logo
Robert Benton, Oscar-winning 'Kramer vs. Kramer' filmmaker and screenwriter, dies at 92

Robert Benton, Oscar-winning 'Kramer vs. Kramer' filmmaker and screenwriter, dies at 92

Yahoo14-05-2025
Robert Benton, the Texas-born filmmaker who surpassed the difficulties of severe dyslexia in his childhood to become the Oscar-winning director and screenwriter behind films including "Kramer vs. Kramer" and "Bonnie and Clyde," has died.
John Benton, the filmmaker's son, said the director died Sunday at his home in Manhattan of "natural causes." He was 92.
Read more: James Foley, filmmaker who directed Madonna music videos and 'Fifty Shades' sequels, dies at 71
Robert Benton, during a career that spanned from the mid-1960s to the early aughts, was best known for projects that explored common lives and the connections between family and community, from the fallout of a divorce in "Kramer vs. Kramer" to the toll of loss on a single mother in "Places in the Heart." He was nominated for seven Oscars (including a co-nomination with late scribe David Newman for "Bonnie and Clyde") and won three, among them a directing award for "Kramer vs. Kramer." He also received writing Oscars for "Kramer vs. Kramer" and "Places in the Heart."
Veteran actors including Paul Newman, Dustin Hoffman, Meryl Streep and Sally Field also enjoyed Oscars glory for their work in Benton's films. Newman received a lead actor nomination for "Nobody's Fool" and Hoffman and Streep each won their first Oscars for "Kramer vs. Kramer." Field won the lead actress prize for her work as single mother Edna Spalding in the Great Depression-set "Places in the Heart."
"I loved Robert Benton with my whole heart. He was a rare artist and equally rare human," Field said to The Times on Wednesday. "I was lucky to know him. There will never be another. Rest, if you can, Benton.'
His Oscar-nominated projects also include "Bonnie and Clyde," "The Late Show" and "Nobody's Fool."
Read more: A storyteller focused on the ties that bind
Benton, deemed "one of our last remaining masters of humanist drama" in 2007 by former Times film critic Patrick Goldstein, was born in Waxahachie, Texas, on Sept. 29, 1932. He struggled with reading in his childhood and found comfort in drawing, which he said "allowed me to extend my attention span and rejoin the world.'
His passion for film and knack for storytelling can be traced back to trips to the cinema with his father. "I became a storyteller just watching the stories on screen," he recalled in 2007.
He attended University of Texas and Columbia University and served in the U.S. Army from 1954 to 1956. Before breaking into the entertainment industry in 1964 with the short film "A Texas Romance, 1909," Benton moved to New York and was an art director for Esquire magazine. During his tenure, he helped the outlet launch its Dubious Achievement Awards with former colleague and 'Bonnie and Clyde" co-writer David Newman.
He told The Times that his career in the editorial world encouraged him to move past certain creative inhibitions, which would later serve him in filmmaking, specifically for "Bonnie and Clyde." The classic film, which premiered in 1967, was directed by Arthur Penn and starred Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty as the titular crime duo.
Read more: Ruth Buzzi, who played a purse-wielding spinster on 'Laugh-In,' dies at 88
"It taught you to be a lot less constipated about having a bad idea or being made fun of," he said of his time at Esquire. "You'd just cut loose.'
After the success — and critical scrutiny of brutal violence — of "Bonnie and Clyde," Benton made his feature directorial debut in 1972 with "Bad Company," according to IMDb. He reunited with David Newman to co-write the western, which starred Jeff Bridges. For Benton, writing and directing films would prove lucrative and he would hold directing and writing credits for films including later projects "Still of the Night" (which reunited him with Streep), "Nadine," "Nobody's Fool" and "Twilight."
"Kramer vs. Kramer," which premiered in 1979, was an adaptation of Avery Corman's novel of the same name. The film starred Hoffman as an advertising executive and Streep as his ex-wife who navigate the throes of divorce and its effects on their young son.
Despite often pulling double duty, Benton told The Times he saw himself "like Dracula — I don't leave a trace in the mirror," and said he is "shaped by who I collaborate with." Notable collaborators included Anthony Hopkins, Nicole Kidman, Morgan Freeman and Radha Mitchell, among others.
Read more: Priscilla Pointer, 'Dallas' and 'Carrie' actor and mom to Oscar nominee Amy Irving, dies at 100
Later in life, Benton struggled to earn the same critical acclaim that defined his film career. "Nobody's Fool," which starred Paul Newman as an aging trouble-maker, earned Newman his second-to-last Oscar nomination and also starred Bruce Willis and Jessica Tandy. Benton was nominated for adapted screenplay.
The 2005 Christmas action-comedy "The Ice Harvest" was Benton's final writing credit and 2007's "Feast of Love," starring Freeman and Mitchell, marked his final directing project. Ahead of the film's release, Benton told The Times about his more laissez-faire approach to filmmaking.
'The gift of getting older is the gift of making things simpler,' Benton said. 'I used to agonize over things. I worry a lot less today. You realize that what shows up in the process, that might take you by surprise, is often better than what you'd planned for.'
Benton, who briefly dated writer-activist Gloria Steinem, married artist Sallie Rendigs in 1964. She died in 2023 at age 88, according to the Hollywood Reporter. They had one son.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Sign up for Indie Focus, a weekly newsletter about movies and what's going on in the wild world of cinema.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uvalde school shooter was fueled by Instagram and ‘Call of Duty,' L.A. lawsuit alleges
Uvalde school shooter was fueled by Instagram and ‘Call of Duty,' L.A. lawsuit alleges

