BBC Scotland: "To see all this damage is horrendous. Everybody is in shock, they can't quite believe it. It's very emotional."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Judges order 'robust' inquiry into MI5 false evidence exposed by BBC
The High Court has ordered a "robust and independent" new investigation into how MI5 gave false evidence to multiple courts, after rejecting two official inquiries provided by the Security Service as seriously "deficient".The two reviews took place after the BBC revealed MI5 had lied to three courts in a case concerning a neo-Nazi state agent who abused women.A panel of three senior judges said it would be "premature" to decide whether to begin contempt of court proceedings against any individuals before the new investigation was also "commended" the BBC for "bringing these matters to light". The two official inquiries, one of which was commissioned by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, absolved MI5 and its officers of deliberate the judgement concludes that the "investigations carried out by MI5 to date suffer from serious procedural deficiencies" and that "we cannot rely on their conclusions".The three judges - England and Wales' most senior judge, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, President of the King's Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain, said: "It is to be hoped that events such as these will never be repeated."Their judgement says the new investigation should be carried out under the auspices of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner Sir Brian Leveson, who has oversight of MI5's surveillance activities. His office, IPCO, was also provided with false evidence by MI5 in the director general Sir Ken McCallum repeated his "full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings".He said resolving this matter was "of the highest priority for MI5" and that they would co-operate fully with IPCO."MI5's job is to keep the country safe. Maintaining the trust of the courts is essential to that mission," he said. The case began in 2022 with an attempt to block the BBC from publishing a story about a neo-Nazi agent known as X. It has become a major test of how the courts view MI5 and the credibility of its gave evidence to three courts, saying that it had never breached its core secrecy policy of neither confirming nor denying (NCND) that X was a state in February, the BBC was able to prove with notes and recordings of phone calls with MI5 that this was MI5 officer had confirmed the agent's status as he tried to persuade me to drop an investigation into X, a violent misogynist who used his Security Service role to coerce and terrify his former girlfriend, known publicly as "Beth".The two official inquiries criticised by the High Court were an internal MI5 inquiry and an "external" investigation by the government's former chief lawyer, Sir Jonathan Jones KC. The latter was commissioned by the home sectary and Sir the judgement said that "there was in our view a fundamental incoherence in Sir Jonathan's terms of reference". The ruling said he was asked to establish the facts of what happened but not to "make findings about why specific individuals did or did not do certain things".However, the judges said Sir Jonathan nevertheless "did make findings" that there was no deliberate attempt by anyone to mislead the court - without ever speaking to an MI5 officer at the centre of the case and without considering key additional BBC evidence about what took judgement also found that MI5's director general of strategy, who is the organisation's third-in-command, gave misleading assurances to the court in a witness said its original explanations were "a fair and accurate account" of secret material which, at that point, had not been court forced the government and MI5 to hand over the material, and the judges concluded that MI5's explanations were not "fair and accurate" and "omitted several critical matters" - including that IPCO had been misled and what was known by several MI5 officers at relevant judgement said that it was "regrettable that MI5's explanations to this court were given in a piecemeal and unsatisfactory way - and only following the repeated intervention of the court"."The impression has been created that the true circumstances in which false evidence came to be given have had to be extracted from, not volunteered by, MI5," they said. Today's highly critical judgement also found: In this one case MI5 has misled two separate branches of the High Court, as well as the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, and security cleared barristers representing the BBC known as special advocatesMI5's core NCND secrecy policy about the status of agents was maintained in the legal proceedings long after "any justification for its maintenance had disappeared"The BBC and I, as well as our lawyers and special advocates, should be "commended" for the "central role" we have played in bringing these matters to light The judgement said that a "major" failing by the official reviews is that they did not contact me, despite the fact I was the other person involved in the key judges said that, having "considered carefully" further evidence I submitted in response to the reviews - such as records and notes that showed both reviews included false statements - it "paints a significantly different picture" to the one presented by added that they accepted the internal investigators and Sir Jonathan in the external review later considered my evidence "in good faith".But they said that because they had already reached a conclusion that there had been no deliberate attempt to mislead the court, they would "inevitably find it difficult" to revise those conclusions in the light of evidence which "fundamentally affects" the basis of their conclusions.