Los Angeles Times

time6 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Uvalde school shooter was fueled by Instagram and ‘Call of Duty,' L.A. lawsuit alleges

Tess Mata's parents were once enthusiastic about social media. The 10-year-old from Uvalde, Texas, wanted to be TikTok famous. She used to dance, sing and imitate popular trends on her videos, with mom Veronica and dad Jerry keeping a watchful eye on her online habits. But then Tess was gunned down at Robb Elementary School in 2022, one of 19 children and two teachers killed by a former student. Since then, as details of the shooter's personal life have become public, the Matas and a handful of other Uvalde families have come to believe that his exposure to gun content online and in video games led to the tragedy. They are now suing three companies they allege profited off the violent fantasies that led to their children's deaths. The defendants include the maker of 'Call of Duty,' a first-person military shooter game where they say 18-year-old Salvador Ramos encountered a virtual version of a Daniel Defense-branded AR-15 he used in the attack. They are also suing Meta, alleging Ramos encountered ads for the gun that promoted violence on Instagram. The Matas and three other families from Uvalde will travel more than 1,200 miles this week to confront the companies in L.A. County Superior Court, where they have filed claims for negligence, aiding and abetting and wrongful death. 'They glorify these weapons. They made it enticing for young kids to want to purchase these guns, and kids that young are so receptive to these types of things,' Veronica Mata told The Times. Activision, the Santa Monica-based video game developer, has filed for dismissal, arguing that the 1st Amendment protects 'Call of Duty' as a work of art. Meta has also fought to have the case tossed, pointing to well-established case law that shields social media platforms from liability for third-party content posted by users and advertisers. Whether the case proceeds could be decided at a hearing Friday in downtown L.A. The families allege 'Call of Duty,' one of the top-grossing video game franchises in the world, encouraged violence by catching Ramos in a repeated gameplay loop with real-world weapons. And they claim Instagram equipped him with the knowledge of how, when and where to buy the gun he used. 'To put a finer point on it: Defendants are chewing up alienated teenage boys and spitting out mass shooters,' the complaint claims, noting that the three most deadly K-12 school shootings in American history — Uvalde, Parkland and Sandy Hook — were all committed by young men who played 'Call of Duty' and used an AR-15. 'Call of Duty is a simulation, not a game. It teaches players how to aim, reload, and fire accurately, while habituating the teenage nervous system to inflict repeated, graphic violence. And though the killing is virtual, the weapons are authentic,' the complaint alleges. Ramos' choice of the Daniel Defense AR-15 was intentional, the lawsuit said. The small weapons manufacturer has a market share of less than 1%, but a specific rail displayed on a popular 'Call of Duty' gun made it easily identifiable to players online despite a lack of branding inside the game. 'It is the Defendants who gave Daniel Defense a direct line into children's homes and heads, who wrote a playbook for how to peddle firearms while circumventing parents and the law, and who created a simulation with real-life weapons and applauded children for their proficiency at killing,' the complaint said. Meta did not immediately respond to The Times' request for comment, nor did Daniel Defense, another defendant in the lawsuit. Courts have long rejected the idea that violent video games like 'Call of Duty' are responsible for the actions of those who play them despite the moral panic surrounding the issue, and have also overturned efforts to restrict minors' access to them. Most modern 'Call of Duty' games are rated for mature audiences over 17 by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board, but are available to minors through online marketplaces that don't meaningfully verify someone's age before purchase. 'Any adolescent that wants to download Call of Duty can do that,' Josh Koskoff, a lawyer for the Uvalde families, told The Times. A 2011 Supreme Court case, Brown vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn., struck down a 2005 California law that banned the sale of violent video games to minors. There was 'no tradition in this country of specially restricting children's access to depictions of violence. ... Grimm's Fairy Tales, for example, are grim indeed,' the late Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the 7-2 majority opinion. Activision has long defended its games as protected artistic expression despite criticism of its extreme violence, which sometimes involves players killing other combatants — almost never allowing civilian casualties — in combat simulations, sometimes in public arenas like airports and urban sprawls. 'Call of Duty tells complex stories that explore the real-world combat scenarios that soldiers face in modern warfare. There can be no doubt Call of Duty is expressive and fully protected by the First Amendment,' the company said in a court filing. The families still mourning their children say challenging the institutions that failed to protect them has been an ongoing fight. The new case is another chapter which feels like taking on giants, Veronica Mata said. The city of Uvalde approved in May a $2-million settlement for a flawed police response to the shooting, and a Texas appeals court Wednesday ordered the release of documents from the school board and county about the shooting, local news reported. 'We can step forward, and we can make that change and make them understand that what they've done and what they continue to do is not benefiting them or anybody else,' Mata said.

Wordle hint today: Clues for July 18 2025 NYT puzzle #1490
Wordle hint today: Clues for July 18 2025 NYT puzzle #1490

USA Today

time10 hours ago

  • USA Today

Wordle hint today: Clues for July 18 2025 NYT puzzle #1490

WARNING: THERE ARE WORDLE SPOILERS AHEAD! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT THE JULY 18, 2025 WORDLE ANSWER SPOILED FOR YOU. Ready? OK. We've seen some hard Wordle words over the years and if you're here, you're probably struggling with today's and are looking for some help. So let's run down a few clues with today's Wordle that could help you solve it: 1. It has two vowels. 2. It's a noun. 3. It's associated with a nocturnal animal. And the answer to today's Wordle is below this photo: It's ... LORIS. While you're here, some more Wordle advice: How do I play Wordle? Go to this link from the New York Times and start guessing words. What are the best Wordle starting words? That's a topic we've covered a bunch here. According to the Times' WordleBot, the best starting word is: CRANE. Others that I've seen include ADIEU, STARE and ROAST. Play more word games Looking for more word games?

Michigan football gets trolled at ESPYs by host Shane Gillis
Michigan football gets trolled at ESPYs by host Shane Gillis

USA Today

time13 hours ago

  • USA Today

Michigan football gets trolled at ESPYs by host Shane Gillis

Shane Gillis has jokes for Ohio State and Michigan 😅 The annual ESPY Awards (think equivalent to the Oscars for acting) took place on ESPN on Wednesday night for the sports world, and it was another entertaining night where things like "Team of the Year" and "Male Athlete of the Year" were handed out. The Ohio State football team was nominated for the "Team of the Year" for its College Football Playoff national championship run, but that award instead went to the Philadelphia Eagles for winning the Super Bowl. But not all was lost for Buckeye fans because anytime an unbiased observer dunks on Michigan, it's worth the price in gold. And that's exactly what happened when host Shane Gillis went on a sidebar to criticize the Wolverines for the alleged cheating surrounding the Connor Stalions sign-stealing allegations. While taking a bit of a stab at Ohio State and Will Howard by congratulating them for winning the national championship, but who also "lost to Michigan," Gillis then went on a quick rant about the That Team Up North. 'Michigan, who didn't cheat this time. Beat them fair and square,' Gillis said. He then went a little further. "Are we ever going to hold accountable (talking of Michigan)? Yeah, whatever, they're allowed to cheat, no repercussions.' Joking or not, the runway for the advanced sign-stealing allegations appears to finally be wearing out. The NCAA Committee on Infractions had a hearing with Michigan on June 6 and 7, and that would mean that we should hear a final ruling by September 9 -- just in time for the start of the football season. We are all still waiting. Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store